Loan Amount: .04 BTC
Reason for Taking out a Loan: trading
Amount to be repaid: .047
Repayment Date: on or before 1/29/2019
Type of Collateral: None
Thank you
Denied, among other, your email address was changed recently so I suggest you before ask loan, sign message with old staked address to prove account ownership. Smart call, account default here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5087785.msg48794998#msg48794998 archived http://archive.is/2eHqr and it changed hands, judging that "collateral sold". Actually, it is strange to see that account was sold for 0.05 BTC and first message after this is loan request for lower amount. |
|
|
|
it's just unfair to accuse us
What is unfair? Your compliance director Shanique Adams said she is not part of this project. You, as creator of this project didn't know that, someone had to point it to you. How serious this project can be if communication between team members doesn't exist and you don't know who works for you? I need to photoshop Ben, because he gave me a long photo.
the website will give an odd photo. It needs to be square. + He gave me the photo. i just make it square.
"We have photoshopped senior-vice-president-chief-financial-officer's picture to fit in square"------------------------------ Where is your crypto bank registered? What is name of the company? |
|
|
|
~
Calm down ICOEthics, Help-Coin has their own thread. I can't stay cool anymore.
Stay cool and let OP post proofs if there is any. Some facts, most of projects which were exposed with fake team run away and I won't take any chance to guess whether project is legit or not. If someone wants to stay anonymous that is just fine, but the moment they give their anonymity name and picture they lose that anonymity and they become liars and (potential)scammers.
What exactly are we discussing about here, some newbie account published website with some random pictures and random names, plagiarized information about project and ask money and OP thinks they are legit. Maybe OP can be specific in next post, if there will be any? |
|
|
|
Leave them neutral feedback, report them to moderator and please read this post and join discussion. I have neg-trusted some egregious spammers that e.g. distribute malware. This is against the rules and mods will likely nuke them but in the few minutes or hours until that's done it's worth putting the red tag on.
They should be always tagged, I remember one case where moderators didn't ban accounts even evidence was provided in many ways https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg28915532#msg28915532. But yes, in 99% cases users will be banned and this is to warn others before moderators do their job. |
|
|
|
Bitcointalk management should initiate legal action against these fraudsters.
Why don't you start legal action? |
|
|
|
They are either alt accounts or not alt accounts. I don't see what this has to do with topic.
You are posting here but screenshot captured by dr.jeef. Who is that guy? Nice catch. dr.jeff has this email in profile:  jeefpeterson is similar to Griff Peterson. Also shitposter: go to moon  very good OP proofs please. |
|
|
|
When I add the evidence soon, I will laugh with my ass. This is probably laughing part: Busted, posting in the same thread, guilty as charged. I bet 10$ next proof will be "They both posted in this thread, they both quoted the same post and both did it at the same time"
I am still waiting for evidence @sanju_redy. Stay on topic please. |
|
|
|
As far as we can see, your teammates don't have a picture. They also don't have a real profile. Your project is a scam? Do you want to open a topic about this project?
You know meaning of word anonymous, right? anonymous adjective
uk /əˈnɒn.ɪ.məs/ us /əˈnɑː.nə.məs/
C2 made or done by someone whose name is not known or not made public source: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/anonymousToday you have learned 2 new words, anonymous and fraudster. Be proud of yourself. Btw, what TMAN's avatar has to do with this thread? I thought you are collecting evidence for some random ICO with fake team, as you mentioned somewhere. So, can you post proofs? |
|
|
|
I'm still waiting for you to question yourself and to review the projects you've done injustice.
Which one? |
|
|
|
Have you tried to talk to one of the project owners who you claim to be scam? Of course not, your position is enough to say scam, do you think so?
So, you have asked question, answered your own question and then asked another question which you have already answered somewhere in thread. You must be right then. |
|
|
|
People who do not tolerate even the slightest criticism are organized fraudsters.
Nop, still nothing. fraudster noun [ C ]
uk /ˈfrɔːd.stər/ us /ˈfrɑːd.stɚ/ UK
someone who gets money by deceiving people: Source: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/fraudster"They are fraudsters"Is a statement. Not critic. Whose sockpuppet are you? Seems you can't read, go, read, answer post you quoted. |
|
|
|
~
You should definitely stand against the crooks. But you cannot do this by attacking people and executing people without judging. I'm definitely not against you. What now? Are you against them or with them? |
|
|
|
Ok, I have to ask this in 2 threads. Is S_Therapist your brother's new account? That would actually explain everything. This was his last post( September 19.):  Also, for the record, account kawser05 is connected IIRC in another investigation thread. |
|
|
|
I still think that's not a good reason to keep the money. As far as I can see there was no obligation for either party to be truthful about their identity and I doubt the contractor could show a face matching their avatar either  Yeah, I know  User should return whole amount if they didn't start working on thread, or return partial amount and keep the rest of money if they start working on thread but stopped because of fake things. My vote goes to "partially return, keep the rest". Question: In case of partial return, who will decide how much is partial? And how? |
|
|
|
Also I feel that all of the "donate to charity" options are unethical simply on principle: either the user is entitled to keep the money, or he is not. If he is not entitled to keep the money, he is not entitled to donate it, either. Donating the money serves no purpose except to make stealing from a scammer seem less unconscionable than it is.
That is correct. User should either keep the money or return it. Perhaps user should make a video call with fake team before returning money to wrong person. If team fail to show their published face(s) during video call, user is not obligated to return money to new random person  |
|
|
|
its look to me they are also ponzi scammer.
This is all you need:  Promising high unrealistic returns, risk free, passive income, 3 level referral program and all other ponzi craps. What the...? You..you...! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
