Nice use of #1 of the shitcoiner's guide to shitcoin logic.

#1. No matter how dire the warning from those technobabling nerds sound, they can be easily refuted with one word--JEALOUSY. Say it often and say it proud and don't let their theoretical arguments get in the way of you and your rightful shitcoin future. If they tell you the algowhateverthingy is broken, say "These blankcoin motherfuckers have been saying that for months and look, our coin is still alive and stronger than ever! They're just jealous that (our coin is ahead of them on coinmarketcap.com) or (our coin has twice the innovation as that has-been and every day we're eating into their market cap)." If you can work SCARED and JEALOUS into the same post, all the better.

I'm always amazed when someone sees a guy shouting obscenities at the bar while watching a sporting event and reacts with, "I don't get it, it's just a game?" That guy (the one tearing his hair out over a game) most likely lost a small fortune gambling and it might have been the straw that broke his overly-understanding-for-too-long wife's back or the one that will get his back broken by a less-than-understanding bookie.

In the cryptocurrency betting circle ,the game is never really over and one can spend years hoping their luck will turn around, however impossible the chances would look to an uninterested observer. My guess is that DE views your statements on synereo as a threat to his investment and that DE also believes that if he can discredit you that his luck will turn around. Why he doesn't get a new bag after reading the likelihood of a coin's failure is beyond me, but he may have timed it very badly and is unable to coop rationally with the loss "realized." He doesn't seem too rational, so this seems likely and would explain his obsessive behavior.

Inspiration!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1430587.0

The Shitcoiner's Guide to Shitcoin Logic

This is a handy guide for those who are sick and tired of technical arguments. Don't be the victim of technowizardry and logic, don't let the cryptocurrency world be ruled by math, fuck math! Math is for eggheads and dorks and no future is going to be dictated by protocols. Cryptocurrency is easy and a good marketing plan and these helpful techniques will be all you'll need to put nerds on standby and rocket your shitcoin to the moon and beyond.

#1. No matter how dire the warning from those technobabling nerds sound, they can be easily refuted with one word--JEALOUSY. Say it often and say it proud and don't let their theoretical arguments get in the way of you and your rightful shitcoin future. If they tell you the algowhateverthingy is broken, say "These blankcoin motherfuckers have been saying that for months and look, our coin is still alive and stronger than ever! They're just jealous that (our coin is ahead of them on coinmarketcap.com) or (our coin has twice the innovation as that has-been and every day we're eating into their market cap)." If you can work SCARED and JEALOUS into the same post, all the better.

#2. THAT"S JUST LIKE YOUR OPINION MAN. This a technology built around theoretical math, and you don't have to know much about theoretical math to know that these eggheads are always arguing about who's right. But lucky for you and your shitcoin is that you don't have understand therorhetical math to pull the OPINION card. Just keep saying it and no one will notice that you aren't actually arguing math, game theory, economics, or any other nerdisms. Just keep on saying it's just their opinion, because there are more people with no therorhetical understanding than there are that do--and you just need their money to launch your shitcoin into the stratosphere (or whatever crap is between us and the moon).

#3. FUD. If 1 and 2 aren't doing the trick just keep repeating FUD (while simultaneously slipping in every possible negative you can about them or whatever coin they endorse). Politicians call this mudslinging, but we'll call it FUDslingin'.

#4. "They're attacking us therefore...." JEALOUSY, BUTTHURT and FEAR are a powerful trifecta of shitcoinery. No one trading your shitcoin is worrying about the subtleties of distribution or scale or anonymity or security--you just need a slogan via bumper sticker logic.

#5. If all else fails, TROLL! Make fun of their mom, their dad, their girlfriend, their lack of a mom, dad, or girlfriend. Say they're poor, say they're rich, say they have a small penis, a big penis, multiple penises of varying size--whatever, anything to get the subject off a technological footing. People buy on emotion and abusing people's emotions is shitcoinery 101.

#6. Act like a girly man, say the critics are bullying you, ganging-up on you, forcing the narrative on you without your consent, but whatever you do, don't engage their valid criticism--you'll use up a lot of energy, lose control of the narrative and likely expose the holes in your shitcoin.

#7. Appeal to greed. Tell them you sold your position in their coin and that you won't ever buy their coin until they stop attacking your shitcoin. Doesn't matter if you own any or not--what you're hoping is that they are just average shitcoiners like yourself and are all about getting paid in shitcoin gold.

I find it amazing that you are pitching this as a good investment when you can't even acknowledge a major flaw. When it breaks, it will be broken, and you won't be able to just fix it. Congratulations on your bliss, but I'd pay to see your face when you realize what it's based on. Happy trails, I'll let you get back to your little sales rally.

How would you "fix" an X11 exploit? Sorry if your hand waving and promises are meaningless to me. Evan's plan was to eliminate the exploited chain and roll everything back, but that's BS, and when countered on his flawed plan, he disappeared. So now the plan is to just wait and see if it happens and then fix it? How? Luck and good intentions?

X11 is insecure. Instanx is flawed as outlined by TPTB_need-war. Both of these flaws have been made apparent to Evan. He initially argued that one didn't exist (in the case of instantx) and stated that there was an easy fix if X11 was exploited, but when shown that his logic was flawed in both cases, he disappeared from the both conversations. So is there a plan to fix these flaws or are you maintaining they don't exist?

Hope isn't a plan. How will the flaws be fixed? And don't sell me by the same genius who built them into the coin. Show me a plan, a white paper, anything but marketing spiel and vague promises. Amateur hour is over.

You should do more research, then you'd realize that the flaws in dash are hardly opinion (but maybe you think Evan will magically cure them after he's done curing cancer).

World class dev team? They chose the insecurity of x11, a second rate anonymity method, and topped it off with an instamine and emissions reduction. This level of delusion should be reserved for religions and psych-wards, not technology.

Aren't you the same idiot who tweeted that Evan could cure cancer if he was locked in a room for an hour?

Weird that you assume that I'm somehow ashamed of my willingness to crowdfund a Jenna Jameson sexbot (but whatever).

Anyone with half a brain has figured out that you are only using the moral low-ground argument because you either don't have a technical argument to invalidate Shelby's criticism or you lost the technical argument already and want to shift the ground to save face.

What's great about a sound technical argument is you can keep posting it without making any adjustments and save yourself a lot of time and hassle. So post one or STFU.

Here' mine:

DecentralizeEconomics can't invalidate Shelby's criticism of Synereo, so he is attempting to attack Shelby's character and by that invalidate Shelby's criticism for those stupid enough to believe technical arguments can be invalidated non-technical arguments. 

An example would be: Caravaggio murdered a man, therefore his paintings are worthless or poor quality. Though anyone who knows the slightest thing about art would know that history has proven Caravaggio's art is priceless, and oddly enough, he is considered one of the greatest painters of the gospels to ever live despite his less than gospel life--put that in your morality pipe and smoke it.

What's great about this is that now I can copy/paste the technical argument that shows you and your agenda for what they really are and I don't have to waste time running in pointless circles. I love efficiency. 

I think you're a waste of time, dude. Not sure why you are getting all two bit psychologist on me, but if Shelby's criticisms of Synereo are just opinions, you should be able to show as much--end of story. So do that and stop trying to assassinate people's character with your soap box moralizing. This is a technical forum, not a church.

The people on his list were among the best at what they did. You're not even a very accomplished troll, maybe flashing your balls would help....

But getting back to results of actions rather than intent of morals--so you're pimping what is likely faulty technology and TPTB_need _war is dismissing that technology based on the available info, so the result of those actions is that you are convincing people to invest badly and TPTB_need_war is convincing people to invest wisely--you're the bad guy. No amount of moral soap boxing is going to dismiss a sound technical argument, it may distract those with a low-technical aptitude, but it will never erase a valid point. I suggest you get off his balls and invalidate his points, or pick a new coin to shill. People like yourself waste everybody's time (and money if anyone is dumb enough to take you seriously) and (try to) drag this whole forum into the realm of he said/she said.

Can you invalidate any of Shelby's criticisms of synereo? If not, why are you wasting everyone's time? Besides the obvious of having a bag of synereo that your emotionally bound to defend until it reaches some set price goal that you think will make you a success.

I'd crowdfund a Jenna Jameson android, but as far as a coin, why would I care what the person posts as long as the project can achieve its goals and they aren't the same as a dozen or so other projects out there? Yes, all things being equal, I would crowdfund the project with the developer who doesn't post his junk on forums, but all things aren't equal, so as long as his behavior doesn't get him locked up or otherwise destroy the project's chances for survival, what do I care? It seems the people who cry foul over people's personal foibles are the same ones who don't understand the technology enough to look past superficial aspects to determine which projects are "good" and which are "bad."

Also, do you not see that your post are easily dismissed as someone who is backing a coin that TPTB_need_war criticized and therefore you are trying to destroy his credibility by any means necessary? You're hardly the first and certainly not the best (attempt)--you might want to try learning the fundamentals of the math and logic he is using to criticize the weaker coins on this forum as most intelligent people aren't going to be swayed by posturing and rhetoric.

So that means the dashtards will have to make good on their promise to defend their crappy-ass coin even if Satoshi criticizes it.

Tok, just because you don't understand that Monero's coinbase is as verifiable as Bitcoin's doesn't mean the rest of us are that ignorant, but nice try to refute a valid criticism by attacking something uninvolved. I suggest you try again and try harder.

Still waiting. Isn't there one person in all of dash who can refute the claim that x11 and instantx are major design flaws. The longer it goes on the more likely it becomes its own topic. So maybe next time you can try someone who understands cryptosystems better, or at least understands them.

Apparently reading isn't your forte either, those who said they lost money on the dashscam are myself, meme magic, and kennyP.

Still waiting on a refutation from anyone on the two design flaws in dash--instantx and X11..... Anyone? I know your dev gave up, but are you all just hoping the poor design decisions are going to magically disappear, like so many coins after an emissions cut?

^^look up, 3. I know dashtards are mathematically challenged, but come on!

Qwizzie, you're a fucking moron. The only reason there isn't a GUI is that the developers (unlike the shit developers at dash) want to get the coin right before making it available to a general audience--notice they didn't slam 11 algos together making the coin 11 times insecure or fuck up remedial math with a poorly thought out instantx scheme. As for the crippled miner, that's pretty well documented and hardly on par with dash's launch, but nice use of supposition as FUD.

But again, I ask you, Evan, Tok, Aleix or any of the dashtards to refute the claims that X11 and instantx are extra-shitty designs in a world of shit designs. Marketing (or scrambling to divert attention away from poor design) isn't going to save your coin from the epic fail that is Evan's design choice--but congrats to him for fooling a few speculators with x-names and soda machines in the meantime.

I pick coins that won't break because they picked the right algo and weren't stupid enough to combine 11 of them for 11 times the insecurity.

Also, still waiting for one of the dash community to refute the weaknesses of X11 and instantx--your ideas on money properties hardly qualify as refutation of the bad crypto dash was built on. But I'm sure your house of sand won't blow away before you can cash out, if that's your worry.