SHA2 is not supported for these, only scrypt.
dude do you know of a bfgminer Fork that will let me mine sha with a gridseed? I can't stand the cgminer for gridseed it sux!!! I don't get why you would not add sha for gridseed???  your the guy who was like I don't really care about scrypt & yet you add scrypt for gridseed  I'm sure a donation would help convince him to add the support. |
|
|
|
The formula for HW % is HW/(diffA+diffR+HW)*100 correct?
I assume it looks more like HW/((diffA+diffR+HW)*100) given that multiplication comes before division.
never wrote it down I just use a website. http://www.coincadence.com/antminer-s1-hardware-error/Formula: Error % = HW / ( HW + DiffA + DiffR) * 100 |
|
|
|
Is there a way to set the clocking for each antminer (u1's) separately?
I am currently running two instances of BFGminer to run my mix of antminers, Bifury's and 1 Nanofury. I would like to be able to consolidate and only run one instance in one command window if possible. The reason I need to run separate clocking is that 2 of the ants will not run stable at more than 1.8 Gh/s or the 0881 so I run them on one instance along with my nanofury and bifury and run the other 7 ants 2.0 in a second instance.
Please let me know if this is possible and if so how to structure the command line to do so.
Thanks
For each device: --set ant@<vcom port here>:clock=xxxx I believe or something similar It never worked for me and I tried several different ways of doing it. I'd love to see someones working conf file that does work so we can figure it out once and for all. I settled on 2 instances and dealing with it. It took less time in the end to configure it that way. PITA with all the files now. |
|
|
|
I'm getting 4% HW errors using the 387.5 freq settings and only getting 189.7 Gh/s. I tried both 400 settings (0780/35 and 4f81/36) and I was getting 15% HW errors. My temperatures are always below 50.
Is 4% HW error acceptable or is overclocking not really viable for my unit?
4% is high. Anything over 1% and my impression is you are just wasting energy. My S1 gives a .44% error at 387.5 which is higher than I would like but appears to be acceptable to the community. Mine are below 50 as well with ambient room temps. |
|
|
|
that is nothing and not even worth posting about. My s1 best share is over 5 million. So there, old tech beat the faster youngin  a u2 miner has 538k best share. so what? Um, you don't know what an AntMiner u2 is, do you? I was pretty sure it read S but I must have not has enough coffee. or it was edited |
|
|
|
|
seems to me that round was less power less time. same proportion of shares, = more payout due to less power = less people mining-more money
paid out.
You're probably right. Getting them to correct it wouldn't happen anyway.
|
|
|
|
that is nothing and not even worth posting about. My s1 best share is over 5 million. So there, old tech beat the faster youngin a u2 miner has 538k best share. so what? |
|
|
|
Ghash why do you steal, don't you make enough money? 13800 2014-06-10 11:37:03 305103 25.0014 1/120 a minute 29.14 Ph/s 133600/25000083362 0.00% 400231522 0.00013360
13799 2014-06-10 11:36:05 305100 25.0900 4/120 17 minutes 38.40 Ph/s 133600/25000083362 0.00% 9315616754 0.00013408 exact same shares, even less speed on the pool than previous block but same payout? Actually made more off the block with 38 ph/s vs the block where there was only 29 ph/s How is that possible? Less people worked it. More money should have been spread.. ps: your support sucks donkey cocks. Especially Daniel |
|
|
|
I disagree on how you are using the word micromanagement here. Managed yes micro'd no.
It's nothing more than adding another safeguard to preserve the currency.
Mechanisms to deal with large hashers that approach 51% are already in place. When an entity reaches that point and they are deemed to not be trustworthy, that will cause the value to decrease. When the value decreases then they no longer have an incentive to have that much hash power running and will stop. Modifying the way Bitcoin works to prevent someone, you don't like, from reaching a certain percentage is what I would call micromanagement. Once the precedent is set who is to say what that magic percentage that no one entity should be allowed to reach. 51% isn't the number that double spends are possible, that can be done with a much smaller percentage. I say bullshit. The value didn't decreased before when it happened before. The pool operator took actions. Which they didn't have to do. w/e You'll disagree to disagree. |
|
|
|
maybe the developers need to add code to throttle nodes that start to encroach on the 50% mark.
Exactly the kind of micromanagement that will kill Bitcoin. How do you consider that micromanagement? DO you propose to not do a thing and expect the the pool operator to play nice? Head in the sand mentality? Yes, that is what I said in my above post. What else can be done realistically. We need Bitcoin because here in the U.S. the politicians took our currency off the gold standard with which has damaged our economy and allows politicians aka government to manipulate our markets. So like I said Bitcoin will manipulate according to the originally established rules and succeed or it will not be able to adapt and will die. If Bitcoin needs to micromanaged to stay alive then it is just as susceptible to manipulation as the U.S. currency and is no better and then won't be useful anyway. I disagree on how you are using the word micromanagement here. Managed yes micro'd no. It's nothing more than adding another safeguard to preserve the currency. |
|
|
|
|
As long as they don't require a phone number or using a google product.
|
|
|
|
|
it basically happens now anyway with the maintenance fees.
ie: savings account with less than X $$ = a monthly fee..
charging you money for keeping your money in there.
|
|
|
|
maybe the developers need to add code to throttle nodes that start to encroach on the 50% mark.
Exactly the kind of micromanagement that will kill Bitcoin. How do you consider that micromanagement? DO you propose to not do a thing and expect the the pool operator to play nice? Head in the sand mentality? |
|
|
|
maybe the developers need to add code to throttle nodes that start to encroach on the 50% mark. So regardless if a node can hash over 50% of the network it won't matter. How they can do that I don't know and I'm not sure if it's even wise to do so. I'm sure it was considered if I thought about it |
|
|
|
I will personally find anyone using ghash and end them
Stop using them before I find you or hire someone who will
Your time is near
What you mine will no longer matter on this earth
come on than big boy  1 Bitcoin for this guy delivered to me send it to me I'll give you my addy personally  I'll be able to use it to start a new pool  |
|
|
|
i would say xfx pro edition is the best
i dunno if its just me but i have a very hard time to corsair ax1200i because it cant run the two s1 antminer units it will run for about 10 mins then it will automatically shut down i have been running back and forth to the shop to figured out the problems and they are also replacing the units but it will end up with the same problem so i just decide to get a one unit of xfx pro edition and one seasonic platinum which is run nice with the s1
are you throwing a 5v load on the corsair? I'm pretty sure those need a load on the 5v rail or they will shutdown like you describe. i am pretty sure that im throwing a 12v on it so i dunno what is the reason why the corsair is showing a bad behaviour  i already ask dogie about this problem and he said that it should run perfectly but i dunno what is wrong with it so to save the time that i wasted to go back to the shop i decided to get 2 units anyway everything is fix now and the 3 s1 unit is running on 3 different psu yes the 12v load is obvious or the ants wouldn't run at all. But uh yea <facepalm> next... |
|
|
|
I will personally find anyone using ghash and end them
Stop using them before I find you or hire someone who will
Your time is near
What you mine will no longer matter on this earth
come on than big boy |
|
|
|
i would say xfx pro edition is the best
i dunno if its just me but i have a very hard time to corsair ax1200i because it cant run the two s1 antminer units it will run for about 10 mins then it will automatically shut down i have been running back and forth to the shop to figured out the problems and they are also replacing the units but it will end up with the same problem so i just decide to get a one unit of xfx pro edition and one seasonic platinum which is run nice with the s1
are you throwing a 5v load on the corsair? I'm pretty sure those need a load on the 5v rail or they will shutdown like you describe. |
|
|
|
|
I believe the problem lies in many areas.
More hashing power = more blocks solved = more money. Everyone is mining for money
The pools that have decent hashing power where you can still make money but it averages out longer
have shitty fees so people don't want to mine there.
The ones that keep mining there do it for various reasons from loyalty to laziness to explore different pool options.
The pools that have what I consider excellent terms have no hashing power yet and you might as well be solo mining.
P2Ppools are good but might as well solo mining if you don't have much hashing power and have higher than 30 ms latency to the pool.
Ghash took it to the next level by selling could mining and exchanging currencies as well as multipool profit.
So any new pools or existing pools need to step their game up I believe.
Some pools haven't updated their site since they opened as a pool years ago.
When you make creative criticisms people tell you to go start your own pool.
It's a circle jerk imnsho
|
|
|
|
What kind of a controller is it? Can any one give out something about the controller?
It is a TP-Link TL-WR743N/ND v2 controller. It is running OpenWRT Barrier Breaker r38031. So, its a wireless router controller running cgminer. I'm looking to explore this. Can you guide me to a good forum or link discussing about this controller, if any? the openwrt forum would be a good start. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
