I see youre still getting your news from the same sources you used in early 2022.
News from the future comes to me in a probabilistic form, so sometimes they are not accurate if opposing volitional acts actively interfere in the natural course of time. And the news about the appointment in August of a special prosecutor to investigate the old case of Biden’s son and the Burizma company, because of which Poroshenko was forced to fire prosecutor Shokin, is completely from the present time, so there can be no inaccuracies here. As far as I know, a special prosecutor in the United States is a person with special powers so that those with whose interests it conflicts cannot influence the investigation of a case. And he is now investigating all the corrupt connections of the Biden family since the early 2010s. But it's okay, it seems that you can become the President of the United States even while in prison, so Biden still has a chance for a second term. That is good to know. So "accusations against Trump" are just likely, or one could even think probabilistically 5% right, given that you do not provide anything but two line from you, a well known Kremlin troll. You know what this proves to me? The great interest that Ruzzia has in a Trump victory, as probably the only way of getting some benefit from this fiasco war. If Trump is your last hope, it speaks very loud about the situation. You are finally getting the picture. What is Trump? If Trump was in power, there would be no US/Ukraine war against Russia, which would mean that there would be no sanctions, which would mean that Russia would remain weak, and BRICS would mostly remain in theory. Now that Trump has been removed from the scene (at least temporarily), Russia has become stronger than ever militarily, BRICS has grown worldwide, the USD is becoming worthless by all the fake fiat money being pumped into Ukraine, Ukraine - which has always been a corrupt country - is being crushed and destroyed, and the US is losing control of the world. This might be a new Russia/China world order if it succeeds. But if Trump gets back in, he will bolster the US, and the BRICS thing will have simply been a wave in the nature of things. You are finally getting it.  |
|
|
|
It has just been reveal that BRICS nation have approved the admittance of Argentina, United Arab Emirate, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Ethiopia and Egypt following the summit in South Africa. Why many believe that this changes everything in the global politics, some believe that NATO have just infiltrated the BRICS in order to weaken them. According to Jackson Hinklle, while Egypt have receievd millions of dollars from US as aid, Argentina linked IMF that is controlled by the West and Saudi Arabia is the ally of the US that controls OPEC and the petrodollar while Iran is the enemy of the USA. Now that friends and enemies of the USA and NATO have joined the BRICS, is there no chances that one or some of the allies may be mole in BRICS, a way NATO's infiltration? Interesting times are really ahead for the world! All these nations have personal reasons for joining BRICS. China and Russia want to end NATO and the US political and economic dominance. The two world powers want to create a strong bloc that will compete with the US and allies. Iran has suffered so much from the US because of sanctions and they want to create a new partnership that will make them survive without the West. Saudi Arabia has not been favored by the Biden administration and they are not also getting the needed security support. Saudi has continually expressed its displeasure with the US government through different means like their agreement with Russia to cut oil production to maintain high prices even after Washington warned against such a move. Saudi Arabia's joining BRICS is to expand its relationship with other key nations to enable it to rely less on the US. Ethiopia, Egypt, Argentina, and others are there for economic and political survival and some of the leader of these nations are not Pro-West BRICS still have many hurdles to overcome since many of them are still dependent on the West. The Saudi Riyal and the UAE Dirham are currently pegged to the US dollar. Egypt and Argentina are two of the biggest debtors of the IMF. BRICS will achieve its aims if the members will pursue it collectively notwithstanding their personal interest. China, Russia, India and Iran are trustworthy but any of the others still have a close connection with the West. BRICS is getting some unusual help. BRICS has been around since 2010, and it was under consideration long before that. But it hasn't moved along very fast. Enter the US and Nato sanctioning some foreign countries. What happened after the sanctions began? BRICS grew stronger. There must be some $trillionaire people/countries/organizations around who are funding the sanctions that are making BRICS stronger, with very few people recognizing what is going on. I guess they have found that the USDollar has out-served its usefulness, so they are moving on with BRICS. |
|
|
|
~
BADecker-That makes no sense at all. Electricity should be used to do something as useful as possible. Yes. Cryptocurrencies are useful. But so is solving the most important scientific problem. Why would you refuse to solve the most important scientific problem for absolutely no reason at all?
~
People who don't have toasters don't think that electricity is useful toaster-wise. But they DO think electricity is useful for other things. Everybody who uses electricity would be happy to pay for their electricity with electricity cryptocurrency. They could even get off of fiat for electricity that way. The thing that you are right about is the most important scientific problem. Science should at once focus entirely on validating the Bible, because the Bible is God's Word, and it is God Who built and controls all science and physics and everything else. This would bring happiness and joy to all people, because they could then see the greatness and love of God. |
|
|
|
What happened?
Nazis got unexpected help from USA and UK? Our Ukrainian friend prefers not to remember that in April 2022, negotiations between Ukraine and Russia were already at the final stage, until Boris Johnson flew from London to Kiev on an unannounced urgent visit and ordered Zelensky to curtail negotiations and fight with Russia to the last Ukrainian. Probably the depopulation people are getting rid of the smartest part of the Ukrainian population. But like Hitler got rid of the smart Poles in WW2, they have come back with an intellectual vengeance lately. Do you think it will be the same for the Ukrainians in the future? America's Domestic Party Politics Fuel the Ukraine Catastrophe
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/09/phil-giraldi/americas-domestic-party-politics-fuel-the-ukraine-catastrophe/I am surely not the only one who has noticed that the defensive propaganda lines that are flowing out the Democratic Administration have become more than ordinarily ridiculous of late. One is astonished at the melding of fact and fiction to create narratives that depict the White House and all that pertains to it as forging a new and more wonderful country. Wasn't "Build Back Better" the battle cry, whatever that is supposed to mean? And the spin is endless, even when a clueless Joe Biden belatedly winds up in Maui to relate to the tragedy in which at least 1,000 died, only to be greeted by surviving local residents saluting the president with their middle fingers upraised. As the president looked out over the destruction of an entire city by fire he reminisced by recalling his long ago "almost" encounter with a fire in his kitchen. Locals who were screaming for help from government were, in fact, getting almost nothing while the nation's Chief Executive was in the Oval Office gloating over sending another $23 billion to the arch crook Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, money to fight a war that Biden encouraged and has blithely entered into. ...
|
|
|
|
You're missing the whole point. Trump didn't go there to surrender.
He literally went to jail to surrender himself after being indicted by a grand jury. He had two options: wait till they came to get him or surrender. He made the right choice for once. Trump would thank you for your agreement with him on his choice. Notice that they had a whole bunch of extra police protection, etc., that day. Trump went right through that police protection by not doing anything to 'activate' it. Then he got inside where his surrender is causing their downfall. Btw, thank sirazimuth for me, for his wonderful self-portrait of himself, a couple posts above. Apparently he has a lot of love, all that dark chocolate under that Hershey Kiss wrapping. |
|
|
|
Well of course they care about the science. Just watch as they make enough money to start electrical power plants to further enhance their mining without hurting the people. Then they will start using the excess electrical power as another form of cryptocurrency, directly, without converting it to Bitcoin or an altcoin. Might not be your kind of science. But it's still science.  |
|
|
|
Shills a tee shirt (likely made in China) emblazoned with NEVER SURRENDER and his mugshot, to fleece his ignorant, worshipping flock of $34. Gotta pay those mounting astronomical legal fees, doncha know. (his plan all along when he sported that ridiculous look...like a 5 year old's expression when about to throw a tantrum) And its a pic of him when he surrendered.. You can't make this shit up.  You're missing the whole point. Trump didn't go there to surrender. He went there to make THEM surrender. He simply hasn't gotten that far yet. Watch his process. |
|
|
|
Trump didn't lie. Find his words in context and see that he was questioning, or that he was quoting others who supposedly were knowledgeable. What happened to all that? It didn't go away. It's still there. Total dishonesty of election officials in front of the general populace. If not illegal, it was because they had the authority to make unconscionable laws. Trump to the Georgia Sec of State (the guy in charge of elections), one day after Trump received the report on the investigation he paid for that determined there were no irregularities involving dead people or duplicate votes: “So dead people voted, and I think the number is close to 5,000 people. And they went to obituaries. They went to all sorts of methods to come up with an accurate number, and a minimum is close to about 5,000 voters.”
“But you also have a substantial numbers [sic] of people, thousands and thousands who went to the voting place on November 3, were told they couldn’t vote, were told they couldn’t vote because a ballot had been put on their name.”
Here he is repeating Rudys lies about Ruby Freeman and her mother. This was after he asked Bill Barr to look into it, who did, and testified under oath that he personally told Trump that they were doing there job exactly as they should have been. No suitcases, no trunks, just transporting ballots in bins from one area to another the same as any other polling facility. “We had at least 18,000 . . . voters having to do with her. She’s a vote scammer, a professional vote scammer and hustler.” “They weren’t in an official voter box, but they were in what looked to be suitcases or trunks, suitcases but they weren’t in voter boxes.”
There's plenty more, let me know if I should keep going. Like, literally....I could keep going for pages. He lied a shitload. Full audio: https://youtu.be/AW_Bdf_jGaA So, the SoS lied, but in a way he made legal. Same as before. When you have the authority to make laws for an election in your State, if you are shrewd enough to make the laws sound good, but make them so that they do bad without the people understanding what is going on, all you have done is legalize what is generally illegal. Trump simply called this out. For example, the unconscionable legality of using voting machines when you know that they can hook to the Internet and be manipulated, is legal if the SoS makes it so, but is simply wrong. In other words, Trump is being called out as illegal when he is 'spiritually' right (the spirit of the law process rather than the legality of certain sections of it). |
|
|
|
Power doesn't corrupt. The corruption is there long before the power. The reason we don't see the corruption when there is little or no power is, people without power are humbled by their weakness. So, they often don't act on what little power that might fall to them. If a corrupt man is given power,there is no way that he wouldn't display his corrupt habit. - Since all people are corrupt, you are talking about everyone. If power is given to someone,the way he operates without power remains the same,and some can hide their corrupt habit to deceive people but it can't be hidden for long. - Right, much of the time. But sometimes a corrupt person changes his mind, just like a good man changes his. If you see a man that is in power and is corrupt,this means that he has been corrupt ever since the beginning before he came into power. - That is true, because all people are corrupt. But there are many 'bad' people who do not show it at all when they are poor... because they need help just to live. Showing corruption when poor, might turn away the benefits that they might get from those who are good and somewhat in control of giving benefits. In addition, when they are poor, they see how corruption harms other poor people, and their empathy keeps them from showing the corruption that they naturally are.Let's take for example of the corrupt politicians that do everything in their power to make sure that they win elections by rigging it or even kill people for power. In my country,I will say that corruption leads to power and not power leads to corruption,because we hear big lies before elections and we see how the votes are sold out to a candidate that has paid for it and at the end the wrong candidate that is not the people's choice will be put into power. Meaning a corrupt leader that used money to rig election, and he will continue with his corrupt act in power. |
|
|
|
~
For example, if George Washington installed Churchill as a leader like them, the word lie can be compatible with politics.
So, you are saying that Hitler was the good guy after all? |
|
|
|
~ Why is this even here? Trump did all kinds of things that are not illegal. But he didn't do D. The election was stolen. The method used to do it was to make unconscionable election laws that were not illegal to make... election laws that if the people understood what they were, the people would be abhorred that their State officials were like this. D is the correct answer! And yes, Trump did call election officials and lied about thousands of dead voters and dominion hacking and workers stealing ballots and other stupid stuff that he claimed to know was true but was actually false. And then he said find me ~11,000 votes. The election was stolen. The method used to do it was to make unconscionable election laws that were not illegal to make... election laws that if the people understood what they were, the people would be abhorred that their State officials were like this. What about dominion, and dead people voting, and Ruby Freeman passing USB drives with vote stealing software, and stuffing ballots into suitcases? What happened to all that? Trump didn't lie. Find his words in context and see that he was questioning, or that he was quoting others who supposedly were knowledgeable. What happened to all that? It didn't go away. It's still there. Total dishonesty of election officials in front of the general populace. If not illegal, it was because they had the authority to make unconscionable laws. |
|
|
|
Power doesn't corrupt. The corruption is there long before the power. The reason we don't see the corruption when there is little or no power is, people without power are humbled by their weakness. So, they often don't act on what little power that might fall to them. |
|
|
|
~ Now you are talking about your wife. Sorry, I forgot you are a woman. Does it matter in your case? The point is, the wife says, "Honey, you wear the pants in the family. You make all the decisions... but only as long as they are what I want." Everybody (almost) wants a king... as long as the king does what they tell him to. Russians aren't any different. As I understand it, you have nothing more to say on the topic. All the goals of the war outlined by Putin are failing. The West will not allow Russia to realize its national interests. Today, Ukraine has moved from defense to offensive and Russia has no chance to stop it. There isn't anything more to say. It's clarified right here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5461768.msg62780035#msg62780035. |
|
|
|
~ You don't get it, do you. When Biden, Putin's American hand, is cut off, Trump will take over, and there will be peace rather than more money for Ukraine, which is prolonging Ukraine's no-win war. Your hope that Trump will help Putin win the war is in vain. The world community cannot afford the Russians to win the war. This is the last war of Russia as an empire. The Russians will lose, just as they lost in Afghanistan. As usual, you are kinda funny. First, there isn't any world community. The closest we are coming to one is BRICS. The people who use the USDollar are not a community. They are all using it for their own benefit. They don't really care about what anybody else thinks. When they realize how badly they are being screwed by the banking owners, they will drop the USD quicker than a wink. And you are totally against yourself. Biden, the guy who pushed the sanctions which made Russia stronger than all get-out, showed us that he is Russia's American hand by making Russia stronger. So, you are right in the fact that Biden will be gone, and those who are fighting Russia will stop.... exactly the opposite of what you say... that Russia will fail. Do you even know what you are talking about at all? |
|
|
|
~ Nice.. nice... an answer by the manual... 1- You said Biden's are way worse. , which implicitly means Trump did bad stuff - so you are giving credit to all that "hearsay" yourself. See? That is the problem of defending by saying "the other guy is worse" - it means that you are no good yourself. Trumps biggest wrong when president, was not recognizing how crooked the Deep State really was. If he had recognized it, he would have been able to take measures to stop them from stealing the vote and the presidency.
2. MAGA is a slogan for simple minds. There is not philosophy behind... it is whatever Trump says, even if when it contradicts something he said before.
It is as I said before. Somebody from another country may not want America to be great. Russia probably doesn't like the idea of America being great. But common, law abiding, God-fearing Americans certainly do, simply because America is their country. Don't you have any patriotism for your country? Or don't you have a country, so you are simply angry with everyone?
3. Again, is not about weighting what "he did good" vs "the crimes he committed". Justice is an independent power in a democracy, so the fact that Trump is "liked" is irrelevant to him getting behind bars if (I would say when) proven guilty. It does not work by balancing, it works by owning your acts and playing within the legal rules.
Many people are speculating on what the courts will decide. Nobody condemns you for having your non-American opinion. However, you don't know about the American government. The Democracy part is the second part. The higher part is the Republic, that doesn't work like a Democracy. Personally, I don't think Trump knows how to use it. But maybe he does. I'll show it to you right now. If in any charge, Trump requires anybody to get on the stand and show the injury Trump did to him, there isn't anybody. Trump harmed nobody. No case.
4. You are very confused about what an US president can and cannot do. The "presidential pardon" does not work in a number of cases he is being judged for and if guilty of trying to subvert the system he would not even be able to run for president. You need to read the US constitution and listen to some legal experts on this matter.
No, it is you who don't know US law. The indictments are about something that Trump supposedly did while still in office. Now that he is out of office, and way past the statute of limitations, Trump should be tried in a court in his home state. It's kinda like if somebody in the US wanted to indict you. He would have to go to your country, and operate through your country's legal channels. The indictments in Georgia are a sham. There isn't anything legal about them.
On regards to your comment of "if you are not from the US then you are an enemy of America" is the same as what you say: if you do not think like I do you are an enemy. (again, I guess you mean the US, America is a continent - or two in some books). Is always the same... the words of a wannabe dictator.
That is kinda true. People from different countries often don't think alike. So, since you stated the obvious, and then you tried to use semantics on the word 'America', you are showing us all that you are simply a foreigner trying to play games with people in a country not your own. The fact that you consider that your opinion is the only valid "American" (meaning US, which is not America) does not make it so. The fact that you try to hide Trump's very likely criminal acts behind a very poorly constructed attack on me or who I am, or what I represent means that you are not better than a Taliban. You lack culture, reasoning and are the perfect example of why the US is in danger. You do not even understand the concepts behind the US constitution and what it really means the US democracy - created by illustrious men whose main achievement was precisely to consider different viewpoints, creating guarantees of freedom for all and a system that can be protected from self-proclaimed leaders that think the they simply can be above the law of the country. Because that is all the problem here - Trump and his court of singers thinking that he can be above the law. The time to prove it wrong has arrived no matter how much you insult and spread shit to cover up. I really don't like being a copycat, but a lot of what I am doing is just copying you... in the opposite direction, of course. Part of the difference is that I have a lot of website evidence, and other. If you could find some for your opinions, you might have some evidence. |
|
|
|
Every time Kari Lake goes to court on elections, she gets a little closer to overturning the Arizona Governor election. Now she even has findings for The Gateway Pundit on her side for finding the proof that she didn't have at the first trial. I finally figured out what "Deep State" means. It's all the sewer sludge that Kraken has to fight through to righteously rise to the top. Judge Rules Kari Lake Lawsuit Seeking Mail-In Ballot Signatures Will Go To Trial
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/judge-rules-kari-lake-lawsuit-seeking-mail-ballot-signatures-will-go-trialArizona Republican candidate Kari Lake announced an upcoming trial date in a lawsuit to acquire mail-in ballot signatures nearly a year after the November 2022 midterm election. "We are scheduled for a 2-day trial set for September 21 & 25th," Mrs. Lake wrote on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, over the weekend. "I will never stop fighting for Honest & Transparent Elections." In a separate statement to The Gateway Pundit, Mrs. Lake also said that the recent court order "is a huge victory for election transparency." "We're moving forward," she said. ...
|
|
|
|
They fall into the hands of Russia in the form of rockets and shells that force these hands to move away from Ukraine. You don't get it, do you. When Biden, Putin's American hand, is cut off, Trump will take over, and there will be peace rather than more money for Ukraine, which is prolonging Ukraine's no-win war. |
|
|
|
The real point is that if you limit your crime to little, tiny pieces of crime each day, you look way better than a criminal who robs and thieves and murders and steals and terrorizes all at once. So, governments limit themselves to tiny crimes, but a whole bunch of them to make their money... like taxation. They look better than the out-in-the-open terrorists, so the people support the government. Besides, loss of property and imprisonment for not paying taxes.
I find your point really intriguing, though I have a different perspective. I believe you might be simplifying how crime works and the role that governments play. Crime is not just a matter of quantity, but also of quality. Some crimes are more harmful than others, and some crimes have more victims than others. Taxation is not a crime. It's a way of pooling resources for services that could possibly benefit everyone. Governments aren't perfect, but they aren't inherently bad either. They consist of people with diverse opinions and interests who answer to the public they serve. If you disagree with how your taxes are used, you can elect a different government or get involved in civic activities to influence policies. Using crypto could give you more control over your finances and let you support causes you're passionate about. But completely avoiding taxes wouldn't be fair to society and could harm the greater good. In the complex legal dictionaries of the US, the word 'tax' means something. When you look up the 'something', you find that it means 'something else'. When you look up 'something else', you find that it means fraud or thievery. So, tax is fraud and thievery, illegal stuff. |
|
|
|
That's what I like about you. You take a look at a post, and then you ask where the info is. But it is right in the post you were answering in the first place. I'll highlight it for you. Your attempts to prove that democracy in Russia are unsuccessful. Russians are enetically incapable of democracy. They need a king, a leader, a dictator who decides everything for them. For the Russian people, democracy can result in the loss of the empire, which is contrary to their worldview. Now you are talking about your wife. Sorry, I forgot you are a woman. Does it matter in your case? The point is, the wife says, "Honey, you wear the pants in the family. You make all the decisions... but only as long as they are what I want." Everybody (almost) wants a king... as long as the king does what they tell him to. Russians aren't any different. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
