Try change USB riser?
Very good advice. I have been have batches of them fail lately. The green ones with 2 capacitors. Replaced them with Ver 6 and 3 capacitors and running smoothly again.
|
|
|
website won't let me invest btc. when i click thr btc button i just get a loading glass, and X with no popup displayed.
The ICO is blocked in USA, so if your IP shows a US IP you're blocked.
|
|
|
I reverted back to 12.2 for ZEC for my 7970's and 280x's and couldn't be happier with 15.12 and BIOS mods from the BIOS mod thread for ZEC mining for Hynix and Elpida.
|
|
|
ZEC is not really worth it right now, i have turned off miner for it this days
My guess is he is just spamming his signature because what he said makes absolutely no sense what so ever. You are right. My electricity price is $0.2. It is still very profitable. Shhhh. Don't tell him, that just means more ZEC for us.
|
|
|
Seeing as how this ICO managed to breeze past the minimum required to fund its smartphone app project, doesn't seem to be unlikely that they'll also reach the next milestone target which means a pilot project in Africa. Now that I would be very curious to see, as there are a number of Africans on the team (go, global South!).
I do wonder how the 1 billion unbanked will be able to afford a smartphone though!
That must be 0bama's next project.
|
|
|
Is Claymore planning a new release guys?
The miner is already very fast. Difficult to improve speed any more. But it's need to improve stability. Ive had zero problems with stability with the miner itself. The only time something goes wrong it's because of me (oc to much) Keep up the good work claymore! I tried stock frequinces on 270X and 280X. Same result - miner 12.4 unstable. I read this thread - most 280X on 12.4 unstable. This means that 12.4 need to improve stability. I can confirm your findings with 280x, I reverted back to 12.0, now I can run at higher intensity, I don't have to use -r 60 to reset miners due to falling hashrates. I tried the -old 1 but it didn't do it for me. Try 12.2 - for me it gives more speed than 12.0 and stable. Thanks, I concur. About 2% faster, and so far, stable.
|
|
|
Is Claymore planning a new release guys?
The miner is already very fast. Difficult to improve speed any more. But it's need to improve stability. Ive had zero problems with stability with the miner itself. The only time something goes wrong it's because of me (oc to much) Keep up the good work claymore! I tried stock frequinces on 270X and 280X. Same result - miner 12.4 unstable. I read this thread - most 280X on 12.4 unstable. This means that 12.4 need to improve stability. I can confirm your findings with 280x, I reverted back to 12.0, now I can run at higher intensity, I don't have to use -r 60 to reset miners due to falling hashrates. I tried the -old 1 but it didn't do it for me.
|
|
|
Hello, I have i7-4710HQ @ 2.50GHz Claymore detects 8 cores but I'm only minging with 4. What do i need to do to make it mine with all 8?
Minging at about 117H/s.
-t 8
|
|
|
I have been watching this thread with anticipation of jumping into the RX480 world. Last week tried to order a bunch of MSI RX480 X Gaming 8GB. Both Jet and B&H Photo said were in stock. Just got an email from both saying manufacturer shortage. They each cancelled the order. Sounds to me like Vega release might be imminent. Sorry, I know it's off topic, sort of.
|
|
|
If anyone is using SGMiner-GM with Windows to mine XMR with a RX 470 or RX 480, I would appreciate posting your h/s. Thanks. Thinking of picking up a few.
I tested Gygabyte G1 rx 480 4G => 860H/S. But no idea if stable long term, it was just a try. Thanks for your input.
|
|
|
If anyone is using SGMiner-GM with Windows to mine XMR with a RX 470 or RX 480, I would appreciate posting your h/s. Thanks. Thinking of picking up a few.
|
|
|
I dare not imagine the movement after the official announcement
just fasten seat belt a bit The price is so sensitive right now, it's gonna be a big drop if not approved. The price to buy is anyone's guess at this point. I'm guessing under 1000. yes if etf not approved. i think -25% -30% if etf approved the moon Whatever happened to "sell the news?"
|
|
|
Birfinex showing 1336.4 and immediate dump to 1069. Never seen that kind of action.
|
|
|
Satoshi Nakamoto may be none other than Mr. "irrational exuberance" himself, Alan Greenspan.
Sorry, I couldn't resist after all the tequila and Anarchapulco...
|
|
|
Personally, I remove the shroud leaving only the heatsink on the GPU. Than I slap a nice powerful 120mm PWM Delta (or equivalent) onto it (making sure it covers the VRMs) and then I solder the 4 fan wires to the back of the GPU's fan header. That allows the fan to be powered and controlled by the GPU its self, no headaches. GPUs run extremely cool, and you'll never have to worry about fan failures again. Also allows you to keep the original fans nice and fresh for resale.
If you're not big into soldering, I'm sure adapters exist that would allow plugging directly into the GPU's header.
I think I have pics of the process somewhere. I'll post them later if I find them.
Is this the adaptor? https://www.amazon.com/Gelid-CA-PWM-02-Adapter-Sleeved-Cooler/dp/B005ZKZEQA
|
|
|
Personally, I remove the shroud leaving only the heatsink on the GPU. Than I slap a nice powerful 120mm PWM Delta (or equivalent) onto it (making sure it covers the VRMs) and then I solder the 4 fan wires to the back of the GPU's fan header. That allows the fan to be powered and controlled by the GPU its self, no headaches. GPUs run extremely cool, and you'll never have to worry about fan failures again. Also allows you to keep the original fans nice and fresh for resale.
If you're not big into soldering, I'm sure adapters exist that would allow plugging directly into the GPU's header.
I think I have pics of the process somewhere. I'll post them later if I find them.
So the GPU can handle the extra amperage of the replacement fan?
|
|
|
with sapphire 280x hynix AFR I have 640Hs 1100/1625 mod bios, Sapphire 280x Elpida BBBg 605Hs same clock mod bios.
I can approach that, too, but not without eventual HW errors with sgminer, that is why I said, "stable." Out of curiosity, with what miner and config, drivers, etc. do you use for those results?
|
|
|
Hey guys
What miner should I use? Is minergate any good? Is it slower? Are fees higher ? I have no idea what is the difference. Help is much appreciated
For 2 gb cards claymore's, for 4gb and more better sgminer-gm. I had a lot of problems trying to run sgminer-gm so I stuck to claymore. I have 2 win 7 x64 rigs with 15.12 drivers, and both rigs are mostly 290s or 290Xs, but each rig also has 1 380 on it. I think sgminer-gm didn't like either the 15.12 drivers or the fact that I didn't have all the same GPUs on each rig. Claymore "just works". Sgminer-gm seems to require quite a bit of skill in setting different parameters and I found it confusing and read conflicting information about how best to define the parameters. If I could spend more time learning to use sgminer-gm I would love to try it but as I said - I found it difficult to set up correctly. Do you have any suggestions about where to learn how to use sgminer-gm properly? You assumption about 15.12 is correct. Use AMD drivers 16.9.2 or higher. The following works for 380x: set GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 set GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 set GPU_MAX_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 set GPU_MAX_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 sgminer -k cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://monerohash.com:7777 -u ADDRESS -p x --rawintensity 512 -w 4 -g 2 --gpu-engine 1040 --gpu-memclock 1625 --auto-fan --temp-target 80 --no-submit-stale --no-extranonce With my modded 380x I get 730 h/s. Can't speak for 290. But for 280x:--rawintensity 896 -w 8 -g 1 --gpu-engine 1070 --gpu-memclock 1550 Both yields better than the CM miner. Sorry, Claymore, I've always used your miners but you've been passed up. You have good bios for R9 380x whats results for 280x? --rawintensity 896 -w 8 -g 1 --gpu-engine 1070 --gpu-memclock 1550 ? It varies depending on card: Gigabyte at 1100/1550 elpida does 578, 1100/1500 hynix does 565 Sapphire Hynix, and XFX elpida 1050/1500 does 563 with sgminer all stable, no HW errors less than .2% rejects.
|
|
|
Hey guys
What miner should I use? Is minergate any good? Is it slower? Are fees higher ? I have no idea what is the difference. Help is much appreciated
For 2 gb cards claymore's, for 4gb and more better sgminer-gm. I had a lot of problems trying to run sgminer-gm so I stuck to claymore. I have 2 win 7 x64 rigs with 15.12 drivers, and both rigs are mostly 290s or 290Xs, but each rig also has 1 380 on it. I think sgminer-gm didn't like either the 15.12 drivers or the fact that I didn't have all the same GPUs on each rig. Claymore "just works". Sgminer-gm seems to require quite a bit of skill in setting different parameters and I found it confusing and read conflicting information about how best to define the parameters. If I could spend more time learning to use sgminer-gm I would love to try it but as I said - I found it difficult to set up correctly. Do you have any suggestions about where to learn how to use sgminer-gm properly? You assumption about 15.12 is correct. Use AMD drivers 16.9.2 or higher. The following works for 380x: set GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 set GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 set GPU_MAX_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 set GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 set GPU_MAX_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 sgminer -k cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://monerohash.com:7777 -u ADDRESS -p x --rawintensity 512 -w 4 -g 2 --gpu-engine 1040 --gpu-memclock 1625 --auto-fan --temp-target 80 --no-submit-stale --no-extranonce With my modded 380x I get 730 h/s. Can't speak for 290. But for 280x:--rawintensity 896 -w 8 -g 1 --gpu-engine 1070 --gpu-memclock 1550 Both yields better than the CM miner. Sorry, Claymore, I've always used your miners but you've been passed up.
|
|
|
|