Price still looking good without the slightest hint of FOMO yet. Wouldn't even mind some retrace before attacking $10K for good... but it could perfectly try to do it at any moment instead.

This is Fine.

Go Badger, Go!


P.S.:

Honey Badgers: Masters Of Mayhem. Full (Documentary): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45EbX3XPuqM

No, I don't have any reasons, I thought that you did, that's why I was asking:


Or maybe you meant that you would be directly spending it all?

While it is always good to have some good chunk of cash on hand I will have to store most of it in banks, like it or not. That's how life is nowadays.

I share your pain/feeling there.

Somewhere around half looks too much for me though... unless a good chunk of that is for rebuying later. But of course, everyone goals and circumstances are different.

What I don't understand is how to avoid banks here for a sizeable amount of money.

I mean, P2P or even OTC and whatever for the sell, yeah, but then storing heaps of *cash* sounds like a big pain in the ass in many senses.

Also there are lots of limitations on what you can do with that cash... And those limits seem to keep being reduced time after time... And once you go the way of cash you cannot easily convert that cash into banking fiat (which is necessary for any big purchases, like real estate, cars, boats... or even one of those "supercharged" Mac Pro's).

Now THAT reminds me one of the reasons why I didn't sell *anything* in 2017... The logistics and decision making is a big pain in the ass. It is not as easy as just "pull the trigger".

I am not sure what you are saying here. Are you saying I do support BSV?

I am fully aware BSV and CSW/Ayre go from the same hand. Which is enough of a reason to consider it the shittier of all shitcoins (even more than Bcash which is a lot to say). I just do think that the more money I can get from it the better because it is in some way coming from their pockets any time they commit to pump it.

Yes, my ultimate goal is to dump it all for more BTC (or even FIAT). It's just that I always try to dump an additional little chunk in their face every time they pump. I am in no hurry to finish it all... unless I were going to "lose" the remaining coins. That would surely "hurt my feelings" and my pocket!

Are you talking about BSV? I do have unclaimed coins... Should I do something? What is the deadline?

I thought that had already been solved and they were NOT doing that.

It's not that I do have much but there's some people in here that do (i.e. Jimbo) so this is public service information totally pertinent for us Bitcoin holders and, even if "accidentally" and for laziness, BSV "holders" too.

The TENacious honey badger (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg53642996#msg53642996) says that he should be arriving any time from now... Knowing him that may mean as soon as in the next few hours or even sometime during the next week... He said something about maybe doing some stop on the road to recharge energies before the final fight... But he has confirmed that he is definitely coming... *SOON*.

That's not even a "dump" at all. Just a couple hundreds from where we were 24 hours ago.

Retesting after every AYH won't hurt at all. The higher the "consolidated" price we rally from (after the halving) the better. The less the FOMO (until it is inevitable), also the better.

This is fine.

Indeed.

To be honest I wasn't in the best of moods yesterday (IRL issues, irrelevant here)... But my post wasn't intended in a negative way. Just found it funny how you have repeatedly taken out of context the word "need" in the very same context time after time... even though I think you do it on purpose

I don't want to censorship you! I just want to smack some sense in your head so that you stop being distracted by the subtle and irrelevant details of everyone's writing styles and focus (and argue if you feel the need) on the practical/real meaning of the contents FFS!  

Maybe becase for that kind of "conventional" stocks to surge in price it is needed that they WS types are also in pumping it themselves. So they are not gonna question their own actions. Not before they sell, I mean. Then they will talk about how it was a bubble. And blah blah blah... Rinse and repeat.

I think we already recently had some conversation about the multiple meaning and intensities of "need".

I would say that what Majormax means with "needs", in this particular case, is that it would be better for the price to reach the resistant point above in a kind of way (slowly) so that it doesn't correct as fast as it climbs. Also, even if at some point we will surely see some sort of "explosion" (see? that word could also have different meanings depending on context) and subsequent correction, it would be better for us bulls if that happens from a higher slowly consolidated price.

Does it really NEED to be that way to reach the best outcome? Of course not... it just "needs" it to maximise the probabilities of it. But it could perfectly happen otherwise. That's so obvious that it should be needed (lol) to explicitly mention.

I remember you have in the past also questioned me about some statements in which I used the word "need" in relation to Bitcoin price and I think I didn't, at that time, clarify my position about it. So, this is it and I hope it helps for better understanding any future usage of the word "need" I might unconsciously use in the future when talking about price dynamics

Which basically "confirms" there is good buying support for a little retrace. And probably even more support for a bigger one. Also it is not as if sellers were pilling up to sell. Much the contrary.

I want to see the price over $10K as much as everyone else... but I love how smoothly the price is rising step by step and doing the proper retests.

Looks good so far.

It's very nice how $9K is holding (for now) and people don't give a shit about it anymore. Slowly stepping and maintaining price without any FOMO signs sounds great. Even a little retrace would not do any harm right now.

I assume by rMerit you mean Merits. If this some sort of new thing I am unaware, disregard all my comment.

If I do have 1 Smerit and when I sent it you you would obtain 1 Merit and 1 Smerit, we could just cycle the same Smerit back and forth between us and reach an unlimited amount of Merit. Just by cycling the same Smerit.

To decay merit cycling. Otherwise just *ONE* Smerit could result in the "creation" of an unlimited amount of Merit just by cycling it repeteadly between users.

More/less than 50% is almost like nothing. It could be 50.01% vs 49.99%. Only when TA can offer an EV of a few % points it can become useful... even if barely in most cases.

It's almost funny how the NSA helps warning about all those vulns that they have been using for years... as soon as they notice they are not only ones exploiting it.

One have to acknowledge that the guy is a first class troll. None of that shit will hold in the end at the court. It is just a matter of time. Wonder what his plan is... if he really have one (probably don't). Sometimes I think he has a terminal illness (besides the mental one) and he think he will be dead by the time all his lies crumble catastrophically (jail/bankruptcy).