Any players associated or friendly with an exchange? We have an tradable asset, so the next rational step would be to get it listed somewhere.  Given the market cap is >1 million and this would allow those who aren't into mmorpgs or have the time to invest to learn a game as complex as CK the broadest coverage of CryptoKingdom's land, collectibles, consumables and in-game assets, it seems like a no-brainer. 

As far as gameplay meeting life in this instance, the man or woman or order who does this, would be a Hero in the realm and deserve an honor befitting the result, so my imagination is piqued and would like the challenge of making the reward meet, or even outdo, the blessing this accomplishment would bring to all those who fly the CK banner.

HMC_

Quoting for posterity. We'll see who has the most stupid stupidest crowd.

BTW, are you refuting the inclusion of institutional investors in the hype cycle or does insulting people take care of that glaring omission--

Funny thing is how you missed "institutional investors" on the white chart--or are you implying Monero has had a period of institutional investing

That's not due to an unfair launch, it just turned out to be an unfair outcome to latecomers due to circumstances outside the developer's controls--mainly it was a small group of people that understood the technology and an even smaller group who put value on that technogy--can't blame the launch for that or the amount of time it took more people to get it. I guess satoshi could donate the funds to some sort of airdrop, but that will likely create metadata that can be linked backed to him or the group that uses the pseudonym--to use a cliché: it is what it is.

You mean the Satoshi model? It legitimizes the opensource nature of Devs who care about such things.

Why isn't there a "I think the OP has a short to manage and is full of shit." option?

Even evil botnet overlords know that questions aren't conclusions--they're rhetorical devices of fear, uncertainty and doubt used to misalign the paltry brains of lesser creatures.

(where do you get your weed?)

Will it? I'd speculate (and that's all you and the OP are doing as I can't find a law that states, or even infers cryptocurrencies are illegal) that some states will combat other states by encouraging anon cryptocurrencies--I'm sure someone in the CIA has figured out that cc's are a good way to drain Chinese wealth into western hands--and if they haven't, gamblers will figure it out for themselves--though their motive is just to gamble they can keep all their winnings.

Introducing ckgame

This account is run by His Eminence, Luigi, The Marquess of Rome. Giving s-hodl or ck to this account will grant you shares of ckgame that can be traded on cryptocurrency exchanges. NOTE: s-hodl is preferred as it doesn't create rounding issues.

Example command: give s-hodl 1000 ckgame

Currently 1 s-hodl is 1.28 ck and the s-hodl fund also has holdings in mka and m. If you wish to convert ck directly to s-hodl, please contact His Eminence, Smooth, The Marquess of Cryptoluna for more information.


Blockscan ckgame: https://blockscan.com/assetInfo/CKGAME

If you are interested in adding ckgame to an exchange and need additional information, you may contact Luigi on BCT, IRC or email him at luigi1111w@gmail.com.

Vote: To make s-hodl the first asset to be listed on public exchanges--s-hodl would be converted to counterparty asset ck-game to be listed on non-agora markets.

Debate: Up until now has been whether to use s-hodl (simple reinvestment asset that takes ck dividends and buys additional ck, therefore accruing more ck value over time) and ck (which would add dividends to the fund that would not be reinvested into ck).

Opinion: I prefer s-hodl as it puts buy pressure on ck with reinvestment and also retains dividend yield for those who invest on exchanges (liquidity providers).

^^

Bitcoin has had darkmarkets to itself for a long time, and that 2% is better 0%, but keep grasping--I'm sure one of these days you'll grab a valid argument.

Are you ready to get back on topic?

And still a market that depends on privacy (Alphabay in this case) valued Monero over dash. Your inane hand waving and your deluded attempt at economic theory can't change that fact--you're like a poor-man's professor Bitcorn.

You'd also say that cryptocurrency doesn't depend on cryptography and instamines don't matter, but that's because you're a moron--could you get back on the topic instead of peddling your ridiculous notion that (despite the market saying otherwise) somehow we can't trust privacy coins that actually work at keeping your transactions private--this is a perception argument you lost a long time ago, and has no base in the mathematical world of cryptocurrencies, and no matter how many info-graphs you throw at the wall, will not fool a savvy investor or miner or crypto-enthusiast.  

As far as the topic goes...it's pretty simple, for those holding their coins on Polo-- yes -- Polo going under is a risk; for those who don't hold their coins on Polo, the potential risk is a sell-off by thieves which dips the price--this isn't complex, unknown, or the developer's fault: people seem to trust Polo and they want to trade on margin. So to fix the perceived problem, sputz and the op should stop playing mom and create another place to trade on margin that is as trusted as Polo or get Monero added on more exchanges that offer margin trading, because trying to convince people to take their funds off Polo isn't working, and do to the risk/reward of trading on Polo, will likely never be effective. The idea that somehow the Developers can somehow order more exchanges to margin trade XMR or that the community can be bullied into keeping their coins safe in their wallets and never risk them on an exchange, smacks of the control measures cryptocurrencies were designed to fight, and sounds about as idiotic as trying to convince people to not go to the roulette table because they might lose some money.

^^Tombot hit on the problem and likely solution. We already have an investment that is made up of ck and reinvests ck dividends, so it will be easier for investors to understand and won't force them to do extra work to get their rightful dividends--that item is s-hodl. On Wednesday's Senate we will vote on whether it will be the official ck-exchange asset. You can convert ck into and out of the item--the fund manager, smooth, will have to explain the details, but that means every ck holder can convert their ck into the exchange item.  We will likely also need to rename it so it is easily identifiable with the CryptoKingdom gaming platform--though dragon's blood is probably a little too mmorpg for investor's taste. I was thinking CKA as in CryptoKingdom A-shares or CKD as in CryptoKingdom Dividend/Dragon (shares)...but first thing is to establish the preferred asset to go on exchanges.

Like fair distribution and honesty in implementation and creating threads that purport that there is some secret cabal of coin marketers, but fail to use evidence to back the claim and resorts to innuendo and fantasy. Yeah, communities should have higher standards, but since it's open source, you get what you get and what you've got is a bad case of hypocrisy exasperated by the fact the very thread you are posting on is an example of a dasher's classlessness.

TBH, there's three things I'd like to see happen before we party.

1. Archduke Quest finished (I want to have the celebration take place with gambling and chat and a few hands of high stakes poker).

2. A BTC-->M gateway similar xmr.to added to increase Monero adoption and # of CK players (NewLiberity has agreed to look into this, but no updates as to implementation atm).

3. Be on the way to adding a CK asset to a cryptocurrency exchange.

#3 begs the question: what asset is best suited (from an efficiency and equality standpoint) to best represent our Kingdom as an asset on an exchange?

When those three things are accomplished (or at least a certainty as far implementation), we can party like we just don't care

Is anyone interested in adding a aeon depository to cryptokingdom?