I am proudly banned from Twitter. If you use Twitter and have not been banned, then I do not have any respect for you, and I consider you subhuman. By the way, the worship of Elon Musk is idolatry in every religion, so all the Musk worshippers need to be locked up.
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
How do you feel about people who DON'T use twitter, and haven't been banned?  |
|
|
|
~ Not at all. But you seem to be confusing what I said with both, striking down laws, and jury nullification. If the law in a school zone is 15mph, and a driver drives through at 120mph, and a cop pulls him over and it goes to court in a jury trial, the jury can strike down the law with regard to the driver so that he gets off totally free. Generally a jury won't do this, because the jury has friends and family with kids going to the school. But they can do it if they want, even if there is no good reason. It's up to them, totally. This does not strike down the law for anybody else, however. For every other person who breaks this law, it's a totally new court case. If, however, there are bunches of people who drive 120mph through this school zone, and the juries for most of them declare these drivers innocent, the city or state just might change the law so that the speed limit for this school zone is no longer only 15mph. The reason might be that it's an old, condemned school that is not being used, and has a chain link fence around it, and the school zone speed limit SHOULD be removed. The point is that the jury rules in a trial-by-jury court case. In general, when they strike down a law, it's for that court case only, not for the whole country... although other court decisions might base themselves on this one to some extent. First of all, nothing of what you says in the constitution, at most is your interpretation or something coming from some shitty YouTube channel, probably paid for by Ruzzia and what you call "strike down a law" is simply "ignoring the law" dumbass. So I am guessing right, you are banking on a jury declaring Trump innocent because it is Trump, and that has to happen for the tens of felonies that he is now indicted for - so any future president will know that it is ok to send murdering mobs, rant about judges, ... Trump is the example of how liberties can be abused. And, let's not forget, calling the army to kill their own citizens protesting: https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/24/politics/bender-book-trump-milley-protests/index.htmlhe top US general repeatedly pushed back on then-President Donald Trump’s argument that the military should intervene violently in order to quell the civil unrest that erupted around the country last year. So much for liberty. I agree that people are and have been dumbed down regarding the ways they can use the Constitution and the laws. But I showed you a little of what the 6th and 7th Amendment say. And you even quoted them, but forgot to consider what they say. The Amendments are part of the Constitution. Because of the way the people have been trained by the 'Perry Mason' show, and by the courts, themselves, it will be difficult for them to use the full law as they could if they simply knew how. So, let me explain it to you simply. In the US, there are three basic things regarding the standard populace. They are written into the Constitution, underlying the whole thing: 1. The right to contract; 1. The right to own private property, including themselves; 3. The right to influence government in certain ways. Everything that goes on in the country flows out of those 3 things. If it doesn't, it is criminal activity... sometimes by the general populace, and other times by government people. All you need to do is read the Constitution, the laws, and the court cases, to see this. Of course, simply reading that stuff doesn't do anything. You have to think. And like many Americans, the evidence is that you are finding that thinking is difficult for you. |
|
|
|
The courts adjudicated that Jones was guilty of harming the Sandy Hook parents. Does Jones like the judgment against him? Alex Jones still must pay $1B judgment: Judge - ABC News - https://abcnews.go.com/US/alex-jones-ordered-pay-1-billion-judgment-sandy/story?id=104175574. Probably not. So, what does this mean? It means Jones will be very careful in the future to NOT say things that he doesn't have real proof for. Everybody makes mistakes... including Alex Jones, the courts, and everybody else in the whole world. So, among the many good things that Jones says, there will always be a few mistakes. And since Jones is going to be much more careful, Americans and the world will get the benefit of the truth from him from now on. Bringing Jones back on X provides two great benefits: 1. It benefits the American people because they will find out more of the truth that they need to know; 2. It benefits the Sandy Hook parents, because Jones will be earning from talking, so he can pay off his court bill. Basically, anybody who doesn't want Jones back in the media is somebody who is against Americans and against the Sandy Hook parents. You must be joking. Most the things Jones and professional conspiracy theorists like him spread are completely fabricated "information" which they do not have any evidence of. It is not a matter of him being careful about saying thing he cannot provez otherwise he would not be able to say anything at all which appealed to his overage subscriber/viewer, it is about him continue to spread lies and devious conspiracy theories but ones which are not directly targeted against inviduals or organizations which could sue him again for defamation. It is different to say parents are part of a cover up for a false massacre in a school, from saying the earth is flat or the government is spraying the sky with chemicals. Nobody will be able to sue Jones for saying Earth is flat (a planet cannot sue for defamation) and the government won't sue Jones because it would be ridiculous for them to do so for those allegations of them having aliens or whatever. Also, Alex is not even willing to start paying to those families, hence he declared bankrupcy after years of accumulating millions of dollars from selling silver water to his followers. You must be joking. Did you ever watch a Jones Infowars podcast? His desk is littered with the evidence and proof. Did you ever look into the evidence and proof? I didn't either. Then Jones puts the wording of the evidence and proof right on the screen for everybody to see... including the location of the info in law and policy so that anybody can go look it up. It's true that Jones stretches some of the info to mean some things that the info doesn't necessarily mean. But the other side is that he doesn't always explain how bad and damning some of the info really is. And, like everybody, he makes a mistake or two once in a while. At least, Jones gets the info out there so that people can look at it for themselves if they have a mind to. I don't want to remain totally ignorant of what is going on. Do you? Jones shows a lot of what we would never see otherwise. |
|
|
|
~ Ammon Bundy didn't know what he was doing in court. The jury simply liked what he did in the wildlife refuge takeover. The jury freed him. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/28/us/bundy-brothers-acquitted-in-takeover-of-oregon-wildlife-refuge.html. The jury has the authority to vote how they want regarding any case they hear... provided it is a jury based on the 6th or 7th Amendments. There is evidence of court cases all over the place, where juries even reversed the charges in some cases, so that the plaintiff had to pay the fine. You: "juries can strike down laws" Me: "No they can't" You: "Juries can vote how they want" Me:  Are you confusing 'striking down a law' with jury nullification? You know just because a guilty person is acquitted or has a hung jury doesn't mean that law they broke is struck down, right? Did OJs jury strike down the law that makes murder illegal? Not at all. But you seem to be confusing what I said with both, striking down laws, and jury nullification. If the law in a school zone is 15mph, and a driver drives through at 120mph, and a cop pulls him over and it goes to court in a jury trial, the jury can strike down the law with regard to the driver so that he gets off totally free. Generally a jury won't do this, because the jury has friends and family with kids going to the school. But they can do it if they want, even if there is no good reason. It's up to them, totally. This does not strike down the law for anybody else, however. For every other person who breaks this law, it's a totally new court case. If, however, there are bunches of people who drive 120mph through this school zone, and the juries for most of them declare these drivers innocent, the city or state just might change the law so that the speed limit for this school zone is no longer only 15mph. The reason might be that it's an old, condemned school that is not being used, and has a chain link fence around it, and the school zone speed limit SHOULD be removed. The point is that the jury rules in a trial-by-jury court case. In general, when they strike down a law, it's for that court case only, not for the whole country... although other court decisions might base themselves on this one to some extent. |
|
|
|
The courts adjudicated that Jones was guilty of harming the Sandy Hook parents. Does Jones like the judgment against him? Alex Jones still must pay $1B judgment: Judge - ABC News - https://abcnews.go.com/US/alex-jones-ordered-pay-1-billion-judgment-sandy/story?id=104175574. Probably not. So, what does this mean? It means Jones will be very careful in the future to NOT say things that he doesn't have real proof for. Everybody makes mistakes... including Alex Jones, the courts, and everybody else in the whole world. So, among the many good things that Jones says, there will always be a few mistakes. And since Jones is going to be much more careful, Americans and the world will get the benefit of the truth from him from now on. Bringing Jones back on X provides two great benefits: 1. It benefits the American people because they will find out more of the truth that they need to know; 2. It benefits the Sandy Hook parents, because Jones will be earning from talking, so he can pay off his court bill. Basically, anybody who doesn't want Jones back in the media is somebody who is against Americans and against the Sandy Hook parents. |
|
|
|
I wonder if he got the Covid jab, and how many of them. |
|
|
|
in space there is no "matter" in the OPEN SPACE..
Our area of the galaxy has an average density of 1 atom per 30 cubic meters. Doesn't seem like much, but it makes relativistic travel troublesome. my words were in regards to dark matter.. if you cant see/measure it/weigh it. its not the definition of "matter" Right! At least as far as it concerns us in the scheme of things, it doesn't matter. |
|
|
|
 Time travel ain't what it will have been And if you think it is a hassle now, just wait until yesterday Time travel jokes never get new She looks kinda Irish she were my girlfriend. But judging by the many times you re-post her picture... you saw her first, so I won't butt in. |
|
|
|
Any machine like the universe must have a very intelligent, extremely powerful, Being that made it. The definition of such a being would fit the definition of our word 'God'.
But that extremely powerful Being must have been created (or sustained) in a medium we call the universe, but would more fittingly be called "God". God is inside of the universe and outside of it. He sustains it and Himself, as well. God is an alien, but also human. God is so extremely great, that He probably has many universes. These universes are so extremely different than each other, that the word 'different' is way too weak. If the universes weren't different than each other, they would be part of each other, and not many other universes. I'm amazed that you keep limiting yourself and your understanding. |
|
|
|
~ This that you say is the exact point why speech should be free. Why should anybody suggest that Jones's stuff is fabricated? Many people say it is the truth - with a few mistakes here and there, just like everybody else who talks. If we can't hear it, how can we make the judgment about whether it is fabricated or not? Or why should we not apply the fabrication idea to the speaking of EVERYBODY else at the same time? The sensors in X and every other media outlet should simply make categories according to what they think is the truth, and what they think is falsehood. Let everybody speak. Then, 'censor' them by sticking them in an appropriate category based on 1 - 10 regarding how truthful the media thinks they are. That way people would be able to easily ignore them, or go to see what they say if they want. It's called freedom, both for the speakers, but also for the listeners. The funny thing regarding X is, if they were to enact censors more than they have, even Elon would be censored. The problem is not what they people say or listen, actually. The problem are the consequences which go beyond speech and can originally start from speech. For example, Alex Jones can day whatever he wants and they would not be a problem, but the issue is the fact he damaged the parents of those children who got murdered by a madman for no reason. Do you understand the difference? Another example, let us assume there is some person who start to pose as a doctor, but does not actually have a degree in medicine and never went to college, and that person starts to claim one can combat cancer using salt water and ivermectin. What if his stupid claims translated to the death of hundreds of people who got deceived by him? You can say whatever you want, but still you can defame and cause the death of people indirectly. There is where the problems lies on. The trouble with your line of thought regarding Jones is, it was not Jones that damaged the parents. It was they, themselves. After all, they were the ones that induced their own feelings of pain by placing any stock in Jones's words. Since they DID place stock in his words, maybe Jones was right after all. They really need to go back to the psychiatrist for more self-control training. Your whole line of thought should be applied to most Covid government officials and doctors, rather than Jones, who is helping to show the truth about the evil in the medical and government... even if he made a mistake about the school shootings. |
|
|
|
~ You seem to forget that Quantum Mechanics allows for two opposite things to both be correct, even at the same time. Tucker TROLLS CNN With Massive Billboard Outside Their HQ: 'The Corporate Media Is DEAD' - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpdXpL9ywz0.Though, it sounds not make sense to apply quantum mechanics to political analysis though... It is supposed to only be valid for the study of atomic or sub atomic particles. There is no correlation between whatever tucker Carlson could say and the laws of quantum mechanics. And you would be aware of it if you ever tried to study those laws of physics, though I understand education of that level within the United States is very difficult to afford anyways. So perhaps your ignorance is not completely your fault. The quantum Mechanics usage above, was regarding the statement franky1 made that suggested that some of the articles BADecker posted contradicted each other. However, QM affects everything. Isn't light a subatomic particle at the same time that it is a wave? |
|
|
|
So, if Trump wanted to avoid being criminally charged, he should have switched the court over to the Common Law side. The way to do it is to stand as a man, present, and not represented (no attorneys)... and make the statement that any man/woman who has been wronged by him should get on the stand, show the wrong, and "I will compensate him/her." So, it is Trumps fault for not swinging the whole thing into common law, and holding it there.
This doesn't work. It's been tried. The judge would just deny his stupid request like all the stupid requests he's made before. All the appellate courts would decline to intervene, including SCOTUS. If your theory worked, nobody would ever be prosecuted by DOJ for breaking federal laws. It wouldn't be a secret nobody knew about. It would just take one successful case, and then everyone would do it. The reason it doesn't work most of the time is that the so-called defendant didn't go far enough. A man/woman can't accept being the defendant, and stand unrepresented at the same time. The two are contradictory. But that's what most of them try to do. So, most of them lose by contradicting themselves. Thank you for proving my point... well, several of my points. You forgot the part of my quote which says, "... with relation to the court circumstances to which they allow themselves to be called." It's only when a large number of juries strike down a law that SCOTUS will be called to strike down the law for the whole country. Other than that, the law is stricken for the court case to which the jury has been called, and so strikes it.
So how about some examples of a jury "striking down a law". That's not how it works. Congress (or state lawmakers) make laws. If they want to get rid of a law, they have to pass a bill, Judges interpret the laws. Executive branch enforces the laws....wait you learn better from youtube videos...I have two perfect videos for you, please watch: 3 Ring Government - Schoolhouse RockI'm just a bill - Schoolhouse RockAmmon Bundy didn't know what he was doing in court. The jury simply liked what he did in the wildlife refuge takeover. The jury freed him. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/28/us/bundy-brothers-acquitted-in-takeover-of-oregon-wildlife-refuge.html. The jury has the authority to vote how they want regarding any case they hear... provided it is a jury based on the 6th or 7th Amendments. There is evidence of court cases all over the place, where juries even reversed the charges in some cases, so that the plaintiff had to pay the fine. |
|
|
|
this topic just reveals where badecker learns his silly little mindsets from..
always knew it was a fox news/tucker carlson inspired narrative, but now point proven
and no surprise badecker wants to pay a monthly fee on how to learn to sound like an idiot
the issue with joining a subscription is you then get indoctrinated to want to follow the stupidity just to make it feel like your money went to something an idiot then uses in life.. otherwise they have to admit that they wasted money and time if they go against the narrative they paid for
It is quite weird and interesting of you think about it, by the way. Most of people do not pay to listen to a very specific narrative and embed in it. I agree with you those who pay for Tucker subscription will rationalize their expense and avoid reality so they can justify the way they chose to throw money away. Kind of sad. for years now badecker has been a subscriber of freedom-phoenix which most of his brainfarts are direct quotes of.. so now we will see a echo of tucker speeches too in the past he has made a a few posts from different subscriptions where the articles oppose each other but he was determined to say they were both correct. but when asked how can he rationalise his opposing views he just ends up admitting he is just reiterating the stance of his trusted sources, thus just mindless copying You seem to forget that Quantum Mechanics allows for two opposite things to both be correct, even at the same time. Tucker TROLLS CNN With Massive Billboard Outside Their HQ: 'The Corporate Media Is DEAD' - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpdXpL9ywz0. |
|
|
|
But that's the kind of people you like, right? Back stabbers.
If you believed your country was still a Democracy (and you clearly don't), you'd realise the lunatic you're rooting for is the one betraying all the principles your nation was founded upon. You are mistaken. America is a Republic. The so-called government is the Democracy. The 6th and 7th Amendments to the Constitution allow a 12-person jury of the Republic to strike down any Government law... with relation to the court circumstances to which they allow themselves to be called. I have told you a million times: youtube is not a credible source of information in general, but those channels that you seen to be following are probably the humour section of some short of outlet. 6th In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. 7th In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. There absolutely nothing of what you say on this nor any other amendment. A jury cannot fucking "strike down" any law dumbass, much on the contrary, they have to decide on specific questions about the charges following the criteria setforth in the common law. Go to kindergarten dumbass. Thank you for proving my point... well, several of my points. You forgot the part of my quote which says, "... with relation to the court circumstances to which they allow themselves to be called." It's only when a large number of juries strike down a law that SCOTUS will be called to strike down the law for the whole country. Other than that, the law is stricken for the court case to which the jury has been called, and so strikes it. You quoted it right in your quoting of the 7th Amendment, "... and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law." In other words, what the jury decides is the thing that becomes law for the case at hand... even the striking down of a Congressionally mandated law. But that is only for, "... Suits at common law," as the 7th Amendment says. There is no common law trial for criminal cases listed in these two Amendments. So, if Trump wanted to avoid being criminally charged, he should have switched the court over to the Common Law side. The way to do it is to stand as a man, present, and not represented (no attorneys)... and make the statement that any man/woman who has been wronged by him should get on the stand, show the wrong, and "I will compensate him/her." So, it is Trumps fault for not swinging the whole thing into common law, and holding it there. However, Even if he accepts a criminal jury trial, the decisions of the jury cannot be changed except through a proper declaration of mistrial. If the jury decided that Trump was innocent of everything, he would get off, free. It would only apply to him. The next person accused of breaking the same law(s) as Trump, would have to get his own jury, and jury decisions for himself. They might be different than in Trump's case. Now you can see why the judge won't allow Trump a jury trial. Trump is popular enough that many juries might set him completely free. The judge is partially wrong in this. He isn't supposed to dis-allow a trial by jury, even if the defendant agrees to such, or hires attorneys, becoming a ward of the court, thereby. But nobody seems to want to take the judge to task over his failure to obey his own Rules of Court. |
|
|
|
while science and religious views are not fundamentally incompatible, science demands strict standards of falsifiability and empirical evidence to constitute proof. As God is a non-natural concept, its existence inherently lies outside the scope of scientific proof either for or against. Thus personal faith and individual experiences remain the key basis influencing views on God's existence.
One of the strongest religions is the intentional non-use of science to prove that God exists. Simple scientific proof for God is easy. Here is how: Scientific evidence for simple machines is quite evident by the fact that people use simple machines all over the place. In fact, the machines that people make and use ALL have their base in the machinery of the universe. Because of this, the natural machinery of the universe CAN be called 'machine'. Machines have makers, including the universe machine. Any machine like the universe must have a very intelligent, extremely powerful, Being that made it. The definition of such a being would fit the definition of our word 'God'. |
|
|
|
Having trouble thinking clearly, lately? Did you get the Covid vaxx? Maybe the two are linked. Neurosurgeon Unveils COVID Vaccine Shocking Link to Brain Damage & Cancer Risk
https://needtoknow.news/2023/12/neurosurgeon-unveils-covid-vaccine-shocking-link-to-brain-damage-cancer-risk/His presentation titled 'Spike Proteins and Neurodegeneration: Effect of artificial exosomes on the nervous system in the form of an injection' covers the damage the spike protein does to the brain, the elderly, and unborn children, as well as its effect on cancer risk. Dr. Blaylock details a number of ways that the COVID vaccine spike protein stimulates inflammation in the brain that can cause toxicity and even brain damage. Elderly people are especially vulnerable because their immune cells age, don't reproduce themselves, and can become highly inflammatory. The elderly also secrete much lower levels of the reparative neurotrophic compounds, which is why is aging is the number one risk factor for neurodegenerative disorders. Dr. Blaylock explained that unborn children are also very vulnerable as the nano lipid carrier of the COVID vaccine spike protein goes right through the placenta and can affect the development of brain cells. He said that COVID injections are responsible for reduced lymphocytes that help to fight cancer. ...
|
|
|
|
~ The war is not popular in any major country. Do you think the Ukrainian people like it? It wasn't easy for the millions who migrated out of Ukraine just to get away from war. They would have rather stayed home in peace. But just to show everybody where you are, you seem to like the war, just like your buddy Zelensky... along with the ruling elite of the world and their military war machines. Kill off the few Ukrainians that are left, before they simply fail, and Russia is shown to be the good guy by going in and helping them out with reparations. Governments are made ups of supposed leaders. They are not made up of the people/citizens. Most of the citizens don't want war. It's the leaders that want war. Wake up. You are wrong. US presidents often rise in popularity when they wage war. Ruzzia population at several levels were supportive of the war at the beginning. Wake up and try to read some proper information - do you need more confirmation that you are NOT better informed, smarter or more moral than the rest of the users here dumbass? By the way, it seems that quite a few incidents are ongoing with the Ruzzian civil aviation. It seems that they are "patching" here and there the components, so I would not be surprised to see metal raining from the Ruzzia skies. Well, make up your mind. Either you believe Russian news, or you don't. Since you seem to believe it in this post ^^, you should really consider believing that Russia is trying to liberate Ukraine from US domination, like they have said. You can't read either? Where in my post does it say that this information if from Ruzzian sources dumbass? https://aviationsourcenews.com/analysis/11-air-incidents-in-russia-in-eight-days-civilian-crash-inevitable/Following its audit of Russia’s flight safety last September, The International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) issued it with “red flag” status, ranking it alongside Bhutan, The Democratic Republic of Congo, and Liberia as one of the four most dangerous countries to fly in the world.
“Unfortunately, the ICAO red flag status is not just a political gesture as many believe,” one aviation expert told Novaya-Europe, asking to remain anonymous. “It reflects how things really are.” The ICAO is an international organisation that is only about preserving the reputation of the air transportation industry and is quite strict (in general) regarding the safety of flights to make sure people know what they are doing when taking a plane. In general, takes a neutral approach (not always) caring only about following regulations on safety. What is the significant safety concern of ICAO Russia?
Russia's actions, including illegally double-registering aircraft stolen from European leasing companies and operating aircraft on international routes without a valid safety certificate, led to ICAO issuing a Serious Safety Concern (SSC) against Russia, declaring aviation in Russia to be fundamentally unsafe Now, this does mention a Ruzzian source, see the difference? https://www.newsweek.com/russian-plane-malfunctions-2023-tripled-western-sanctions-1850780There have been a vast number of cases in recent months of Russian domestic passenger planes making emergency landings due to technical issues, driven by a lack of spare parts. According to Russian Transport Minister Vitaly Savelyev, the country has lost 76 passenger jets since February 2022, due to Western sanctions. I will not quote the Ukrainian sources that say they hacked the databases and found nearly 200 incidents, etc... I guess sanctions do reach parts of the economy. Well, you had the chance to redeem yourself. Of course, you can do it any time you want... before the war is over. The profiting war machine in Russia is probably making almost as much money of the Ukrainians as the profiting war machine in the US. Also, He's Finished And It's Over - https://rumble.com/v40x0sb-hes-finished-and-its-over.html.Backlash Grows Among Ukrainians In Response To Zelensky's 'Rose-Tinted' Speeches
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/backlash-grows-among-ukrainians-response-zelenskys-rose-tinted-speechesExtreme doubts about Ukraine's ability to fight back Russia, and to sustain enough Western support while doing it, have become increasingly obvious to all. This has led to some rare and significant backlash against the Zelensky administration by some of the Ukrainian populace and even among military officials. As of Tuesday, President Zelensky visited the White House where he stuck by his message of "Ukraine can win". He at one point in a joint press conference with Biden called the idea of ceding territory to the Russians for the sake of achieving peace "insane". But a Ukrainian official interviewed by Financial Times has said the military and the people are ready for more realism. She pointed to the widening rift being created given the Zelensky administration is needlessly painting a 'rosier' picture than everyone knows actually exists on the ground. "In order for society not to build castles in the air, and to take off its rose-tinted glasses... it is necessary to stop being afraid to speak the truth," Iryna Zolotar, adviser and head of communications for Ukraine's former defense minister Oleksii Reznikov, told the publication. She described a situation where "expectations are overstated and do not correspond to the real state of affairs." She complained that the public can no longer be fed a message of Ukraine being always "about to win". FT says multiple other officials said something similar - that while an atmosphere of optimism was crucial toward surviving the opening part of the war, continuing to blindly push inaccuracies about the state of the conflict on the public is blowing back negatively... "But with Ukraine enjoying few military achievements this year and western support faltering, the communications strategy is creating a rift between the presidential administration and military leadership, say officials from the armed forces, former presidential staffers and communication strategists," FT writes. ...
|
|
|
|
^^^ Things are changing. Tucker is moving into the spotlight on his own. Corporate Media is Dead
https://tuckercarlson.com/WHAT IS TCN? (Tucker Carlson Network) Tucker Carlson Network is the new streaming platform that is home to exclusive all-new content from Tucker Carlson. We will regularly be releasing new video content that tells the stories that matter and helps you make sense of the world around you. Why we founded TCN News coverage in the West has become a tool of repression and control. Reporters no longer reveal essential information to the public; they work to hide it. Journalists act as censors on behalf of entrenched power. They have contempt for the public. They hate the truth. Democracy can't function in a society like this. Voters can't know what they're voting for. People do understand they're being manipulated, and they resent it. The population becomes angry and paranoid. Things fall apart. There's only one solution to a propaganda spiral like the one we're living through, and it's telling the truth about the things that matter — clearly and without fear. That's our job. We plan to do it every day, no matter what. JOIN THE MOVEMENT We are the sworn enemies of lying, pomposity, smugness, and groupthink. We believe the corporate media is broken beyond repair, and the only way forward is to build something better. If this sounds like you, too, then join us today. By becoming a member of Team Tucker, you will unlock access to endless hours of exclusive members-only content from Tucker Carlson. Join the movement, and help us tell the truth about the things that matter. A direct line to Tucker and his team Join Now ...
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
