This to me is what makes SuperNET interesting as an asset. Lots of potential streams of revenue for the future. Sticking its fingers in all kinds of pots, some of them are going to turn out to be honey.

How are we(the public) supposed to know anything about XC's technology when it's closed source?

It appears to be there now.

I bet this is common among the better devs in this community. Ones that are doing it for their enjoyment or their beliefs first. Not for profit, or as some get rich quick scheme.

Interesting that you say that. My opinion of Shadow is that it's either complete bullshit made up by the whales, or they do actually have some hidden genius(supposedly you) who's capable of developing the tech that they're claiming. Reading your post makes me think it's possible they're not full of shit. I'll be interested to see how it all turns out.

I can't believe the community voted to keep it closed source, lol.

I didn't know that. I thought it might have been the devs own crazy decision.

I wonder what it could have been had they open sourced it while people were interested in it.

Not saying it's 'dead', but I think they've made a huge mistake.

Current Bitmark Development: Part Four

http://bitmarknews.com/2014/11/06/current-bitmark-development-part-four/

I think he meant to respond to windjc.

Not so sure it's down much more than a lot of the others looking at some charts.

But other than the fact that all of crypto is in a major bear market right now:

I would say the reason that there's been some people selling over the last little while is that a lot of people who bought BTM before weren't necessarily familiar with the project. And as our community doesn't participate in any sort of 'pumping' some people might view the lack of constant chatter as some sort of negative.

We're working on improving the flow of information though as we know there are many people who still don't have much information about the project.

Also, I agree with you about there being a lot of good news. There is a lot going on now. People are working on a lot of projects and personally I'm extremely excited to see how all of these projects come together over the next little while.

Perhaps because regular miners are getting pushed out due to mining being unprofitable for them. Just a guess, I have no data either way other than seeing people complaining about mining costing more than their power bill in the main XMR thread.

Hello people, another development update. This one is part three and is about the work that Leathan has been doing for the project.

http://bitmarknews.com/2014/11/04/current-bitmark-development-part-three/

The commits just keep coming like there's some sort of machine behind them that doesn't eat or sleep, just codes.

Do you use linux and know how to use the command line a little bit?

We could use some more testers to help really get the network tested out. I noticed you have a VPS link in your sig, perhaps you know someone who might want to help test out such an ambitious project that's had so much coding done for it so far: https://github.com/jl777/libjl777

James knows better than I but I think we could use another 50 dedicated nodes on our p2p network so we can further test all our open source, mostly already developed technology.

SuperNET is functional and there are a ton of people running nodes testing it everyday. There is a massive amount of core code done already: https://github.com/jl777/libjl777

In fact we need more testers. If anyone can run a node on linux and knows how to use the command line a little bit please get in touch. We want 50+ nodes asap.

Does this look dead to you? https://github.com/jl777/libjl777/commits/master

SuperNET is more alive now then ever.

How is Bitmark finished when there's multiple devs and people working on it full time?

How is it finished when there's major real life projects involving marking being developed by third parties?

It's more alive now then it's ever been if you judge a project by the amount of work being done on it.

What happened to the discussions that were going on about being the first Bitshares fork? That would be pretty incredible I think. There's a lot of potential there. And the DPoS thing is quite interesting. Even Vitalik wanted to use that system for Ethereum. But he apparently has to convince a ton of people who are anti-PoS in general.

It's probably just variance as the nethash calculations are just based on the timing between blocks and are just an estimate.

Yes, I loathe the day Gavin introduced that term to this community. I can only dream of the day that people stop using that as a way to sidestep logical analysis and rational discussion about things.

No comment about the situation but your post was good and wish more people would take a similar approach..

I'll alert the relevant people to this thread.