Can't the investor based games be just what it is and have the FORUM say it's a ponzi that having pretentious DT members spam their negs?
Is it our pretentiousness that bothers you or the fact our action is having a strong effect on the scammers and those who wish to help them scam in return for a share in the loot? The IBG section is what it is and will continue to be what it is, a place where ponzi scam threads live and a place where members of the forum community have decided that participation is collaboration and your intention to seek profit from theft should be communicated to other members who may encounter you. It isn't complicated.
|
|
|
leave your feedback Will this do? Public Service Announcement - This is just another Ponzi Scam Do Not Invest!
Those who choose to post of their participation support or encouragement for this scam will be tagged with negative trust for proving they wish to help the scammers operate this Ponzi in return for a share of the funds stolen from other users. Thereby proving they are not trustworthy forum members.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!
|
|
|
This warn is enough for me Says the scumbag who wanted to buy a ponzi script: Selling Bitcoin Double Site ( Ponzi ) This Script Features : - installation script (free guide e-book how to install) - automatic payment - rpc blockchain , bitcoinqt support - accept bitcoin, LTC,... - create fake transactions - affiliates program (beta) - custom time left - custom, price payment , change/stop payout - add/date/update time left - transactions info (see on PHPMyAdmin) - Detailed all coin earning Demo?
I can not buy it Product not found
|
|
|
You are an annoying piece of shit.
That's really the only point of your reply, to express how frustrated you are that you can't excuse ponzi scams. Listen, nobody is stopping you from seeking to profit from money stolen from other people, so what's the problem? All we're doing is communicating your lack of concern for where your profit comes from and reducing the supply of naive 'investors' to follow your deposit, which means you are likely to end up being the mug who doesn't get paid. How does that make us the bad guys? Of course you don't want to be the mug who doesn't get paid. You want other people to be the mugs who don't get paid. How does marking the scam and scumbag in that situation make us the bad guys?
|
|
|
You are getting way too big for your britches, my friend. And that passive aggressive tone you've adopted is unbecoming. So he points out, correctly, how dishonest the content of your post is and you come back with an accusation that he said it in a way you don't like? Hahaha, man boy you really struggle at this.
|
|
|
Public Service Announcement - This is just another Ponzi Scam Do Not Invest!
Those who choose to post of their participation support or encouragement for this scam will be tagged with negative trust for proving they wish to help the scammers operate this Ponzi in return for a share of the funds stolen from other users. Thereby proving they are not trustworthy forum members.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!
|
|
|
The same applies to every gambling service. A ponzi isn't gambling, it is fraud and theft. But there is need for such gambling services, and we see nothing wrong in it. The first part of that sentence is just bullshit as there are more than enough legitimate and fair gamlbing, gaming and investment services people can avail themselves of and, for that matter, you could actually set up and run yourself. There is no justification for what you are doing. The second part of that sentence is already assumed even though there is no justification for what you are doing.
|
|
|
Really? That it?
'Nobody likes you, go away' - Seriously? That is the crux of your rebuttal. Sad.
LOL.
|
|
|
Please SNavy, feel free to disprove this statement: all doubles sites are dangerous and will scam after a while
Jesus, you remind me of the scrypt.cc idiots who used to plead with the operator to prove people like me 'wrong' about it being a scam. It isn't just that 'all doubles sites are dangerous and will scam after a while' the whole thing is a scam pyramid structure, especially in this case where the asshole OP was pretending he had a 'magic' trading bot which would guarantee a steady profit. That is out and out fraud even beyond the illegality of the ponzi itself. Unless an 'investment' site actually provides proof and accreditation as a legitimate investment service, it is a scam.
|
|
|
Yeah, whywefight, get your own thread of whining shitbags who can't string together a coherent rebuttal and hate being held to account for their actions.
This one is mine, all mine!!!11!!11elebenty!!1!
Soon I will triumph over Vod as the antagonist with the biggest hateclub! Mwahaaahaaahaaaaa. Etc. (disclaimer: number of real people may not equal that of the multiple forum accounts dedicated to showering you with constant attention, your dreams may not equal that of the Globex Corporation, its subsidiaries or shareholders. Batteries not included)
|
|
|
I can't, coz I don't know that field
He doesn't understand tech, he only understands that this is 'magic', but not a ponzi, according to the ponzi scamming scumbag OP.
|
|
|
If everybody understand the risk, then nobody is being scammed. You can't know that everybody understands the 'risk' because. firstly, you can't define what the risk is as a probability value outside of 'it *will* collapse'. You basically decide when you're going to steal the last 'investors' money, which is no better than running a lottery where you manually choose who will win and who will lose. Secondly, you cannot ensure that EVERYBODY who participates understands what they are even sending money to. There are enough people on this forum who struggle with the English language to negate your claim that everybody understands because multiple PMs I receive are evidence that, no, not EVERYBODY understands. This means you are running a scheme which will rip a number of people off. That is the definition of a scam.
|
|
|
Fix the script? You mean the ponzI script which steals money from some users and shares a portion of it with others?
The only way to 'fix' that is to stop drawing more victims in and shut it down.
|
|
|
Well, considering that they say, "We are first doubler distributed by veteran entrepreneur group." it is a slam-dunk admission that they're wanting to operate a ponzi.
A ponzi, by it's very nature, will collapse because of math. People who want to make money by running or participating in a ponzi do so on the basis that they want to 'profit' by way of money which will be stolen from later 'investors', ergo, it is a scam. It is not gambling it is theft, plain and simple.
|
|
|
Public Service Announcement - This is just another Ponzi Scam Do Not Invest!
Those who choose to post of their participation support or encouragement for this scam will be tagged with negative trust for proving they wish to help the scammers operate this Ponzi in return for a share of the funds stolen from other users. Thereby proving they are not trustworthy forum members.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!
|
|
|
Public Service Announcement
These people are ponzi scammers Anybody who collaborates with them will be marked as proving themselves to be untrustworthy
You have been warned!
|
|
|
I am a scammer?? Post prove so others can see.
Here's proof that you are a ponzi-scamming scumbag: - 150% ROI IN 5 DAYS, 30% OF YOUR INVESTMENT PER DAY.
1.You are running a ponzi scheme. 2. Ponzi schemes make 'profit' by stealing it from some 'investors' and sharing it with others 3. ALL ponzi schemes collapse because of math. You know this to be true yet you continue to try and promote your crappy scam. You are a scammer.
|
|
|
The problem is, I've seen some of the feedback that you have left, and when i look at the references for some, i dont see how the users are directly posting support Urgh! Again with the, "I've seen . . ." and "when I look at . . ." - Evidence or shut the fuck up you tedious infant. Did i not send you a number of PM's which saw you remove at least one trust rating? You sent me two pm's, one concerning a referenced thread which the user had since deleted but hadn't asked me to remove their rating, and another which you wrongly marked as referencing a deleted post, when it wasn't. So still swinging and missing on the evidence front when it comes to accusing me of being wrong.
|
|
|
received again, thanks admin do you realise you answered your own topic? lol Bwahahaaaahahahaaaa! That is truly hilarious!
|
|
|
|