I should have made this self-moderated to keep dissenting opinions and people who poke holes in my confirmation bias away.
I fixed that for you. If you just want your bias confirmed turn on the TV. This forum is for discussion, not circle jerking. The fact is Hillary Clinton had more motive to kill Peter W. Smith than anyone in the GOP. Trolls be trolling so hard. Nah, self moderated to keep asshats who troll threads just because they dislike the content of the thread. Asshat trolls who distract from the conservation. Asshole trolls that don't really care about the topic, just arguing about pointless shit. A guy was murdered, probably by a Russian agent. The house intelligence committee should investigate the guy's murder. I suppose only a loony would think Clinton murdered this guy. The same sort of loony that'd think bombs sent to Democratic leaders were a false flag operation. Wait, that's this troll here! Anyway, this thread will be interesting to look back on once the investigation completes.  So you are saying your conspiracy theories are perfectly legitimate and fact, and every else's conspiracy theories are trolls and insane if they disagree with you. |
|
|
|
Hey look! More distraction from Democrat crimes and their supporters by creating yet another freak show. I changed my mind, that house staffer should file charges for assault now.
Ya think all these "distractions" would eventually stop. Maybe if Trump would take this piece of advice, they would:  You are right, Jim Accosta shouldn't have broke the law assaulting that women. |
|
|
|
I should have made this self-moderated to keep dissenting opinions and people who poke holes in my confirmation bias away.
I fixed that for you. If you just want your bias confirmed turn on the TV. This forum is for discussion, not circle jerking. The fact is Hillary Clinton had more motive to kill Peter W. Smith than anyone in the GOP. |
|
|
|
Hey look! More distraction from Democrat crimes and their supporters by creating yet another freak show. I changed my mind, that house staffer should file charges for assault now. |
|
|
|
|
Google got its seed funding from In-Q-Tel, the well known venture capital arm of the CIA. These companies are not private, impartial, or separate from the government by any means.
|
|
|
|
So you are saying you have no ability to defend your argument, so you demand others do your research for you?
I'm saying YOU are too retarded to do your own research. You never back up your own claims. I've sourced my claims. It's not my fault you're too retarded to figure out how to click links. So you are saying it is my job to do your research for you to prove your point? |
|
|
|
Schools spend little to no time on basic things like teaching children how their own brains work with critical thinking skills, logic, and debate and instead "teach" by operant conditioning which results in more of a parroting effect than actual thinking skills. The problem with this strategy of "teaching" is that even if you teach them the right thing to parrot, information changes and becomes outdated.
Furthermore in the US we spend an inordinate amount of time conditioning children in subjects that are somewhat arbitrary when most of the world takes advantage of this time to start training in specialized industrial skills. Not everyone is going to be a PhD or get a masters degree, most people won't, and those people need that bridge to get to the next step in their careers. Furthermore this is a huge workforce which could be taken advantage of to raise overall productivity as these kids learn on the job for credit.
A bit of a conflict here. There is no conflict at all. There is a difference between social conditioning and learning specific industrial skills. It is really pathetic how little people know about how to manage their money let alone what money itself is. When you say "most of the world", you have to keep in mind you are talking about nations that mostly have strong unions, universal healthcare, and free/cheap higher education. If everyone is educated on how money works, they would demand more rights and our capitalist system would not survive. I know you really want to turn this into an argument for Common Core and Communism, but it is not. None of what you mentioned is required for any of this to happen. Furthermore your final statement is little more than a a very bold assumption. |
|
|
|
So you ARE saying you couldn't pass a 5th grade English class because you do not know how to source your arguments!
I'm saying you're too retarded to go back when this was first referenced in this thread to look at the source. Rofl. So you are saying you have no ability to defend your argument, so you demand others do your research for you? |
|
|
|
The link between Russia and the GOP was taken out by Russian agents. His suicide note is pretty damning to be honest; "NO FOUL PLAY WHATSOEVER - ALL SELF INFLICTED," Smith's note read in part. "NO PARTY ASSISTED OR HAD KNOWLEDGE AS AN ACCOMPLICE BEFORE THE FACT."
Now that democrats control the house intelligence committee, some investigation can actually be done into this guy's murder. It seemed the guy had a lot on his mind the day he was killed according to news source. I'm willing to bet he was going to tell the whole world about the GOP / Russia corruption and collusion. Cool story bro. "His death occurred 10 days after his interview with the Wall Street Journal, in which he said that he had sought Hillary Clinton’s deleted emails from Russian hackers. " https://www.ibtimes.com/gop-operative-peter-w-smiths-cause-death-might-not-be-suicide-reports-say-2565737 |
|
|
|
So you are saying your claim you sourced your statements is good enough and you don't need to bother sourcing your argument?
Uhhh... I sourced it back a few pages ago. I've listed names, which you have not. Disprove any these violent right wing extremists or show me how the violence they committed is not related to VIOLENT RIGHT WING RHETORIC. That was your claim, now back up your claim. Scott Leader and Steve Leader
Curtis Allen, Gavin Wright, and Patrick Eugene Stein
Alexandre Bissonnette
Michael Hari, Michael McWhorter, and Joe Morris
James Alex Fields Jr.
Brandon Griesemer
Nikolas Cruz So you ARE saying you couldn't pass a 5th grade English class because you do not know how to source your arguments! |
|
|
|
So what you are saying is you couldn't pass a 5th grade English class because you don;t know how to source things?
Hey man, if you don't wanna do your own independent research, that's on you. I've already sourced this back a few pages, but you ignored those sources. Also, it seems with you, you'll jump to "fake news" for any sources I list. Also, the fact that you can't provide a list of individuals (from the left side that are violent) shows that YOU don't know how to source things. "inb4 demands APA or MLA citations on a web forum" rofl. So you are saying your claim you sourced your statements is good enough and you don't need to bother sourcing your argument? |
|
|
|
So what you are saying is the left hasn't been violent and calling for violence for over two years, and the right has a monopoly on violence which you can prove with sources?
Sure, just look up the following individuals. They're right wing violent individuals that I can name off. Can you send over a list of left wing violent offenders so we can compare and contrast? Scott Leader and Steve Leader
Curtis Allen, Gavin Wright, and Patrick Eugene Stein
Alexandre Bissonnette
Michael Hari, Michael McWhorter, and Joe Morris
James Alex Fields Jr.
Brandon Griesemer
Nikolas Cruz
So you are saying you couldn't pass a 5th grade English class because you don't know how to source things? |
|
|
|
So you are saying that the Democrats did not benefit from the public being distracted from their horrible failure of trying to slander Kavanaugh, and the later proof that it was all a fraud.
Nah, the democrats benefit anytime a violent right wing extremist, who is a core part of Trump's "base", goes off and attacks democrats. Instead of scaring democrats, it just unites them and shows them what hate rhetoric does to the people. Just like after 9/11 and other tragic events; we become more united rather than divided. Hate won't prevail.Honestly, I think we need to start holding some news agencies for inciting this violence. It was the individual's decision, but his decision was a "misinformation" decision via the right wing hate propaganda broadcasted daily. You're not allowed to tell someone to go shoot, bomb, or kill someone else without being charged with "inciting violence", but the right wing propaganda does so frequently under the guise of "freedom of speech". It's absolutely disgusting these people aren't held accountable. So you are saying the left hasn't been violent and calling for violence for over two years, and the right has a monopoly on violence which you can prove with sources? |
|
|
|
So you are saying that you have no reply to our argument so you must insert words into our mouths in order to create a straw man for you to slay?
Hey man, you're the one saying domestic terrorism is a distraction from political appointments. I'm pretty sure there's a thread for "that" political appointment, but instead you change the narrative here to point towards that. In reality, the narrative should be about condemning hate rhetoric. So you are saying that the Democrats did not benefit from the public being distracted from their hateful rhetoric and horrible failure of trying to slander Kavanaugh, and the later proof that it was all a fraud? |
|
|
|
That guy was dumber than rocks.
I think Techshare was referring to the mass media dropping the Kavanaugh story and going full steam ahead with this one, in order to create non step negativity.
So, you're saying media shouldn't cover domestic terrorism ?? I think we would all appreciate it if you didn't speak for us. We can do that ourselves. You attempt to take the most extreme example of any interpretation you possibly can in a vain attempt to avoid discussing facts. Facts like the media is complicit in hiding inconvenient facts from the population, and selling them lies. All of it. So you're saying these people weren't radicalized by Right Wing hate rhetoric and it's just "fake news" broadcast by the "lame stream media"? Scott Leader and Steve Leader
Curtis Allen, Gavin Wright, and Patrick Eugene Stein
Alexandre Bissonnette
Michael Hari, Michael McWhorter, and Joe Morris
James Alex Fields Jr.
Brandon Griesemer
Nikolas Cruz So you are saying that you have no reply to our argument so you must insert words into our mouths in order to create a straw man for you to slay? |
|
|
|
|
Ever heard of the phrase "don't put all your eggs in one basket?"
|
|
|
|
I think collective education is still very valuable, but the wrong things are being taught in the wrong ways. Kids should learn how to manage money, how to take calculated risks, and how to make smart investments so they aren't forced to become modern slaves.
We are social creatures and need to be around others from a young age to develop emotional intelligence and also cultivate lasting friendships, which help in many aspects of life (emotional health and also business deals later in life because you grow to trust them).
Traditional schooling environments should remain but the coursework should change to account for the current job market, which is becoming increasingly digital in nature.
I agree completely. Everything is always about balance in all things. Too much of any good thing can be destructive. You pointed out a couple of the primary issues with our educational systems. Schools spend little to no time on basic things like teaching children how their own brains work with critical thinking skills, logic, and debate and instead "teach" by operant conditioning which results in more of a parroting effect than actual thinking skills. The problem with this strategy of "teaching" is that even if you teach them the right thing to parrot, information changes and becomes outdated. Another point you brought up was basic money management skills. It is really pathetic how little people know about how to manage their money let alone what money itself is. Furthermore in the US we spend an inordinate amount of time conditioning children in subjects that are somewhat arbitrary when most of the world takes advantage of this time to start training in specialized industrial skills. Not everyone is going to be a PhD or get a masters degree, most people won't, and those people need that bridge to get to the next step in their careers. Furthermore this is a huge workforce which could be taken advantage of to raise overall productivity as these kids learn on the job for credit. Yes, it's more of a sophisticated form of babysitting than anything else. The course-work attempts to be as well-intentioned as possible, but the people behind educational institutions are usually old-school and from different eras, and don't have real experience in the fields they're talking about. Making trade school seem like less of an option for "failures" would be a great strategy for job creation, less crime, and greater well-being in the US. A lot of the time they are even paid better than office jobs that require degrees (until we experience the wrath of AI). I agree the primary purpose, other than conditioning, is probably just keeping kids off of the streets. The course work and entire educational model in the US is of Prussian origin however, which lends itself to focus on social conditioning. I don't think it is appropriate to call people who end up in trade schools failures. Everyone wants to be a PhD or a scientist, but in reality MOST people will not be that. Making them feel like less of a human being because they are doing manual labor still critical and in demand to our society is not fair IMO. As you mentioned many of these individuals end up making way more than their academic counterparts because their skills are becoming more and more rare and in demand. The ones who will be doctors and scientists will make their exceptional state known. I think this designation of these types of workers as "failures" is largely a symptom of the arrogance and desires of the teachers themselves so they can tell others they taught doctors and scientists. Teachers don't get excited when they tell each other they trained a highly skilled welder. |
|
|
|
That guy was dumber than rocks.
I think Techshare was referring to the mass media dropping the Kavanaugh story and going full steam ahead with this one, in order to create non step negativity.
So, you're saying media shouldn't cover domestic terrorism?? I think we would all appreciate it if you didn't speak for us. We can do that ourselves. You attempt to take the most extreme example of any interpretation you possibly can in a vain attempt to avoid discussing facts. Facts like the media is complicit in hiding inconvenient facts from the population, and selling them lies. All of it. |
|
|
|
....
Chinese Students and Scholars Associations have more than 150 branches in american campuses and organize 430,000 Chinese students studying in USA.
The Chinese Students and Scholars Association alerts Chinese consulates and embassies when Chinese students and/or American schools stray from the communist party line..
American goose-stepping lib tards are pretty easy to control. Further more they laugh at lefty retards more than we do here because they know what good tools they are. |
|
|
|
I think people don't really understand the whole concept of climate change. At first it was about global warming, it didn't work, people didn't understood what that is really about. Then, it was about climate change, not many know what that is also. Something more convincing should be promoted to people in order to make them believe that what the environment suffers from mankind mass destruction is going to affect themselves, their children and the whole world. The problem here is: what about the ones saying: i don't care. we will die anyway. How do we convince those? Maybe with aggressive advertising or real situations.
I saw today a post on Facebook with a polar bear crawling, very skinny, starving, etc. My heart melted. But for those that don't care, how do we make them more emphatic to this matter?
It seems to me that you, like many other who support the anthropogenic global warming theory tend to think more with your emotions than with your logic. Just wanting good things does not guarantee you your path will achieve it. That is what logic is for. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
