The Federal Reserve is a private entity and works like this for decades. Banks and the US government ask loans and get money created magically. The taxpayer is not paying for the bank loans but when it's about the government loans, it creates a debt for each citizen (when you give birth there, your kid has already a debt of $50,000)
With the scriptural money, the money doesn't exist physically, only in a database, it's created magically based on the fractional reserve rate. If the money stays scriptural that could be ok, but if people suddenly decide to go to the ATM and transfer out everything in cash, then the drama will start.
|
|
|
The guy is most interested to get a few promoters from here who will promote their affiliate URL to get the commission (from the CPA model) It's interesting for the person with a blog, channel,... If not then there are still some ways, but the person will need to have a budget to advertise
|
|
|
"cryptocurrency" and "cryptocurrency options" are the same thing for them. They generalized the term to include different business types under the crypto activity. The article isn't telling it but the question remains what are the requirements asked to the issuers. KYC? Don't they enough ask the customers, ID scan, selfies,... next is the nudes photos? Genealogy report back to level 8?
|
|
|
It's not about an airdrop/ICO from Blockchain.com itself. But it will partner with some ICO projects. I suppose by distributing the coins on behalf of the ICO campaign. At least it's what I understand. Blockchain will do the due diligence for people (more lazy they can be so) and can serve as an authority in a near future. Most ICO will beg to partner with blockchain.com hehe Blockchain.com also notes that airdrops can benefit crypto creators by facilitating decentralization. Crypto teams usually allocate their tokens to internal groups, partners, and public sales. But by distributing tokens freely via an airdrop, creators can ensure that their coin is spread far and wide. As the paper notes, each cryptocurrency becomes more useful as more people gain access to it.
The paper outlines a number of guidelines that Blockchain.com will follow in order to decide which coins to partner with Although Blockchain.com will curate reputable tokens and airdrop them directly to users, airdrops are not safe from scams
|
|
|
You could be surprised at a company how the workers are using the computers. Lack of security protocols, lack of knowledge and people who don't take care enough are creating a lot of potential risks.
I know 2 small companies that got a ransomware: 1 has paid the money, the other one has been out of business and closed with several people suddenly unemployed.
- The first didn't have a choice. Clients, providers, accounting, data, everything was on the computer and nothing can be done without data. After 2-3 weeks (without to be able to work) the founder couldn't wait anymore to see IF something can be done. So he decided to pay the ransom to save the company.
- The second one didn't have enough money to pay. Without to be able to continue to work he didn't have the choice to close his manufacture. And all the workers became jobless.
So I would say depending on the situation it can be a wise thing to pay
|
|
|
Look like they are spinning their business model and do like a lot of Eu banks introduced, supposed to be a"maintenance monthly fee". They would have to introduce this from the start and not after 1 year of operation. Since they claim to be a bank, be ready to get the as with your bank
|
|
|
A poor is just a little exaggerated from the author. It's simply that they have no use of it. They make money with dollars and have dollars to use. Why should they bother to convert it. The same for you if you are paid in dollars. Why should you convert it to the SecondLife currency if you have no use of it (no merchants use it, no bill can be paid with,...). I can also take as an example, Zimbabwe dollars, oil, aluminum,...
|
|
|
I tried the demo and wasn't able to find the section to place the trades. Or does the site only collect data from the connected accounts and perform no trading actions? Free users have not the Multi-exchange feature, so what they could do on the site?
|
|
|
Institutional investors have long ago started to come into crypto. It's not because (with the link you posted) Fidelity integrated the digital assets this week that's you can say "Now, Institutional investors will come" Grayscale Investments is managing 8-9 cryptos for clients https://grayscale.co/about/ and it's not the only one
|
|
|
Purchased SSL and installed successfully from Cpanel. But still, my website does not redirect from HTTP to HTTPS. please guide me.
You don't need to install it from your CPanel only. You have to enable it in you WP panel too. Somewhere in "General settings" > "your website url" The setting needs to be changed manually from "http:// thewebsitename.com" to "http s:// the websitename.com" Click update and that it. You can so remove the plugin installed before.
|
|
|
It is called market manipulation and of course, forbidden in most countries. I can imagine a bigger exchange busted doing it and the result on the new media. As a company, you can get real trouble. Don't know where Yobit is located but you can be sure that soon or later Yobit will know how it is to play with the fire
|
|
|
Exactly why people should rethink this drivel about stablecoins. If this is all it took to cause the peg to collapse, imagine what would happen if a similar event with even twice the magnitude happened, and across all Tether holding exchanges.
For all the volatility of Bitcoin, this is something foreseen many times for Tether and its ilk.
All stablecoins are inherently centralized, so what's the point of having centralized cryptocurrency in the first place? Yeah, people can conduct transactions without intermediaries, no one can seize their coins and so on, but still there is a huge central point of failure that can result in massive loss of value. It sounds paradoxical, but stability comes with the risk. For people who don't care and have no interest in decentralization and are only in the market for a profit. The banking industry has also few points of failure and it resulted as you describe a massive lost (crash 1919-2008, money devalued in countries,...) It's not a problem for the people I was referring to, at least they will still own a digital currency
|
|
|
Si il y avait des sites pour doubler ses bitcoins on irait tous desuus, et on arreterai meme de travailler. Il y a des sites poubelles sur le web qui promette aux visiteurs de doubler leur bitcoins. Fonctionnant su un system pyramidial tu peux tte douter don que ces sites sont a eviter
|
|
|
When is the algorithm change? I want to get video cards.
Save your money man, or use GPU to mine another coin. There will be no change in the algorithm. Zen team might be right long term to don['t change it, but short term is a disaster. And it's the right thing to do. To think for the long-term, you can't go for a short is you're building a serious cryptocurrency infrastructure. Otherwise, you will be like stuck in your expansion in the future.
|
|
|
It's just about forwarding the problem but if it's the only way then we would need more startups like this one to attract investors in a friendly environment. Even if it is not the only one, the more choices there are, the more people will be attracted to it.
|
|
|
With the Brexit, we will see an exodus of start-ups and established companies moving from England. A lot of them are working on it since months. Not surprising to see Coinbase following the same path but I disagree to say Ireland is attractive for the financial industry. A lot of medium and large enterprises are there mainly to avoid the high taxes (i.e. Google)
|
|
|
It isn't something new, unfortunately. Check out the "Press", you will figure some threads starter love it! The economy board is also infested. When you see one from time to time it isn't much annoying, but when you see a member doing it continuously, it's clear the user has no interest to participate in a conversation with others :/
|
|
|
If people start to take a look finally to the decentralized exchanges platforms then the problem wouldn't be it anymore.
true but the decentralized exchanges work best when you are only concerned about trading cryptocurrency with cryptocurrency. for example when you are trading bitcoin/altcoins. otherwise when fiat is involved the centralized exchanges will always be the best because despite all the time consuming and annoying KYC verification it still is a lot safer than dealing with a random person on the internet with fiat which has a lot of ways to scam you with it. I would prefer to not be a victim of a KYC rather than lending my coin to a website type that is regularly hacked There is Bisq, with crypto/fiat exchange and the person receiving the fiat payment is somewhat protected. You can have an arbitration process. Also, Bisq removes banks well know to dispute a "fraudulent" transfers There is a trade limit per trade, which is generally too small to attract criminals.
2. We will remove national currency payment methods which are found to be used for chargebacks.
3. We introduce with version 0.6.0 a new feature for detecting the age when a payment account has been set up. Recently opened accounts will have lower trade limits. This adds protection against stolen-bank-account-scams.
|
|
|
|