nvcc is not in the PATH.
find it and then:
export PATH=***nvcc directory***:$PATH
if you install cuda by .run file, it will be into a subdir of /usr/local, don't know about the deb method.
you can run "find / -xdev -name nvcc" if unsure.
OK, GOOD, NVCC IS THERE-- But, then "make" failed on not finding "gcc-4.9". An attempt to install v4.9 revealed that gcc-4.9 was up-to-date. I then created a symlink to the "/usr/bin/gcc-4.8" directory with "sudo ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-4.8 /usr/bin/gcc-4.9". On returning to the "pallas" directory, I issued the command "make", and the compilation continued from where it had errored out. The compilation is running while I type this. VOILA' It compiled!!!! I ran the "--help" command. Right now, the machine is mining Ethereum (ETH), and I will check out your work sometime today. Thank you, Pallas! --scryptr Evening scryptr - I tried your method above - in full disclosure - I am a Ubuntu noob. I keep running into this error and have tried now for 24 hours with no luck to get past this point. I am running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. The error: nvcc -g -O2 -I . -Xptxas "-v" --compiler-bindir /usr/bin/gcc-4.9 -gencode=arch=compute_50,code=\"sm_50,compute_50\" -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\" --maxrregcount=80 --ptxas-options=-v -I./compat/jansson -o heavy/cuda_blake512.o -c heavy/cuda_blake512.cu heavy/cuda_blake512.cu(11): error: invalid redeclaration of type name "uint64_t" /usr/include/stdint.h(55): here 1 error detected in the compilation of "/tmp/tmpxft_00003be0_00000000-9_cuda_blake512.compute_52.cpp1.ii". make[2]: *** [heavy/cuda_blake512.o] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/pokeytex/Downloads/ccminer-m7-branch-master' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pokeytex/Downloads/ccminer-m7-branch-master' make: *** [all] Error 2 Any help is appreciated. Thanks - pokeytex your system headers have those typedefs already defined. probably gcc 5.4, the issue wasn't there with older compilers. you need to remove those definitions at the beginning of the related files. there are a bunch. or use gcc 4.9 (the default for this fork). @pallas I am not sure what you mean by typedefs. I am running Ubuntu 14.04 - clean install on an intel box. I believe the 64 bit version. I installed all basic stuff and have followed along on all of the tutorials so far. The error I am getting is based in GCC - I downloaded gcc 4.9 but get the same error still. I refuse to give up! :-) Any more advice please? With a cherry on top! |
|
|
|
nvcc is not in the PATH.
find it and then:
export PATH=***nvcc directory***:$PATH
if you install cuda by .run file, it will be into a subdir of /usr/local, don't know about the deb method.
you can run "find / -xdev -name nvcc" if unsure.
OK, GOOD, NVCC IS THERE-- But, then "make" failed on not finding "gcc-4.9". An attempt to install v4.9 revealed that gcc-4.9 was up-to-date. I then created a symlink to the "/usr/bin/gcc-4.8" directory with "sudo ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-4.8 /usr/bin/gcc-4.9". On returning to the "pallas" directory, I issued the command "make", and the compilation continued from where it had errored out. The compilation is running while I type this. VOILA' It compiled!!!! I ran the "--help" command. Right now, the machine is mining Ethereum (ETH), and I will check out your work sometime today. Thank you, Pallas! --scryptr Evening scryptr - I tried your method above - in full disclosure - I am a Ubuntu noob. I keep running into this error and have tried now for 24 hours with no luck to get past this point. I am running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. The error: nvcc -g -O2 -I . -Xptxas "-v" --compiler-bindir /usr/bin/gcc-4.9 -gencode=arch=compute_50,code=\"sm_50,compute_50\" -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\" --maxrregcount=80 --ptxas-options=-v -I./compat/jansson -o heavy/cuda_blake512.o -c heavy/cuda_blake512.cu heavy/cuda_blake512.cu(11): error: invalid redeclaration of type name "uint64_t" /usr/include/stdint.h(55): here 1 error detected in the compilation of "/tmp/tmpxft_00003be0_00000000-9_cuda_blake512.compute_52.cpp1.ii". make[2]: *** [heavy/cuda_blake512.o] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/pokeytex/Downloads/ccminer-m7-branch-master' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pokeytex/Downloads/ccminer-m7-branch-master' make: *** [all] Error 2 Any help is appreciated. Thanks - pokeytex |
|
|
|
Still here guys..
Flu has landed in the Banzai Family home.. Normally it has almost 0 effect on me, but I'm really having a knock-out by the flu this time.. I'm back in a few days..
Feel better BanzaiBTC - the flu sucks! Took me out once for (5) days. That was in my 30's. Can't imagine what it would do to me now in my 40's! |
|
|
|
Does anyone have rigs built with nVidia cards ? Which model/manufacturer is the best one?
Thanks
I tend to prefer EVGA 1070s. The SC one with backplate and single 8 pin power plug. YMMV I second that! EVGA is all I use. |
|
|
|
|
So apparently poloniex is not getting deposits on XCN? Is anyone else having this problem? I submitted a couple tickets but not fix as of yet.
|
|
|
|
@pallas - hello - I appear to be successful in compiling the miner on Windows until I get to the very end - it gives the following error:
Error 29 error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'pthread.h': No such file or directory 13 1 ccminer
Do you know what this is caused by?
Thanks - pokeytex
Not sure about windows but maybe something like this might help: http://sourceware.org/pthreads-win32/It is just a bunch of files - where do you drop them to have Visual Studio recognize your path in miner.h? |
|
|
|
|
@pallas - hello - I appear to be successful in compiling the miner on Windows until I get to the very end - it gives the following error:
Error 29 error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'pthread.h': No such file or directory 13 1 ccminer
Do you know what this is caused by?
Thanks - pokeytex
|
|
|
|
|
I have also been running my wallet since the ICO distribution with absolutely no issues. 22 plus connections all the time and consistent stakes. Windows 10 64 Bit - Anniversary Edition.
-pokeytex
|
|
|
|
Network weight almost tripled during the last several blocks.
Looks like someone added quite a big stake to the network.
yeah, interesting, because as fast as it spiked, it went back to normal. Staking doesn't appear to be working for me anymore. Unlocked wallet, # of coins to stake would increase gradually and minting would happen. Then as the day went on the number of coins would go up and down slowly and now it went all the way to zero. Closed and opened wallet, staked coins would slowly rise and then fall back to zero. One issue found, when using parameter -datadir=<path> the # of connections to the network stay at 1. Had to run the wallet with no parameters to get more connections. Hrmm - I can't say that is true on my end. I use -datadir=<path> and have 22 connections to the network! My peers: 109.235.70.63:34061 51.254.181.195:8572 45.48.185.55:8572 167.114.103.43:54207 148.251.8.18:44673 91.153.109.149:8572 194.135.93.51:8572 [2003:41:2002:200:a00:27ff:fe5c:ec8f]:8572 62.153.176.78:9030 24.160.59.242:55276 50.168.101.34:35008 213.93.178.167:58846 68.224.11.146:49571 77.66.16.225:9538 106.69.55.195:49776 [2001:0:5ef5:79fd:388b:31c5:95ba:c83c]:49954 50.88.60.250:40022 104.200.24.136:41642 94.142.234.39:65049 [2001:0:9d38:90d7:3c25:240f:c17c:e004]:65281 62.131.31.251:8572 [2001:0:9d38:90d7:1c7a:7216:2686:ecb]:53417 85.11.163.123:65026 217.121.241.52:40778 |
|
|
|
Guys I have some terrible news. I was in a very bad accident. Some idiot make an illegal left turn in front of me. Ill be ok, but my brand new 2016 Corvette is totaled. I didnt have it 30 days  Woody and Meta will be handling things for a couple of days while I rest. Im not seriously hurt, but the airbag exploded on my chest , and it feels like someone swung a like a sledge hammer as hard as they could, directly into the middle of my chest. Give me 2 days, and Ill be good as new. Vegas Damn Vegas I am sorry to hear this! I hope you recover quickly! Stay well rested. -pokeytex |
|
|
|
Low volume just proves that not many weak hands in this project. Picked up a few extra's on the dumps . Just means even more coins out of circulation  There is only the few people holding PIO that's why there is no weak hands. I will keep mine to see further development. Of course if I see 0.01 and over I will unleash PIO partially. that's great,holding PIO for long is a good choice. only 4k coin is listed for sell on yobit. a few mBTC invest can pump this coin up to 0.001 BTC. Nice to see some good investor who decided to hold and not sell like fools. LOL - why sell? Nothing has been released yet. The best is yet to come! |
|
|
|
|
@vegasguy - anyway you can make sure that the wallet links on the OP have the version number listed? It is confusing without it.
|
|
|
|
Ok guys let's make a briefing.
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
Missed that... but as I've mentioned numerous times, almost all miners are on Windows. Not releasing Windows binaries is basically shooting yourself in both feet at the same time and cutting off your hands. You may hate SP, but there is a reason he, Wolf, and Claymore release windows binaries first and foremost. There isn't a market for nix, despite what the vocal minority that tells you how horrible windows is and that nix is the master race, they're probably like .1% of the population. If you care about money, building windows binaries probably should be first and foremost on your plate. People aren't going to donate for nix versions they can't build, let alone use because they're on Windows. This completely puts aside the free market and that people wont donate (or buy) a miner that is earning less then other algos. @bensam1231 - you hit the nail on the head! I have multiple rigs and would have enjoyed mining M7 - however no windows binaries means, no mining. No mining means no donation for Pallas. I am sure I am not the only one that feels this way. I tried to compile with whatever means I could find online but at the end of the day it wouldn't work - i moved on. |
|
|
|
do i need to "setgenerate true" in the wallet to mine properly or is that just for CPU mining? The GPU miner seems to be working but I'm not sure if that setgenerate was neccessary. I have not yet received any coins but I think its because the GPU keeps cashing every couple of hours. Any help would be cool. I'm brand new to all of this.
Thanks in advance.
I am no expert but I am pretty sure that setgenerate=true means that you are mining with the CPU. As far as the crashing goes - maybe it is a power or update issue in the software? |
|
|
|
So I wanted to explain the 10% POS rate. Some of you may feel that the rate might be too low and detract investors. The 10% rate stabilizes the price. The next stage is to build a multipool to fund our next development stages. After the multipool, a 4 tier masternode will be added. These numbers are a rough draft and Im still tweaking them, so I welcome feedback.
500 fly collateral 5% of POS
1000 fly collateral 10% of POS
2000 fly collateral 15% of POS
5000 fly collateral 25% of POS
These numbers will change, as I need to sit down, and have it make more sense. In essence for those of you that dont know, for example when you setup a masternode of say 5000 fly, then youll receive 25% of the entire POS system and split that 25% with others that share that same masternode level. I know these numbers are off, and I need to sit down and calculate it to really make sense. But I just wanted to make an example to show you what our next step will be after the multipool.
Vegas
I sort of like the idea, but I only have 92FLY so kinds of sucks for me, to get any further now will be really hard or really expensive Hi Crunk. That is the whole reason for doing this. Lowering the POS and making the POS rate dependent on masternodes, causes not only people to buy, but also to hold to get the benefits of the masternodes (MUCH higher rewards). So prices will go higher, and the dumping will slow. So, my advice is there is still time. Slowly collect a bit of fly as you can. I would buy sooner , than later, because the POS is 35% right now but in a couple of weeks, it will drop to 10%. This is at block 90k. Griffith is not an expert on Masternodes, and hasnt done any work with masternodes. So he advised me to find someone else that is much more experienced with Masternodes. So to my knowledge nobody has created a multi-tier masternode system. Im announcing a 100 fly reward to someone that can find a dev that actually completes this.
Vegas @vegasguy - reach out to @infernoman or @wigitgetit they know masternodes! |
|
|
|
I just wait for other exchange like bittrex, c-cex or yobit
I'm hoping it will be listed soon.
Or you can just place your buy order on: https://alcurex.com/#PIO-BTC |
|
|
|
I just think that when we had problems way back with the implementation of the antidump, and it caused wallet issues, some people may still think this is the case, so I think it would be wise to do both. Continue development and start a twitter campaign about what our plans our regarding the multi-tier masternodes, AND the dash parallel chain.
Vegas
The only problem I see is history repeating itself again! Let's develop something first before boasting about what might be. We should have learnt this lesson by now. Develop, test, release. The masses will come when there is something to come for. Don't get me wrong. Everything is working great now but why should people buy Fly? For the promise of something maybe in the future? Nah - not interested. There are too many of those coins out there right now! Build something tangible and then we can all market it to the masses! Just my opinion. |
|
|
|
Guys we are just finishing the wallet. The superfly pos% changes, remains unchanged. But, we need to come up with an answer. A twitter campaign is badly needed to get the word out that fly is working perfect, that fly is 1 year old, and we have clear future plans. However, I need to make sure that superfly is always funded, because I will be giving out rewards each week, but I wont be getting back because there are no fees, and I dont want to bring fees back. I want to give to the users, not take. Please submit ideas. I will reward for the best idea.
Vegas
@vegasguy - before we start a Twitter campaign - why don't we lay low and complete something that is Twitter campaign worthy - like the masternode/dash idea? Then we don't need to worry right now about funding the Superfly wallet and you can concentrate on making something new for us all to talk about? |
|
|
|
Let me give you a shout to you, your a coward that losed hes balls underway, its funny you even think you were suitable for beeing a dev you runned twice now. I agree in crypto people need thick skin and if they are down they step up their game and prove people wrong. People like you are the scams and things why crypto doesnt get adopted. Please delete your account and never ever join any crypto related project cause your not suitable for it. You didnt even wanted help cause you wanted your last pump before you leave didnt you.
No you're wrong on all accounts man. I get that you're angry. I'm here stating that I have no conditions to go on. I'm not a coward and I never intended for it to go wrong and I did not make any out of it. At first on what accounts i only own one (yes means you dissapointed more then one person, and if more people say the same isnt it getting obvious then) Its not about what you made out of it that makes you a dev isnt it! Are you retarded ? You came with rich words and didnt make any of them true, you accepted even money for it, in my eyes your so much more then just a coward, but i keep it some sort of civil. A real dev would find hes balls and continu. Reputation can also be build, But let me guess you will just start a new coin and scam more people. I am only sticking with WELL KNOW devs and/or larger public projects from now on. My suggestion is everyone be careful in the future before giving your money (hard earned) to anyone boasting about a product without a working model to show. I also suggest contributing a small amount in the beginning and/or stay away from no name ICO's altogether. And if anyone has learned anything in the last week - the last pump and dump was purely that. Notice the messages that came out and the way the coin was dumped on the way up again. I am sure regular traders were part of it but think of how scammy it looks and now we still have nothing to show for all of the messages other than - someone's feelings are hurt - and now "I am leaving again"! Follow the pattern. P.S. There are real devs out there doing real work - check out Vcash (John-Connor), Pio Shares (BanzaiBTC), Spreadcoin (GeorgeM), Waves(Sasha Ivanov) to name a few. These folks are there through thick and thin and do not promise and run away. They don't even promise. They have a road map and constantly chip away at it. Check them out. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
- 
