i made this posts TO WARN YOU = i DON'T WANT THE COIN TO DIE = I WANT THE COIN TO SUCCEED . (SO BAD COMMENTS FROM OTHER PEOPLE . STFU . (better to listen to advices makes you cry , than advices that makes you laugh . )
Just personal opinion. People would listen to you if you would cut off that megalomaniac stuff about your rich friends, companies you own, thousands of dollars you lose from your pocket every time you break the seal behind your barn. By the way. This is open source project. You are entitled to perform the activities as you suggest by yourself. Cheers! I don't mind reading about his rich friends, companies he ownes or amount of MYR in his bag. I guess it irritates the less fortunate miners. On another note, finally some mintpal support, GO MYR!! |
|
|
|
If removing PoS would help the developing process I can see a point in sacking it. But please lets not increase the volume of new coins created or the maximum supply.
Its inevitable. Removing PoS will increase volume of new coins created (both PoW and PoB.) Increasing PoS diff. will increase volume of new coins created (both PoW and PoB). Their is no way to keep the current daily coin supply the same unless PoW block creation time is increased. No way, like reducing-PoW-PoB-block-reward no way? Reward system is a story on its own. PoW reward was designed for a mediocre difficulty. If this coin ever takes off expect a 3-4SLM block reward. That wont work so a fork will be required. PoB suffers from the same flaw, current PoB reward is 17, once we increase PoW generation rate expect more burned coins. We should have 400k burned coins in a week or two which should drop the reward down to 10 or less. |
|
|
|
If removing PoS would help the developing process I can see a point in sacking it. But please lets not increase the volume of new coins created or the maximum supply.
Its inevitable. Removing PoS will increase volume of new coins created (both PoW and PoB.) Increasing PoS diff. will increase volume of new coins created (both PoW and PoB). Their is no way to keep the current daily coin supply the same unless PoW block creation time is increased. If we turn off the POS the effect is to go back at the first rate (before block 16k) and if I remember it was not bad. Just not to change anything else. If we turn PoS off we will have 3 times more PoW and 3 times more PoB blocks than in the last 2 weeks (since block 15.1k). I wonder how the exchange would react to an influx of 3x more coins. |
|
|
|
If removing PoS would help the developing process I can see a point in sacking it. But please lets not increase the volume of new coins created or the maximum supply.
Its inevitable. Removing PoS will increase volume of new coins created (both PoW and PoB.) Increasing PoS diff. will increase volume of new coins created (both PoW and PoB). Their is no way to keep the current daily coin supply the same unless PoW block creation time is increased. |
|
|
|
LOL primer- just dumped his 10000 SLM on Bter  Hopefully! This coin is going NOWHERE WITH PRIMER IN THE COMMUNITY HE IS (OR WAS) ONE OF THE BIGGEST BAG HOLDERS OF SLIM & HIS LOGIC IS TO COMPLETELY BASH AND DEGRADE SLIMCOIN EFFECTIVELY REDUCING HIS OWN PROFITS?! WHO DOES THAT?! A CHIMPANZEE HAS A HIGHER IQ THEN PRIMER You are forgetting i sold 19 BTC worth of SLM, including todays dump  How much did you make off SLM ? PoS is broken and the proposed fix will have a huge effect on daily coin supply. Good luck with your bag if you decide to hold )) I haven't made anything because I've chosen not to sell, I'm in for the long haul (: Let me ELI5 for you as you are still clueless : Proposed PoS fix will increase PoW/PoB blocks. Miners like I will mine 3 - 5 times more every day compared to todays rate. Thats PER block type! I average around 10 PoB blocks /day. I will average 30 after the fix. I average around 500SLM via PoW /day. I will average 1500SLM after the fix. You get it now retard ? |
|
|
|
LOL primer- just dumped his 10000 SLM on Bter Hopefully! This coin is going NOWHERE WITH PRIMER IN THE COMMUNITY HE IS (OR WAS) ONE OF THE BIGGEST BAG HOLDERS OF SLIM & HIS LOGIC IS TO COMPLETELY BASH AND DEGRADE SLIMCOIN EFFECTIVELY REDUCING HIS OWN PROFITS?! WHO DOES THAT?! A CHIMPANZEE HAS A HIGHER IQ THEN PRIMER You are forgetting i sold 19 BTC worth of SLM, including todays dump How much did you make off SLM ? PoS is broken and the proposed fix will have a huge effect on daily coin supply. Good luck with your bag if you decide to hold )) No it isn't still decided yet. We will vote for complete turn off PoS because it won't bring anything. PoB is more than enough. You dont get it, do you ? If you eliminate PoS completely it will lead to even more PoB/PoW blocks... |
|
|
|
LOL primer- just dumped his 10000 SLM on Bter Hopefully! This coin is going NOWHERE WITH PRIMER IN THE COMMUNITY HE IS (OR WAS) ONE OF THE BIGGEST BAG HOLDERS OF SLIM & HIS LOGIC IS TO COMPLETELY BASH AND DEGRADE SLIMCOIN EFFECTIVELY REDUCING HIS OWN PROFITS?! WHO DOES THAT?! A CHIMPANZEE HAS A HIGHER IQ THEN PRIMER You are forgetting i sold 19 BTC worth of SLM, including todays dump How much did you make off SLM ? PoS is broken and the proposed fix will have a huge effect on daily coin supply. Good luck with your bag if you decide to hold )) |
|
|
|
LOL primer- just dumped his 10000 SLM on Bter 2.5k, but i will dump 20k more if someone puts up a 0.00020000 buy order  |
|
|
|
Conclusion : Dump now as there will be 3 to 5 times more coins minted daily when/if the PoS fix is applied. Sad.
LOL why do i have a feeling its your node that charges 40 slm to send to BTER? Great, encourage everyone to dump into your buy support so you can rape even more coins. Youre the biggest POS Ive ever seen, & i dont mean Proof of Stake. Go mine doge, retard. |
|
|
|
Primer. I wish cancer upon you.
I wish the same to you and your entire family. I haven't posted in a while... so I came back to ask what's going on with this coin and why the continuing price decline... ... and I see people who wish cancer to their respective families... lol..  WTF???  He is one sick person. I spoke in self-defense. |
|
|
|
|
Conclusion : Dump now as there will be 3 to 5 times more coins minted daily when/if the PoS fix is applied. Sad.
|
|
|
|
Dump fest on BTER, I guess miners did not like my calculation |
|
|
|
|
WOW, 1BTC buy support in the last 10 min. We have not had such MEGAPUMP since April.
|
|
|
|
My rage has melted away. You have the best timing and thanks for your input.
And there are some new reddit subscribers! Myriad is getting famous because of last events. Yes, the real-time DEATH of a coin is an interesting event to observe! |
|
|
|
I am here and need input on the new PoS reward increase from 1% to 10% and make them more difficult to find.
If I understand it correctly, increasing the PoS reward this way will make the number of PoS blocks found drop 10-fold, but each reward proportionally rise by 10x. This would not affect PoS reward, but increase coin generation rate. PoS currently generates way too much dust, and screws up the difficulty adjustment for PoB and its consequent discovery rate, which is your coin's main selling point. Block Range [PoS, PoW, PoB]23352 24351 [466, 394, 140] 24352 25351 [342, 479, 179] 25352 26351 [384, 457, 159] 26352 27351 [693, 222, 85] 27352 28351 [653, 252, 95] 28352 29351 [661, 256, 83] 29352 30351 [693, 232, 75] 30352 31351 [465, 401, 134] Currently, the PoS generation rate varies from 34.2% to 69.3% of each 1000 blocks. I assume a 10-fold drop should cut it to 3.42%-6.93%; this will likely allow PoW/PoB to dominate and achieve a PoW block rate of ~90-100 seconds. Also, the average reward for PoS from blocks 30353 to 31352 appears to be 0.07796 per block for the 464 PoS blocks that appear in this range. A 10x reward will bring the average reward to about 0.78 SLM / block, with a PoS block rate of about once every half an hour. If this is the case, then I think keeping PoS with the 10x reward amendment will allow Slimcoin to maintain its status as the coin with tri-hybrid block and still allow PoB to shine. I am correct to assume that blocks above stand for a 24h timeline ? If so, current average for PoW is 3.5min (30352 31351 [465, 401, 134]). Implementing the PoS fix would increase PoW generation rate by x2 or x3 . What about PoB ? EDIT : When taking other days into calculation, we are to expect an increase of x3 - x5 in both PoW and PoB. |
|
|
|
MYR @ 0.00000094 Only around 2.5mil MYR required to dump it down to 0 |
|
|
|
My idea is with the PoS reward increase, since the PoS difficulty will be higher, less will be found and thus the reward will compensate. Also, it will make PoS more worthwhile.
I would eliminate PoS... Yeah, i don't like PoS... PoB on the other hand... that fix about offline burned coins affecting PoB minting difficulty, that needs to be done. Slim, btw, was trying to include getrawtransaction on the code (i even forked it on github) but heck, most "getrawtransaction" implementations are totally incompatible with Slimcoin's code. I strongly suggest you take a look, i will try my hand at it again on the near future, but my current priority is to get my system up and running because servers need to get paid. +1 to eliminate PoS. Its a nuisance. |
|
|
|
wait...
is there a wallet version where i don't need lot of RAM to run it ?
or is it under development ?
Yes, default wallet configuration does not require any RAM unless you want to mine with it. |
|
|
|
Mister 8bitcoder, would you be so kind to respond to the community?
8bitcoder is gone and someone is using his account to post messages and change the OP from time to time.. Satoshi is long gone and hasn't posted in over 2 years. Bitcoin = dead coin. Satoshi left after years of development, bitcoin community when he left had hundreds of developers. What we got here are clowns. NeuroMode is a noob. Foodies is a noob. Ahmed is very likely a scammer. They cant read nor write code. Primer. I wish cancer upon you. I wish the same to you and your entire family. good now go troll another place you have been here since the birth of christ. whatever medications you are on they are not helping. Tell your doctor that you sit in front of your computer all day and say nonsense. Or if you have autism or auspergers i sincerely feel sorry for you but seriously i just took a look into your chat history and its just thousands of posts all basically the same trolling. Something is not right in your head You are the one in need of medical (psychiatric) attention. Wishing cancer upon someone is beyond any medically curable disease. |
|
|
|
Is it normal not to find a share in well over 30 minutes ?? 2014-07-07 13:38:19] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:38:19] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:39:22] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:39:22] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:39:24] Stratum requested work restart
[2014-07-07 13:39:25] thread 0: 1 hashes, 18.68 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:39:25] thread 1: 1 hashes, 18.46 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:40:40] thread 0: 19 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:40:40] thread 1: 19 hashes, 15.31 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:41:43] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:41:43] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:42:45] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.31 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:42:45] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.31 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:43:48] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.28 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:43:48] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.28 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:44:51] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.31 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:44:51] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.31 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:45:54] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.28 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:45:54] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.27 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:46:54] stratum_recv_line failed
[2014-07-07 13:46:54] Stratum connection interrupted
[2014-07-07 13:46:56] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.46 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:46:56] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.45 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:47:59] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.27 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:47:59] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.27 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:49:01] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.31 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:49:01] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:49:50] Stratum requested work restart
[2014-07-07 13:49:52] thread 0: 13 hashes, 15.52 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:49:52] thread 1: 13 hashes, 15.50 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:50:55] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:50:55] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.28 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:51:29] Stratum requested work restart
[2014-07-07 13:51:29] thread 1: 9 hashes, 15.60 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:51:29] thread 0: 9 hashes, 15.59 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:52:32] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:52:32] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:53:05] Stratum requested work restart
[2014-07-07 13:53:07] thread 1: 9 hashes, 15.61 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:53:07] thread 0: 9 hashes, 15.59 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:53:53] Stratum requested work restart
[2014-07-07 13:53:53] thread 0: 12 hashes, 15.52 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:53:53] thread 1: 12 hashes, 15.49 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:54:56] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:54:56] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:55:58] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.31 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:55:58] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.31 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:57:01] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.31 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:57:01] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:57:14] stratum_recv_line failed
[2014-07-07 13:57:14] Stratum connection interrupted
[2014-07-07 13:57:16] thread 1: 4 hashes, 15.98 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:57:16] thread 0: 4 hashes, 16.04 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:58:19] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.27 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:58:23] thread 0: 17 hashes, 15.27 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:58:56] Stratum requested work restart
[2014-07-07 13:58:58] thread 1: 10 hashes, 15.57 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:58:58] thread 0: 9 hashes, 15.60 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:00:00] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:00:00] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:01:03] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:01:03] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:02:06] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:02:06] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:03:09] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:03:09] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:04:11] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:04:11] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:05:14] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:05:14] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
EDIT : The same on another server! [2014-07-07 13:40:14] stratum_recv_line failed
[2014-07-07 13:40:14] Stratum connection interrupted
[2014-07-07 13:40:15] Stratum requested work restart
[2014-07-07 13:40:15] thread 0: 13 hashes, 15.40 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:40:15] thread 1: 13 hashes, 15.41 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:41:18] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.28 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:41:18] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.28 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:42:21] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:42:21] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.28 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:43:24] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.25 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:43:24] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.24 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:44:26] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:44:26] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:45:29] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:45:29] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:46:32] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:46:32] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:47:35] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:47:35] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.29 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:48:38] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:48:38] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.30 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:49:40] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.25 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:49:40] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.25 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:49:50] Stratum requested work restart
[2014-07-07 13:49:52] thread 0: 3 hashes, 16.21 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:49:52] thread 1: 3 hashes, 16.21 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:50:40] stratum_recv_line failed
[2014-07-07 13:50:40] Stratum connection interrupted
[2014-07-07 13:50:42] Stratum requested work restart
[2014-07-07 13:50:42] thread 0: 13 hashes, 15.50 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:50:42] thread 1: 13 hashes, 15.49 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:51:29] Stratum requested work restart
[2014-07-07 13:51:29] thread 0: 12 hashes, 15.26 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:51:29] thread 1: 12 hashes, 15.26 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:52:32] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.27 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:52:32] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.27 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:53:05] Stratum requested work restart
[2014-07-07 13:53:07] thread 1: 9 hashes, 15.54 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:53:07] thread 0: 9 hashes, 15.53 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:53:53] Stratum requested work restart
[2014-07-07 13:53:53] thread 0: 12 hashes, 15.46 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:53:53] thread 1: 12 hashes, 15.46 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:54:56] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.21 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:54:56] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.20 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:55:59] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.25 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:55:59] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.26 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:57:02] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.23 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:57:02] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.23 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:58:05] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.26 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:58:05] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.25 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:58:56] Stratum requested work restart
[2014-07-07 13:58:56] thread 0: 13 hashes, 15.42 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:58:56] thread 1: 13 hashes, 15.42 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:59:59] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.25 hash/m
[2014-07-07 13:59:59] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.24 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:01:02] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.27 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:01:02] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.27 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:01:26] stratum_recv_line failed
[2014-07-07 14:01:26] Stratum connection interrupted
[2014-07-07 14:01:29] thread 0: 7 hashes, 15.71 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:01:29] thread 1: 7 hashes, 15.66 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:02:31] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.26 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:02:31] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.26 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:03:34] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.27 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:03:34] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.26 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:04:37] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.25 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:04:37] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.25 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:05:40] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.27 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:05:40] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.27 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:06:43] thread 1: 16 hashes, 15.28 hash/m
[2014-07-07 14:06:43] thread 0: 16 hashes, 15.28 hash/m
Maybe vardiff is not a good idea ?? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
