I have a problem that I get the message that someone claimed on the same IP as me but only I use this network and I am the only one in my family who uses this page. I have deleted cookies but it continues to throw me that error
It can happen if you're using a VPN or if you have a dynamic IP address that is shared among several users. |
|
|
|
|
Decentralized currencies should not have a supreme leader who can have this much power to just unilaterally decide to change the burn supply. Ethereum isn't as bad but I've always felt uncomfortable with Vitalik having outsized influence.
|
|
|
|
If something was an obvious scam it could never reach 7th position in rankings, there is no way that people would invest into a known scam that much, people would sell everything they own and get out as quickly as possible. However this doesn't mean they are not scam neither, they could very well be one but people just don't know about it and that's it, in the future it could turn out that it was a scam all along.
Bitconnect was once #6. |
|
|
|
|
If you plan on selling low value items it would be a good idea to go with a payment processor that accepts Lightning Network payments such as OpenNode, Coingate, or CoinPayments.
|
|
|
|
"Honest users". LOL. Hey man,
banning is nothing to worry about, because every account will just have a small amount of crypto on his coinpot account. Just in the summary, 100 Account or maybe 1000 Accounts, its much money. So if 1 of 10 Accounts per month with 2$ balance get banned, its not the worst. just take another IP-Adress, create another account and its all cured.
Anyway, the faucet collector does a good job in being undetected, and if you bot something like 16h per day per account, they dont recognize you as a bot at all.
My experience so far.
|
|
|
|
|
Polkadot was created by Ethereum co-founder Gavin Wood. This does not look like just another money grab to me. I think they are trying to build a better smart contract platform.
|
|
|
|
|
CoinPayments has a web wallet that supports like a million shitcoins. You can also convert your coins to other cryptocurrencies and purchase gift cards from their wallet. There is also Jaxx Liberty which is a browser extension for Chrome.
|
|
|
|
I've got to pitch in here - just because someone supports something and says so doesn't mean they're automatically a shill! This is tin foil hat territory.
I'm not saying he's being paid to shill. The overenthusiastic manner in which he supports a website with such a negative reputation seems irrational and fits the definition of shilling. |
|
|
|
crime doesn't pay
It pays very well actually. Just look at all the scams advertising on Coinpot faucets. |
|
|
|
Most people don't just blindly trust a website to always be perfect and never make mistakes. If billion dollar companies like Microsoft, Netflix, and Google have no foolproof way of accurately detecting fraud 100% of the time then I seriously doubt a faucet with a less than stellar reputation is as infallible as you make them out to be. False positives are normal and should be expected when relying on automated fraud detection systems. Unfortunately, there is no transparency whatsoever and we have no way of knowing whether people are being unfairly punished, specifically being targeted, or if they are actual cheaters. Unlike any other website with significant presence in crypto they don't offer customer support and they stay away from public forums and social media. i don't make anyone out to be infallible and i don't blindly trust - i (and many others like me) have used coinpot for a long while without having to use multiple accounts, not running multiple multiplier tabs, not ad-blocking, nor trying to cheat or game their system. i feel safe that my account will not be blocked. as i've said several times before on this thread...coinpot makes their money from advertising. so from their point of view more ad impressions/clicks = more revenue. so it is not in their business interest to ban genuine honest users i'm not saying it has never happened, but i cannot see any reason why they would do it unfairly/maliciously they offer customer support - i have replies twice from them in the past from email enquiries - but in that news post it clearly says that they wont enter into discussions with cheaters/fraudulent users That is just a lie. I've contacted them before about changing my email address and also for a withdrawal that failed because they were trying to spend the same coins in separate transactions. They never answer. It has nothing to do with not wanting to engage with cheaters. They are probably inundated with complaints because of how poorly they run their sites and would rather not deal with criticism and being held accountable so they just go into hiding. ok we are just going around in circles now  it's simple, if you cheat you are hurting the site and ultimately the other, honest users will get worse service/lower payouts etc so when you get caught, don't get butthurt and don't expect them to treat you nicely in return and waste time and resources replying to your complaining emails as they mentioned in the news post, all faucet/casino sites face the same problems. for fun, take a look at the freebitcoin threads which are full of whingers and whiners also. same reasons i expect I've never been caught cheating, stop deflecting and using logical fallacies. They don't respond to support complaints no matter what reason you have for contacting them. The difference between ScamPot and FreeBitco.in is that FreeBitco.in actually responds to emails and always provides evidence when they ban people. ok so "ScamPot" is is "poorly run" and is cheating/scamming good honest people like yourself? probably should just stay away from it then as they will obviously be out of business soon  Another deflection. Not even the shills can come up with a convincing enough defense. |
|
|
|
PIZZA is the latest food token scam.  |
|
|
|
Most people don't just blindly trust a website to always be perfect and never make mistakes. If billion dollar companies like Microsoft, Netflix, and Google have no foolproof way of accurately detecting fraud 100% of the time then I seriously doubt a faucet with a less than stellar reputation is as infallible as you make them out to be. False positives are normal and should be expected when relying on automated fraud detection systems. Unfortunately, there is no transparency whatsoever and we have no way of knowing whether people are being unfairly punished, specifically being targeted, or if they are actual cheaters. Unlike any other website with significant presence in crypto they don't offer customer support and they stay away from public forums and social media. i don't make anyone out to be infallible and i don't blindly trust - i (and many others like me) have used coinpot for a long while without having to use multiple accounts, not running multiple multiplier tabs, not ad-blocking, nor trying to cheat or game their system. i feel safe that my account will not be blocked. as i've said several times before on this thread...coinpot makes their money from advertising. so from their point of view more ad impressions/clicks = more revenue. so it is not in their business interest to ban genuine honest users i'm not saying it has never happened, but i cannot see any reason why they would do it unfairly/maliciously they offer customer support - i have replies twice from them in the past from email enquiries - but in that news post it clearly says that they wont enter into discussions with cheaters/fraudulent users That is just a lie. I've contacted them before about changing my email address and also for a withdrawal that failed because they were trying to spend the same coins in separate transactions. They never answer. It has nothing to do with not wanting to engage with cheaters. They are probably inundated with complaints because of how poorly they run their sites and would rather not deal with criticism and being held accountable so they just go into hiding. ok we are just going around in circles now it's simple, if you cheat you are hurting the site and ultimately the other, honest users will get worse service/lower payouts etc so when you get caught, don't get butthurt and don't expect them to treat you nicely in return and waste time and resources replying to your complaining emails as they mentioned in the news post, all faucet/casino sites face the same problems. for fun, take a look at the freebitcoin threads which are full of whingers and whiners also. same reasons i expect I've never been caught cheating, stop deflecting and using logical fallacies. They don't respond to support complaints no matter what reason you have for contacting them. The difference between ScamPot and FreeBitco.in is that FreeBitco.in actually responds to emails and always provides evidence when they ban people. |
|
|
|
Most people don't just blindly trust a website to always be perfect and never make mistakes. If billion dollar companies like Microsoft, Netflix, and Google have no foolproof way of accurately detecting fraud 100% of the time then I seriously doubt a faucet with a less than stellar reputation is as infallible as you make them out to be. False positives are normal and should be expected when relying on automated fraud detection systems. Unfortunately, there is no transparency whatsoever and we have no way of knowing whether people are being unfairly punished, specifically being targeted, or if they are actual cheaters. Unlike any other website with significant presence in crypto they don't offer customer support and they stay away from public forums and social media. i don't make anyone out to be infallible and i don't blindly trust - i (and many others like me) have used coinpot for a long while without having to use multiple accounts, not running multiple multiplier tabs, not ad-blocking, nor trying to cheat or game their system. i feel safe that my account will not be blocked. as i've said several times before on this thread...coinpot makes their money from advertising. so from their point of view more ad impressions/clicks = more revenue. so it is not in their business interest to ban genuine honest users i'm not saying it has never happened, but i cannot see any reason why they would do it unfairly/maliciously they offer customer support - i have replies twice from them in the past from email enquiries - but in that news post it clearly says that they wont enter into discussions with cheaters/fraudulent users That is just a lie. I've contacted them before about changing my email address and also for a withdrawal that failed because they were trying to spend the same coins in separate transactions. They never answer. It has nothing to do with not wanting to engage with cheaters. They are probably inundated with complaints because of how poorly they run their sites and would rather not deal with criticism and being held accountable so they just go into hiding. |
|
|
|
Most people don't just blindly trust a website to always be perfect and never make mistakes. If billion dollar companies like Microsoft, Netflix, and Google have no foolproof way of accurately detecting fraud 100% of the time then I seriously doubt a faucet with a less than stellar reputation is as infallible as you make them out to be. False positives are normal and should be expected when relying on automated fraud detection systems. Unfortunately, there is no transparency whatsoever and we have no way of knowing whether people are being unfairly punished, specifically being targeted, or if they are actual cheaters. Unlike any other website with significant presence in crypto they don't offer customer support and they stay away from public forums and social media. |
|
|
|
Both Inoue and Casimero had an individual fight, is it possible that if both fighter would win their respective fights, they would finally face each other?
This is what we have been looking, we were hype when it first announce but due to the pandemic, promoter of Inoue might have found a reason to cancel the fight as IMO, they don't want to risk the undefeated record of Inoue against Casimero, but let's see if both fighters could win and then we will start to speculate again and hopefully that time we will be virus free some promoters will find no excuse not to make the fight happen. Too early, so I expect there's no odds for this fight yet. If they didn't want to risk his undefeated record then they wouldn't have agreed to fight him in the first place and could have easily gotten a fight with Oubaali instead. Both fighters are keeping busy now and hopefully they will face each other later on when they're allowed to have spectators. |
|
|
|
it was a notification on windows 10, on the right side in the action center like an email or the news, i had notifications enable on freebico.in .. but as soon as i tried to see on the site i couldn't login
If somebody did make a withdrawl from your account you should have also gotten an email notification. |
|
|
|
Terrible shame, any time you’re having a bad day think of this guy. I’ve seen too many of these type of stories, nobody should be keeping that amount of coins on a platform like Electrum.
This is an unforgettable mistake, one day he can tell this to his grandchildren if time comes. I've seen a lot of this too, but this is huge, 1400 BTC is around $14 million dollars, he can bought 2 mansions from it. Software wallet was never safe, there are really bugs and holes in the security. if he's taking 1400 BTC in a single wallet then he probably more in different wallet, if I got that huge amount of bitcoin I'll just put it in a hardware wallet. How I wish Actually no, I disagree that software wallets are unsafe. If you are understand how they work, you can store a million bitcoins. If you are paranoid like me, go buy a useless laptop (worth of 50$) and do it cold storage. You can't get "hacked" this way. Yep, his grandchildren will be like "GRANDPA WE COULD HAVE A BILLION DOLLARS RIGHT NOW" (oops speculation). You can still install malware on an airgapped software wallet or somebody could clone your hard drive. A hardware wallet can still be hacked if you have physical access to the device but it is not as easy. If you have 1400 BTC your best options would be a hardware wallet, preferably one that can function offline like Coldcard, or an encrypted paper wallet. It's almost no effort and low cost for that additional security. |
|
|
|
This is why i rather be in Custodial wallet than in open source cold wallet, because only inexperienced or few people manages it, then split my private keys into different Crypto's into many different wallets, just in case a major critical error or a software happens to that one specific wallet. As the saying goes "Never put all your eggs in one basket" better safe than never.
A custodial wallet is worse. There's no guarantee that they won't steal your money. I used to use Coinbase before they mandated KYC and then lost access because I registered under a pseudonym and I couldn't provide an ID with that name. A few weeks ago I received an email from Coinbase saying that anybody who hadn't been KYC'd would lose access to their account forever and any funds still on Coinbase would be forfeited to the user's local government. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
