No. This concerns me directly and in a public way.
Ok, so it is public then and we should wait for OP to say what was the reason to use new account, reading removed post it looks like they are evading something. I am not sure why you've ignored this fact. |
|
|
|
The difference is I was requested to be involved and am inherently involved. You just choose to impose yourself where no one asked you to be so you can give your pathetic life the feeling of having a minuscule amount of control.
Do it privately then. |
|
|
|
This rating has no substantiation or basis in anything other than the fact that he has more than one account and you SUSPECT based on nothing else he COULD MAYBE have done something worthy of tagging.
It doesn't look so: Vod is an abuser and he's a moderators friend, i already got the experience from them Wink so don't waste your time, like me: make a new account and be careful when you talk because this forum is full of corrupted/idiots mods.
ps: yes this is not my main acc. I will do it wherever the fuck I please
Me too. What was the reason to leave it and use new account? |
|
|
|
You claimed he could be evading a ban.
Except cherry picking (I also said "tagged"), as I said, it is my observation, we are talking about trust feedback so it is not moderation issue. Also considering I was directly requested to respond, and the fact that ABitNut is on DT via my inclusion, I am directly involved here. What is your reason for involving yourself other than your own personal entertainment?
Do it privately then.
because i had another account from 2012 which i left to make this one with another name
Which account? What was the reason to leave it and use new account?
Even if i take one hour to find it in my mails it won't change anything at the situation Why not? It could. What was the reason to leave it and use new account? |
|
|
|
because i had another account from 2012 which i left to make this one with another name
Which account? What was the reason to leave it and use new account?
Someone having an alt account is not a valid reason for negative feedback
Irrelevant. This s not the intended use of the trust system. I posted my observation, but why are you repeating what I have said? This is a, matter for moderator if anyone.
Trust is not moderated so it is not for moderator. Also at this point your involvement is unrequested and counterproductive.
So is your involvment in DT. Go spam somewhere else. |
|
|
|
I checked reference link and it points to missing post, however, someone archived it http://web.archive.org/web/20150517200326/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=677224.20 (post #29), StonerStanly posted: Vod is an abuser and he's a moderators friend, i already got the experience from them Wink so don't waste your time, like me: make a new account and be careful when you talk because this forum is full of corrupted/idiots mods.
ps: yes this is not my main acc. Someone having an alt account is not a valid reason for negative feedback, however, I am really surprised that OP said it is not alt account while they clearly said it is. Question is, which main account has been tagged (hm...banned?) and for what reason? |
|
|
|
Tko može razumjeti dobro a tko ne, ja mu ne mogu pomoći.
 odlučio sam podići sve na jednu drugu razinu
Zato sam i rekao da nemam vremena ni volje za raspravu
OK ne da mi se više raspravljati o Regulusu i meritima
Treba stvoriti javni pritisak na forumu i argumentima privući na svoju stranu
Možda postoje ljudi čiji se život sastoji od čitanja postova na ovom forumu cijeli dan i odgovaranja na njih, analiziranja foruma, pisanja argumenata i kontraargumenata u postovima dugim pola kilometra i sl. i samo od toga žive ali to nije slučaj kod mene.
Meni više ništa u ovoj temi nije jasno. OP prvo hoće raspravljati o permabanu i regulusu, raditi javni pritisak i davati argumente, onda neće... Slično je napravljeno u temi u meti: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5178987.msg52350197#msg52350197 al dobro. Doduše, mislim da je 1248 znakova sasvim dovoljno i znakova i vremena za napisati nešto "korisno" za temu.
Izlazim iz ove teme. |
|
|
|
I would suggest everyone to put OP on ignore, talking to OP might get your posts removed as well because you will very likely break forum rules(not intentionally), like me in this thread:  A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. True, but don't tell me you expect anything more from TOAA. It's nonstop keyboard diarrhea, just like the flow from cryptohunter. Not surprising.
She is back on ignore, I don't think I will miss anything valuable from TOAA's posts. This was very bad attempt to change subject from " plagiarist and thief in DT" to whatever she wrote there. Don't feed troll. |
|
|
|
A moje pitanje je gde naći i pročitati pravila za unban?
Sad sam vidio post. Ne postoje takva pravila, svaki slučaj se gleda odvojeno. Global mod reče: I'm happy to not issue another sig ban at all and just leave accounts banned forever if you think that would be more fair. Several factors are involved with issuing them but there's no set criteria and every mod may have different reasoning. I asked theymos for the reports against you and it seems like it was just that copy and paste that got you banned. I unbanned the account. Možemo nekakav zaključak izvući iz ovoga. Mislim da je Regulus priča malo dublja,
i vezana je za onoga koji ga je prijavio,
Možda mu je netko kopao po postovima zato što je merit source pa ga prijavio a možda je netko prijavljivao spam i naletio na njegov post. Prije će biti da je ovo drugo, pogledaj screenshot, sve upućuje na to. PS
A vidi sad ovo i @marlboroza je na 'listi'
Jedan od većih trolova na forumu. Najbolje ju je staviti na ignore, nećete ništa propustiti. What's your point?~
U pravu si  Nego, bilo bi zanimljivo da admin pita neka pitanja i Danijel mu odgovori "ne da mi se više raspravljati..." 
Btw, poslao sam sinoć poruku u upravu u vezi regulusa i permabana, možda dobijem odgovor, možda ne... |
|
|
|
(gospodin is Russian for Mister [Google Translate] what does this mean? I have lived in Russia before. is this a problem? Nothing, but OP tried to point this: Vispilio is Latin for NIGHT THIEF
gospodin is Russian for Mister
If you are posting in Turkish local, then you are not allowed to use nicknames in different languages because someone might accuse you of being alt accounts  |
|
|
|
I have a question for you: why did you add me to your distrust list? What did I do to make you a distrust? Who hated me for you?
please answer honestly
Probably because suchmoon doesn't know who you are and doesn't find your trust feedback relevant or does not want to see your sent trust feedback, which are all positive without reference links btw. As for the flag, it should be created only if you suspect that person might steal your funds or you will lose funds when dealing with flagged account. Moron or not, making very bad connections based on "they distrusted me on the same week so they could be alt accounts" or whatever Timelord2067 wanted to say in that thread is not good reason to flag him so I won't support it. |
|
|
|
No, this is me ranting about someone adding plagiarist and content thief to default trust. Correct me if I am wrong, but this is second time this user ended up in DT and again person who caught goraset stealing their work and trying to pass it as their own for monetary gain ended up with negative trust https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2050090.0. This may or may not be true and this could be a valid and correct objection. If you only have spent time to read thread instead writing wall of text which I stopped reading exactly here you would have seen what I am talking about. |
|
|
|
Why is my nick in this thread?
Why is my alt's nick in this thread? Uups, wrong account. |
|
|
|
No, this is me ranting about someone adding plagiarist and content thief to default trust. Correct me if I am wrong, but this is second time this user ended up in DT and again person who caught goraset stealing their work and trying to pass it as their own for monetary gain ended up with negative trust https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2050090.0. |
|
|
|
|
Why is my nick in this thread?
|
|
|
|
These are just suggestions, not laws  Ok, what about this: 1. If there is a clear interest from a local or global community to forgive a permaban for some user (voting for example, if more than 20 members support the removal of permaban
Who will decide if alt accounts are vouching for banned alt account? 20 accounts might be 5 individuals. Or 1. Or 20. Or vouching for any other reason/gain? You will need only 1 account with very good argument. 2. If at least 6 months have passed since permaban
What was the reason for plagiarism? Was it intentional? 3. Just in case of plagiarism
How many cases? 1? 2? More? |
|
|
|
za ostalo si već ionako zaključio da je nebitno.
Onda bi u svrhu diskusije za svako "nebitno" trebao dati kontra-argument, zar ne? Recimo, zašto smatraš da je regulus bio promoviran u merit sourca jer je cijenjen, po čemu admin zna da je cijenjen? Jel misliš da admin smatra da je cijenjen zbog ovog https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2828982.0, zbog čega je vjerovatno i postao merit source? OK ne da mi se više raspravljati o Regulusu i meritima
Ja samo kažem kako izgleda, vjeruj mi, nisam jedini... a zašto je Regulus ljudina znaju oni koji su ga imali čast osobno upoznati.
Zamisli si da sam ja admin i da želiš nekog odbanati zato jer je ljudina. Ja nemam pojma tko je regulus. Zašto je regulus ljudina? S jedne strane imamo 2 nađena c/p posta za signature kampanju. S druge strane imamo ljudinu koju bi trebalo odbanati jer je napisao nekoliko dobrih postova. Pojasni "adminu". |
|
|
|
1. If there is a clear interest from a local or global community to forgive a permaban for some user (voting for example, if more than 20 members support the removal of permaban
Who will decide if alt accounts are vouching for banned alt account? 20 accounts might be 5 individuals. Or 1. Or 20. Or vouching for any other reason/gain? You will need only 1 account with very good argument. 2. If at least 6 months have passed since permaban
What was the reason for plagiarism? Was it intentional? 3. Just in case of plagiarism
How many cases? 1? 2? More? 4. If there were no other bans before
Irrelevant, you can be spammer and never banned/posts removed. I won't discuss this any further. 5. If the user apologized and admitted his mistake
Everyone will apologize and admit - well, what is there to admit if they have been caught? Also irrelevant. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
