as long as you trust the dev team, all should be good
You can't trust anyone in crypto.. I thought everybody already knows.. So true, I wouldn't say VTR is scammy though. waiting patiently for the torrent to be implemented if dev can make it work, i don't know if holders are starting to doubt the project since the price is moving down again to 900 sat hopefully dev can give good update and the value will sye high to 10k hahaha, good luck dev. Come back just before Christmas time, we might get that long awaited price correction, if not then on the second fork in Feb. If the torrent System is good, then were looking at a value of a few hundred satoshi per coin minimum. Easy dollar each, (even more long term). Don't forget the torrent community is huge, many, many more times people use torrents than crypto. It was the number one internet usage before organisations like the MPAA started lobby governments to censor torrent sites. Don't concern your self with the current price, wait for the big release. I concur. The torrent niche is empty, waiting for us. We have a huge amount of users who are using scammy mirror pages to find torrents every day. And they will love VTorrent. If implemented correcty this will be one of the top ten altcoins, no doubt. We are all gambling here with the capacity of the dev to make the machine work. For me it worth the risk. |
|
|
|
Aprovechando este hilo... os enlazo la presentación que hicimos el pasado Abril de Bitsquare en la Comunidad Bitcoin de Barcelona. Creo que es interesante conocer de mano de su creador el proyecto y su filosofía: https://vimeo.com/174312139Para más información, comentarios, debates, etc. podéis ir al foro oficial: https://forum.bitsquare.iosaludos, |
|
|
|
If/when the Dev releases that, all those Chinese guys will stand in the queue to buy VTR  Chinese guys and the rest of the world. btw I fully support the closed source torrent implementation at release. We can open when when the coin get traction. |
|
|
|
If our developer progress as expected, the exchanges will come like sharks to a drop of blood. Meanwhile enjoy the cheap coins  |
|
|
|
Small bug report that is fairly inconsequential:
When staking my list of recent transactions on the overview page & transaction page never seems to update. The next time I reopen the wallet the new transactions are listed so staking works (I can tell because Windows puts a notification in the bottom corner everytime I get PoS) however in terms of display nothing happens.
Also in terms of the wallet I find it times out/lags a little and I'm using a very high-specced computer (i.e. 6 core/32GB RAM/GTX 1080/SSD/Windows 10.1). Perhaps it's Windows only that lags at this stage? I mean the wallet eventually recovers and doesn't actually crash or anything, but it doesn't look like its playing along as well as it could.
Understandably these are both low-priority issues but would be nice to see them addressed at some stage)
I have the same error, the transactions that are mined never show up in the transaction list (but they are added to the total) untill I load the wallet again, but transaction back and forth bittrex show up straight away. Also cyberhacker is on BCT, he posted a few times on this thread. Ok can we make a list of Chinese exchanges to request the coin on? BTC38.com and what others? I can happily contribute some BTC towards voting on this matter as I believe it will help this coin in the long run. Maybe not enough to get it accepted straight away but to at least give it a headstart. Polo don't add closed source. Good old c-cex... https://c-cex.com |
|
|
|
Wow, looking time since I have posted on here !
hey stonehedge, good to see you again |
|
|
|
Bienvenidos todos a Bitcointalk |
|
|
|
Nuestro próximo meetup: Criptomonedas y legislación en Europa: Regulación actual y escenarios futuros. El 14 de Octubre a las 19h en itnig, con: Alejandra Sánchez Gómez:• Es abogada en Soares & Vacite Abogados, especialista en el sector de IP y Nuevas Tecnologías, con especial enfoque en el entorno Bitcoin y Blockchain. Alejandro Gómez de la Cruz:• Es abogado en el departamento de consultoría de IT de Grant Thornton. • Alejandro es el fundador de la página web de referencia Law & Bitcoin, que trata de las implicaciones legales de Bitcoin y Blockchain. Toda la info e inscripciones en: https://www.meetup.com/bitcoin-barcelona/events/234296177 |
|
|
|
FYI: We have been harassed for more than 2 years in this thread. We have suffered all kind of threats by supremacists from other coins (mainly moroneans). They did not work in the past and it does not work now. They are barking, Sancho, that's a sign we are ridingDon Quijote de la Mancha |
|
|
|
Friendly reminder for newcomers: |
|
|
|
 Hello. I have to log in to ignore trolls. * OMG  Welcome back Chaeplin!! It is really nice to see you. Things have changed a bit since you left (I think you have a lot to read ) |
|
|
|
 3 in a row! Not bad guys. |
|
|
|
Fuck! How could you compare and MLM coin to a real crypto existing? Onecoin is ponzi and i don't see any good things or ways to earn by that self proclaim coin, and i don't really bother to know more about it since i know they only running a shaddy business out their, so thats why i would really choose dash for this comparison since i can see the healthy and unhealthy flactuation for this coin everyday and i think that ia the normal movement of the real coin and not those ponzi ones.
Relax dude. This is another fud thread made by our Munero friends to try to discredit Dash. Nothing to see here. languagehasmeaning https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=547161;sa=showPostsSame old crap again and again in the alt section. What a disgusting community you are... Sigh   |
|
|
|
Please stay on topic. You have dozens of theads to talk about other currencies in Bitcointalk. Thanks! |
|
|
|
It is not about trust. Even in crypto you have to trust certain people. For example, every investor holding DASH at this time is trusting that Evan and the core team will pull off Evolution as advertised and further increase the value of the coin -- else you should sell now.
No, it is not about trust -- it is about properly aligned financial incentives. And in this case they are aligned properly. I can't think of any reason for Node 40, for example, to snoop becuase they would be killing off their own business. Not to mention hurting the value of any DASH they hold. It makes no sense.
Not to mention there is no evidence I have ever seen of 2000~3000 nodes (i.e. enough to do any reasonable snooping or double spending of IS transactions) being hosted on a single service...
I agree that more decentralization is always better, but this is a non-issue started (seemingly) by trolls.
I think the point is...lets explore ways of continuing to better the security. I for one don't see anything wrong with Mr. Jones proposing his theory. In Theory...it could in a very remote possible way happen that someone or entity might host close to 50% of MN's...in theory. I think its worth having people who are not DASH fans pointing thinkings out. Its benificial for us to not have ourselves surrounded by only fanboys and "yes" people...but constantly test and re-test and analyize with critical eyes on any and all possible angles. As Neil deGrasse Tyson says and I quote .... "Test ideas by experiment and observation, build on those ideas that pass the test, reject the ones that fail, and follow the evidence wherever it leads" +101 Find it, review it, fix it. That's what I said, only you said it better. notwithstanding this: b) Referring back to the document that was linked earlier ( https://www.dash.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dash-WhitepaperV1.pdf), someone who controlled (or snooped on) 50% of all masternodes would have a 25% chance of deanonymizing a 2 round PrivateSend transaction, a 6.25% chance of deanonymizing a 4 round PrivateSend transaction, and a 0.39% chance of deanonymizing an 8 round PrivateSend transaction. I can agree that the system can be improved in this point. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
