Monerohash.com reports 12.81 MH/sec , and my daemon reports 13.44 Mh/sec (probably because the pool software divides by 1024).
Oh, neat. The full hash rate is usually 15 - 18, so this means the vast majority of hash rate switched successfully. No it doesnt, the diff algo takes time to update.. What does mean the hash rate is probably close is the fact that we had 13 blocks in the first hour. The expected is 15. EDIT: with the anticipated 20% hash rate drop, the expected would be 12.
|
|
|
Ninja fork. I'm expecting a big diff. decrease. Two big private Chinese botnet pools have not upgraded (3.7MH/s total hash), I have a feeling there are many more. Approximately 20% of the hash rate has not upgraded, so yes there will likely be a difficulty decrease over the next 24 hours, depending on how long those miners take to upgrade.
|
|
|
More cheap coins Even cheaper coins available today. 8000/0.00006500 contact OP sold
|
|
|
I never made it to the list either! ( Please add me
p.s I didn't mine during the instamine. And don't care.
Proud to be a small part of Dash revolution
You don't qualify. Unlike the others you actually posted about all sorts of stuff in 2013. So either a purchased account or one of the few previously-active cryptocurrency community members who got interested in Dash. No way to tell which I suppose.
|
|
|
So what does it mean to flush_txpool?
Sometimes you can send a transaction that gets stuck and that lets you clear out your node's transaction pool so you can reuse those coins. The main use for this was a bug in the earlier 0.9.x releases but it can occasionally happen for other reasons. Normally you wouldn't need to use that command.
|
|
|
I'm unable to compile 0.9.3 on Ubuntu 14.04 using this old tutorial. There was no specific error except this: make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/xxxx/bitmonero/build/release' [ 92%] Built target core_proxy CMakeFiles/unit_tests.dir/blockchain_db.cpp.o (symbol from plugin): warning: the use of `tmpnam' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/xxxx/bitmonero/build/release' [ 92%] Built target unit_tests make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/xxxx/bitmonero/build/release' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/xxxx/bitmonero/build/release' make: *** [release-all] Error 2 There is an compile issue with one of the tests, but unless you are doing a parallel make (which that old tutorial does not advise), by the time you get that point all the release binaries should already be built. Look in build/release/bin
|
|
|
So currently monero hides both addresses in a transaction but the amount is visible? And is this mathematically proven anonymity or is it more of a mixing type anonymity?
It has some attributes of both. With ring signatures it is mathematically proven (see white paper) that it is impossible to determine which of the possible spenders (outputs) is the real one. It is like mixing in the sense that each input has a finite set (generally 2-5 in practice though higher mix counts are allowed) of possible outputs and this ends up having a mixing-like effect on the entire blockchain. It is unlike mixing in that the coins being "mixed" don't need to be spent at the same time (like coinjoin) nor do their owners need to take any active steps to mix (like most mixing systems), nor is there any coordinating central coordinating system that can either steal your coins (like centralized mixers) or serve as a point for tracking and logging (like most if not all coinjoin-based implementations).
|
|
|
I could be wrong here but my concern is that the volume on the exchanges will be so low because everyone is investing hodl. If I am not mistaken the exchanges need a certain volume or they discontinue trading the coin?
On YoBit the volume is 1.1BTC in the last 24 hours. I think it has to drop to .01BTC volume for a month before they will think about de-listing it. Don't forget the exchange also gets to keep the interest on all the deposited coins (unless they give it back to account holders, but no exchange has done that afaik). Granted that's not a large amount, but it should add a bit to profits on top of trading fees.
|
|
|
I like Shen's papers more than price action. Haven't seen Surae and Sarang active of late? Both busy with other work. We do expect some new contributions from Surae sometime in the foreseeable future, but no promises at this point.
|
|
|
Updated to .9.3 and lost all incoming connections again. Revisited my last procedure with no luck. Deleted old rules, replaced them, tried rebooting router, out of ideas for the moment.
The Monero daemon still uses port 18080 for incoming connections, so updating to version 0.9.3 has little to nothing to do with your issue. You need to post more information, otherwise you can't receive any useful help. Post a screenshot of the port mapping you have done in your router for example. I don't know what the problem is/was, but after a while I got 1, and about 10 minutes later it's up to 2 connections, so it is working. typical used to be 6-9 though. Checked my sometimes very poor internet connection, and it is good enough, not bad enough to be a limiting factor, at any rate. edit: now 3 after 30+ min. No idea why it is picking up so slow, but its working, so I can ignore it now while it does its thing. It's just luck. Other nodes have to pick yours, which depends on a lot of things like when they started, what other nodes are up, etc. Just being available means you are helping the network. If there are a lot of reachable nodes, then yours won't be needed (or used) that much but if the number drops then yours will be there and helping.
|
|
|
Hi guys,new forum memer here! I would like to ask if there is any lightweight monero wallet that keep my monero safe locally offline. Thanks in advance!
Most safe strictly for cold storage is a paper wallet. Here is a guide: linkIf you want a lightweight GUI wallet you can occasionally use to transact, try this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=903579.0I think you could use it on a computer that is kept offline most of the time. How safe is it making a cold storage wallet with .simpleawallet and just keeping the key file safe offline compared to the procedure explained in the guide? Pretty much the same as long as it is all done offline, the keys are never brought online and you check the integrity of the simplewallet you are using. There is an older guilde for doing safe cold storage with simplewallet, but I don't have a link to it. Maybe someone will reply with the link.
|
|
|
Hi guys,new forum memer here! I would like to ask if there is any lightweight monero wallet that keep my monero safe locally offline. Thanks in advance!
Most safe strictly for cold storage is a paper wallet. Here is a guide: linkIf you want a lightweight GUI wallet you can occasionally use to transact, try this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=903579.0I think you could use it on a computer that is kept offline most of the time.
|
|
|
PSA: Users, (solo)miners, exchanges/merchants, and pooloperators must be on 0.9.x (preferably 0.9.2) in advance of the hardfork otherwise you will get forked/booted off the network. If you are mining on one of the following pools, please contact your poolop immediately or switch to another pool.
At this point it is probably best to just move. If they haven't updated now with a 33 hours left they're likely a lost cause. Move your miners now and avoid wasting your hash rate.
|
|
|
Why doesn't Polo have an ETH/XMR pair? Obvious thing to do is make a support ticket and request it. Certainly seems like a reasonable request to me.
|
|
|
I'm dumping 300xmr/day, whatever the price..
Ha! That will really move the market. As long as you have a lot of other minnow friends... EDIT: IIRC you already sold ALL your XMR, no? Yes i sold almost 100k xmr in the last 2 months, invested all into ETH and made a fortune. I still mine XMR at 300KH/s , dump everything i mine at 24h intervals Thanks! We will be grateful for your largesse in letting us have your coins at giveaway prices, while you keep looking back and wishing you had kept them. Don't forget to close the door on your way out? either primers a liar, thief, a closet monero lover, or theres a miner that goes about 15x faster than whats publicly available. He claims to have a large number of computers mining.
|
|
|
bitmonerod .9.2 status tells me 'update required'. getmonero.org has only .9.1 available, and I've seen nothing posted here. Rumor has it there is supposed to be an update later today, just wondering if it is released already.
The update required message is kind of a bug. It is based on the planned hard fork date, but your version is new enough for the hard fork anyway so the message is wrong. Anyway, the minor release is still scheduled for today but not up yet.
|
|
|
Running .9.2 on windows 64, 100% synced, status says:
...v1, up to date, 8+0 connections
can someone give me explicit instructions to get connected?
thanks
It would require knowing a lot more about your particular network. For a typical home setup you can find more information by looking in google for "how to forward ports".
|
|
|
Running .9.2 on windows 64, 100% synced, status says:
...v1, up to date, 8+0 connections
can someone give me explicit instructions to get connected?
thanks
What do you mean "get connected" ? From the above it looks like you are connected, although incoming connections might be blocked by a firewall. That's not critical to fix unless you are comfortable messing with firewall settings. it was mentioned that with incoming connections blocked I'm not doing the network any good. Not that it's a hashing monster, but every little bit adds up, so if I can, I'd like to do my (little)bit. Sooner or later I will have a much more substantial hash rate to contribute, but might as well have it figured out before then if I can. Baby steps. I'm learning. Okay in that case you have to make sure that port 18080 is open to the outside world and forwarded to the computer running the node if it is behind a NAT router. Once you do that and wait a while you should see your incoming connection count start to increase.
|
|
|
|