“No matter how much we ask after the truth, self-awareness is often unpleasant. We do not feel kindly toward the Truthsayer.”
― Frank Herbert, quote from God Emperor of Dune
Good quote. Perhaps now you could: Sure does look like you knew I had BitcoinSupremo on my list months ago, but here you are swearing up and down to the entire community you didn't know.
Where did I say that I didn't know? Quote me correct post or you are lying.
May I remind you that you made some statements in topic of this thread and in thread linked in topic of this thread, you got caught lying several times in past few days and you are making bigger fool of yourself at the moment, correct and best thing you can do right now is to do what you said you would have done and also to lock this topic. |
|
|
|
To my surprise red paint is still here
I have default trust settings and there is no red paint on your account. now is even much easier to get it because there are hundreds of DT members, which trust rating counts as a valid one and give us nice red -1 in the account trust summary.
Point those accounts in reputation or in "default-trust" thread in meta and if it is wrongly placed it should be resolved. |
|
|
|
You too don't seem to have any great reasons to exclude someone from your trust list. Remember : rules for thee but not for me
That quotation is probably provably wrong, but, if you want to use T's words, this quote is much better: Because.
Is there a chance we could reduce all these inter-member bitching threads. I actually gave Tecshare some merits for a few "real world" posts in some other threads. I thought that his comments were constructive and useful, and hopefully he will switch to such posts as Bitcoin moves higher in value. All these bitching threads must be putting off some potential new members of Bitcoin Talk, and that can't be good for Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is maturing into a really useful wealth preservation asset, hopefully Bitcoin Talk can mature with it.
I agree, TECSHARE should probably do what he said: To be perfectly frank, if some one had simply politely notified me of this issue, I probably would have just removed him.
~
Nice story, too bad it is not true. he will just avoid answered questions once confronted and move on to the next imaginary allegation.
Interesting theory If you don't mind, address this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183844.msg52433998#msg52433998. |
|
|
|
Maybe OP should lock thread? Doesn't look like he will be active here?
Oh now look what you did... now he will NEVER lock the thread. He didn't say that, he asked a question, look: Why should I lock the thread when you are all still busy showing everyone how thirsty to "get me" in any way you can manage?
Although I am not familiar with these kind of conclusion-based questions  |
|
|
|
Why should I lock the thread when you are all still busy showing everyone how thirsty to "get me" in any way you can manage?
Have you found correct quotation yet? |
|
|
|
I on nije previše aktivan u posljednje vrijeme tako da vjerovatno je ovo što Trofo kaže. Ko prvi vidi prijavu reaguje i rješava je.
Gledajući Cyrusovu aktivnost, zadnji post je napisao 9 SEP, prije toga je imao dva posta samo u augustu mjesecu.
Nije mi jasno čemu služe neaktivni moderatori... neophodna je reforma moderatora... ali možda je sve super i ja ne znam ništa... i ne treba ništa pitati i tražiti Cyrus je administrator, postove brišu i teme miču koliko sam shvatio global moderatori (mprep, hilariousandco i rickbig, čini mi se da je ovo on pod drugim nickom) Što se tiče pravila, najbitnije je ne pisati, kako se kaže, "back to back" ili "post za postom". E sad, ovisi koji mod naleti, recimo ako naleti mprep on će spojiti postove u jedan veći, ako naleti neki drugi mod najvjerovatnije će jednostavno izbrisati post. I referral linkovi također, to će biti obrisano u 99% slučajeva. Sad, off topic postova kod nas ima poprilično, al ajde, otom-potom. U svakom slučaju, ovaj naš dio je izgledao katastrofalno nakon što je lauda otišao, cijela sekcija je bila ispunjena altcoin temama pa smo nešto probali napraviti https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3212995.0 i djelomično smo uspjeli međutim nismo dobili moda. (omg, sad vidim da sam istrolao hilariousa negdje pred kraj teme  ) U svakom slučaju vrijedi opet pokušati. |
|
|
|
Not really a question, but the question mark is there so that I could later weasel out with some bullshit like this: I presented a question, not a statement.
Learning from the best. Don't forget: Yes, of course rules only apply to those you oppose
Maybe OP should lock thread? Doesn't look like he will be active here? |
|
|
|
Da li je ovo još jedno od tvojih trik pitanja?
Kao na primjer? Čisto informativno, ako dođe opet do traženja moderatora da znamo što ćemo reći, premda bih ja iskreno odustao od traženja bilo čega ovdje. |
|
|
|
Ako 'Herbew section' može da ima local moderatora, ne znam zašto ne bi mogli mi
Imali smo - maknut je, pitali smo - dobili smo odj. 
Zapravo me zanima razlog zbog kojeg tražimo moderatora, da li je zato što su neki postovi maknuti ili zato što neki postovi nisu maknuti? |
|
|
|
1) What are the potential attack vectors they could use to take advantage of their position?
Phishing. Elaborate.
No. I won't give them ideas and solutions. I will just add something: I think I'm mostly concerned about #6. It does appear the DT is mellowing and becoming more tolerant to behaviors that would have been unacceptable in the past. Or maybe it's just me and my nostalgia for "good old times".
I remember one situation when someone was selling coins and someone else suggested them to use exchange. User was tagged because of that and person who tagged them was excluded from DT because they didn't want to remove negative. Hm..can't remember who was it. Yeah, I also miss old times. This situation would have never happened in old days, no one sane would have knowingly included scammer in trust list. And, today, we have discussions like " why do you think he is scammer if he stole someone's work? Whats your point? I trust him, go fuck yourself"... |
|
|
|
Careful now. If you apply logic in a TECSHARE-related topic you will be assigned to the clown car and will have to wear makeup and a wig for the rest of your life.
Forget about logic, jump into clown car wagon, have fun with clowns! I have special red nose designed for new clown car members!
REEEEE: You knew I had him on my trust list.
Changing subject quoted for record. Sure does look like you knew I had BitcoinSupremo on my list months ago, but here you are swearing up and down to the entire community you didn't know.
Where did I say that I didn't knew? Quote me correct post or you are lying. As far as I remember, there was question mark at the end of each sentence so it has to be a question - your words, not my. REEE: What is this - > ?
REEE: I am just making sure you understand the meaning of a question mark considering it was included in your quote of mine. I presented a question, not a statement. Do you propose the fact that I posed this question was mistaken?
REEE: I asked a question. You made interpretations, now expect me to take responsibility for them. Uh no.
Now, as we resolved this misunderstanding by simply using your own words, I am politely asking you to address this: Sure does look like you knew I had BitcoinSupremo on my list months ago, but here you are swearing up and down to the entire community you didn't know.
Where did I say that I didn't knew? Quote me correct post or you are lying.
REEE: Like any other user, he is free to leave negative ratings at will. He has little to no power in this system. If he does start abusing any authority he has let me know and I will handle it one way or another.
So you will just go "lalalalala"? I have already told you that is publicly available information, so when you say "let me know", I did.To be perfectly frank, if some one had simply politely notified me of this issue, I probably would have just removed him. Source: TECSHAREAw look at you putting on your little bow tie pretending to be all diplomatic all of a sudden. I can read just fine. You on the other hand don't know the definition of the word "ignore". Apparently you don't know the definition of the word "violent" either. As far as the other links, what is your point, that I responded within 10 hours of being on the default trust and removed years old additions to my list that should not have been there? THE SHAME! REEE over and out. |
|
|
|
You got it all wrong. Getting your own personal REEEE thread is a badge of honor bestowed upon you by His Techcellency.
Yep, I'm jealous.
Techbadge? Anyway, I am particularly interested in this part: Sure does look like you knew I had BitcoinSupremo on my list months ago, but here you are swearing up and down to the entire community you didn't know.
I am still waiting for correct quotation from locked poll, seems TECSHARE is making things up. |
|
|
|
Since marlboroza is unable to have an open discussion and allow me to reply after trying then failing miserably to drag me through the mud, and has to resort to locking his topic to try to make a point because he knows I will demolish it, I decided to open this topic up to continue any discussion that needs to be had, including my reply. I literally posted that I will reopen it if you send PM! So, instead of contacting someone, you choose to try to defame me? Sure does look like you knew I had BitcoinSupremo on my list months ago, but here you are swearing up and down to the entire community you didn't know.
Where did I say that I didn't knew? Quote me correct post or you are lying. As far as I remember, there was question mark at the end of each sentence so it has to be a question - your words, not my. I didn't add him out of "spite", I added him because he was targeted https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182672.msg52426923#msg52426923This is not true. He was tagged because his account has bitcoin connection with scammer egg.chuck, he was tagged because he used alt accounts to self vouch for payed gambling tips ("I bought tip, would recommend") and he was tagged for making blatant lies. As I said few times, everything is publicly available information, together with his other retaliatory nonsensical feedback you ARE ignoring right now. and he is staying there because it is being used to target me So you added him because he was "target" even thought it is not true, and he stayed in your trust list because someone pointed that you have him in your trust and you thought this is targeting you? Thanks for that link BTW, I was looking for that. That is why you locked the thread right hoping I wouldn't notice or post it isn't it? Yes, that is exactly why I posted link in public forum. I hoped no one will notice....
Why is this thread in meta? This is personal attack against me! NOTE TO MODERATORS: This thread is now clearly directed at me individually, please move it to the appropriate subforum of REPUTATION Upps...source:tecshare |
|
|
|
If the account is banned, what is the problem? How is a banned account going to effect the trust system? Did they leave a bunch of false ratings or is this just a pathetic stretch for you to give the impression of impropriety?
NOTE TO MODERATORS: This thread is now clearly directed at me individually, please move it to the appropriate subforum of REPUTATION as per my report where it belongs. Thank you.
No, it is not. You are missing my point here. As I said, you see everything as personal attack.
What is point of DT system if hacked accounts are "allowed" to end up in DT? I am not missing anything. If the account was not used to abuse the trust system, and it is now banned and unable to be used, exactly what is the harm to the trust system? Of course there is no risk What is the harm of having hacked account in default trust system? Good question. But as you have already answered it, there is no point into continuing this discussion with you. If you don't like the answer, just pretend I said something else. Why would I pretend that you said something else? You said "of course there is no risk". Oh right, I forgot I am supposed to uphold a higher standard than practically everyone else on your own trust list. I forgot, its rules for me and not for thee.
I have to admit, you got me here.  Who is in my own trust list again? |
|
|
|
If the account is banned, what is the problem? How is a banned account going to effect the trust system? Did they leave a bunch of false ratings or is this just a pathetic stretch for you to give the impression of impropriety?
NOTE TO MODERATORS: This thread is now clearly directed at me individually, please move it to the appropriate subforum of REPUTATION as per my report where it belongs. Thank you.
No, it is not. You are missing my point here. As I said, you see everything as personal attack.
What is point of DT system if hacked accounts are "allowed" to end up in DT? I am not missing anything. If the account was not used to abuse the trust system, and it is now banned and unable to be used, exactly what is the harm to the trust system? Of course there is no risk What is the harm of having hacked account in default trust system? Good question. But as you have already answered it, there is no point into continuing this discussion with you. |
|
|
|
If the account is banned, what is the problem? How is a banned account going to effect the trust system? Did they leave a bunch of false ratings or is this just a pathetic stretch for you to give the impression of impropriety?
NOTE TO MODERATORS: This thread is now clearly directed at me individually, please move it to the appropriate subforum of REPUTATION as per my report where it belongs. Thank you.
No, it is not. You are missing my point here. As I said, you see everything as personal attack.
What is point of DT system if hacked accounts are "allowed" to end up in DT? |
|
|
|
Max power is 364 or so (limited by max activity in a year).
Oh, yes, I looked whole activity and rounded it to 1000. It will not go down to zero. It's reduced by 15% from the previous value, not by 15% from the original value, so something like this: 100% -> 85% -> 72% etc. That is base power minus 15% and then modified power minus 15%. This confused me a little: Once per 24 hours, you can click a topic's bump link. When you do this, a modified bump power is calculated as your base bump power minus 15% for every super bump you've done in the last 30 days, and this is added to the topic's bump score. In other words, your modified bump power is base_power*0.85super_bumps_last_30_days.
I have to see this in combination with morvillz7z's post (@mod I promise I will delete posts). |
|
|
|
What is mini bump and what it does? And how?
As theymos describes it, it's simply posting in the thread. You don't reduce any of your bumping power by posting in a thread, but if it's the first time you've posted in that thread in the last 7 days 1% of your bumping power is directed towards the thread's bump score. Mini bumps
If you haven't posted in a topic in the last 7 days, posting in it adds 1% of your base bump power to the topic's bump score. Deleted posts count against the 7-day limit, but not the topic's bump score.
Mkaay... Lets see if I get this right. Your base bump power is the smaller of these two values:
- The activity you would have if you'd signed up 1 year ago.
- The merit you've earned in the last year. Lets say my bump power is 1000. My super bump increased thread's bump score by 100X and it went to top of page #1. So, my bump power went down by 15% and it is now 850, but, if I post something in thread, that thread will get 1% of my based bump power or score 10. If I bump several threads within 30 days my bump power will go to 0, but I will still "give" 10 points to bump score for 1 post in thread every 7 days. What will this 10 points do? If 10 accounts give 10 points, will thread go to top if all other threads have score bellow 100, or?
edit: ok, I tested it and old thread went to page number #1, thread #24. Second bump did nothing, unfortunately, I can't remove bumps duo "rules about deleting posts in altcoin". |
|
|
|
And? If I remember right he is some one I traded with a long time ago. I don't like using countering trust ratings. What exactly is your issue other than your obsession with digging through my shit looking for peanuts?
I can't find feedback for trade and you left lots trade-feedbacks in 2013/2014. So banned and possible hacked account will one day maybe become default trust member because you think that you have traded with them long time ago? Is it original owner who you traded with still owner of account or not? You probably know this because you trust them because you maybe remember that you traded with them? |
|
|
|
And speaking of power, is it something wrong with my internet (I'm on 2g near a mountain top  ) or the topic bumped my marlboroza is still the second one on that page and the one he "mini bumped if I understand the term correctly is 4th? I am trying to find this but I failed. What is mini bump and what it does? And how? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
