Seen it all now a staff member on default trust who promotes a ponzi scam  I expect people to follow their own judgement. Those who act depending on the actions of "a staff member on default trust" deserve to be burned. Maybe I'm expecting too much. So newbies who are highly likely to regard BCT Staff members as reliable indicators of trustworthy services should basically go fuck themselves because you feel like taking advantage of your position to earn yourself a few dollars? Nice morality you got there, does it come in 'decent' or do you only do 'I got my satoshis so fuck you'? |
|
|
|
Wow look ma, I've become famous  . Judging by your response are we to assume not a fuck is given on this matter? If so, that is extremely worrying. |
|
|
|
Oh isn't it just typical Homero, The good news is that we grew too fast. That's the equivalent of responding with, "I am too much of a perfectionist" when asked to list your flaws in a job interview. Now, I don't want to oversell anything, in fact, I debated on whether or not sending this letter. Awesome grammar there, Josh. |
|
|
|
FYI, for anybody still unsure about the facts, xscrypt is a proven ponzi scheme because WhiteCodex already admitted to another user that a known ponzi-scrypt exploit was applicable to xscrypt. I found an exploit and know how to create contracts as I want. I thought I would share it publicly as OP fails to listen to me. https://www.dropbox.com/s/c594czmd7w65rou/XScryptContract.zipThis small program gives a random address and random txid so it looks real to OP. 1) Register on site, Get your user/affiliate ID. 2) Run application 3) Create contract (make sure its not too big as else it will fuck their payments and you wont get paid, It will also look suspicious) 4) Hopefully, Profit from scammer. its an EXE, Not posting source until OP admits his scam. If you are wary (which you should be of course) Run this in a sandbox environment.You found an exploit? oh very nice, we know that exploit since we launched. You can add any fake contracts you want, but to the payout we need to aproval each contract. So we verify each transaction on our cold address and aprove the payout. You know it because since yesterday you are trying to get payout from your fake contracts, but we always denied it Nice try. Best Regards See? He admits they know about the exploit. The ponzi-script exploit. The exploit only applicable to scams running ponzi-scripts. |
|
|
|
Good job, nice work. We need more media outlets willing to explain the facts about 'cloud mining'. While you're at it, perhaps you might want to extend the article to question why a service purporting to help users learn which cryptocurrency services are suspected scams, is so fervently shilling for scrypt.cc and was also a spittle-flecked rabid shill for Homero Joshua Garza's GAW/Hashlet/XPY fraud. Badbitcoin.org appears to suffer from selective reasoning. |
|
|
|
am trilingual
Quite the cunning linguist. :rimshot: |
|
|
|
Who says its only mining scrypt coins? [expletive deleted] ASIC miners can only mine the specific ALGO they are designed for! Bitcoin ASIC miners can only mine SHA256 coins and Litecoin ASIC miners can only mine Scrypt coins. SHA256 is like 27 coins. According to http://coinwik.org/List_of_all_DCs there are 174 scrypt or variation of scrypt coins. With custom software couldn't a scrypt miner mine the most profitable of the 174 scrypt coins? You only need concern yourself with Litecoin and any coin with sufficient market liquidity which is more profitable than Litecoin to mine. There would be zero point in mining anything less profitable than Litecoin if you are seeking to sell what you are mining to earn the bitcoin that scrypt.cc 'pays out' every ten minutes. Fact is you can check this yourself. Go to coinwarz.com and add up the total network Hashrate for Litecoin and any Scrypt coin above it in the list which isn't merge-mined with Litecoin. Now add up the Hashrate of the public pools for those coins because scrypt.cc wouldn't be wasting money paying pool fees when they have way more than enough power to solo mine every coin including Litecoin, and deduct that total Hashrate of the public pools from the total Hashrate for the combined coin networks. There is no space left to hide but a tiny fraction of scrypt.cc's claimed 850GH/s of Scrypt ASIC mining power. Ergo, they are lying about mining with 850GH/s of scrypt hash power. |
|
|
|
Who says its only mining scrypt coins? [expletive deleted] ASIC miners can only mine the specific ALGO they are designed for! Bitcoin ASIC miners can only mine SHA256 coins and Litecoin ASIC miners can only mine Scrypt coins. |
|
|
|
This is what stops you guys from getting your point across. The fact is that you guys attack everybody who wants to keep on believing.
Ever think about the possibility that they themselves might be one of the innocent victims you are so furiously trying to protect?
Just because someone doesn't see things the way you see them, and wants to stubbornly keep on believing what you have proved to be wrong, doesn't make them amoral, stupid or a scammer.
Just a human being, hoping that you're wrong, and that he won't lose money.
Given that we can't tell who here is an 'innocent victim' stubbornly refusing to accept the truth or a paid shill/members of the criminal gang running these multiple ponzi scams, it is best to safely assume that anyone attempting to defend this fraudulent site in the face of indisputable facts is likely to be less than 'innocent'. If I hurt the feelings of the 'innocents' or offend them in any way that's just too bad. I'm here to send a message, not pander to self-indulgent immature narcissists who cite 'tone complaint' as their only response to what I have to say. For every one stubborn idiot in this thread who refuse to listen to the content of the message, there'll be dozens more who 'get it' and are better off for having 'got it'. |
|
|
|
Enjoy your crusade of futility.
Oh it is never futile when there's always the chance to show that scumbitch Vik from badbitcoin.org to be the immoral shill she always has been.  |
|
|
|
scrypt.cc is promoted quite a lot at hashtalk.ch, hashclub.org and talk.paycoin.com. Just do a Google search for other sites.
Thanks, I might go take a look. [edit] Eesh, just did, they're dumber than a bag of rocks and it isn't helping them that badbitcoin.org is also shilling furiously for this scam as they, for some reason, trust Vik almost as much as they originally trusted the ultimate GawTard, Homero Joshua Garza. Even in the face of incontrovertible proof they'll still deny it and call for Vik to start her 'Bodysnatchers'-stylee screeching. Why do you guys care so much, how much crypto-karma do you think you'll get? I find it amusing you argue so vehemently about this and yet say you don't really care. All of the posts, for and against, have no impact on the site or people sending them new coins.
The question is, why do you care so much about the truth being posted in this discussion? You *do* know, right, that complaining about Facts U Dislike being posted in a discussion thread normally singles you out to be a shill or even part of the scammer group themselves? The more vociferous your complaint about the truth being 'outed', the more likely it is you are already aware of it and want to keep it quiet so you can continue to profit off other people's naivete and ignorance. Either way it suggests questionable intellectual integrity and low moral standards. |
|
|
|
|
Oh noes! Some random on the internet just made arbitrary slights against me, well, my forum avatar/persona 'me'.
I haz a sad.
In other news, check out my new sig! Got the idea from another genius. It is Genius!
So how come 'Admin' doesn't answer the sticky problem of his 850GH/s of scrypt mining not actually fitting anywhere in the known crypto Universe?
Might it be because he doesn't actually have 850GH/s of scrypt mining power? Or maybe it is because he doesn't actually have 850Gh/s of scrypt mining power. Hmmm, tricky . . .which one is it?
|
|
|
|
In fact I was not asking opinions from morons.
You mean like the kind of morons who reply above the text they're quoting, instead of below it? |
|
|
|
Hi guys and girls!
Can you please advise whether it's safe to invest now?
Thanks!
Where are these idiots coming from? Of course it isn't safe, they are running a ponzi scheme, not mining! Seriously, is there another forum or place where they are promoting scrypt.cc because I find it hard to believe that this thread is the only source of discussion about it because, if it was, nobody with half a brain and a pinch of morality would be willing to continue supporting this criminal enterprise. |
|
|
|
|
Yeah, but do you have cake?
|
|
|
|
YOU started to use word "criminal" and repeat it several times. So, if it is in your opinion criminal, then you must call police. If you dont, you are the part of the crime. understand?
Don't be so puerile, there is no evidence that this fraudulent operation is even where it claims to be based, other than a domain registered to the 'Marcelos' that everybody refers to. It is highly unlikely that this Marcelos is even the 'Admin' or owner of this op, given that it is vouched for by the Ukraine-based cmmonitor scam which purports to verify these fraudulent operations. It is highly likely that this site is just one of many run by the same group as that responsible for cmmonitor. People who choose to continue participating in this criminal operation, even when it has been proven to be fraudulent, which it has, are guilty of collaborating with the criminals, not those who are posting advice to others not to take part in it. Weak attempt at deflection. |
|
|
|
sewot banget nih orang kalo masih bayar belum di bilang sekam  English, shill for xscrypt, as your posting history shows you to be more than capable of. |
|
|
|
I can see you, angry, red head, raping F5 to see who write something new.. , funny guy... Description of Ad Hominem Translated from Latin to English, "Ad Hominem" means "against the man" or "against the person." An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form: Person A makes claim X. Person B makes an attack on person A. Therefore A's claim is false. The reason why an Ad Hominem (of any kind) is a fallacy is that the character, circumstances, or actions of a person do not (in most cases) have a bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim being made (or the quality of the argument being made). |
|
|
|
some facts for scrypt.cc : I ignore the math about minning, and "proofs" that this site is not doing things which are discribed on site. If you believe this math, then its ponzi, scam, criminal whatever, BUT: 1.this project works for YEARS - doesnt look like ponzi.. 2.Admin state is like: "I dont care", you should care about security for yourself. If you click fucking links, then you will be hacked.. Also admin do not care som much about support and especially ABSOLUTELY DONT CARE about new ones. -this also doesnt look very ponzi, right? 3.the site is profitable, which is very rare in cloudmining "business". You do not make contract or anything like this, you can sell your khs anytime, so if I want, I can RIGHT NOW quit the system, with huge profit, and I did it two times, just to be sure if I really can. I can. this is also very rare in this business and also - doesnt look very ponzi.. 4. there are some negative comments mostly about deposit and withdrawal. I can say for me, I did a lot of deposits and withdrawals and ALWAYS it was less then half an hour. Maybe Im lucky, but these problems can be also on users side /maybe they live in jungle I dont know../. 5. there is one actually small group of people who get "scammed". If you will go deeper you will find these are just kids who clicks three months on every faucets, then they "invest" their obligate 0,001BTC, maybe use same login as for faucets... If they get email with free KHS, hey will of course click the link, etc... Three months ago I start to make some fun with bitcoins. I dont like word "invest". Its a gamble and fun. But I use this word just to decribe what I did, but it is NOT fucking investment really. I joined with small amounts few sites. ZeusHash-maintenance fee is 80percent, then they make "great new GHS III" only with 75percent. ehm.. I will never see my money back. Genesis - 0,5BTC invested, 0,001 daily, after three months 0,0008 daily and it will go down. I will never see my money back. Bitcoincloudservices- 0,1BTC invested - 0,0005 daily. After 75days they stopped to send. I will never see my btc back. And form these sites is NOT possible to go away. Scrypt.cc - After two months I have my money back in wallet, the same amount as invested I had still in my acounts. I made very unique passwords for each acoount, I made new 2steps verificated gmail account for each of my accounts on scrypt.cc, I didnt click links, so I didnt have problems with security. Im still in this game, just now I withdrawed some BTCs after weekend , they was in my wallet in less then 5minutes..... So guys, this is MY math, to so sofisticated, sure, but THIS ONE WORKS . Good luck to everyone and fuck off to all haters who talk their bullshits but didnt even try scrypt.cc. /what are you doing here? whats your point? if you didnt even TRY it? ?/ And greetings to math-geniuses who prove everything, but have still zero profit  .. PS: Im just normal user and Im in no way related with scrypt.cc . Believe or not, do what you want, I really dont care.. But all I wrote here is PURE truth... cheers.. Oh look, a shill who has only ever posted in this thread to support scrypt.cc AND he's flying that, "Hey it's all just a gamble, amirite?" bullshit excuse. As for, "all the haters who talk their bullshit but didn't even try scrypt.cc" are you so retarded that you think this even makes sense? Scrypt.cc objectively PROVEN to not be what they claim to be Scrypt.cc having run their ponzi operation for quite a while now does not make it any less of a fraudulent scam. By your measure Bernie Madoff's scam was legit because it operated for decades, right? Idiot. |
|
|
|
we know that exploit since we launched.
So you confirm then that your system is running a ponzi script and you are aware of the exploit within that system? Not like we didn't all know you are a scammer, but at least we can confirm you're also too dumb to realise what you've just admitted to, which helps underline the fact you are fairly low risk in the grand scheme of things because you can't even successfully communicate in such a ways as to hide the fact you are operating a ponzi scheme. It's like you're doing our work for us, thanks! Its a low exploit and dont put our system on risk. Crypto what you think is your problem. We don't operate a ponzi, but i dont know because i talking this to you. You are those who even if we are here online aand paying for 1-2 years, you will continue talking nonsense as "Ponzi", "scam" .... Best Regards Your system is a ponzi script, otherwise this exploit would not work. That is what you have admitted, by asserting that the exploit found is a 'low exploit' you have implicitly declared your system to be a ponzi script. Are you too dim to understand that? You.Admitted.Your.System.Is.A.Ponzi.Script.Because.You.Admitted.The.Ponzi-Script-Exploit.Is.Relevant.To.Your.System. Simple enough for you? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
