That's what doggie in the fire is saying, too.

what a coincidence.

My friend, let me tell you something. I never had a sex and i probably won't have in this life. I'm almost 40 years old. But i never got any compensation for that. All i have is 0.5 btc but i'm still happy with my life.

Here’s a question for you guys.

(In an alternate life you get a decision)

You can have 10,000BTC now but you have to sign a contract to never have sex again. Oral sex is allowed though.

Sign it or not?

Oh btw PAMP

You may wish to ponderate upon this trend line: https://www.blockchain.com/en/charts/avg-block-size?timespan=all

That is not much materially different than I had remembered, and of course, you are trying to say that you have some different holding and allocations phylosophy from PeterR.

Nonetheless, it sure it is good to figure out some of these stakes from time to time (even for the benefits of other readers of this thread who might read some of you frequently bitcoin naysaying posts), and surely even though I disagree with you opinions in terms of your choice to hold onto those two shitcoins (bcash variants ABC and SV), I disagree with you pumpening baloney Bcash crap here, but it is laudable that you, at least, to give us some ideas about the approximate ratios of your bcash bag holdings, especially if you are going to be making certain kinds of uptalking attempts of those bcash variants and attempting to suggest that such talk is somehow relevant to this thread, including your ongoing bitcoin neggings..

By the way, even though you are saying that your dollar value held in BTC is greater than BCH and BSV, that would not be too difficult to accomplish by even holding 10x more of each of those stupid ass shit coins, based on current BTC dollar values, but yeah, perhaps there will be some kind of pumpening of those coins, but I doubt that long term holding of those coins would be prudent, nor vindication likely, as you are suggesting, but surely if your money is where your mouth is, then perhaps that is some kind of credibility... even if still seeming to stretch the concept of relevance, here, especially when a kind of meaningful vindication, such as either of those shit projects gaining meaningful network effects to supplant bitcoin (which seems to be what you are suggesting to be not only plausible but likely) seems to be quite a long shot - maybe even in the less than 1% scenarios of likelihood, similar to roach's seeming planning and preparing for Armageddon.....

No metaphor, I'm not that clever or weird.

There's literally a filthy bag of garbage I need disposed of. I moved to a new neighborhood not so long ago, and garbage collection is 2x a week. I missed it the first week. The cats kept tearing into it. I'm afraid if I put it outside too early, they will again, and the neighbors will get pissed. I should ask them but I don't speak the language.

I should just put my question in Google Translate and hold the phone up to them like a big American dildo.

Well, the most American thing I can do is say "Y'all know what I should do with my garbage around here?" just assuming they speak English. They don't.

whoa!
For a minute there I thought you were metaphorically describing hanging out on this thread when certain trolls (not to be mentioned) are posting...

For those monetary archaeologists trawling this forum in the year 2140, the price of BTC just went from below $11,000 USD (is the USD still a thing in 2140?) to over $11,600 USD in the course of less than three hours.

I'm assuming that is what prompted the comment of 'nice'.

Great.. I am glad to hear from you bitserve, regarding this particular assessment of "fine".....

even though many of us, including ur selfie, likely recognizes that corn gives approximately less than two shits about the from time to time assessment of any of us.

 

 

As for there being a "limited supply", is this not simply a variable, able to be changed at the discretion of the largest and most powerful network contributors?