Very strange situation with payouts. Pool showed a lot of payouts, then it showed 1 payout, but on wallet 0
This coin looks like scam
You need to learn few things: - chain forking - shit pools - shit wallets that fork easy - attack on network or pool some 5-6h ago http://http://neoscrypt.pro pool had 90% hash power which is NEVER good and for that you can blame YOU stupid miners which all go to one pool! Then that pool stoped working, why, I don`t know then chain splited and most clone yiimp pool left out! http://neoscrypt.pro still need to pay out coins before chain split! if they does not then owner is a thieve, rest forked coins ARE GONE UPDATEthis is neoscrypt.pro address so they have coins mined prior the fork/pool/wallet fuckup http://explorer.muncoin.info:3001/address/MQ6HentxaRTEJLSjLCdcLUz1Rg3zXmcJLh2:12AM is when the pool stoped, all mined there after is gone to null I hope they pay out |
|
|
|
|
most pools are dead, was is a ddos on them or bad pool one of which had 90% of hash at start or plain fork, duno... when today we see bunch of morons runing pool
|
|
|
|
pool.friends-master.net
Pool fee: 1 %
Payout : 1 h
-a skunk -o stratum+tcp://pool.friends-master.net:8433 -u YOU_MUN_WALLET_ADDRESS -p c=MUN man you are forked on wrong chain! you mined block is low maybe now you are on right chain but no blocks... why I don`t know |
|
|
|
|
prolly zero if on forked pool and most are... if not maybe 1-2 per day, duno
|
|
|
|
|
The pools are forking as mad...... I am not sure which one works at right chain some are on their own and are alone, so those pool should stop or resync
add some nodes, or something 90% here will get zero!
|
|
|
|
|
WTB mun price per mun 0.0001 BTC pay in LTC or some alt from bittrex
from 100 to 1000 MUN!
|
|
|
|
|
Does masternode need sentinel, I have it for some other coin but now sure if I can use same on both coins
|
|
|
|
|
I would drop power limit on 1080Ti it can draw over 300W and your is on limit
mine at 80% is using ~200w I don`t like to push it more, clock is ~1400-1550mhz for GPU
|
|
|
|
|
Verge is full of orphants i bet most of shit coins sp talk also, no way you can mine solo and have near calculator!
|
|
|
|
|
For neoscrypt when you have a time best would be if power use can be optimized, all my cards are hitting power limit this heavy limited 1070 to ~120w have low speed gain 1-2%
the algo is so heavy on power
|
|
|
|
don`t be like sp_ he earned 100+ BTC for other ppl work and he still don`t have 1080ti nor 1080 I think!  |
|
|
|
I updated thread 17.8 is 7870MB use like it can not pass 8GB and card is defo 11GB  -i 17.9 well its 8296Mb still works -18 alocate for a sec 8720mb and exit with error Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1447 : an illegal memory access was encountered klaus ccminer -21 works but use low memory, i23 try just ~3600MB and does not start too UPDATE:5x 1070 on dual core one instance does not slow down compared with 5x, but I need to drop intensity from 17 to 16.x but its looks like system is limted by just 8GB of ram and 16GB swap so only 1080Ti have problems with multy GPU with hash drop on ine instance all GPU |
|
|
|
Also 4x 1080Ti now works on one instance but hash rate drop 6-7% per GPU
4x instances is faster, same settings, -i 17.5
maybe you need to tie each GPU to different CPU core in one instance?
Try tweaking intensity higher, 17.5 allocates little more than half of 1080Ti memory. Try 18 if you can. Think I'll add some kind of scheduler in next release to tweak work distribution manually. drv 388.59 win10 (8gb ram, swap file 32GB) one GTX 1080ti -i 17.8 works memory usage: 7870MB (msi afterburner) like it can not pass 8GB? BUG?! card is 11GB -i 18 Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1447 : an illegal memory access was encountered. -i 18.5 Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1304 : out of memory. -i 19 Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1303 : out of memory. ccminer works on |
|
|
|
|
Palit gamerock 1080 - they are all micron GDDR5x
real GPU clock 1960Mhz (power limit 90%) manual clock
memory real 5022, +504 in MSI afterburner
1070 in same PC with less clock ~1850Mhz is faster by 10% and does not ask for memory OC
Also 4x 1080Ti now works on one instance but hash rate drop 6-7% per GPU
4x instances is faster, same settings, -i 17.5
maybe you need to tie each GPU to different CPU core in one instance?
|
|
|
|
|
GTX 1070 + 1080 now hash with one instance fine... gtx 1080 speed match ccminer speed I think there is room for it (pool side is now fine)
1080 like need more memory OC, with +500mhz it give 1140khs
will test 1080ti and 1070 rigs later
|
|
|
|
GTX 1080ti now no way to start...
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1427 : an illegal memory access was encountered.
Play a bit with intensity, put -i 17.5 or -i 18 or -i 18.5, default one won't work with 1080ti I have, first version worked fir 1 card, this one does not on gtx1080ti maybe -i does not work also tried -i 14 in gtx1070 it start but all shares are invalid, -i 17 works |
|
|
|
|
GTX 1080ti now no way to start...
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1080' at line 1427 : an illegal memory access was encountered.
|
|
|
|
|
Also check pls why one 1080ti works fine and 3x with -d 0,1,2 hash same speed as one card on pool
hash reported by miner is fine
|
|
|
|
|
1st it is important to make option to solve CPU hog, 99% mining rigs are 4-6 cards in dual core CPU, even i5 can run more then 3 GPU atm
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
