Dunno why you edited out your first topic about this, but why did you create a new thread?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3589759.msg36490665#msg36490665

That's a hell of a fee to pay for tumbling some coins...

OP, I'd be interested in testing your mixer, but not at the rates that @AdolfinWolf has specified, especially considering that the service fee shows a maximum of 4% on your site. How is the transaction fee specified when returning coins?

This is my concern, as well, especially considering that this is a brand new forum account.

I have a strong suspicion that the account subscriptions are obtained using blackhat methods, such as by carding.

The two vouch copies I have received in the past for these services (both within 6 months) are no longer working, so the chances that this user's products will last are slim to none. Oh, and "lifetime"? I can't say whether this user will replace any voided/suspended accounts or not given that they have absolutely no history on the forums.

OP, why the brand new account? I doubt that this is your first time on the forums; why not just use your original account?

Says the guy wearing a paid sig, as well

If I were here simply for the sig campaign, I would max out my post count every week, which I don't. There have been periods where I haven't worn a paid signature here. What gives you the impression that I am solely here for the campaign?

I don't understand you.

I got you.



One for me, and one for you

While I appreciate the discount, I currently already have an existing adobe account:



I was merely offering you a service to help you out with your sales.

Good luck.

That brings up another issue entirely: as long as there are campaign managers like the one for the campaign that the referenced user is in, there will always be shitposters that are accepted into shit campaigns, unfortunately.

I agree that users that are here solely for bounty campaigns and not quality users by any  means, and I'm hoping merit requirements will become a thing relatively soon... But again, as long as we have campaign managers that will just accept anyone and everyone, merit and ranks won't make a difference.

I was going to suggest that you post this in the Known Alts of anyone thread, but it looks like you already have.

May I suggest that you add a link to that post here and then lock this topic? Click the "lock topic" link at the bottom left of this page.

I don't believe your proof of payment.

Sign an a message from a bitcoin address that you own that can prove the activity that you show in your screenshot/gif.

And if you want an established member of the forums to vouch for your product, I'd be willing to review your method/product and provide honest feedback regarding your method.

Let me know.

While I agree that the payment reward is low, there are many users on the forums that would appreciate making an extra $10 per day. Given that these are math problems, extensive knowledge of the English language probably isn't a requirement, so this is perfect for third-world users of the forums to make a few extra bucks a day.

There's no need to criticize the OP for making this offering; simply ignore it if it doesn't interest you.

I agree. This user is a shitposter that doesn't provide any substance to the conversation. They're not even relevant in the majority of the posts.

I am going through this user's post history and reporting the posts that I feel are unsubstantial and irrelevant/spammy, like others have recommended. I advise you guys to do the same.

I'd be willing to offer you ongoing reviews and bi-weekly updates regarding this service if you're willing to give me a vouch copy. If you agree to this, I'll provide you with a fresh email address that has not previously been used as an Adobe account.

Here is a link to a previous review for a similar product: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1650765.msg20409494#msg20409494

So you're willing to provide transactions with dusty inputs? This only increases the size of the bitcoin transaction (and all future transactions), thus increasing the fee. No thank you.


There we go, the first reasonable suggestion/information I have seen so far in this thread. But to be fair to anyone reading this, an escrow doesn't necessarily prove anything if a long con is the intent. Not saying that you're intending to con anyone, but I'm just playing devil's advocate here.

STAY AWAY FROM THIS SITE! YOU'VE BEEN WARNED!

This domain was registered less than 2 weeks ago, yet it claims to have sold over 53BTC on the platform?


https://www.whois.com/whois/btc2wire.com

---

---

This referral program is coming from a Newbie account, and neither the user or the company has any credibility whatsoever. Furthermore, the Terms and Conditions page displays a 404 error: https://www.btc2wire.com/page/terms

Additionally, the second question in the FAQ is


Here's the thing. Legitimate companies don't ever pose this type of question in their FAQ. Why bring negative attention to something if it's completely unnecessary? If a company is legitimate, it will just operate the way that it's supposed to. There won't be any need to have to prove that it's not a scam...

Not only this, but the entire FAQ is very poorly written. Kind of peculiar for a company that has done over HALF A MILLION US DOLLARS in exchanges... You mean to tell me that they couldn't hire a professional writer?

---

If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

This is classic digaran, from what I've gathered in the past. But he will reference others' posts in new posts that are created in topics that are completely unrelated to the context of where he's posting, so you might want to check his post history to see if he has replied to your post elsewhere on the forums.

And if I'm being completely honest, I am not sure if this post itself is a serious one or a sarcastic one. @digaran often claims that he's joking when saying something, but only after someone calls him out about something that he just said. His negative trust is a result of that practice, except that he crossed paths with a DT member that doesn't take lightly to joking about the things that he has joked about.

Whether @digaran is fit to be a merit source isn't really the question we should be asking, in my opinion. It's whether he's cut out to be a representative of the forums. I think all would be fine and dandy having him as a merit source if he didn't blatantly announce it so often across the forums, especially when he continues to post such controversial, racist and insulting posts in the ways that he does.

He has also stated that he wants to use his merit source status as some sort of "immunity"? That, to me, shows irresponsibility.

I say there are other qualified applicants for the merit source position. It's a "nay" from me (not that it matters).

This has nothing to do with why we're commenting on your service. You say that you've been on the forums "for a while", yet your registration date is less than a year ago. You don't have any positive trust left by a DT member, but you have 3 negative untrusted feedback ratings.




I'm sorry, but you're asking people to privately send you their bitcoin so that you can manually mix their coins, but I don't see how anyone in their right mind would do so. And by you asking people to try your service before putting blame on you or calling you a scam only attract negative attention by way of, what, reverse psychology... It only makes you look even more suspicious when trying to prove so hard that you're not a scammer. Imagine that I asked you not to think about pink elephants. Now you're thinking about them. You see how that works?

While I do like the idea of privacy and anonymity for my coins, I already have 3 mixing services that I use that I trust a hell of a lot more than I'd trust you. Forgive me for being so crass, but I'm just being honest in the hopes that others can see the same risks involved with the service that you're offering.

There's absolutely no need to get passive aggressive with your responses to people who have comments about your service. That only makes you look unprofessional, in my opinion.

Confirmed.



However, I am getting an error when trying to access the site with "www.". You may want to check that out.

Additionally, you should add a redirect to the standard http:// to automatically forward to https:// whenever someone visits your site. (edit: looks like you've added the redirect; good job)

If this is the case, then the users of the particular boards that OP is talking about should be able to click on the "Report to moderator" link to at least bring attention to posts that break the rules. It might be wise to select a moderator for these boards based on how many posts they have accurately reported, along with a review of their history on the forums.

Came here to say this, as well.

Before I show you how to move your topic, may I just say that I don't think it's too late for Bitcoin. While it's not cost-effective or profitable enough to mine, I still think investing and hodling is a viable solution to profiting from Bitcoin. I will continue to recommend and suggest that people invest into Bitcoin until after Wall Street dips their hands into the BTC pie and becomes publicly traded. That's just my personal opinion, but I firmly believe this.

With that said, you'll get much better answers and replies from the Mining support board. To move your topic, click on the "move topic" link, found at the bottom left corner of this page.



From there, navigate the drop down to Bitcoin > Mining > Mining support and click the submit button.

Cheers, and welcome to the forums!

So now I'm assuming that @Adioliver and "Fazlur" (as you call him) know each other personally, too, right?

Dude, give it up already. Do you know what it means when people say "you're digging yourself a deeper hole"? You're just bringing more attention upon yourself and inviting the internet sleuths to come dissect your accounts even more.

Me? I'm done; I think I've satisfied my own curiosity enough to leave you alone now. Cheers.