This is an interesting story but would you be able to provide some proofs to us? Some people might have think that this is not good conversation but I think there's no harm on it if it happened 10 years ago, I'm pretty sure gambling sites already solved that exploit and managed to improve their security. I was curious what kind of exploit you've found and how would you be able to withdraw that money if you've made millions? I assume you also deposit a big amount and what kind of casino is that?

I think it came from third party casino games as those are the ones that are vulnerable from exploit.

Hopefully they are not learning about shitcoins.

I am not gambling frequently. So why the need for me to take a break. If I have the time to gamble, I will gamble. If I do not have the time, I will not gamble. My gambling activities are not about the festive period. It is about having time to gamble. During the festive period, I might have time to be with friends and gamble together which is fun for me.

Undoubtedly 1xbit is a scam site which was proven a long ago. But I could not agree with you that as the site doesn't have a license means the site is a scam. When there is a licence even the site can make a scam.

I'm positive that I've seen a signature space wearing exactly that on this forum. Never knew someone paid for it. Anyway, I told them no deal. I'm sure you'd see another wearing it if you observe well. It's actually a newbie account so you can't know the person behind it.

A member asked for the cost of renting my signature space and I told them. Was kinda shocked that the signature is "FUCK Royse777" What sort of signature is that. Would Royse777 or any member be informed about this mind explaining? Have you seen anyone wearing that signature? I think I have but didn't observe closely. What is the purpose of this signature ad? Is it a sort of promotion for Royse777? Why the aspersion?

lol they care about the age limit(pretending to be actually) because each site says they
are letting to register this or that age (but can be faked once deposit is coming)
there is so much to expect in the gambling community but there is also so much that 
they are hiding from us.

I think they will stick to their commitment and if they said about early adopters then all those members who played on their platform should be considered not only the angel investors or private investors. I'm sure each player who adopted them deserves to get some share of the airdrop.

I know that the ones who played with more cash might get more value from the airdrop but the ones who even played with minimum should also get some share from it. You should not lose hope because if they are truly generous then they will also give share of that airdrop to those users who gambled with less money.

Edited out

You are absolutely right, this is why building and running a casino is a very profitable business, more reason why we see a lot of new casinos springing up almost every day.
This days, building a casino have become really easy, but the hardest job now is finding players.

In the game of gambling, casinos are always the winners, I mean, no body with the power to build and program his business will do so In a way that he or she loses to his or her customers, he or she much program the business in such a way that his or her customers will continually lose to him or her, with some minor wins here and there from time to time, so that the customer doesn't at any point in time start suspecting that the business is rigged against him or her.

This is exactly the same casinos are built, but in a much more advanced way where by, players are betting against themselves, when they all lose, the casino packs all the money,🤑,  but when some players win, the casino pays the winner from the money others lost, and also keep the rest to themselve.
This makes casinos the most and always profitable ones, as far as gambling is concerned.

I think any gambler has lost money that they regretted losing. Personally, I have not met any gambler who would not lose. If I'm not mistaken my biggest loss in the casino was about $2500. Losing such money is very frustrating, which is why I began to use the tactic of limiting the deposit. Now I do not allow myself to deposit more than $200, so if I lose, I do not lose more than this amount.

This issue of gambling scams/cheating could happen to anybody and the most legit casinos could be greedy at a point too, it all depends on the teams involved and the amount won by the bettor at that time. You see, a casino could have been paying the person for years, but at a time, they might turn their back, and I do not even know what to call that. Should we say they are not legit again or what? Because they will continue to pay others and still let them believe they are good, which is why I like to balance my opinion based on investigation and the proof provided on both sides when disputes arise between casinos and their customers and not take a side ignorantly as some would do.

Well, I still blame this on poor regulations. Had it been there are strict regulations, the authorities could have weighed in and made the casinos accountable for their liabilities, and even fined them if need be, especially if further care was not taken after persistent issues and warnings. This alone will make them sit right and do the needful. Every casino should be accountable for winnings and pocket the losses proudly, that's how it should be, and liquidity or not, they are obliged to settle the winners' winnings, they do not just have any excuse to do otherwise. They should have rejected such a bet if they knew they were not liquid enough to take care of the potential winning. However, if they accept the risk, they should be liable. Their inability to pay makes them irresponsible and a scam.

For me personally, gambling every day would make me addicted, and I'm not sure that my mind can stay clear enough to make wise decisions anymore. If you consider gambling as a game, playing games every day is enough to make you tired, not to mention if you lose continuously, the feeling is even worse. In gambling, sometimes we can win a large amount of money at a certain lucky period, but it is not certain that we will continue to be lucky after that, so if you keep gambling every day, I think it will increase your chances of losing money. Choosing a good time to gamble I think will be more reasonable than trying your luck by gambling every day.

Your points are good, but we can still further argue the subject out based on the context of your narration. In both trading and gambling, we need luck, only that the level of luck we need varies, and that's if we want to view the expression called luck as existing at all. I must say that many times in my trading experience, there are instances that I could truly express that luck was at work for me, so it exists too there. Take, for example, a trader who analysed the market quite well and opened a buy position with 250 pips take profit and 100 pips stop loss. But suddenly, the market started moving against him abnormally without a valid reason, and for this, it (the market) changed the short-term trend to bearish, which is against the position of the traders. After some times of scary movements against the position, the market now almost hit the stop loss having moved 99 pips of it and remaining just 1 pips to hit it and close the position at a loss.

But suddenly the market could not proceed further with just 1 pips to hit the stop loss but just threatened for hours but still couldn't hit the level. Due to this, the trader could have just taken heart and abandoned the trade and closed his gadget believing he had already lost with no more hope. On getting back to the chart after hours of closing the gadget, he now met the trade in huge profits. I see that as luck and something similar had happened to me many times in trading. Also, the sports betting aspect of gambling could be likened to trading. The two are not so strongly the function of luck but expertise. This is especially true if we limit it to the buy/sell in trading and lose/win in gambling. It's the casino aspect of gambling that is so reliant on luck, even though the expertise in trading will still yield better results than the expertise in gambling.

It is nothing other than suffering and smiling, it is a race of the survival of the fittest, I also wonder about the same situation whereby you discover many people are complaining about how bad the economy is and yet, if you go to the market, you will be surprised on the rate people are buying and selling and the markets are moving, then I wonder how they were able to get the affordability despise the ongoing inflation, so this has brought me to my conclusion that whether things cost or not in the market, we should only focus on a purchasing ability because while we are complaining, many others are not being worried and they are buying and selling, we should get adapt to this.