Bitcoin Forum
June 01, 2024, 11:04:18 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 [150] 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 ... 514 »
2981  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: [COVID-19] Folding@Crypto.Games ~ 0.5 BTC in incentives for a good cause on: March 31, 2020, 08:57:47 PM
CG: HCP123 ; FH: HCP123 ; Coin: BTC

A fantastic idea! I only just got all my gear setup again after a move and just prior to the government mandated lockdown here! Was looking at setting up WorldCommunityGrid again, but then the notification email for this thread arrived! Cheesy
2982  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: [ANN] BITHD.com Razor (Card Design Hardware Wallet Released) on: March 31, 2020, 04:05:49 AM
Just a heads up... my Razor came in the mail the other day, and I just have not had a chance to open it and/or test it due to trying to get myself and my partner setup with the government mandated lockdown due to Covid-19 Undecided

Now that things have settled down, rest assured that I will make the effort over the coming days to do a full unboxing and initial impressions (with pics and some very short and likely bad quality video Tongue) etc.

Thanks again to the BitPie crew for the review unit.
2983  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: keepkey: shapeshift different than chrome app! on: March 31, 2020, 03:06:08 AM
My favorite Android wallet is Coinomi. I only wished it worked with the HW wallet.
Have you tried Mycelium? That appears to have KeepKey support built in... but I've only ever used it with Ledger Nano S and Trezor ONE.


2984  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: keepkey: shapeshift different than chrome app! on: March 31, 2020, 02:38:34 AM
I was talking more about the transaction fees associated with sending BTC... I will admit I haven't looked in a while, but previously fees for transacting via ShapeShift were fairly high (and fixed) in comparison with being able to manually set fees in Electrum.

Things may have changed.
2985  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Very Large HD Wallet Indexes Used - How to recover funds? on: March 31, 2020, 12:47:55 AM
I don't think this is going to be possible and/or feasible from the Electrum console. Undecided

I think a better approach might be to see if it is possible to modify the Electrum source code and get it to start generating addresses from an index higher than 0. Possibly closer to the origin value of your order numbers. Perhaps ask on the Electrum GitHub issues page and see if the devs can assist? https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues

The devs are fairly active and might be able to offer some guidance on a workaround.


In future, you'd be better off using the "account" value of the BIP32 derivation path to separate your stores, rather than such large address indexes.
2986  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: Ledger Live Nano missing btc on: March 30, 2020, 11:14:42 PM
Things that spring to mind:

1. "Gap Limit" issue... if the original accounts were setup using the Chrome App and NOT Ledger Live, it's possible the coins were sent to an address past the gap limit or even a change address (if selected from the drop down menu instead of using "receive" tab)

2. Valid but incorrect seed... there have been instances in the past where users have managed to get seeds confused and use a wallet for a while but have a seed written down that doesn't match that particular wallet. Not likely given OPs claim that this is their only wallet.

3. Multiple "Accounts" within Ledger... 1st account is currently empty, so Ledger Live might not see if coins were sent to "2nd" accounts. Could test using Electrum and specifying 2nd or subsequent accounts in derivation path (ie. m/49'/0'/1')

4. "Forked" accounts? I know that there were all sorts of crazy things happening when the BCH fork first happened with the "split" accounts in Ledger Chrome App... I'm not sure if Ledger Live still looks for these? Was the device originally configured/setup within Chrome App or Ledger Live? Huh
2987  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: keepkey: shapeshift different than chrome app! on: March 30, 2020, 10:54:22 PM
Thanks for the reference. That page clearly explains the limitation of the Chrome App - I hadn't seen that page before, and was surprised as the different operation between the app and the ShapeShift web portal.
That's due to the Chrome App being developed by the original KeepKey devs before the company was then sold to ShapeShift. ShapeShift then developed their web portal which kind of pushes users into registering and using ShapeShift and it's fees Tongue

However, as an existing Electrum user, you're in a good position to be able to leverage that as a frontend for your KeepKey so you get the benefits of all it has to offer with the added security of a Hardware Wallet.
2988  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: Nano Ledger S Battery Question? on: March 30, 2020, 10:36:43 PM
I'm not sure why we're still going around and around on this Huh

First and foremost, you need to get access to your seed backup and check it. Given the current state of the world, the closed borders, the lack of flight availability etc, I'm not even sure you're going to be able to achieve this in a timely fashion. Undecided

As for the device, have you actually emailed ledger yet? The sooner you do that, the sooner you'll get your answers regarding whether or not they'll even replace it, the process involved, shipping timeframes etc.

Asking random people on an internet forum about a specific company's specific processes is not going to yield the results you want. TALK TO THE COMPANY! Roll Eyes
2989  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum Lightning Demo on: March 30, 2020, 10:21:10 PM
Thanks for the link, but I really just wanted to do it myself as a learning opportunity.  It didn't occur to me that since I've already compiled the binaries (several times now,) I should have that file myself, right?  I'll have a look when I get home.
Not necessarily... unless you have explicitly installed the appropriate libraries, the Windows build will still complete "OK" (with errors that scroll past) and binaries will be built... but the libsecp256k1 stuff will be missing and you'll get errors when you try to run it... as per this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5222986.msg53807327#msg53807327

If you have "libsecp256k1-dev" installed in Ubuntu (with apt-get)... and the python library "libsecp256k1" installed (with pip)... then the build-wine process will automatically compile the libsecp256k1-0.dll and roll it into your binary file. You can also find this compiled .dll and then copy it to a Windows machine and put it into your Electrum "source" folder to be able to run from source.
2990  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: does not show my Bitcoin on Armory Wallet on: March 30, 2020, 10:10:41 PM
I imported the PrivBase58 into Electrum wallet and I can see my balance, but it is a watching-only-wallet.
How can I change that so I can send them?
It seems something went wrong with the import into Electrum. If it is "watching-only", then you have not imported the private key, you have imported the public key. So, make sure you are copy/pasting the correct field from the Armory export.


These are my recommended settings when exporting from Armory to import the keys into Electrum:


Note that the "PrivBase58" will most likely start with a "5", it should have no spaces (use the "omit spaces" option as shown) and it should be 51 characters long.


You should be able to import this into Electrum using the "Import Bitcoin Address or private keys" option when creating a wallet:



And simply paste in the private key(s) that match the address(es) that you sent coins to:



This will create an "imported" wallet with the address(es) and you should be able to send:



2991  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum Lightning Demo on: March 30, 2020, 09:30:38 PM
Do you have any other links? It's blocked on Mediafire look at the image below.
...
Can you re-upload the file to other hosting sites I suggest you upload it here zippyshare.com. and post it here or pm the link.

Thanks in advance...
I just banged it up on mediafire because it was the first (easy) filehosting that came to mind! Tongue It would seem it is freaking out about pyinstaller and blocking the file Undecided

In the meantime, I've added the same file to zippyshare for you: https://www92.zippyshare.com/v/qdHxapxK/file.html




Quote
Why not just install the copy from HCP to try? I think we already talk about this "libsecp256k1" from another thread here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5222986.0

So, I think the copy from HCP includes the "libsecp256k1"
Yeah, I went to all the effort previously with libsecp256k1... it's been compiled on my ubuntu VM, so is automatically included when building, so all the lightning stuff is working. I managed to open a couple of channels on Testnet and send some coins.




Code:
Error: Failed to load libsecp256k1.

I did a little google search and came across this issue posted on github: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/5976

I literally laughed out loud when I saw who posted the issue; "hey I know that guy," I said to myself.  I'm at the office today, so I don't have time to try compiling the libsecp256k1-0.dll, and I don't have a Linux vm installed on my work machine anyway (time to fix that.) 

But, I assume that worked for you, and that's all I need to run Electrum from source on my Windows 10 machine?
Yeah, I've tested it on Windows 10 running from source as well... so I've put the compiled ibsecp256k1-0.dll on zippyshare too: https://www92.zippyshare.com/v/CucF6mf9/file.html

Let me know if it works ok!
2992  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Starting..., on: March 30, 2020, 09:10:13 PM
It could be not corrupt wallet as I said the core start up fine on my co worker's wallet but upon exchanging from my default_wallet (the core give) to the wallet.dat of my co-worker the core quit on it's own no whatsoever reasoning why the core did it there's a function to the bitcoincore network where you can switch upon many wallets but you need to rename every wallet to not overwrite the first one (what the core give)
I'm a bit confused by your explanation. Undecided

So to clarify, you are saying that if you use the coworkers wallet.dat as the ONLY wallet.dat it works OK? But if you try and use multiwallet functionality then Bitcoin Core crashes? Huh

Or are you saying that it starts ok with "default_wallet" and "co-worker wallet.dat" files in the data directory, but when you try to switch it crashes? Huh
2993  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: [FREE PRIVATE GIVEAWAY] Bitcoin keychain on: March 30, 2020, 11:00:50 AM
Just checked in after a few weeks "in the wilderness" due to moving from one end of the country to the other... and then a govt enforced coronavirus lockdown... and was like "shit! I hope I wasn't the guy holding it up!".

Thankfully... I was not! Tongue
2994  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum Lightning Demo on: March 30, 2020, 09:12:36 AM
I have compiled and uploaded a snapshot of 4.0.0a0 as at 30th March 2020... It is available here: http://www.mediafire.com/file/50jvn15ysgj8qsd/electrum-3.3.8-1845-g79d57784c-portable.exe

Ignore the filename, it's just a quirk of the build system as discussed earlier in this thread.

As always, Use at your own risk. I accept no responsibility if something goes wrong and you lose coins... TestNet is there for a reason! Tongue





Seems my channels got closed while I've been offline due to moving etc Tongue
2995  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory on Mac problems on: March 29, 2020, 11:29:16 PM
I looked around on the brew.sh site and couldn't find a specific package to download called "openssi".
I think you might be searching for the wrong package. The package name is openssl... that is an "L" NOT an "i" or a "1"... Wink
2996  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: JAXX liberty WALLET on: March 29, 2020, 11:15:56 PM
Jaxx supports BIP39 mnemonics does it not? Huh

Simply importing the 12 word backup phrase into Electrum using the "I already have a seed" and "BIP39 seed" options when creating a wallet in Electrum should be enough to clone the Jaxx wallet.

Once you have it in Electrum, it would enable you to send to "bc1" (aka bech32) addresses.

Get your Jaxx Liberty Backup Phrase if you don't already have it: https://support.decentral.ca/hc/en-us/articles/360006407953-How-to-see-your-Backup-Phrase-in-Jaxx-Liberty


In Electrum, select "File -> New/Restore", then enter a new name like "Jaxx_Clone" and click "Next":



Then select "Standard Wallet" and click "Next":



Then select "I already have a seed" and click "Next":



On the next screen, click "Options" and make sure that "BIP39 seed" is checked:



Then enter your Jaxx backup seed and click next, NOTE: it should say 'BIP39 (checksum: ok)':



Make sure you select "Legacy (p2pkh)" and that the derivation path at the bottom says: m/44'/0'/0' (it should say this by default when you click legacy) and then click "next":



Create a password and click next and your wallet will be created with the same addresses as Jaxx Liberty and you should see all your coins/transactions/balance:





2997  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: ERROR Debug.log on: March 29, 2020, 10:55:21 PM
I CAN'T OPEN BITCOIN CORE

This is the message : a fatal internal error has been preset, consult the debug.log file for more details
Did you check the Bitcoin Core debug.log file to see what the actual error was? Huh

The debug.log file is in the Bitcoin Core data directory (same place as the wallet.dat file). Without the error details from that file, no one will be able to assist
2998  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Starting..., on: March 29, 2020, 10:51:04 PM
How exactly are you attempting to "switch" wallets? Huh

The easiest method is to shut down Bitcoin Core. Once it is completely closed, then copy/move the current wallet.dat from the Bitcoin data directory. Then copy your "co-workers wallet.dat" into the Bitcoin Core data directory and overwrite the existing wallet.dat or, if necessary, rename it to wallet.dat.

Then restart Bitcoin Core. If it starts up it'll probably want to rescan to get the wallet up to date with current blocks etc. At the end of that process you will have a better idea if the wallet contains anything.

If it doesn't start up, either report what the error message shown is, or you can check the debug.log file for the errors... although chances are if it doesn't start up with the "co-workers wallet.dat" it is most likely not a Bitcoin Core wallet.dat or it is corrupted.
2999  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Coin Address Generator on: March 29, 2020, 08:47:12 PM
And in case it wasn't already obvious and well known... DO NOT USE BRAINWALLETS!

There have been countless examples of people losing bitcoins from bruteforced brainwallets. No matter how "random" you think your brainwallet phrase is... eg. lines from obscure poems, all the street names you've ever lived on in reverse chronological order etc... it isn't.

They're a "bad idea"™

Stick with properly randomly generated seeds and/or private keys.
3000  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: walletnotify issue on: March 29, 2020, 08:32:46 PM
NeuroticFish is correct... walletnotify should trigger twice for each transaction... once on initial receipt of (unconfirmed) transaction and once when the transaction gets it's first confirmation.

If you're getting the 1st update, but not the 2nd "in your shop", then most likely your code at the shop end is to blame. You can check that walletnotify itself is working correctly by simply using a simple shell script that just appends to a local text file... check to see that you're getting each transactionID twice.

This example from an old thread should work quite well:
Code: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=203438.msg2134545#msg2134545)
#!/bin/bash
F=/home/btcdev/wallet_transaction_log
D=`date +"%Y%m%d%H%M%S"`
echo ${D} - ${1} >> ${F}

Once you have confirmed that it is indeed triggering twice, you'll just need to try and find out where the break in your chain is... I'd guess in the processing on the server of the "http://myoniondomainname.onion/transactions/btc" call.
Pages: « 1 ... 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 [150] 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 ... 514 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!