Fired up 5.0 pointed it at a pool running peercoin and this error basically kept showing up.
Coinbase check: multiple inputs in coinbase: 0x26 It appeared it was mining ok, shares seemed to be accepted and credited. But that coinbase check wouldn't go away. I'm curious to know what it is and why its doing it. I wasn't mining to any coinbase address or to a wallet address. Just to normal username.worker.
Reverting back to 4.* works with no output like pasted above. I'm guessing it's checking bitcoin related and because I'm not mining bitcoin but another sha it isn't handling it well? only a guess
|
|
|
Guys, NTK has been added on Cryptsy's coin vote page. Let's go and vote! https://www.cryptsy.com/coinvotesSubmitting first vote is free, but you can vote more than once with CryptsyPoints (on website) or BTC (donation to the address below) https://blockchain.info/address/1NUQWH35WPW6VQDtk2uEd5CfYPoE6Tgk78 Using the buttons below, each Cryptsy user is allowed 1 free vote per coin. We are also accepting paid votes, which have no limit on the number of votes you can cast. Adding new markets requires a significant development investment for each new coin, so your paid votes will help offset the costs and accelerate the development time.
Paid votes can be submitted using either BTC or CryptsyPoints. To vote with BTC, simply send BTC to the deposit address listed next to the coin(s) you wish to support. Every 0.0002 BTC sent to the respective address received will count for 1 vote. You can click on the address link next to any coin to view payment votes cast using BTC, which are posted after getting 2 or more confirmations. should be noted that you must be a member of cryptsy to vote.
|
|
|
it's vapourizing way faster than OP predicted
OP too bullish!
did not want to scare the people. i have some feeling big dumps coming again, any time soon midweek again when the ftc guy sells more bfl coins to pay customers back
|
|
|
MMXIV if you like guaranteed returns. Any other coin if you feel like gambling
bs coin when they chaging their name again?
|
|
|
which exchange do you see that at?
|
|
|
I gained. But I don't count the cost of electric, it's the cost of living/business. (writeoff)
|
|
|
Is the site down now? I refreshed the page and it's blank.
not loading here currently
|
|
|
who the hell wants to dedicate an entire hard drive to a blockchain? Oh wait who is rational in the digital currency world.
Let's be rational indeed. If Average Joe ever uses a bitcoin wallet, it will be SPV at best, possibly just a client connected to his bank, using some yet-to-be defined upper layers on top of it (or something Ripple-ish) to make the UX smooth and 'secure'. The point being, Average Joe won't store the blockchain at all. Other big players upstream (something Google-ish) will provide the service and find a way to monetize them. Sources: my own experience of the internet evolving from 1994 to 2015 So are we trying to centralize bitcoin than to just a few big players? or is this supposed to be a currency away from the major banks. Because the big players who run a 6tb blockchain will be the new banks. as an avg joe. I don't trust any of the wallets yet. I prefer core/wallet currently and 30gb block chain is stupid now. Great we both have the same experience big woop except I cut my teeth on a trs-80 so I guess I could count the 80's too Who's "we"? You want to run a node? go right ahead. As I said, for the foreseeable future - even with a bigger block size - it only takes commodity hardware. Mundane truth vs hyperbolic speculation. On BTC the latter seems to count more than the former :/ we=community "face palm" ppl act all fucking smart on here than play stupid with their responses.
|
|
|
who the hell wants to dedicate an entire hard drive to a blockchain? Oh wait who is rational in the digital currency world.
Let's be rational indeed. If Average Joe ever uses a bitcoin wallet, it will be SPV at best, possibly just a client connected to his bank, using some yet-to-be defined upper layers on top of it (or something Ripple-ish) to make the UX smooth and 'secure'. The point being, Average Joe won't store the blockchain at all. Other big players upstream (something Google-ish) will provide the service and find a way to monetize them. Sources: my own experience of the internet evolving from 1994 to 2015 So are we trying to centralize bitcoin than to just a few big players? or is this supposed to be a currency away from the major banks. Because the big players who run a 6tb blockchain will be the new banks. as an avg joe. I don't trust any of the wallets yet. I prefer core/wallet currently and 30gb block chain is stupid now. Great we both have the same experience big woop except I cut my teeth on a trs-80 so I guess I could count the 80's too
|
|
|
My bet: nobody has any rationale for this hysterical selling and dumping. Or did I miss something?
Gavin has a good road map for scalability and is widely supported in his efforts by the community. yea I don't think so. That isn't the vibe I get from the community right now.
|
|
|
everyone should have stopped using skype when MS an american company bought them. There is no privacy for anyone using it now. Especially with the govt saying they have the right to seize overseas servers from american companies. Rest assured the intelligence community has a backdoor to your skype.
|
|
|
more like the bitcoin titanic. every day I see less and less of a difference between the two.
|
|
|
Doesn't surprise me, as based on historical transaction sizes Bitcoin can't even handle 5 transactions/sec.
The dumb part about it, after over a year of time from where the issue became apparent, this is the laziest and most unimaginative solution possible. If there is a hardfork anyway there could be done something smarter about it, like that variable block size proposal, or perhaps addressing the cause. Every node storing every transaction forever is incredibly wasteful. Partial storage with parity would be one approach, colluding smaller transactions into larger one would be another, different kind of nodes or even changing the way the Blockchain stores transactions are all directions to research.
But that would require the will to innovate from the Bitcoin development team, not changing a few hardcoded values.
As usual, EM is both right and sort of nasty about it at the same time 20MB blocks maxed out is roughly a terabyte a year. 3TB drives are already down to $100. 6TB is top end 8-10TB are already in the pipeline. its going to be several years at least before blockchain size outstrips storage capacities. So lets put this 'bloat' myth to bed. who the hell wants to dedicate an entire hard drive to a blockchain? Oh wait who is rational in the digital currency world.
|
|
|
I'm getting a sick joy out of all these sky are falling posts.
|
|
|
who cares. Buy it from them if you're that concerned.
|
|
|
Time to bail, folks. The third largest pool couldn't be this unlucky...very unusual. 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7-hour blocks in regular succession.
where you going? someplace that finds blocks every 22 hrs? go to eligius and get 16 hr blocks every other day. I have already been gone for sometime now...been solo mining actually. Eligius is not the only other pool. It looks like another 7-hour block...and counting. no shit really? I thought there was only 2 Then you shouldn't have stated an inappropriate example. How can you compare Eligius to GHash? seriously your a stupid twat. It was just a pool name.. It wasn't even a comparison. you're too fucking stupid to waste the keystrokes on anymore.
|
|
|
another scam coin like 2014 er mauitecoin w/e its called now
|
|
|
Time to bail, folks. The third largest pool couldn't be this unlucky...very unusual. 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7-hour blocks in regular succession.
where you going? someplace that finds blocks every 22 hrs? go to eligius and get 16 hr blocks every other day. I have already been gone for sometime now...been solo mining actually. Eligius is not the only other pool. It looks like another 7-hour block...and counting. no shit really? I thought there was only 2
|
|
|
|