Yep, and then let's see if you can gain some weights in next few days.

I guess the coins have been staying there for enough time beyond the optimum point that basically leads to reduced weight.

Thanks mate, did being busy but would be able to get updates, and will PM if get buried again. thx.

Great to see you're around, will talk things with you later on; almost buried right now. 

Yeah it's about a year, time goes by so fast; let's observe this greatness thing.  

Liked much the pictures, and this is too great too, good job mate, nothing else could I say how much care of you.

This actually 1.62416564 coins (in XMG) a day by average.

I guess no plan yet for SuperNET and things like that, haven't been that far yet, but I guess those exchanges launched with desired / valid goals always look ideal and the reality would misrepresent what's supposed to be, whilst there are so many coins out there, most of which would squeeze into a small room. It's great having something like btc-e, but growing up is a pain.

Submitted info and see how they'd say, would go through proofofdev when necessary.

I'd like to see it being underground.  

I've been keeping all of my machines idle for magi alone plus few vps since the beginning, simply running ever...

Don't worry, guess some maintenances are needed, imagine they have that many coins/wallets to take care of. 

Thanks for updates.

It's very cool, like it much.  

Looking very nice!

fragilefungi, I guess there are some points deserving in-depth consideration, sorry for delayed response. The idea of rewarding small stakers is very much appealing and coincident with magi's goal, while the barrier to overcome is how we avoid big stakers. I believed this is already done in PoS-II, as people stake with 10,000 XMG won't get benefits compared to staking with 1000 XMG. This is mostly considered from security point of view.

Speaking of the present focus, the stake shares, "Increasing the block reward for small blocks will definitely encourage big holders to divide their coins into small pieces", that actually means we aren't benefiting small stakers. One can launch 100 wallets with 100 XMG in each, and he can only make transactions within a few wallets without affecting the rest of others, so the affected wallets regarding PoS staking are actually not throughout, but just a few. So the big staker is still benefitting, point me out if I missed the point in your post.

 "IF [PoS-block-reward] < 0.1 AND [Coin-age] < 200 THEN [PoS-block-reward]=[PoS-block-reward]*4" is doable and would be interesting; however, we may need some careful thinkings to plugin some tricks -- extra efforts, that small stakering are willing to take. I can't talk this approach clearly as I don't have clear idea yet, but I guess it won't be straightforward to embed the above your mentioned equation into the code, or the big stakes will be getting the same benefits. But that seems something interesting I have to take a deep thinking along that.

[Coin-age] = [number of coins] x [effective stake days], [effective stake days] is a function of actual stake days and number of coins in PoS-II. [Coin-age] is maximized at certain conditions with a middle size of coins in stake, and stake for a few days less than a week. So the current scheme is actually encouraging small stakers. In other words, people won't be able to get significant high stakes in any cases unlike the conventional PoS, that's the fair point. And of course, your equation is doable, but I have to give it a more serious thinking. My primary concern is that we have to be careful about increasing interest that leads to benefits throughout (it would be very much appealing if benefiting small stakers ONLY). Also I deeply believe that when we increase interest, people would be willing to accumulation more than selling. However, I guess there are some basic lines to hold, and making people commit into accumulating rather than selling because of a desire to stake for more coins is a less solid reason.

I will surely take over whatever I am able to if that is the case. 

Sometimes I have the same feeling as you, as we know there are numerous coins out there. Thanks mate, I do hope any more comments come up on the point of PoW/PoS.

Yeah, will check this.

You're right inflation won't be a big concern compared to other things affecting the price. People are actually getting the same type of blocks with the reward calculated in terms of:
What we can play around are the coin age and APR; based on that, there would be no good solutions to "improve the rate for small stakers". One way to have "big" or "small" block is to apply high APR for small stake holders and low APR for big holders; however, big holders can divide their holding into small pieces, say launching 10 wallets instead of all in one wallets, and appear to be small stakers. So it won't be a practical solution. The PoS-II deals with the coin age; one has to maintain a proper number of coins to maximize [Coin-age], so does the [PoS-block-reward]; this is an extra effort, and I believe we can do some thing more along this point.