They should sign the binaries with a Bitcoin address

Looks like he's not the only one
Btw, normal people call that 'screen capture', just nothing to do with copy and paste. Thanks for playing though

It's not a wiki, it's a HTML web page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki

Exactly what I wanted to do when I saw his post (and I must not be the only one )
Thanks for confirming Thomas, the difference between the 2 sites is CLEARLY like chalk and cheese


And yes, the quote is intentional, I want to be sure everybody realizes they have an eyesight impediment

Omg it's even worse than I thought, Thomas's email is at riseup.net, just like Gavin 

lolwut

Nope, impossible to know because the output address is a pool key which never was used before

Oldminer's sig:


You seem mad bro

From the newbies forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=36864.0

Variance and maybe the hashpower used in ixcoin and i0coin

Right!
"Software" instead of "tool" would be ok?

You won 10 internetz

You can of course comment here

Thanks I didn't find that thread yesterday when I made the page
http://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Useful_tools

I'm sure 60+% of bitcoiners are dumb enough to use these binaries

I'm about to post a poll in the discussion forum, we'll see

I thought about that but the nonce avoids it I believe

Jack is right, you have to wait until your client download all the blockchain

Nasakato = Atlas = Oldminer

I mined 0coin

You mean block 8k and difficulty 256?

Wat?

Well, so if you're right and only speculators are buying, everything's ok
I was afraid some dumb people got scammed