Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 12:56:59 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ... 82 »
521  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 TH] mmpool.org - 1.5% fee split DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/tor on: August 04, 2014, 01:17:15 PM
Personally anything that can improve the amount of bitcoins we make now and make it quicker I am all for.
522  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: August 01, 2014, 03:21:04 PM
well if they were maybe selling boards or complete units they would have better luck.
523  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: July 30, 2014, 06:39:41 PM
I am a bit confused. SO they are continuing to sell boards to people interested in developing hardware around there chips,  but wont ship us the MPP and the other batches?

For the record they have even continued mining as stated on there site.
524  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: July 30, 2014, 02:16:32 PM
Meh.

Should I open a moderated thread to discuss serious things about the bankruptcy process to keep this guy that was and probably still is being paid with the money stolen from us from making us lose time?

Yes a new linked thread would be a good idea
525  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: July 29, 2014, 12:02:43 PM
can someone repost the link to file a claim online. Thanks
526  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 TH] mmpool.org - 1.5% fee split DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/tor on: July 23, 2014, 10:26:19 PM
We should have another 12.4(TH/s) next week and we're willing to send up to 25% of that to mmpool possibly.  We already have ~1.7(TH/s) on there.

What would it take to get 100% to mmpool?
527  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: July 22, 2014, 07:54:43 PM
It really doesn't matter if they are investing $10M or $100M.  The most the creditors every see is $6M, in 2 years.  In exchange we give them $9M of inventory and IP rights.

Do you have a buyer at $9mm for the inventory and IP?

How did you come to believe that the inventory and IP is worth $9mm?

Isn't $6mm better than nothing?

Agreed, Im not sure how $9mm was decided for the inventory but if its true then I think we are best off to just liquidate all inventory and distribute the money.
528  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Linux mining distro for the Raspberry PI - MinePeon on: July 17, 2014, 07:41:56 PM
Any chance of getting an updated build of what ever version your on on the img folder?

Also just to make you aware incase you dont, the plugins menu was not working and cgminer booting on start was not either.
529  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 TH] mmpool.org - 1.5% fee split DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/tor on: July 17, 2014, 04:09:16 PM
The fee here is not the problem. I have benchmarked ghash.io against btcguild and eligius with equal hash rate over a period of several months. BTCGuild came out on top, and at the time it had a 3% fee and the other two were 0% fee. If there is one thing that will bring ghash users over it is more frequent blocks. Keep in mind that most people mining there are also using cex.io, and these are mostly people who think that 0.005 BTC and > 20% fees is a good price for 1GH/s. Not the brightest people.

So we have a chicken and egg problem here, but I think the only way the fee could be safely removed is if the PPS split is removed and DGM is taken off the sliding reward schedule similar to the way EclipseMC runs theirs, where every block is paid 25 BTC + fees regardless of how long or short the block is. A donation mechanism would then have to be used to recover the costs of running the pool. Then finally after all that work we'd probably still get no one from ghash.io moving over.

I am not sure where you got most of your info, but your very incorrect. cex.io had a public statement where they said that 25% of the hashrate they have is their own. That means 75% of the hashrate is by miners just are pointing there local miners at the pool and not with cex.io.

As for a 0 fee, I am not saying a 0 fee will make us more money over the long term tho I think it will, having a 0 fee encourages miners to switch as they see our pool says no fee then they switch.
530  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 TH] mmpool.org - 1.5% fee split DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/tor on: July 17, 2014, 12:51:39 PM
Yes luck has a huge factor indeed. I am a bit worried about mmpool, the admin, I have seen him in IRC in a while and I have emailed him with no response.
Email again. As far as I know I've caught up on all pool related emails so it may have slipped through the cracks.

Other mergeable coins I know of are huntercoin, coiledcoin and gesitgeld. Huntercoin is very resource intensive and was causing pool stability issues when I last tested it. I can look at patching the coin to make it less intensive but I'm not sure it's worth it. Is the coin on exchanges?

coiledcoin and geistgeld are not on exchanges to my knowledge. Groupcoin has taught me that adding non-exchange coins is not really worthwhile. It's more of a support headache. I'm open to adding these if there is some use of the coin that I'm unaware of.

Well i would still look at huntercoin as it does have an exchange.

As for coiledcoin and geistgeld, they both seem dead and/or not on an exchange so no point in merge mining them. Also is there any status on maybe removing the fee to encourage ghash.io miners to switch to our pool? If we can get to 500th we would have a decent pool with semi constant payouts going.
531  Economy / Services / Re: GAW MINERS PAYS FOR YOUR SIGNATURE >>> HIGH RATES 50posts = 0.1BTC JOIN US! on: July 16, 2014, 08:00:07 PM
I will be in this month as well, updated my signature.
532  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 TH] mmpool.org - 1.5% fee split DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/tor on: July 16, 2014, 06:44:12 PM
I once read that cdf-stats would be needed to keep track on pools reliability. Dont know if other pools have that. In a small pool luck is one of major elements so it can affect stat greatly. In a pool this size cdf can be very misleading as luck varies so much. I think they would have implemented that if seen relevant as pool otherwise seems ok.

I would also like to see cdf stats.

Yes luck has a huge factor indeed. I am a bit worried about mmpool, the admin, I have seen him in IRC in a while and I have emailed him with no response.
533  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 TH] mmpool.org - 1.5% fee split DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/tor on: July 14, 2014, 10:25:28 PM
@mmpool, what is the status of adding more mergemineable coins to the pool to stir up more users?

As far as I'm aware, the only other merge-minable coins are HUC (resource hungry) & FSC (almost dead). However, it seems there's a new coin appearing/disappearing every other day - so it's difficult to keep up..... Tongue


Agreed, I thought there was one other tho

Yeah more coins isn't helpful, I can't even sell my groupcoin

Well more coins is more reasons for others to switch. Yea I cant figure out one exchange that has groupcoin listed on it.
534  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Linux mining distro for the Raspberry PI - MinePeon on: July 14, 2014, 05:25:34 PM

Yea I saw that, I assume it would require a new build of minepeon
535  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 TH] mmpool.org - 1.5% fee split DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/tor on: July 14, 2014, 05:24:58 PM
before you guys get excited about the current hashrate, don't, it's me with a short rental  Cool
it'll drop again  Embarrassed

lol always getting our hopes up

"trying my best to keep it up..."

don't tell the missus.  Roll Eyes

Haha okay. I think if we could get to 500terahashes we would have alot more luck. I know it sounds like a long shot but I mean right now we avg 50-100terahashes and I have seen us as high as 200terahashes once. If we can convince some bigger miners to stay at the pool for a little while it would work out.

@mmpool, what is the status of adding more mergemineable coins to the pool to stir up more users?
536  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 TH] mmpool.org - 1.5% fee split DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/tor on: July 14, 2014, 12:27:36 PM
before you guys get excited about the current hashrate, don't, it's me with a short rental  Cool
it'll drop again  Embarrassed

lol always getting our hopes up
537  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Metadisk - Blockchain Based File Sharing - Powered by Storj on: July 14, 2014, 12:26:50 PM
Yes all the batches are a bit messed up.
538  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Linux mining distro for the Raspberry PI - MinePeon on: July 12, 2014, 11:38:05 AM

cool well I am eagerly awaiting you to post it for us to mess with.

If your feeling adventurous last night I finished the part of the build system that automatically spits images up to the minepeon server.  Go here and grab one;-

http://minepeon.com/img

You will find them in the testing directory,  MPBBB for beagleboard images, MPRPI for raspberry Pi.  (MPX86 should be joining them soon)

Remember though, the images are very alpha but they should work.  The complete OS is there as well as the miners.  The UI is mostly there Wink .

Neil

Cool, I will give it a shot with my pi
539  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: July 12, 2014, 11:36:33 AM
Any idea when we can actully expect something useful to get done at the company.
540  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [70 TH] mmpool.org - 1.5% fee split DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/tor on: July 11, 2014, 01:22:18 PM
Nice that worked out well


Nice to hear from you mmpool. you went quiet for 2 weeks.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ... 82 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!