Just make sure you have your keys. Blockchain.info lets you access them. Do it and keep them somewhere safe

It seems highly likely that one or more Chinese exchange is under water, for one reason or another, and has been running a fractional reserve for a while. What they do about it, who knows? I don't think the conspiracy theory stacks up and there is, of course, the chance of it going the wrong way on them again

Eh. In theory, I think. But the problem is that in theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice they're not.
It makes sense that current value would be perfectly split between the two chains, but I doubt it will pan out exactly like that. One (I wouldn't dare to speculate which) might essentially be treated as an altcoin, with lower volumes and liquidity, which could be manipulated, pumped, whatever. Where there is money, hashrate will inevitably follow. Both chains will persist for a long time, even if one has 1% the market cap of the other. My guess is that total value with oscillate around pre-fork value, with some pretty wild swings.
The rational thing to do is ensure you have all your own keys, sit patiently and wait it all out until the winner becomes clear, then access the BTC on that chain as normal. Unfortunately, 'rational' is an adjective that applies to neither markets nor bitcoiners.

We should have a 'swear box' for that kind of mistake. 1 BTC fine.

No doubt, if he's alive, it will turn out he'll claim to be anti-Brexit or something, like the (pro-Brexit) lunatic who killed Jo Cox.

I'm not sure something 'happened', more that panic sellers overcooked it, helped along by some strategic negative press. So this is more like reversion-to-mean than a fundamental turnaround. That sort of thing generally plays out more slowly, with the news providing noise in the short term.

Product is close to being ready
It's been almost 4 months since the end of our ICO, with bitcoin in an uptrend. Plus someone dumped a lot of Incent on Cryptopia yesterday, market sell down to 3k sats (thanks whoever that was, I didn't think my buy would be filled and was literally logging in to remove the BTC). So price has suffered. But you won't have to wait months for rollout, we're almost there.
There should be another major update from Rob around the end of the month.

True, but there is ALWAYS the knee-jerk reaction. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/business-39306336
Twitchy traders in forex as well as BTC.

Well, not sure about USD prices but it looks like BTC will soon get a bump against Sterling.

One of many. And I think there will be many more commodity-backed blockchain tokens to come. But this is a nice start

^^^
End of Q1, beginning of Q2. There are various moving parts to roll out, so there's not one single 'launch' event.

Re: Wix, yep That's a mockup that needs moving to a proper site. We're careful with the funds we raised at ICO, but not that careful...

I can pass this on, but lots of people have said they like the site! I guess you can't please all the people all the time. Your comment reminds me of the joke:
Q: What's orange and sounds like a parrot?
A: A carrot.

It's a fair point about judging value in the currency in which you invest. However, the nature of the crypto markets is that alts suffer when BTC rises in value. (In fact, this is how all markets work - when they value of the dollar goes up against Sterling, shares in the FTSE100 rise in value because they are denominated in the less-valuable currency but earn revenues in the more valuable). The reality is that if BTC had dropped, alts including Incent would probably be more valuable. This is just the nature of the ecosystem we work in, and we cannot protect anyone against how a $20 billion market decides to act.
The wider context is that we haven't even launched yet. The market 'performance' of Incent is hardly indicative of Incent as a company.

Or wait and sell at a profit.
Just so we're clear: returns come with risk. That's not ideology, that's just maths. If you try to protect investors from the downside whilst allowing them to profit from the upside, you rig the deck against yourself. That's exactly what happens with limited liability and in the global financial crisis. And since Incent is not Too Big To Fail and can't go running to the taxpayer for a bailout, we're not doing that.
What we are doing is exactly what we said we'd be doing, which is building a groundbreaking blockchain-based loyalty product and getting businesses on board. Growth comes from getting that right, not manipulating the market at the expense of long-term holders.

Thank you, someone who gets it!
The trading bot will add depth/liquidity, which won't inherently add buy pressure but should be attractive for traders since it will reduce slippage. It's necessary for settlement because we need to be able to show customers a price on their app, and slippage would be a problem.
The MobileGo ICO starts on 25 April. Merchant #1 should be up and running before that.

I've had a few in the 3xxx range in the last week or so, but on Cryptopia where the volume is higher. I think the fall to 1k was on Liqui, where the orderbooks are so thin that it doesn't take much to push the price down that far. If they'd sold on Cryptopia they could have got 3x more, so I assume it was just an impatient bounty dumper.
I can agree that 3xxx is frustrating if you bought at ICO (which I also did) but that is the nature of the crypto markets. Equally, though, I'd like to give the Sydney team credit for the work they're doing. They are on schedule for release at the time given 6 months ago when we first put out word about the ICO. That is incredibly rare when you consider the delays routinely incurred on other crypto projects. So I won't accept any criticism that we're not doing what we said we would do, based solely on a market that is notoriously fickle. In another 6 months if there's no movement in price, then maybe it would be warranted. Right now, though, with dev on the wallet almost done, a marketmaking and settlement strategy about to launch, and business development looking pretty cool, that seems unlikely.

It's a way of delivering revenues to holders without paying a dividend, which would be problematic for the company and many investors due to securities regulations.

Please tell me where I can buy for 1800! I put an order in at 3400 and it's not being filled.
Our blogs and updates detail who our partners are. To my knowledge nothing has changed there. I can't say who Merchant #1 will be but it will be a pleasant surprise.

Seriously? Did you read any of our materials? Do you even understand what this project is doing?

Different wallets and codebases, different functionality. One is more straightforward, aimed at mainstream users. Incent is based on this as it needs only simple token transfer functionality. The other is more full-featured, and will ultimately include DEX etc.

There are two Waves mobile wallets. Incent is collaborating with one of them
There is overlap anyway, and Incent is in close contact with the Waves dev team.