Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 07:37:36 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 ... 367 »
1641  Economy / Reputation / Re: Abuser gave me a negative feedback. on: September 09, 2019, 10:43:51 PM
Say "thanks marlboroza" @T, seems you don't have it any more. Now do correct thing.

Go fuck yourself clown.
Unlike you, I usually don't masturbate.

He removed it because the clown car organized to have me excluded from DT1 again, thus dropping his own negative rating off of DT, not because of you.
No one organized anything, it is all in your head. Maybe OP removed it because someone suggested him to remove it? But hey, whatever you think in that head of yours!

Interesting you don't seem to care if the OP deserves his rating any more... almost as if... you are here to focus on targeting me personally.
World is not spinning around you mr. troll  Wink
1642  Economy / Reputation / Re: TECSHARE is a scammer on: September 09, 2019, 03:49:34 PM
I agree with nutildah and DireWolfM14 and I want to add that negative is not appropriate. He is not scammer, he is trusted trader but his moral is questionable.
1643  Economy / Reputation / Re: DT everyone? - @TECSHARE? on: September 09, 2019, 03:36:56 PM
@TECSHARE why do you have banned and possible hacked account in your trust list? This one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=79546 - http://loyce.club/trust/2019-09-07_Sat_06.07h/79546.html

@TECHARE why do you have hacked account in your trust list? This one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18021 - http://loyce.club/trust/2019-09-07_Sat_06.07h/18021.html

@TECHARE why do you have account inactive since 2015. in your trust list? This one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=104644 - http://loyce.club/trust/2019-09-07_Sat_06.07h/104644.html

@TECHARE why do you have account inactive since 2017., I mean since 2014. in your trust list? This one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92735;sa=showPosts http://loyce.club/trust/2019-09-07_Sat_06.07h/92735.html

ETC.

DT should hold some responsibility. It worries me to see bunch of scammers and hacked accounts getting into DT because someone has very poor judgement and doesn't care who they include to their trust network - it already happened, and it will happen again.
1644  Other / Meta / Re: [NSFW] - phisical violence in DT - "not safe for work" content on: September 09, 2019, 02:08:53 PM
Sorry Techy, I have no idea what you are talking about ? Why do you think, when I opened thread, that I knew it was you who added BitcoinSupremo to your trust network ?

I would like to point out as well, no one bothered contacting me directly with their concerns, I just happened to stumble upon this thread. One would think if the target really was BitcoinSupremo that some one would try messaging me with their concerns, but nope, not one message.
Why would anyone contact you for anything? Look what you have answered me last time I contacted you in very polite way to add some crucial information to thread:

I have sent PM to TECSHARE to unlock thread so I can add something:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg49486640#msg49486640
Quote
If you have something to add PM me to unlock the thread.

Can you unlock the thread, I have something to add regarding this post:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg52085045#msg52085045

Thanks.
When he reopens thread I will post some important data about this matter.

I will not be unlocking the thread.

Anyway, I am glad that you came here to give your point of view about topic and poll.

To spice it little with P&S, completely off topic:
Quote
Punishing people for their speech, no matter how abhorrent you find it, is ALWAYS the tool of totalitarians. I am a free speech absolutist. This user was excluded not for making a threat, not for even advocating violence, but for having an objectionable opinion in public. I don't have to agree with his ideas to object to him being punished for having a mind of his own. This is a problem that is not just on this forum but growing across the internet. It will result in everyone losing their freedoms, and I object to it on principle.
History has shown that this kind of "free speech" and "opinions" leads to people getting beaten, killed and on larger scale it leads to wars. Not to mention speech of hate is forbidden in certain countries and you could get fine or jail penalty because of it (guess why...).
Free speech is one thing but speech of hate is completely different thing, maybe it is time for English lesson?
1645  Other / Meta / Re: @theymos.Fake conversations becoming a serious issue. on: September 08, 2019, 09:59:27 PM
Just nuke the thread and be done with it.

If everything was that easy... I would love to get it trashed but you need a proof that those accounts are really connected to the service otherwise you are just shooting in the dark.

If they are not reporting spam they are very likely using bumping service. It doesn't need to be trashed, just locked for few days. If "they do it again", it can always be locked for more days and this would make payed bump services pointless.

It can be done like this:

1) report thread which you suspect it is being bumped by "fake" accounts
2) don't report spam accounts
3) let moderator do the rest of the job

If they continue doing so - trash it. Less work for everyone.
1646  Other / Meta / Re: [NSFW] - phisical violence in DT - "not safe for work" content on: September 08, 2019, 06:21:04 PM
His name starts with T and ends with ECSHARE  Roll Eyes
T Roll Eyes?

Yeah but he's never ever wrong and I'm sure he'll be around shortly to tell us that Smiley

BTW the person quoted in the OP doesn't belong in a sane person's trust list for many many reasons even if you think that homophobic comments wouldn't affect their judgement. Looks like some kind of affirmative action on TECSHARE's part to support shit-stirring scammers.
Maybe T will place something like this on their trust page:



Something like...

"openly supports beating the hell out of people for free who don't share their sexual orientation"

Lets see how will T do his DT thingy this time.
1647  Economy / Reputation / Re: Abuser gave me a negative feedback. on: September 08, 2019, 05:36:58 PM
Lets wait for ABitNut to respond. These other clowns are just here to stalk me. Let me throw some peanuts at them until they feel dumb and go away. They want to sabotage this resolution just to try to frustrate me. Don't give them any ammo by replying. You made the first step towards being reasonable. You and I both hold the moral high ground. All these idiots can do is piss up into the air and try not to get wet.

The kind of PMs he sent to me. Pure egoism.
This is disturbing. I hope this message is not truth because it looks like author think there is some kind of conspiracy going on in this thread.

Sending you PM (to account StonerStanley).

"StonerStanley   2019-09-08      He tried to make me thinking that it is my fault if he add a liar into the "trust" feedback list. Very dishonest person, don't deal with him, maybe a scammer. "
Say "thanks marlboroza" @T, seems you don't have it any more. Now do correct thing.
1648  Other / Meta / Re: @theymos.Fake conversations becoming a serious issue. on: September 08, 2019, 04:39:44 PM
The situation with  JollyGood is a bit weird, he is accusing them of being a scam project but in a way that he is provoking again hundred useless bumps. He maybe trying to prevent some newbies from falling in the scam trap but still, it can be aslo a new technique for advanced bumping service, having someone to argue with. This is just a hypothesis...
I talked privately with JollyGood last year and I can tell you that I am pretty sure that he is not doing that, although his methods are strange. 

Btw, these fuckers are sending army of their shills when someone ask them legit questions, I remember one thread (I will have to find it, can't really remember which one it was), I asked them few questions and bunch of accounts start spamming thread, I was reporting them in real time to moderator (they posted some crap and I instantly reported them) and eventually I gave up (maybe I reported whole thread afterwards, can't remember, it was a year ago). It's just like a defensive mechanism, call them scam and they will "hide" your post, if you know what I mean...
1649  Economy / Reputation / Re: Abuser gave me a negative feedback. on: September 08, 2019, 11:45:53 AM
I know but it is not an active member who gave me the feedback, he says he's no more active, he sent a message yesterday but before that he was offline since few months ago.
In that case, you will need to convince TECSHARE not to include inactive accounts to his trust list.

I notice you judged me "abusive" without any proof.  Exercising my authority to mark you is something people expect me to do.  They gave me the power.

Why is it OK for you to judge me but not OK for others to judge you?  Sad
This is very good point.
1650  Economy / Reputation / Re: Abuser gave me a negative feedback. on: September 08, 2019, 11:27:06 AM
So i think that you think that i may be the person who made the thread about VOD (in your quote) ? so you think that i may be a scammer and i was right about it.
I don't think that!

Actually, I think Vod tagged you for something different and you saw Vod's name in that thread and emotionally reacted - I believe I have right for my opinion, which can be very wrong. People don't rant against certain forum members without any reason. That is only reason to ask nick of your account - not sure why you don't want to share it but you have your own reasons I guess.

2: I written in the thread saying that Vod is an abuser because it was true in some cases and i told it with my not-first account (but main account) on a thread where i saw that someone was complaining about him. Like i told you i just made a new account to change the name (somtimes your subscribe on a forum and you don't think to use it on a long-therm, and sometimes you changes so you make a new account
with a "better" name and this is what i did... you are really paranoid in this case, i hate that, i lost a fucking account because of people like you who judge each others without any proof)
Teschare is handling your case, as I can see. If I was him, it would have been handled yesterday  Wink
1651  Other / Meta / Re: [NSFW] - phisical violence in DT - "not safe for work" content on: September 08, 2019, 11:18:56 AM
Who wrote this?
Lets just keep it this way for now.
1652  Economy / Reputation / Re: I didn't cheat anyone! on: September 08, 2019, 10:56:44 AM
@YOSHIE I wondered why you repeated Gahs - Goms connection, but then I figured that you didn't:

3. Gahs
4. Dinki

The same telegram is used by account Gohs:
Bitcointalk username: Gohs
Bitcointalk profile link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=813708;sa=account
Telegram username: @mestiip
Gohs and Gahs are different usernames  Roll Eyes and there is possibility that many accounts have been resold. Please read this thread and this comment, it seems there are more accounts.

Goms, Gohs, Gahs, Das, Daisy14, Dank14, Dinki, Dahhi...  Grin

And also, account Dank14 woke up after long gap http://archive.is/W5sCZ, just like other accounts mentioned in this thread.
1653  Economy / Reputation / Re: Abuser gave me a negative feedback. on: September 08, 2019, 10:28:29 AM
I like the sarcastic projection as if I am the one attempting to arrogantly assert my authority over you

Whatever you say...

Also at this point your involvement is unrequested
What is your reason for involving yourself other than your own personal entertainment?
No one owes you any answers. No one asked you to be here. You aren't resolving anything, more so you are purposely attempting to sabotage a resolution to satiate your own desires to lord over others with your insignificant amount of authority.
You just choose to impose yourself where no one asked you to be so you can give your pathetic life the feeling of having a minuscule amount of control.
It is none of your fucking business. The end.


If you are gonna make a dig, at least be creative enough to have an original one, don't just mirror what I say as if it was a clever retort.
I don't have clue what are you talking about, what digging and mirroring? What is relevant for this tag is this removed post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182530.msg52384559#msg52384559, every reasonable person would wonder why someone is avoiding to address it.

What is more concerning is that post was posted in this thread where loan and ponzi wannabe scammer asked for -ve removal.
1654  Economy / Reputation / Re: I didn't cheat anyone! on: September 08, 2019, 09:01:39 AM
1Dk35CC2bktMUJoUwWGKmR35ykVLyBCJ92

http://web.archive.org/web/20160420095445/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=808046
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg16403000#msg16403000

I actually didn't cheat anyone

Name: Goms
Rank: Full member
Bitcoin Address: 1Dk35CC2bktMUJoUwWGKmR35ykVLyBCJ92
Profile UID: 808046

Hope to get in Grin

Name: Das
Rank: Member
Bitcoin Address: 1Dk35CC2bktMUJoUwWGKmR35ykVLyBCJ92
Profile UID: 812251

Would love to be a part of the team!

4.   Users with multiple accounts will also be unlisted.

Both accounts have been activated today, after 2 years gap:

Account Goms http://archive.is/iMCic
Account Das: http://archive.is/zLVxE

Account Das posted this:

Username: Das
Bitcoin talk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=812251;sa=account

Telegram chat: @mestiip

The same telegram is used by account Gohs:
Bitcointalk username: Gohs
Bitcointalk profile link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=813708;sa=account
Telegram username: @mestiip

Also, account is activated today, after 3 years of inactivity https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=813708;sa=showPosts.

Das was already connected but account Gohs seems new.

Gohs, Goms...anyway:
Looks like ban evasion... perhaps marlboroza can do the honors.

Can you do it?

---------------------------------------------------------------

~
Perhaps, if you tell us why you had to move to new account in first place, someone could help you to resolve old issues, Stanley? You are revealing only one side of the story, not cool.
1655  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: SCAM upozorenja Zbirni topic on: September 07, 2019, 10:43:53 PM
Ako želiš dodati u temu https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5177291.0

Ponzi zamaskiran u igru. Kao nešto kupujete, nadograđujete i čini se da se nešto događa a ustvari novci idu sa jedne na drugu osobu, još k tome ima 3-level referral program sa dosta visokim postotkom da se što više promovira naivcima.
1656  Economy / Reputation / Re: Abuser gave me a negative feedback. on: September 07, 2019, 10:08:06 PM
Why don't you counter negative feedback then? Or exclude user from your trust list again?

Because. Any more questions grand inquisitor?
No, your Honer. Just being curious, that's all.

Carry on with this case.
1657  Local / Hrvatski (Croatian) / Re: Zbirni topic za davanje merita za kvalitetne postove on: September 07, 2019, 08:01:50 PM
Ja se nadam da će nakon ove statistike admini poovno razmisliti da nam dodijele moderatora Smiley
Inače, slažem se, šteta što nema slovenaca, gdje su nestali!?  Grin Grin

Zar CRO deo foruma nema moderatora? Kazes "ponovo", sta se desilo sa prethodnim?
Lauda je bio moderator, čini mi se da je maknut nakon ovoga https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0. Tražili jesmo ali su nas ignorirali, sad global modovi ureduju.

Sijajno, cestitke. Steta sto nije za 8. mjesec jer bi se vjerovatno i ja pojavio na listi?
Poslao sam jih 45 prosli mjesec. Edit, sad vidim da nisam na listi, a poslao sam 45 merita. Kako to?
Tema je napravljena za detekciju merit sourca, ako se ne varam svi korisnici na listi su merit source.
1658  Other / Meta / [NSFW] - phisical violence in DT - "not safe for work" content on: September 07, 2019, 07:32:44 PM
Quote
I just came here because of the title, violent and homosexual do not belong to the same sentence or the same person, gays are weak like pussies and anyone can beat the hell out of them. I would do this for free that is how much I hate homosexuals.

Little poll for now, that's pretty much it.
1659  Economy / Reputation / Re: Abuser gave me a negative feedback. on: September 07, 2019, 07:09:22 PM
I haven't ignored anything. It is none of your fucking business. The end.
So why don't you counter it?

I did.
Negative feedback, I mean. It should be normal to counter negative feedback if you think it has been wrongly placed and/or to exclude user from your trust list if you think they left wrong feedback. Why don't you counter negative feedback then? Or exclude user from your trust list again?
1660  Economy / Reputation / Re: Abuser gave me a negative feedback. on: September 07, 2019, 06:36:05 PM
I haven't ignored anything. It is none of your fucking business. The end.
So why don't you counter it?
Pages: « 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 ... 367 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!