The transaction ID is fd3d7c75daed65e5738406913a6ba1e41f63ed7d6de3efca7b2846f301161308
Thank you guys for your help!
Brad
The transaction has already confirmed. There is nothing you can do to reverse it. You should try to figure out where the 1F5L4b317FPYa4ptchTNqS7ejmtmqKZb7U address came from. If it's from an exchange the recepient will need to contact support to have their account credited. If it's from their personal wallet then they might need to restart their wallet app to have the amount reflected in their balance. If you copied the wrong address or were somehow tricked into sending to the wrong address then it is gone forever. |
|
|
|
|
If you're talking about a transaction being unconfirmed then you can use RBF to bump the fee if you have enough balance or you can try double spending the coins you sent.
|
|
|
|
It depends on what you're advertising. I've done some campaigns to promote faucets and gambling sites and I've had a lot more success with faucets. For some reason part of the amount was locked to withdrawal, maybe it was from Mellow faucet itself, idk.. So I decided to spend it using my ref link..
You're not allowed to withdraw the free credits you get from Mellow Ads faucet. |
|
|
|
Roger Ver is an investor in Blockchain.com which means he's not going to make 'Corecoin' more usable if he can help it. As for Binance, they care so little about Bitcoin's nature they probably think saying 'Segwit' out loud three times when you send gets the job done. Are Veriblock still stinking up the blockchain? They've been responsible for a huge number of transactions at various points. Ver is also an investor in Purse and BitPay. Purse uses native segwit addresses for deposits and BitPay recently announced they would implement segwit. |
|
|
|
Just taking a quick glance at the website and I can already see many red flags. They misspelled the names of several cryptocurrencies and doing a reverse image search on the client testimonials photos leads to stock images. This is also a quote from their website which is absolute gibberish: December 28, 2017 – Third fork in Bitcoin created: New coin on SegWit2x chain called B2X how to trade on bitcoin with Coinkast? |
|
|
|
A bitcoin transaction analysis tool that can help link addresses through their transactions in a flow chart format. This feature combined with walletexplorer.com's address grouping and wallet labeling would be great having in a block explorer.
I remember seeing the bitcoin address linking through the use of the transaction a flow chart in one of the block explorers but not sure what happened. Maybe the explorer closed down as I can no longer recall it.
The desktop version of oxt.me has something like that but it's very slow and requires to sign up with an email address to use it. |
|
|
|
Coinpot should take this opportunity that fees are low to send BTC payments. I've been waiting a few days to get paid.
I've just received the withdrawal I triggered this morning so all working okay here. Did you receive a confirmation email? They did finally send payments this morning. If you look at recent payouts it was 3 days since they had last paid out before today. https://coinpot.co/payouts/bitcoincore |
|
|
|
|
Coinpot should take this opportunity that fees are low to send BTC payments. I've been waiting a few days to get paid.
|
|
|
|
Did you know this site used to offer mining too?
Really ? Why did they stopped the mining option and how it used to work ? Was it cloud mining ? It was browser mining. They used your CPU to mine some altcoin and you would get paid in Bitcoin. It was discontinued due to the site being flagged by anti-virus programs. |
|
|
|
 Unified welterweight titlist Errol Spence Jr. has confirmed the date of his boxing return. "Done deal the King of the division BACK!! Nov. 21 on Fox PPV vs @DannySwift," Spence posted to his Twitter account. The fight against Danny Garcia will be Spence's first since he defeated Shawn Porter last September, and suffering a one-car accident in October. - ESPNBetting Odds (williamhill.com): Danny Garcia +225 Errol Spence Jr. -303 |
|
|
|
|
Dogecoin has at least one big pump each year. If you really want to add shitcoins to your portfolio, put at least 1% into DOGE.
|
|
|
|
|
30% in Bcash does not seem good. There's no demand for it and they have one of the most ridiculed communities.
|
|
|
|
anyway we are 12 days away and i can't wait to watch this game as we have bets against each other here in our compound .
The fight is in September not in August. |
|
|
|
I've been listening to Durand Jones & the Indications. They have a throwback sound even though they're pretty new. https://youtu.be/hIHxDxTcuDk |
|
|
|
This formula is enough to figure out the odds. There are only 214749 decimals that can be rounded to 10000 and 4294967295 total decimals that can be generated. 214749/4294967295*100 = 0.00500001479%
Quote from that thread:
In my case, I have never got more than the third level, I know the odds are tiny, but I have been playing for years.
Quote from Loyce:
I've seen a topic about this before. I'm pretty sure they're not fair for the high winning free rolls.
Another quote:
IMO, if the free rolls were provably fair, freebitco.in would have gone bankrupt long time ago with all the bots and multi accounts...
You can play it math professor all along as much as you'd like, we can also post in our site some 56569069505 number and say we divide it and produce nice results - it doesn't change the fact the high prizes are rigged - otherwise FreeBitco.in would have gone bankrupt by now ... imagine paying out $200 to 0.005% just of the daily rolls that are taking place there. The fact is - you won't see many $200 winners, and the fact is the lottery is rigged too - but it's still a good website, it's credible and it pays out - and that's what's important - that you know that even if you get a basic prize - you would get your payment. Now, With all due respect - we have no interest exchanging messages with you in this thread, if you wish to discuss it elsewhere - go for it. One more post about this - and you would be placed on ignored list - our business interest is not to turn this thread into your own personal blog so if you want to write a blog about our site you're more than welcome to do it elsewhere, so kindly note we won't be paying any further attention to any further FALSE allegations you may have. You can put me on ignore if you want but I have to call you out on your blatant lies. There is no need to rig anything when they are making so much profit from gambling. Do you have any idea how much freebies Las Vegas casinos give away? It's a lot more than a couple hundred dollars to every 20,000th person.
By all means try to make a withdrawal from our site and if you have an issue or claim - then by all means say we're scammers, but otherwise - not interested in your fallacies.
You are already scamming by having big bold letters saying "THIS GAME IS PROVABLY FAIR" without having any way to prove that you are fair. Making your site look like a knock off version of FreeBitco.in and making false claims just makes me believe you are not legitimate and are only trying to phish people's passwords. |
|
|
|
Nice deflection. You try to excuse your dishonesty by pointing to an unproven conspiracy theory. Unless you can actually prove they are not provably fair, then the odds of winning $200 is 0.005%, the chances for $20 is 0.02%, and chances for $2 is 0.04%. They've been very open about their odds on their official thread and they show you their formula on the website.
Firstly this is proven. Secondly there is no dishonesty from our end. Thirdly the % you're quoting are not showing up on their site. Click on the "Provably Fair" in FreeBitco.in - where do you see 0.005% being mentioned? We've been rolling in FreeBitco.in for years now, day after day - never won anything other than the first 2 basic prizes - but does it mean we don't like the site? We like it, but there is no reality of 0.005% like you quote. If you come here to bash our thread you can continue posting to yourself as you would be placed on ignore now. The conspiracy theory you linked to is not proof of anything. Claiming on your site that you are provably fair is dishonesty. Claiming that FreeBitco.in doesn't reveal their odds is dishonesty. From their website: How are rolls calculated?
Two strings are created :
STRING1 = "[NONCE]:[SERVER SEED]:[NONCE]"
STRING2 = "[NONCE]:[CLIENT SEED]:[NONCE]"
Then HMAC-SHA512 is used to hash STRING1 with STRING2 as the secret key, giving us a 128 character hex string.
The first 8 characters of the hex string are taken and converted to a decimal.
This decimal is then divided by 429496.7295 and rounded off to the nearest whole number.
This whole number is used as your roll, with the maximum possible value being 10,000. This formula is enough to figure out the odds. There are only 214749 decimals that can be rounded to 10000 and 4294967295 total decimals that can be generated. 214749/4294967295*100 = 0.00500001479% |
|
|
|
The odds of winning the higher prizes on FreeBitco.in is easy to figure out since they are provably fair.
So why don't you figure it out and post their real odds? You're invited to do so by all means please. Also check out this thread please: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5261370Nice deflection. You try to excuse your dishonesty by pointing to an unproven conspiracy theory. Unless you can actually prove they are not provably fair, then the odds of winning $200 is 0.005%, the chances for $20 is 0.02%, and chances for $2 is 0.04%. They've been very open about their odds on their official thread and they show you their formula on the website. |
|
|
|
Cada cadena siguió agregando sus bloques, cada moneda era gastable en su cadena de bloques.
Los bitcoin en Bitcoin, bcash en su red y bitcoingold en su red.
Los monedas(UTXO) de BCH se pueden gastar en BSV si la moneda existia antes de la separacion porque no quisieron implementar replay protection. |
|
|
|
Gervonta Davis still is in his very prime with an incomparable reflex that can avoid a million punches while his hands are down. And with a KO record of 95%, almost all of the fighter who box with him in the ring end up kissing the floor. Whoever wants this fight to push through hates Leo Santa Cruz the most and will likely bet more than $1M for his 2nd knockout.
Mayweather who is Davis' promoter has kept him protected so it's impossible at this moment to know if it really is such a mismatch. Of course Santa Cruz naturally belongs at a lower weight class, has no power, and isn't a slick defensive fighter so that's why they cherry picked him. That being said, we can't discredit Santa Cruz's experience against championship level fighters. There is also his workrate, he is a big volume fighter. The biggest factor could end up being how well Davis can cut weight. He had problems making lightweight in his last bout and is now going back down to jr. lightweight. There is too many variables to be declaring Davis the winner so early on. |
|
|
|
For somebody who can gain referrals without investing or for somebody who can waste much more time doing claims than me is maybe good choice.
And if you want to fact-check:
Your faucet is not top paid faucet and that is fact.
So, do the math:
If you are talking about freebitco.in
their basic claim is currently 21 satoshi - 0,0020 USD your basic claim is 0,00030 USD see the difference?
And I will ask you 3rd time if you can share percentage setting to hit the higher roll it will be really interesting.
Regarding your repeated question of sharing something FreeBitco.in doesn't share - it's not something they share and we neither, it's like you asking for us to deliver you a script of our site, or like you asking the Coca Cola company to deliver their recipe to you - it's not something they nor ourselves will share, and please refrain from asking for this again. The odds of winning the higher prizes on FreeBitco.in is easy to figure out since they are provably fair. Your site, however, is the one who is blatantly lying by claiming to be provably fair but not actually showing how it is that you are generating numbers when we click the roll button. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
