I just saw that Tweet. Is the side-chaining business good for UNO?
If you ask me, we don't need that. It would also screw with the monolythic nature. Will it make Uno a better store of value? (no) Or will it cause blockchain bloat? (yes) Keep it simple.
I think Bryce just wants to hype as usual.
You remember that guy who asked for blocknet implementation? Same retarded neophile mindset.
This space is full of neophiles who flip flop all the time and only fail because nobody thinks a year or two ahead or even intends to be sustainable.
Where is blocknet today? Oh, right. It made 0.2btc volume today and will be delisted next few weeks ...
See this article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neophileit links at the bottom to 'low arrousal' theory
We should be concerned with improving security and not with lowering that. Uno is a pure moneytoken and we don't need bells and whistles imo. It is good the way it is.
You can build on top of it. You don't need to introduce changes to a perfectly running blockchain.
We have a perfectly stable foundation with this blockchain. It doesn't need change. Build on top of it without a hardfork, dammit!
If you weaken the foundation you do no good. Don't bloat the chain! It's mindblowing compact and small.
The extremely small blockchain is a huge sellingpoint in the future. Why screw that?
Sidechains is phony hype at this stage. I want to see it in bitcoin and how it doesn't cause trouble. I think it will cause a lot of trouble.
my 2 cents.
(sorry for ranting but this space is full of neophiles and 99% of things fail. So please let's be conservative a littlebit. The neophiles right now are screwing bitcoin - don't let them screw Uno. So far they screwed everything up they started with that mindset. I'm not against innovation btw but when you have a monolyth you don't hang a sink, a lantern or a birdscage at it.)