STOP dumping all on CryptoBridge, let the buy orders grow, come on assholes, 2 days ago people was buying at 28k sats, and now you beast are dumping at 2500 sats, i know is free money for most of you, but some of us are investing our money into this.
That guys buyint at +50k sats on yobit should dump and buy 20x more LCC on cryptobridge
Thats what i did. Dumped all mine on yobit last night for $5/ea then transferred over as ltc to tradesatoshi and bought it all back at $0.77 now i have 6x worth. Maybe it will go to zero...maybe not, we shall see having 6x as many though seemed like a good deal, though i may end up wishing i just kept the ltc i used to trasfer between the exchanges lol. Your transfer out from yobit to tradesatoshi worked? Yobit did not stop your transfer? From wat I read, yobit may just stop it. How much did u move out? That's not what he said. He said he dumped what he had on Yobit, converted to LTC and transferring that out. |
|
|
|
Has anyone already successfully claim Litecoin Cash?
I would like to see a detailed step by step guide for claiming.
The guides I know of were for prior to the fork. At this point it's simply: - Get the private key(s) for the old LTC address(s) - Move your LTC to new address(es) (best idea is to create a brand new wallet for this) as you shouldn't use the old one(s) anymore as the keys are going to be in the LCC wallet. - Get and start the LCC wallet - Import the private key(s) You've been here a long time. I'm surprised you haven't gone through this stuff before like for the bitcoin forks. |
|
|
|
(0.65% 0f 840x10^6 is 5,460,000 coins)
If this premine was somehow able to be placed on Yobit before the fork and slowly sold off at roughly 5 bucks per LCC. (Lets just say 25 million bucks)
Actually - it wasn't slowly.
The volume placed LCC in the top ten of cryptos on it's second day (with volume roughly 135 million), and the volume now is something around $500,000 and.
That's quite a haul.
This is almost like an "invasion of the body snatchers" scam. "They look like people, sound like people....." The dev team did everything by the book. I am (grudgingly) sort of happy that most exchanges passed on this.
If there are any bits of evidence to this it would be with YoBit. Were there discussions beforehand about delaying the wallet code to prevent outsiders (you and me) from selling?
I personally think that the withholding of the wallet code for withdrawals and deposits was evil genius "Ocean's 13" sort of brilliant. Hopefully this will be a dying trend due to compliance and weary jaded investors.
LOL so much fud. The premine is sitting at the devs address. better put my tinfoil hat on. True regarding the premine. But do you really think that once they hit that amount they didn't just change their Address and keep mining away? |
|
|
|
there are too many doge coins. and the year of the dog will not bring the course up. doge increases when btc rises and doge falls when btc drops. It was 4 years and will always be like this. there are just too many dogecoins. that will not be supercoin in 100 years
DOGE was mined far too quickly and then abandoned by its creator.That is not good combination for any coin. 5% annual inflation on already far too big supply wont help it stability too. And where is Satoshi with his bitcoin? Which was initially mined centrally by only himself. Yet here's bitcoin today 9 years later, WITH inflation  Yep. However, I've never understood why people throw around the "inflation" term. Inflation has to do with the cost of goods going up in price which may or may not have to do with more money being "printed". Printing more money (mining new coins) is referred to as quantitative easing. I suspect people throwing around inflation is just a way to FUD things which they may or may not know they're even doing. Course, the problem is that the stupid Bitcoin wiki use the term inflation as well sometimes when they're talking about the increased number of coins so that doesn't help. i.e. they use the terms added, increase and then they have a paragraph using inflation to say the same thing.. and then they actually use it more correctly in terms of alluding to the fees required to "buy" your way into a block. . With regard to bitcoin inflation isn't really the right term, because it has capped supply of 21 Million (which we won't see in our lifetime). but by going with wat the definition says: Inflation (noun): 1. the action of inflating something or the condition of being inflated. "the inflation of a balloon" 2. ECONOMICS a general increase in prices and fall in the purchasing value of money. "policies aimed at controlling inflation" I guess really neither apply? cause Doge has actually increased in value since its inception   Well, we're talking about "money" so it would be the economic definition. But yes, it doesn't apply because it's the things we buy with the coin that would be going up in price. Printing more money is quantitative easing. And here's the thing. If quantitative easing of the coin was sooooo bad, then why can I buy more today with a coin than I could 2 or 3 years ago. More people are born every day as well as coins being lost so you need to increase the coin supply "forever" as far as I'm concerned. The only reason I can come up with for people not wanting more coins out there is purely greed. But again, as we see with bitcoin, the price goes up (far more than actual real inflation) regardless of how many more coins are created every day. |
|
|
|
there are too many doge coins. and the year of the dog will not bring the course up. doge increases when btc rises and doge falls when btc drops. It was 4 years and will always be like this. there are just too many dogecoins. that will not be supercoin in 100 years
DOGE was mined far too quickly and then abandoned by its creator.That is not good combination for any coin. 5% annual inflation on already far too big supply wont help it stability too. And where is Satoshi with his bitcoin? Which was initially mined centrally by only himself. Yet here's bitcoin today 9 years later, WITH inflation Yep. However, I've never understood why people throw around the "inflation" term. Inflation has to do with the cost of goods going up in price which may or may not have to do with more money being "printed". Printing more money (mining new coins) is referred to as quantitative easing. I suspect people throwing around inflation is just a way to FUD things which they may or may not know they're even doing. Course, the problem is that the stupid Bitcoin wiki use the term inflation as well sometimes when they're talking about the increased number of coins so that doesn't help. i.e. they use the terms added, increase and then they have a paragraph using inflation to say the same thing.. and then they actually use it more correctly in terms of alluding to the fees required to "buy" your way into a block. |
|
|
|
Anybody saying something in favor of LCC?
They haven't been in this thread for the last 6 days. So what do you think? Pretty unprofessional to have an announcement thread and then not even show up in it once a day or so to give some sort of update on what's going on with things and to respond to some posts. It's the sort of thing you see amateurs doing. |
|
|
|
why you rank is hero but your merit more than 1000,normal circumstances you should be legendary, i do not understand
Because his activity isn't high enough yet for it to trigger the move to legendary. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Yeah, I can't really see it going anywhere either. It's the sort of coin that would have come out years ago, not in todays environment when you consider new tech in things like etherium, iota etc etc. I'd love to see some huge pool/miner just hammer it with massive hash (which is possible given it's using the bitcoin algo) just to see what would happen. Or even try and do some things like double spends etc. It's been a long time since those sorts of things were done as a means to test out how solid a coin design was. |
|
|
|
Yobit closed LCC deposits and CryptoBridge has three times lower price. Any idea when Yobit will open deposits and is CryptoBridge safe?
YoBit hasn't allowed deposits or withdrawals since the fork. They did quickly honor the LTC to LCC "forkdrop" on existing YoBit LTC wallets, but that amazing dream of selling all that wonderful newly minted LCC was exactly that - a dream. I wonder if the Devs had a bunch of LTC parked on YoBit for exactly this purpose. Supposedly they have a large premine for development and I don't know if they can sell it for going YoBit prices. That would be quite the haul and worth the pretense of a legitimate seeming fork if they did arrange that! Cryptobridge is fine Thanks for your answer. Yeah its kinda dream at the moment. You have some free coins to sell but you can't. Will wait until they open it(if they will at all...). The only option is now Cryprobridge to sell at lower price That is why CryptoBridge's price is so low everyone is unloading there. The price is not bad around the one dollar mark. No one can complaint they are free. Coins from the fork are free, those that are mined are not. So the low price is only "good" if it's giving miners a decent profit. |
|
|
|
I don't know why so many people have an issue with the patent
I've been watching the progress on this a little so I don't know all the details. Is it going to be open source, i.e. following the spirit of what crypto is supposed to be about? If yes, than you can then hit anyone that takes the code to start their own coin with a lawsuit and/or blackmail them to pay you a fee. Basically, it all just looks like greed like any other bank/corporation out there and not in the spirit of crypto. |
|
|
|
So what are all those trades on YoBit if they don't allow LCC deposits?  People had LTC on Yobit and so they got their LCC on there. Thus, they can trade. If you like conspiracy theories, Yobit themselves could have used "their" LTC->LCC to also trade. And they could very well have deposits working for themselves, devs etc and so are able to trade. We'll never know. If they used other people's LTC to get LCC that would probably be theft. But then again is it possible to prove that? I guess not right? If that was true, then every bank in the world is stealing out money. i.e. they all take our money and lend it out to others in order to make interest on it for themselves. And no, don't see how it could be proved that they were doing that. |
|
|
|
Slightly unrelated question (to the current argument). What's the benefit of having random sock puppets adding you to your trust list? Like I cant see much "benefit" unless I'm missing out on something
QS did it to try to stitch Lauda up.. it failed as he is a retarded sewer rat. Nah I meant, not accusing either party. In hypothetical scenario, say Lauda (or anyone) makes 6-7 accounts or purchases them. Adds themself to the trust list. How does it affect anyone else. Like if it was a trust rating they gave then it would be trust farming but is just that Lauda's rating are shown as trusted to those sock puppets. Now if the purchased accounts were say DT accounts then maybe yeah it would matter If 1000 people have me in their trust list but only 10 have you, then to just a casual observe I would appear more trustworthy.. That's about the only thing I can come up with. |
|
|
|
How do I rescan my wallet? I added all my private keys, after each key it prompts if you want to rescan. I though I had more so declined but now I need to rescan to receive the coins and can not make it work.
still need help with this, is over shadowed by the huge ass post before lol How do I rescan the wallet? I tried -rescan in the debug consol. I need to rescan to recieve my coins "-rescan" is a command line option when you launch the wallet, not a console command. |
|
|
|
|
Betting would be fun. One side seems to think the bet is for one thing, and the other for something else. Yeah, not going to happen.
|
|
|
|
So what are all those trades on YoBit if they don't allow LCC deposits? People had LTC on Yobit and so they got their LCC on there. Thus, they can trade. If you like conspiracy theories, Yobit themselves could have used "their" LTC->LCC to also trade. And they could very well have deposits working for themselves, devs etc and so are able to trade. We'll never know. Your theory is correct, this is the reason why Yobit love forked coin and credit all their users, because Yobit is the home of the pump and dump coin, they have a new coin now to pump and dump, they can easily make a profit out of it, easy to understand Yobit's action. I thought Bittrex was the home of the pump and dump coin lol. |
|
|
|
So what are all those trades on YoBit if they don't allow LCC deposits? People had LTC on Yobit and so they got their LCC on there. Thus, they can trade. If you like conspiracy theories, Yobit themselves could have used "their" LTC->LCC to also trade. And they could very well have deposits working for themselves, devs etc and so are able to trade. We'll never know. |
|
|
|
How to solo mine LCC?
Can be done from the wallet with RPC and Litecoincash.conf ?
Some advice please.
You can probably do it via the wallet (setgenerate 1 in the console I think it would be). Try it out yourself. However, with the amount of hash on the coin right now the chance of you getting a block is extremely slim to none. |
|
|
|
For those still calling this a scam and that haven't seen this quote:
“We're using the Litecoin Cash name simply because it has become customary in recent months for a coin which forks a blockchain to prefix its name with the name of the coin being forked. This practice has become a widely understood convention. We're not associated or affiliated with Charlie Lee or any of the Litecoin team in any way; we are big fans though.”
P.S. I believe it's the Bitcoin Core wallet that sets off antivirus', probably an older forked version that was modified but never updated for the fix (if there even exists one, I haven't looked ...)
And I'll put this here since you seem to want to cheerlead for some reason. Explain if it is not a scam just taking the name?
- It's become customary in recent months that when a blockchain is hardforked, the new coin takes the name of the old as a prefix. We're not saying it's a great convention, but it's instantly understood by people as "oh it's a Litecoin hard fork". No. It's generally understood that a coin is co-opting the name for other reasons such as to mislead people and try and gain a level of "respectability" they have not earned. Last time there was a lot of this sort of thing if was "Dark" stuff. i.e. BitcoinDark, LitecoinDark, DogeDark, DarkDoge and so on and so forth. So those that have been around awhile, do not view any coin using another's name in a favorable light. |
|
|
|
The fact that this first release of the windows Litecoin Cash wallet make Avast antivirus rise a red flag is not very professional.
All wallets do that buddy. That is, set off antivirus. Has absolutely nothing to do with LCC. Absolutely not. I have had to add no exception for the Litecoin and Bitcoin core wallets. You must be new to all this. Here's just one example of litecoin having this issue in the past.. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1586507.0bitcion has also had this problem at times. |
|
|
|
The fact that this first release of the windows Litecoin Cash wallet make Avast antivirus rise a red flag is not very professional.
A lot of coins (including versions of litecoin), have had antivirus programs flag them. The people then in charge of those programs submit a review request to the antivirus companies and those companies put in an exclusion for them if there's really nothing bad in them. I ran virustotal on the downloadable exe and it only had 1 thing flagged out of 66 and it was that stupid baidu thing which seems to flag almost everything. There are reputable coins out there that still get flagged as a virus by some programs. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
