I recommend you also set a personal text, since some may not know what's that avatar about.

..And yes, it would be nice if a designer would also make a signature for those willing to wear it.

Yes, you still risk some of your funds. So you can do better.

I will give the steps with Electrum, but Electrum may not work on your Win7 and you may need something a bit different than I say. However:
1. Install Electrum onto an offline computer. Ideally newer than Win7. That computer will not go online until the transactions are confirmed and arrived to your HW.
2. Import into this offline Electrum the private keys of the addresses you have funds in.
3. Install Electrum onto an online computer.
4. Import into the online Electrum the addresses you have funds in. You'll obtain a watch-only wallet.
5. On the online Electrum create a transaction that sends the funds to the HW.
6. Save the transaction (you cannot sign it yet, no problem), copy it to the offline computer, load it into the offline Electrum, sign it (the offline Electrum can sign, has private keys), save it back.
7. Load the signed transaction into the online Electrum, broadcast it, wait to get confirmed.

You can do this with one address or all. Since you work with cold storage, it's safe. The only weak point is the USB stick you'll use to transfer data, maybe you can do that with camera if both the online and offline computer have it. However, it's safer than your idea of setup.
If Electrum cannot be installed on the offline computer then maybe you get temporarily another computer you can keep offline until the tx is confirmed, or maybe somebody can explain how to do this with Bitcoin Core (I did this with Electrum, I didn't do with Bitcoin Core, I don't know if it's more difficult or the same).

In order to sign a message with a Bitcoin address you have to own that bitcoin address (i.e. to be yours and only yours).
Binance and the other exchanges give you an account. The address is theirs, although associated to your account. Since it's not yours, you cannot sign with it.

You can download Electrum (it would be good if you would make sure you get it from Electrum.org and also verify it), make a new wallet, make sure you keep safe the seed of that wallet, get one of the addresses and sign a message with it.

For Ethereum I can't help.

Nu am inteles ce fel de portofel hardware este... o fi un Ledger Nano S Plus un pic modificat? Cum deja am un Nano S, am lasat pe altii sa se bucure (desi daca e S+ poate ca era mai bine sa ma bag).


Vazusem gluma, dar cred ca aricii de fapt nu vad chiar asa bine, deci nu sunt convins ca fusese de bine; deci am lasat-o asa..


Multa bafta!


Imi pare rau, dar partea asta nu o stiu, nu am urmarit-o. Nu era.. sponsora ta... de fapt vulpitza forumului?  

Concurs ultra rapid:

[FREE RAFFLE] Betnomi Cold Wallet - I round 🦊
Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5415096

Organizator: betnomi

Se poate castiga: hardware wallet.


Poate participa oricine.
Modalitate de inscriere: se alege un numar (care nu a fost deja rezervat) de la 0 la f
Transportul este gratuit in USA, restul lumii discuta cu MJ.

Concurs incheiat.

With fossil fuels getting overly expensive, this is a normal direction. Miners can use only the cheapest energy, else they will mine at a loss.
Especially with China ban on mining and the energy war Russia is doing against the world, this is pretty much what we have now.

If those are old transactions, they were probably dropped from mempool (not confirmed; double spent and dropped or dropped after a while for low fee).
This means they were never mined, hence they don't exist.

With the recession knocking at our door (is the situation in India so much different from the rest of the world? I doubt it), I think that those numbers are greatly exaggerated.


The important point is "if they are forced to come back to office".
I think that the companies will adapt. They will have to. Of course, the employees will adapt to. A middle ground will have to be set.

Some will go back to the office, maybe for bigger salaries.
Some will find a middle ground, like 2-3 days in the office and the rest from home.
Some may stay at home, but unless they're exceptionally qualified, they will have to find different employer.

So the situation is far from "black and white" and I expect that in many (most?) cases a middle ground will be found.

These can be a proper indicator.


These can be faked, so I would not take this alone into account; it needs more.


No, just no. There are so many fake reviews - in both directions! - you better not rely on those.


Many very good wallets are open source and don't have support page as you'd expect.
Support is usually an indicator of a private product, usually meaning custodial service, which brings another list of risks (KYC, "not your keys, not your coins").

---

I think that best is to check/ask on bitcointalk for good wallets. You will get the names and official websites. And the official websites will have the correct link to the correct wallet (and also ways to check it's the correct one).
I would not google search for the official website, since nowadays those also get cloned and get high ranks in search engines.

Indeed, I can confirm that Watch button/feature is working well for me too (for another topic, but that doesn't matter).

I think that we may need both.
We need to play smarter so no new people come under his attention, or worse, gets silenced.
And we need to debunk him - in court! - in a way he will never ever get taken serious by any court in the world. And maybe even punished for his forgeries and for wasting people's time and money (plus health, since I agree with Greg, war is hell).

I've changed my personal text pretty soon after you did.
I've changed my avatar even a little before you did (we were both in the same campaign).
So I'm not sure why I'm in the list.

But if you asked for my thoughts, I'll tell the same as I said (in PM) to that campaign's manager: my current plan (unless a paid campaign comes up for avatar and unless CM changes rules for avatar) is to advertise Bitcoincleanup for a while (how long will that be, I really can't tell).

Nu te stresa, se intampla cand faci treducere / te bazezi prea tare pe altceva. Chiar mai des decat ai crede. Si nu, chiar nu ma refer la tine, ci la traduceri in general.
Si, dupa cum am zis: probabil ca nu a fost cea mai buna zi pentru comunicarea de informatii.


Ca tot am urmarit, cel putin partial, procesul: bine ca (noi) nu am avut de tradus vreo porcarie de-a lui CSW ca o faceam corecta!

Da, foarte bine gandit!

Iar legat de acel feedback, eu chiar nu inteleg actiunile unora, care par sa tina neaparat sa faca rau doar ca sa aiba o anumita reputatie (vorbesc aici de teribilism, nu de reputatia in sensul bitcointalk). Din fericire forumul se auto-regleaza si ii scoate - mai devreme sau mai tarziu (cel putin din DT1) pe cei care actioneaza fara sa se gandeasca pe bune.

LOL! Suntem niste meseriasi amandoi.
Sau doar nu-i cea mai buna zi (sau doar ora) pentru transmitarea de informatii 

Ma refeream la.. aparitia din partea de mai sus a listei...

Pai il vazusem in postare, il vazusem in lista de la pagina 1... le-am amestecat si a iesit o varza  . Scuze.
Atunci trebuie doar sa il muti (si pe acesta) si la pagina 1 in lista celor eliminate.

Buun, doar ca ... am gasit o problema, cel putin momentan. Da, ca de obicei, vad "problema" la postarea ta, nu la cea a lui 1miau 

In primul rand, cand deschid bitcoinchain.com, imi da in partea de sus a paginii o eroare:


In plus, daca dau cautare dupa un tx id (am luat unul, aleator, de pe mempool.space), imi da "Nothing was found".

---
As recomanda ca cele care nu mai sunt bune sa dispara complet sau macar sa fie taiate. Ca m-a cam fraierit Blockexplorer.com de la tine de pe lista.

OK, I (somewhat) stand corrected, still if only displayed on the phone, that's a bad joke, not security.


This would be funny, but it's actually sad; it means that the one(s) who implemented the wallet most probably doesn't have the knowledge on blockchain/bitcoin/transactions he should have (and the wallet is built on wrong assumptions).

I recommend hardware wallet, clearly. Most probably with Electrum.
Even more, if OP values his privacy, he will also get Bitcoin Core, will download the blockchain and will use local Electrum Server and local Blockchain Explorer.


I have a Ledger Nano S and I use it with Electrum. My Electrum connects to a local Electrs that runs on top of a Bitcoin Core.
There are nowadays better options than Ledger, you can search for all the problems they had with their customers' data, plus they are not open source.
I am kinda eyeing SeedSigner, but as long as my Nano S still works, I stick to it.

And yet again all crypto twitter, news and forum(s) talk again again Dimon and JP Morgan. I will call this a successful advertising campaign.

Didn't Dimon say not long after the "i was wrong about Bitcoin" that he still doesn't like nor trust Bitcoin? And then what you guys expect? For him it's just a tool to make more fiat; it has always been. Then why would you expect he would spend a second understand Bitcoin? Do you think that he cares that what he tells is utter stupid? No; his audience doesn't know (nor cares) that either.
Only the Bitcoiners will care and those will.. just help him with further advertising.