Sorry i haven't kept watch on this thread.

We have this currently available as a private tool called OhGodAVolt. This handle communicating with the various VRMs to control it according to specifications.

As someone brought up before, AMD is releasing stuff for Polaris Soon™. Our tool isint limited in this regard, however.

I've spent hundreds and i have not done everything alone. I am not against helping or sharing, but many simply ask for handouts or "teach me how to do it!" and the only effort they've put is in learning to copy paste strap in PBE.

Good job to you and the few other's whom has achieved solid custom timings. Extra kudos if you had dipped into this before OhGodADecode

The Green GPUs are of more interest. Meanwhile, even if pushed to 33mh/s and undervolted to 100-110w, RX 400/500 isint that interesting anymore.

Nvidia timing mods are rather restricted regarding GTX atm. But i'm still collecting interestees;

https://pastebin.com/63RWr85T

More or less managed without;
sgminer-gm;


Clayclay;


Look like my version of Claymore is inferior to sgminer-gm with these RX 400, huh cool.

This post serve 2 purpose;

-I wish to double check theoretical limit for the claymore miner. Note: I use Linux
-Wish to footnote that i still participate in the vbios modding scene and bluntly state/sell/promote this fact. Note: I operate with OGAC now.



This is the mod i'm currently working on, i believe i'm close to the theoretical limit of claymore and sgminer-gm (pretty sure with sgminer-gm) with the card doing 32mh/s. (Yay Sillicon lottery).

But i am wondering if people have pushed it 33mhs+ with some specific Claymore config?

You're involved how? By making new accounts and making these kind of messages?

Wow...Err...Wrong... Nope... You can't even link D to E without forgetting ABC. ABC dammit, its not rocket science.

YOU started this chain of drama/FUD event, which did not start with this thread...

-By posting in a sale thread taking a stance against me and that before you and I had any interaction.
-By deciding to go Judge Dredd on me. (Explanation so you don't get confused: "Judge, Jury, Executioner")
-By not even giving me the chance to say what i was referring to before unloading your nonsense cannon.
-By PM'ing directly OgNasty to start Drama before i even saw said accusation!
-By choosing to stick to your initial stance after everyone cooled down (i thought) and explained their reasoning to each other.

Let me refresh your failing/erroneous memory and basis;



How the fuck is paying a seller after the good has been received a scam attempt!? Every single people who've paid upon delivery, or refused to use escrow nor go first is now a scammer?
(This is rhetorical. Do not answer. Your nonsense is an insult to pretty much anyone with the ability to use their brain.)

We could have discussed the matter, and cleared everything up right there and then, without you bothering other people with your personal issues but you chose not to. You chose to start Drama.
You chose to PM multiple people as Ammo against me. This is the very definition of Drama Queen.

You assumed falsely i was spreading a lie being his back, which you were also obviously wrong about, i'm obviously talking about the red trust that he received in 2017, you can see this as the -2 is still visible right now.
I'm pretty sure this reference count as "right in our face", not sure how you could possibly miss it.

Me and OgNasty reached an agreement where i was wrong about said statement... where it was said that this so called negative trust, while there, is erroneous (like you).

Just in case you're still confused about what i'm referring to, because you seem to get confused very easily;



I trust you don't need me to encircle the relevant portion in red for you to see what i'm referencing to? Or do i.


...Because it's still there? Wow.

Do even simple meaning/facts elude you? Here is some basis English course for you, i'm not even a native English Speaker;

Will is future tense, i will (in the future) remove it, if agreed on a whole or a part that is wrong or untrue.

Still confused for lack of context?

For example, had i mentioned that "You don't care about the forum" comment of your's on your profile, where i then acknowledged was wrong, i would have removed it. Get it now?

I was offering/considering to edit it once we're done/cleared up here... You know... remove a part or make it neutral, idk, agreement is obviously not going to happen... With this last nonsense post of your's, i think it's well deserved.

I was internally debating removing it in whole or turning it neutral, like your bullshit you put on mine. I take my time to decide things. The red trust part may not of been fair, but then again, it might be.

Like you like to say; I don't trust you. I think you're a plague to some even though you do contribute positively to other things, i think... since sidehack, one of my forum hero, apparently likes you.

You are vindictive and irrational and this ability of your's to twist every single thing through fallacy eyeglasses, ignoring simple facts/reality or other obvious things/reference has now assured me any further attempt on my part to reason with you is obviously a waste of time and that i find my judgement, however irrelevant and of no impact to this forum, to be reasonable, probably.

Please spare me future nonsense, do the damage on my rep you gotta do, then move on.

You may decide to continue arguing semantics or empirical reality, but then it will be without me.
Let the people throw the neg they have to and let's be done with this.

Sorry about the "You do not care about this forum, you have said so yourself." I read "doesn't" instead of "does", i must of read what i expected to see. This is the post; https://i.imgur.com/H1O44jT.png

---

However, we are not discussing like adults, you are spreaded this shit in public. This is why i say you partake in spreading FUD and Drama. This event for instance is a stellar example of you generating Drama.

You do not understand why i say you live off anger and misery? It's obvious, because you pick fights and start drama with multiple people, everyday. Just cuz you feel it is your duty.

And even though i have to agree you're probably right most often than not... While a lot of people you've left comments on do deserve it...
Here i say, since obviously, i know what myself did, do or would have done... and you do not, you can't "know"... am thus now pretty sure you've also labeled other people in the past based on your personal belief and not reality. Which you are entitled to. But this makes you, i believe, the worse kind of people that should wield any kind of authority.

And then, "Present evidence of claim against" ... which event? I assume "self-escrow";

"Own irrational extremist beliefs" is relating to you deciding with no rational basis that i am untrustworthy, other than simply not involving a forum 3rd party to whatever activity i decide to partake in, and with which you choose to ignore the simple fact that nobody has nor is getting scammed(by me), nor will i scam anyone, even if my registered business was falling apart, which it is very much not.
I'm the fucking idiot that goes back to the groceries store because the cashier forgot to charge him/me a bottle of water. (Yesterday)

Not that i expect you to believe me.

This is YOUR claim, based on your personal opinion, not based on fact. ERGO, the basis to what i said about you.

I operate like this on a daily basis, as i have done before, during and today and will continue to, nobody getting scammed here, my business is thriving, people are getting what they paid for and more. You may very well manage to add enough things to my profile on this forum, after which it will render my very small volume of trade on this forum to non existent, but thankfully, your opinion is of little concern in reality or at least, outside this forum, if here.

Therefore since you choose to say i am untrustworthy for this, and let the world know about it, then i chose to say you are attacking the very community you claim to try to protect. I believe neither of us is going to agree with the other.
But this is what led me to that comment on your profile, do you still claim it to be unreasonable?

If you think its fair to accuse me, then fine. Leave whatever remark you see fit on my trust profile.

I've seen you're not against spamming other people's trust page either, you could probably paint mine with enough Red that even if the alleged fact that i would never have scammed them if we did trade is true, they will now avoid taking the risk.

This seem to be your goal from the start, since you warned people of a risk they already knew about, and ignored the track record that does lead to a fair amount of them to decide to take the risk with me. But i can't or will do nothing more about it. Congratulation, you're successful in pushing me at least in part away from the forum.

Yep i said OgNasty had scammed someone recently, i was wrong, he did receive negative trust rating which report a scam, but after personally discussing with OgNasty, i believe they were machinations, by intents not unlike yours. Regardless i don't wish to pay OgNasty or anyone else on this forum 1370$ just to hold my money in escrow for a bit. I'd much rather use a notarized service, which is a lot cheaper and safer.

I did ask to do this instead, as you did not wish to trade with me and go first, which can be seen on the proof you, yourself, posted.

After all you were a newbie account, i'd be nuts to have trusted you.

Now i have asked you to stop harassing me, you have said your piece, you have PM'ed your threats and PM'ed your repetitive insults, i think you can move on now.


If you wish to ignore my contributions to community-beneficial project like bios modding, ethOS and OhGodAetc, so be it.

My "retaliatory" negative rating on you, won't accomplish anything. You yourself said you don't care about this forum's people or this forum. At least that is what i believe you said in one of these pointless reputation thread about you.

But how is it false? I tried to talk to you in private, ONCE, and forward some evidence we could discuss, but instead of replying, you put on me a feedback that i was harassing you.

So how is reporting that false? That is literally what you, yourself said. To me it seem fair, i'd gladly discuss it with you, but i'm pretty sure a demagogue like you will choose to stick to your guns and just either red me back or leave the unfounded reviews on my trust page.

But if i said something wrong or untrue i will remove it from your profile, regardless.

Thank you QcTechno.

I guess ziku is your alt, Danos, its the second time you promptly post here without having any involvement, ignoring all proof and just repeating OP's claim. Oh look, another account tied to You/ziku with reports of you being a scammer. What a surprise.

I think i may have to consider forwarding all reviews left on ziku's page to you also... it make sense that you would try your machinations on a newbie account to protect your sig spam eligible account.

I'm done arguing, but if me asking to use a notarized irl escrow, which would cost a lot less than 1370$USD, rather than forum escrow, make me a proven scammer, you're welcome to leave me a neg trust.

I just read your latest PM from ziku that just came in and yeah, at think at this point, even if i'm wrong, you supporting that kind of person is evidence enough to relate you two.

Half of my efforts in the last years on this forum has been to avoid forum FUD wars between member, but it seem i am not to succeed any longer. Here is the conclusion to another nonsensical FUD war.

I tried to contact Lauda, once, to see if we could discuss this nonsense like adults (mostly). https://pastebin.com/m0HWr7r3
I tried to provide proof to obvious integrity, but she wishes to ignore reality and stick to her guns, like we've all seen so many time shown with any number of extremist belief-related actions.

Her only replies is littering me with her subjective nonsense.
https://i.imgur.com/PrbsPsP.png

It would be nice if someone on DT would start cracking down on people like Lauda, which wishes to use the Trust system for their own amusement, FUD/Bullying, than for properly reporting success/failure of trades and risk taken between members, but i understand this has been going on since the beginning of its times and nothing is likely to change.

Let's all ignore the other half a dozen thread visible on merely the first page of this reputation board, on Lauda's misconduct. She is very proficient, since she managed to scare the people that made me positive trusts in the past into removing it. Obviously this means she is right and i'm wrong.

So here is another memorandum reference that won't change much, for me to put as reference, as i take my leave from this drama that has been forced upon me.



(Apparently, buying from a newbie and paying them when the good has been received verified is proof of illigitiacy, lets all ignore context and available proof to integrity.)

I live in one of the most humid northern places, i've never had a problem. I think the humidity can be a risk if the miner is hot and the air is under 0C. I believe condensation can occur because the miner is hot and then water pellets freeze there. So when you turn it back on, it may cause a short circuit.

I by no mean am an expert on this particular subject, but i can say with assurance the big miners do not filter their intake either, it takes too much intake surface area out. And i'm not actually sure removing the humidity is feasible at all in the first place, because all proper setups will vent the heat out. So as you try to remove it, an infinite intake of it will keep getting in.

Extracting heat from air in a closed environment to be able to remove all humidity sound like incredibly expensive hardware and upkeep costs.

We had a very brief encounter, in which you asked no justifications or explanation.

I did say some blunt things based on negative trust OgNasty received unjustfully.

But the fact remain it's there.

He is a victim of people like you and Lauda, that abuse the trust system to penalize legitimate forum members.

Pardon me for doubting the system you so religiously believe in. I had a talk with him and i believe him. But it is not for you to decide if i have to trust or use a forum escrow or not.
The Truth about me is simple; I wouldn't trust anyone on a forum/online to hold 137 000$ for me. Pardon me for my distrust?

I did ask to use Escrow, just not forum Escrow.

And if i can pay a seller after i've confirmed the goods are legitimate, welp, why not. Yes i believe i can be trusted with 10 000$. I believe someone could send me a millions dollar by accident and i would send it back.

Even though the Escrow while quite assuredly legit, the forum could get hacked, his wallet could get breached, the value of the coin could drop by 90% or raise by 1000%, no matter how small, there is a risk, why take it if you don't have to. If you don't like my offer, you just say no. I didn't harass or coerce you.

That's it. You have no other basis for my alleged illegitimacy.

You did not like me reporting you were wasting people's time and acting fishy by refusing to close even when your asking price was met. You act like your OP said "Not actually willing to sell for now, just taking offer." But it did not.
You were bored or insane and decided to fabricate me some sort of villain persona.

You're pissed i didn't want to play your dance and you decided to publish our private conversation, You decided to throw a hissy fit and here we are.

You come up with other fabrications like "All the newbies i've scammed and that were unable to speak up" You're a newbie(at least on this account) and you seem able to speak up just fine. How come nobody turns up saying i scammed them?

Because i've never scammed anyone, and never will.

I care about my identiy, just like OgNasty do. He has to waste time swatting accusations by people like you. Just like i have to now.
I now understand why he participate in so much forum drama based on a campaign against him.

Irrational people like you can still spread nonsense and fear.

How not crazy are you willing to pay? You're welcome to PM me if you wish to keep the thread clean of numbers. I'm next to Ottawa.

Let me see if i can get this right;

If i ask someone to first send me hardware, where i will first verify said hardware to be in good condition, and only then will pay them; It warrant people removing their reported activity of me not having scammed them? Or me getting red trust?

You're basically saying : "Hey guys, this Virosa guy has performed repeated trade where the mutual agreed upon deal, is where all risks be upon the second party's shoulder, the results of these trades is Virosa respected the agreement, however let's still all remove our trust/neg him, just cuz."

Even though after OP's refusal i asked to use Escrow, and go at his asking price? How could that possibly equate me being untrustworthy.

The whole trust system is about building a profile of people's activity, how they operate and what the result of the interaction was. It's not a power stick for you to enforce whatever rule you see fit. It's a tool for people to read, to decide if they wish to proceed with suggested agreement or to pass.

I've operated like so over a dozen time without a hitch, some say yes, so say no. When they say yes, it allow me to pay them whatever we agreed to at the actual FIAT Value, with no risk of ending up with 25% less, as such today is an example, where BTC is down 25% in the last week.

What matters is 2 party coming to an agreement, whomever may or may not be taking the risk, and both party respecting said agreement. That's a genuine transaction.

So you not only want me, to act the way you want, but you also want to bring in Blazed and Co into this. You're literally acting as the epitome of drama queen. Nobody was scammed here, nobody would of gotten scammed and nobody will be, by me at least.

Sidehack trust you and likes you, but i don't see what he sees. So sure, go and ask Blazed, stir more shit up, i do not wish to be presumptuous, however i believe he knows who i am, what i do, what i contribute to Crypto outside this forum, with bigger stake than this, maybe you'll take his word over mine, maybe you won't and you will stick to your guns and leave me a red trust even though i've never scammed, or will never scam, for as i wish to honor and respect people i look up to and associate with, people like Wolf0, OhGodAGirl, eliovp, kotarius, sling and companies or projects like ethOS.

This is you (and op) having a personal problem with me, nothing more nor less.
I could be offering people to escrow for them, and it's up to them to decide if they wish to be the first to take the risk. Nobody started with trust, it was built. Whether its OgNasty or SebastianJu or phil, it was unknown if they could be trusted, until someone took a risk and slowly they have built their rep.


Thanks i appreciate the word.

Kaaayyy, you're nuts. The defense rest.

Have you started after the S4/S5 era? I wonder if it all started with them getting a couple "Second Hand S5's" mixed up with parts with refurb/new and then it started some sort of Myth repeated by ear over and over, with people forgetting how it really started.

Self Escrow mean no escrow, you go first. Not sure why you're confused about this. Didn't i then offer to use IRL escrow? What kind of intentions you think i've had.

You derailed your own thread to start a flame war. Well done. I saw you made a new one, self moderated, smart. Let's go over this;

-You refuse to sell at YOUR, price, for now. You want to wait more offer. Why? You want to see if any newbies will pay you upfront?
-You refuse to go to a datacenter to get your hash asap
-You refuse to go with an IRL Escrow, what, 137 000$ isint high enough to warrant something notarized? I'm sorry for being so unreasonable!
-You start some sort of witch hunt
-You make a new thread, self moderated

You're acting like many scammers i've met. Step by step.

You want people to red trust me, because why exactly? I didn't trust you, nor did not wish to use any forum escrow? Why did you not go for IRL escrow then?

Maybe you're the one that should get red trust, not that it would matter, you'll just make another new account, you're obviously not new, who's alt are you?

So let's have the forum decide, i mean, that's why you're doing this right? For the shit show?

You're all welcome to ask people i've *actually* traded with, ask them how it went. You're all welcome to go to #ethosdistro @freenode and ask what the Hundreds of customers think of Virosa and his private dealings without escrow, at his advantage.

Or not. Let's wait and see what mods/the mob will do/decide.

Personally i have an house now, and using 100% 240V, so easy money, easy to wire myself. Hopefully OP or someone else will find all this info useful.

Geez, how dare i offer to make a trade without escrow.

Scam accusation is this way;
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0