Ewww, BTC-e. World's crappiest support and interface.
Surely, I admit they suck a little, but you are overexaggerating. I've seen worse. |
|
|
|
 Hmmm....  |
|
|
|
Just wanted to drop a big thanks for your work on this.
This is probably the worlds first TRUSTLESS pay-as-you-go implementation.
Absolutely wonderful. However, is there a chance we will be seeing this in the default client ? Or will everybody who wants to use this channels be forced to use bitcoinj ? |
|
|
|
|
Country: Poland
Vote: Against
|
|
|
|
http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtmlWhen the online drug sales site Silk Road first appeared in 2011, the idea of anonymously buying any drug imaginable from the Internet seemed like cyberpunk fiction. Watch the cheery video ad for the latest dark-web drug marketplace today, and you’d be forgiven for thinking it was selling a service as mainstream as online dating or car insurance. Seems like a modern-day honeypot to me, but only time will tell, I guess. |
|
|
|
If anyone has a clue, I'll be very grateful.
At first, somebody bought a Bitcoin for fun, because it was cool & nerdy/geeky thing to do. But once the man realized what he bought has real value, he didn't want to sell it so cheap - so the price rose. There you have it - the beginnings of free market. |
|
|
|
Looks like a honeypot to me, but only time will tell... |
|
|
|
Failometer is ringing
 |
|
|
|
Isn't this a configurable option in 0.8.2? Or do we need your client for your forked chain?
Nope. - Chain is not forked - Transaction relaying is unaffected - Everything except amount of fees when sending **your own money** is unaffected This is a minor patch, nearly identical to official client. You can simply send money paying less fees, but with higher risk of transaction not making it into a block (fees might not be enough). I created this fork, because i didn't like the decision of the devs to raise fees some time ago without giving user any choice (a configuration option for God's sake !). |
|
|
|
...
holy carrots
...
Question answered. Inform the government.  |
|
|
|
call me a guy with a tinfoil hat again,
You are a guy in a tinfoil hat. Again. it is as simple as changing one innocent character, at some place in the code he's made, to hide the actual purpose though still suggesting just a mistake.
like putting "," instead of ".", "O" instead "0" or "l" where you needed "1"... I've wrote so much code in C that I could think of tons of expressions that would actually work completely different than one thinks they do at the first sight.
Thanks to code analysis tools (and there are many powerful, free & extremely expensive commercial ones) plus git, such a mistake can be easily spotted. Remember that you don't review whole code at once (large). You just review latest changes (small). if the attacker is smart,
There are many smart (and i even dare to say: genius) people looking for backdoors in the Bitcoin code , so that wouldn't be very smart to add backdoors, even if you are a genius yourself. |
|
|
|
Great idea! Yesterday I had the idea of curing aids. Please fund my kickstarter, whitch will turn my idea to business for benefit of millions. I will use donations to purchase necessary servers and domain names.
This sounds **marvellous** !Where do i sign up ? |
|
|
|
Hi, So recently I've started to work on Paysey - A BitCoin Debit Card. About 3 hours ago, I launched a campaign Indiegogo to hopefully raise $25,000.00. You can view the Indiegogo campaign at http://igg.me/at/paysey/x/3726658I was wondering on what your thoughts are? My thougths are whether you are some retarded kid who thinks he can do monies now. I mean, seriously, this is not funny.  |
|
|
|
2013-06-23 Update:NFTF - version 0.8.2 released. Fresh tag - nftf-v0.8.2 is avaiable for download. https://github.com/ShadowOfHarbringer/bitcoin-nftf/tags
PLEASE NOTE THAT UNTIL MAX BLOCK SIZE PROBLEM HAS BEEN SOLVED BY DEVELOPERS, SOME FREE (WITHOUT FEE) TRANSACTIONS CREATED BY THIS FORK MAY CONFIRM VERY SLOWLY OR NEVER.
PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING BEFORE USING THIS FORK.
|
|
|
|
I lost 110.9 BTC with Bitmarket and M4v3R at the Helm. Would't call him a scammer, untrustworthy may be a better word.
Ok whatever, UNTRUSTWORTHY it is then. |
|
|
|
Time for the scammer tag.
I think that after the recents hacks on the website, the webmaster told himself "fuck it, I'm gonna steal from my users too".
Bitcoin value decreases when you do that. That's no good.
You have no idea how much time I've spent to help my users with these hacks (which were not compromises of Bitmarket security). And I didn't get anything in return. If I wanted to steal the money, I'd just announce that I got hacked and whole wallet was stolen. But I want to be completely honest with my users. That doesn't make the funds magically appear, but I believe it's the right thing to do. Why doesn't he have SCAMMER TAG yet ? I mean, he gambled with people's money and lost. I do not understand this... Because a real scammer would not post any longer or pay anything back - a real scammer just disappears and runs with your money... I received some BTC from M4V3R four days ago. I won´t cover my losses but it´s better than nothing. So IMHO M4V3R is not a scammer but just a guy who made a huge mistake and trying to deal with it. No matter. Still a scammer. |
|
|
|
Each lawyer will tell you:
All these ARBITRARY and UNFORESEEABLE enforced transaction fees are ILLEGAL.
It cannot be down to miners whim, what at all and even HOW MUCH they want to claim.
A claim of fees must at least clearly be declared before a transaction is definitely mandated by users.
Otherwise there is no agreement.
No agreement, no fee.
And no other chicanry like delays or denial of service (seems also applied - illegally).
Miners have the right to choose whom they provide service to or not. does this have atopic location at all? I want to see comments on this style of thread Wut ? Also, please stop derailing this thread. |
|
|
|
Time for the scammer tag.
I think that after the recents hacks on the website, the webmaster told himself "fuck it, I'm gonna steal from my users too".
Bitcoin value decreases when you do that. That's no good.
You have no idea how much time I've spent to help my users with these hacks (which were not compromises of Bitmarket security). And I didn't get anything in return. If I wanted to steal the money, I'd just announce that I got hacked and whole wallet was stolen. But I want to be completely honest with my users. That doesn't make the funds magically appear, but I believe it's the right thing to do. Why doesn't he have SCAMMER TAG yet ? I mean, he gambled with people's money and lost. I do not understand this... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
