Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 03:17:47 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 [236] 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 »
4701  Local / Trading und Spekulation / Re: Der Aktuelle Kursverlauf on: January 28, 2017, 09:35:34 AM
Aktueller Kursverlauf rauf:  1 Mio USlessD rauf


https://deutsch.rt.com/newsticker/45858-us-amerikaner-kauft-haus-fur-bitcoin/


Echt oder Ente?

Ja hab ich gestern schon gepostet Wink


... Grmbl... Ich lese doch eigentlich immer alles hier, schon seit 2011....

Mea culpa

 Grin
4702  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin needs altcoins because ... on: January 28, 2017, 09:33:40 AM
because bitcoin will fail in the real world

bitcoin is associate with scam to the general public

...so was the internet in the beginning. so what?
4703  Local / Trading und Spekulation / Re: Der Aktuelle Kursverlauf on: January 28, 2017, 09:22:23 AM
Chemtrails und ein Clinton bild sind das Alle Argumente die ihr für Core habt ?


https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/5qj28t/bitcoin_unlimited_is_an_expression_of_freedom_and/


hier noch ein Artikel vom gekauften Blockstream Chill  Aaron van Wirdum

Forken ist gaaaaaanz schlecht besser nie Updaten den Client immer 1 MB bis 2024 am besten und nur segwit als Softfork max.



Why why why muss blockstream soviele leute Kaufen ?

wenn ihre lösung doch die beste ist HuhHuh



Das grosse Problem, das ich sehe, ist, dass niemand von der small Block Fraktion wirklich von und mit bitcoin lebt, also z.B. wesentlich nur in bitcoin bezahlt werden und auch selber bezahlen. Wäre dies so, dann hätten wir / sie längst die Skalierung gelöst.
4704  Local / Trading und Spekulation / Re: Der Aktuelle Kursverlauf on: January 28, 2017, 09:15:28 AM
Aktueller Kursverlauf rauf:  1 Mio USlessD rauf


https://deutsch.rt.com/newsticker/45858-us-amerikaner-kauft-haus-fur-bitcoin/


Echt oder Ente?
4705  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: As it turns out, Craig Wright actually is Satoshi! on: January 27, 2017, 08:42:37 PM
Tell me if I m wrong, but to me Satoshi and Bitcoin is all about facts, consensus and united community - nothing to do with individuals and far off people bashing and ranting.

I cannot believe that this sprit has changed after he left, even to some legends here...
4706  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin needs altcoins because ... on: January 27, 2017, 03:58:00 PM
Bitcoin needs Altcoin to sustain the demand pressure, most Altcoins trade on most exchanges are against BTC and not fiat, also some ICOs like ICONOMI and Chronobank allowed fiat deposit but this was converted into BTC

But we all know that these BTC will be converted sooner or later,  And the way you stated it, it was the other way around.  It is the altcoin that needed BTC because these altcoins are traded mostly in BTC.  And some ICO needs BTC for them to crowdfund the project.  

this is just another topic with the same argument about bitcoin versus altcoins. there is already another one of these in this board called bitcoin without altcoins!
and so far out of all these arguments and some spam, and among all these altcoins none of them have contributed or otherwise to bitcoin apart from making some traders richer and some lose money.

Sorry, I havn t checked this threads here in depth. I came to this when I was thinking of my point 3 in the op. I ve never seen this 'value' of alts mentioned anywhere or from anybody else.
4707  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin needs altcoins because ... on: January 27, 2017, 11:00:33 AM
... I should change the title to be 'needs some altcoins' ....

Pls check my 3 points in the op - sure that this not say we need all. And I'm fine with the 'some alts' be in the low market cap range, but that's not their usage until bitcoin stays here as a store of value.
4708  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Do you think "iamnotback" really has the" Bitcoin killer"? on: January 25, 2017, 05:23:07 PM
The hardest task is always to find the bug and its nature, even harder if its wrapped into a silent try catch block.


Found is fixed!
4709  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: January 23, 2017, 08:41:28 PM
The next 2 days are critical. If there will be a successful pump, eventually leading to about 1050$ - 1100$, then this will be a EW one, and after months of sideways we'll see 2000$ or more.
If however the pump will fail, then we'll see a major correction, down to about 600$ and the possibility of a new bear market.

Lost my faith in EW long ago... always traders trying their hardest to force wave counts to match history, never predictive of anything.

Hehe, if you found sth working better pls let me now by pm.

 Grin
4710  Local / Trading und Spekulation / Re: Der Aktuelle Kursverlauf on: January 22, 2017, 06:37:22 PM

https://www.microsoft.com/de-lu/store/p/bitcoins-free/9wzdncrd1ll3


WTF?

Huh
4711  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin needs altcoins because ... on: January 22, 2017, 05:25:27 PM
I don't agree with the testnet, because we have already the teestnet with bitcoin, if you want tot ry something you can try it there without making an altcoin to scam investors, altcoin are bad for another reason and is the fact that they remove liquidity to the bitcoin market, if someone want to buy many altcoin he will dump bitcoin for them because it's the easy way instead of going with fiat first

I understand what you say and I mostly agree but scams might be always there but with anti fragility they will disappear again. People get educated!

I also do not want to promote alts here but since they are here try to find a reason for.
4712  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Bitcoin needs altcoins because ... on: January 22, 2017, 04:20:22 PM
...

- Alts work like a testnet for bitcoins (looking forward seeing Litecoin with SegWit)

- Once an alt feature looks working it might get adopted no matter onchain or in a side chain. (RSK)

- Alts mostly need bitcoin to trade and some bitcoins might be always reserved / locked for this.

- Alts might help to generate a closed bitcoin economy

My favorit comes here:

- Alts work like an infinite fear generator (Hydra) against any try of regulators to bring bitcoin down, since there are too many to kill and its very easy to just create a new one (like a Hydra cannot be killed by chopping off some heads, even the biggest one!) > crypto world is anti fragile and it will stay on this solar system from year 2009 on.


Any other things missing here?
4713  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Will segwit be activated? on: January 22, 2017, 10:11:40 AM
Divide and conquer
4714  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Lykke - a global marketplace on the Blockchain on: January 21, 2017, 05:19:11 PM
This might be worth reading for your project.

https://www.finextra.com/finextra-downloads/newsdocs/finra_blockchain_report.pdf
4715  Local / Trading und Spekulation / Re: Der Aktuelle Kursverlauf on: January 21, 2017, 05:05:58 PM
Mädels, wenn der Fernsehr heut nix taugt dann schaut doch mal den dezentralen König hier im Mises an.

Sehr nett


https://youtu.be/HJSo06Su2vE


Und wenn der König spricht, dann müssen sich alle Klumpenrisiken und TooBigToFails warm an ziehen.
(Hätt er doch mal 2011 richtig investiert)
 Grin
4716  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: SegWit vs Bitcoin unlimited on: January 21, 2017, 03:21:30 PM
BU in short removes a single mostly unimportant line in the bitcoin protocol.

SegWit is a brutal hack into many places of the bitcoin protocol that is still not understood fully how it finally plays out and now litecoin tries to test it in real live soon.

You decide whats a bigger risk and could be called an altcoin.
4717  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: PoW vs PoS conundrum - presenting a new form of PoA. on: January 21, 2017, 01:47:41 PM
I m still very astonished that PoS promoters try to work against the laws of physics or restaurants:

There is no free lunch!

Security comes from order keeping and due to dissipation and entropy increase you just have to work! to keep that order and security.

With PoS there will be never such security since you can mine all day but spend nothing ( or very few) for work - despite PoS promoters work hard in mind to overcome simple laws, but you cant fix physics.

I wonder if there is some theorem out there like the CAP that describes what I mean?

If not, we should try formulate this here.


To PoS promoters: Go back to work!

Shows alot of asshats, think they know how stuff works, but at the end of the day , most of those asshats are just plain wrong.

We know PoW is an energy hog ,
We know PoW will Centralize due to economics (BTC, LTC & Doge already have centralized to China)

We hear alot of BullShit security horror stories about how easy it is to attack a PoS coin.

Yet , every time one of you genius rant about the death of PoS due to a security flaw.
I offer you ZEIT's exposed Proof of Stake jugular for you to Prove your ever so deadly theory.
You want to know what has happen each and every time, not a Damn Thing, because your imaginations and the real world are not the same fucking thing.

So again, if any of you brilliant asshats can take down a Proof of Stake coin with your scary laser beams.
ZEIT as always is waiting , bring it on, and break this coin with your attack or SHUT THE FUCK UP!

 Cool




Lol

Looks like you got hit and need some defensive now.

I ve already done your worst attack, I ve never invested into piece of shit and feels like majority is with me.

 sorry
4718  Local / Trading und Spekulation / Re: Der Aktuelle Kursverlauf on: January 21, 2017, 10:12:38 AM
Schöner Ausbruch nach oben. Ein gutes Signal zunächst. [...]

Auch bei der Hashrate:

https://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate

Might be McAffee invests into miners massively?

https://youtu.be/WJe5z6a4DyM
4719  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: PoW vs PoS conundrum - presenting a new form of PoA. on: January 21, 2017, 08:25:56 AM
I m still very astonished that PoS promoters try to work against the laws of physics or restaurants:

There is no free lunch!

Security comes from order keeping and due to dissipation and entropy increase you just have to work! to keep that order and security.

With PoS there will be never such security since you can mine all day but spend nothing ( or very few) for work - despite PoS promoters work hard in mind to overcome simple laws, but you cant fix physics.

I wonder if there is some theorem out there like the CAP that describes what I mean?

If not, we should try formulate this here.


To PoS promoters: Go back to work!
4720  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: 95% lol. No chance. SegWit is now dead. on: January 18, 2017, 09:04:11 PM
Go to 8MB now.  Fees go back down to .0001  Keep building LN until it is fantastic.  revoke Maxwell's commit access as he has shown himself to be corrupt.  
Maxwell does not have commit access anymore the last time I've checked.

Very clever you Blockstream guys are!  hahahahha.  You don't think that we all understand that his puppets do?  Do you really think we are fooled by such clever devices and tricks for fools?  

Hehe, so the code will stay on 1MB for ever, or who dares....?

Huh, did he get now commit keys for BU in exchange to fix the limit there as well?

 Grin
Pages: « 1 ... 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 [236] 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!