Is the dump related to Ddos their clusterfurk?

http://hackingdistributed.com/2016/06/28/ethereum-soft-fork-dos-vector/

Time to move on ...

I think it's funny how crap like this has a 1300-page-thread and there is quality-coins out there that don't even have 400 pages after a year ... shows how many americans are on the forum 

You much McDonald, no?

I think buying/supporting and holding longterm is the better option than renting hash, when it comes to making it more resilient.
That's a topic for discussion of course but i don't see a lot of sense in renting hash opposed to lifting the price in the longterm.
Renting is just 'you mining it'. Higher price is 'everyone mining it'.
My 2 cents.


That being said, Uno is still one of only a hand full of merge mined coins and has a higher hash than 98% of these other altcoins.

edit: don't be discouraged from renting hash though, it's also a good thing to do. Not sure my conclusions are 100% correct. You got to weigh the options yourself. Likely depends on how you look at it.

Better price = more hash

 

Here's your 1-day-chart

have to add: one needs to make a distinction between a cryptocurrency (higher inflation for circulation in business) and a cryptocommodity (lower inflation for value storage with less volume in the markets and less circulation). These are two different valid money-animals in their own right. Apart from that these other (ico)toycoins and tokens shouldn't be looked at as real currency or commmodity because most will be gone in a few weeks and nobody can remember them.

Bitcoin isn't a currency; it's a commodity btw.

The community really needs to discuss what makes a coin a valid money and what properties and requirements and also priorities money has. This crypto-thing is about value store and medium of exchange; it's not about "innovation going nowhere", "adding more features", "good marketing and roadmap" and "littering the landscape with abandoned projects"

Please make crypto great already! No more ponzi-presale-scams! Fuck overrating of innovation - it's broken 'innovation' in 99,99% of cases (aka 'no innovation at all')

Ultimately a simple, resilient, viable and fair coin is to prefer to a complex, hyped, new and broken coin for the longterm investors.  People need to use the brain more.
This is software based on math that needs to be secure and new tech needs vetting and auditing - and a lot of that,this is not dishwashers or radios where more features are always better and simple to roll out.  


edit: don't see a problem with margin-exchange. It just adds a little more volatility but won't affect the overall valuation of the coin. It's just more noise, no issue with that.

edit2: governance is only possible through consensus - in the literal sense of the word, not only machine-consensus; a majority vote is not that. Projects governed by 50%+1 majority votes will 100% fail in the long run. Yes, 100%.
The only way of governance is by consensus or 90% majority-votes. Why it is this way is a topic for a large article about history of mankind and money and dynamics in power aswell as observations in politics.
It's not as easy as people think. People aren't aware of the pitfalls of majority votes. They will have to fail for 10 or 20 years in these coins before understanding what some know already. Such is life

Hey Z. I'm active on and off. Right now in the volatility a bit more again.
You didn't see me for a whole year? Really?

This service enables businesses to accept dozens of altcoins with not much hassle. They'll pay the business owner out in whatever he wants, i think. Funny nobody mentioned it so far. It has been around for a very long time.

https://www.coinpayments.net/

Uno was among the stronger coins today. Made +7% against the $ while others dropped up to 30% in price.

you'll rebuy higher

Is the scam still running?

Yeah, let's be friends until i dump a sack on you or buy the coins you panicsell before it goes up 6 times.  

edit: promo is great though. Thank you for adding value to the coin. Grassroot promo is what really matters.

The Vern-issue is the past. The coins are now with a much more reliable player than Vern and will probably be bought by the community next year which could cause a temporary dip of 10% or 20% from the then price which will recover fairly quickly. After that is done we're going permabull on ya

You'd have to be very lucky to get coins cheaper than this current price i think. Just my 2 cents.

edit: while all of you drown in 'fear, uncertainty and doubt' we're probably in for a correction up soon, in my opinion.

Personally i think there will be another epic altcoin-pump this year. I know others think like that too. It's in the cards and Uno will not be left out in the cold when that happens  

Or at least that's what i like keep telling myself.  

Yes, of course some of the altcoin buyers are hedging btc.

And we just crossed the MA to the north  

Edit:
The buyer on c-cex might have something to do with it  

#5 would be bittrex coldstore and "elsewhere" the 5k came from would be all the hot wallets (which can be verified by the tx).
Around 5k (give or take a few) is also what the bittrex distribution tab shows they should have. I'm fairly sure if an Uno-whale wanted to withdraw a ton from trex he or she would draw on that exact #5 wallet.
On the other side bittrex hotwallets should be fairly empty right now.

Edit: the tx from bittrex to the cryptsy receiver shows two things:
1) Uno is fungible
2) Bittrex is solvent when it comes to Uno

Offers nothing Bitcoin didn't offer 5 years ago already.

Buyer beware with this one.

One day people will understand that only merge mined coins are resilient coins and actually are real coins therefore because even if they are cheap they will survive much longer than most other things that are around.
I for one like merge mined coins because i think they have somewhat of a future as this coin actually proves. It's a ancient coin, still running.
Fuck the Hype-crap. Slow but real growth is much better. It's less risky.

It has to end in tears