|
Reminder to the dev not to release the new updates before the block propagation issue is fixed!
|
|
|
|
|
You guys dont even have mintpal acc ? Only I voted for SHC .. sad.
|
|
|
|
If so shitty give me a normal price and I'll take your burden from you. My offer is way below market price, 5btc for 50k shc. |
|
|
|
Because many people POB, easy mining lost its meaning.
{
"General Info" : "",
"nBurnBits" : "1d014a53",
"nEffectiveBurnCoins" : "166427915074",
"Formatted nEffectiveBurnCoins" : "166427.915074"
}
]
PoB is not working, i am getting one a day, 3000 burnt... I had 1.2% of the network and worked it up to above 1.4% of the network.. It is back at 1.3% now, just because i'm not finding any PoB anymore Something is wrong, the burned amount is not up that much.. Yes, it has not been working well since day 1  I've burned around 9k in the last 2-3 days and found 5 PoB blocks. RoI = never |
|
|
|
You ever hear of botnets? a zombie network of compromised computers would mine the majority of the coins leaving your average person getting almost nil.
Yes I have (and usually in the same out of hand manner). Could you give everyone a quick run down on the theoretical vulnerabilities given my loosely defined specs (one miner per address, wallet restricted, throttled mining), and perhaps also on why such vulnerabilities would be impossible to address? Shinycoin ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=655789.0 )uses an algo that requires 16GB ram. 95% of all botnet zombies run on less that 4GB RAM... |
|
|
|
|
I'm getting different results when running the miner on all threads vs only physical cores.
On newer CPUs i'm getting up to 50% more power when running only on physical cpu cores. On older CPUs (also with AES) i get 50% less when using only physical cores.
Why is this ?
|
|
|
|
Seems like a primer kinda thing to do, but what purpose would that serve he or anyone else?
Not me, once the community discovers shiny i expect 1k shc/1btc exchange rates. That would be great, but how did you come up with that number? Would you rather i say this is a worthless coin, instamined by less than 20 people, 10% of the total coin supply mined in the first couple of weeks ? I no longer mine SHC, just a lurker, waiting for the real exchange to dump this shit. Yes, that will most likely never happen. You're bipolar. How many coins do you have and how much do you want to "dump" them for? 50k for 5btc / 100k for 10btc. only in batches. |
|
|
|
Seems like a primer kinda thing to do, but what purpose would that serve he or anyone else?
Not me, once the community discovers shiny i expect 1k shc/1btc exchange rates. That would be great, but how did you come up with that number? Would you rather i say this is a worthless coin, instamined by less than 20 people, 10% of the total coin supply mined in the first couple of weeks ? I no longer mine SHC, just a lurker, waiting for the real exchange to dump this shit. Yes, that will most likely never happen. |
|
|
|
Seems like a primer kinda thing to do, but what purpose would that serve he or anyone else?
Not me, once the community discovers shiny i expect 1k shc/1btc exchange rates. |
|
|
|
Because many people POB, easy mining lost its meaning.
{
"General Info" : "",
"nBurnBits" : "1d014a53",
"nEffectiveBurnCoins" : "166427915074",
"Formatted nEffectiveBurnCoins" : "166427.915074"
}
]
PoB is not working, i am getting one a day, 3000 burnt... |
|
|
|
Timestamp Type Price (BTC) Amount SHC Total BTC
2014-07-11 21:58:25 Sell 0.00003300 12000.00000000 0.39402000
Some one sold 12,000 SHC at 0.00003300~~~
What a cheap~~
Probably the dev, i dont see him mining on sandors pool any more, must be cashing out to pay those digital ocean instances  |
|
|
|
This is the latest version I compiled under Windows slimcoind. exe, why is it so big?
2014/05/27 13:11 119,822 libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll
2014/05/27 13:11 49,152 libwinpthread-1.dll
2014/07/11 17:35 44,402,882 slimcoind.exe
Because you did not strip it ? |
|
|
|
There are only 9 active members on this thread, dev, his 3 alter egos, sandor, 7000y, bitspender, chinese pool hacker and I..
Is Shiny DEAD !? How many lurkers are reading this ? Lurkers show some support!!
You can erase Bitspender from this coin my friends... I've been mining some great coins, got a whopping 31 BTC profit the last 20 hours with a 1.6 BTC investement You should also checkout N5coin who got listed on BTX and MP within 24hours after ninja launch, and especially IcebergCoin, i guarantee big profit with that one Dump this kind of shitcoins, they always turn out the same. Use your hashpower for profitable purposes It's amazing primer someone more full of shit than you. C'est possible? Dev alter ego get lost. |
|
|
|
Do you really think so? Where are you getting your data? Blocks are being mined at an equal rate (more or less) regardless of the algo being used. http://myriad.theblockexplorer.com And the block reward is the same. Yes I have used this page. On that page you have an information how many coins you are getting per unified MH unit. 340 MYR / MH day by Sricpt 2805 MYR / MH day by Skein Of course this data fluctuates with every block a bit. My SKEIN GPU rig has power usage 300 W / 1 MH = 2805/300 = 9,35 MYR / WAT My SCRIPT ZEUS Blizzard miner has 38 W / 1 MH = 340/38 = 8,94 MYR / WAT Moron. |
|
|
|
There are only 9 active members on this thread, dev, his 3 alter egos, sandor, 7000y, bitspender, chinese pool hacker and I..
Is Shiny DEAD !? How many lurkers are reading this ? Lurkers show some support!!
I've been mining some great coins, got a whopping 31 BTC profit the last 20 hours with a 1.6 BTC investement You are so full of shit/crap/feces its unbelieveable Goodbye linux guru  |
|
|
|
I would like to make this clear here for anyone interested. ASIC miners have the least dump risk of all. Right now the biggest dumping is being done by two entities:
1. multipools because that's what they do.
2. gpu miners because of the high costs of running a gpu mining operation.
Asic miners have the least power consumption and best $/mh ratio so thei have the smallest incentive to mine and dump at these prices.
This is just my reasoning if you feel I'm wrong please comment.
PS: I'm a gpu miner too so there's no need for me to defend asics but I just think that the current schema is the best possible solution to include everyone.
Common denominator - electricity prices. People that think ASICS are wrong for Myriad don't understand the concept of 5 algos at all. Just an example from current status quo: Script (ASIC) - 305 MYR / 1 MH - power usage 30 W - 10,2 MYR per 1W consupmption daily Skein (GPU) - 2500 MYR / 1 MH - power usage 280 W - 8,9 MYR per 1W consupmption daily Pretty much the same efficiency. EVERY ONE IS INVITED. EVERY ONE CAN MINE ON EQUAL TERMS! THAT'S THE BEAUTY OF THIS COIN! Get lost ASIC troll... |
|
|
|
|
One new pool is not going to ressurect this coin from the dead. Email BTER/Poloniex support, ask them to add SHC.
|
|
|
|
I would like to make this clear here for anyone interested. ASIC miners have the least dump risk of all. Right now the biggest dumping is being done by two entities:
Such clown. |
|
|
|
I wish it was possible to add cryptonote algo, including its own blockchain, on top of MYR. If not, lets just fork the hashing algo?
Either would launch MYR to the moon!
edit: replace the damn scrypt with cryptonote and we're set for the moon..
You know what, I've thought long and hard about this and I actually agree with you. We've been discussing the impact of asics for days, and I feel like the common misconception is that it's the asics that are the problem. It's not the asics, its the multipools, hands down. No argument there. I've been repeating myself saying we need asics for polymyr to work, but after re-reading the whitepaper a few times, I came to a realization. Yes we need asics, but we don't need SCRYPT asics. The sha-256 asics can cover the whole spread. The thing that clicked for me was reading about the offset block rewards for the merged mining of alt coins on the network (the whitepaper won't let me copy/paste, go read the future plans section). If done correctly, scrypt coins could still merge with myr, but with an adjusted block reward to make it worthwhile, we could say screw mining scrypt altogether and still contribute enough buy support to keep scrypt coins' heads above water. Plus cryptonote is a pretty interesting protocol with it's own unique anon based perks and so on and so forth. So ya, Primer, I agree with you (fuck!). We should lose scrypt in favor of another gpu based algo (albeit one that can contribute a unique benefit to myr). Scrypt is wrought with multipool dumping, and sha-256 can handle super heavy hashrates well enough alone. Does this keep us in line with the Myriad philosophy? I am one of the smarter guys here, a bit emotional at times due to a large, 20k usd MYR investment. 8bitcoder, is it possible to implement the entire cryptonote algo on top of MYR and its current blockchain ?? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
