The trend is likely changed, and cold-staking might be another trend. I don't know that Gentarium team actually have plans to adapt to that trend change in masternode/PoS coin and hosting service industry or not. Let's see. I agree with you that the team's silence is not good, generally, and should be broken as soon as possible. Investors have their feelings, and their own ability to control their patience and their emotions. When they lose patience, and uncontrollable emotions, they might dump all their Gentarium coins, even price already fell to low range.

Congrats! Eventually, you have become a self-made Legendary user, with 1000 airdropped merits and more than 1000 self-earned merits. Impressively.
I am a self-made Hero Member, and still been on the way to your club. Hope that I will join that club before the end of this year. 3 more months to go.

Exactly. I experienced such thing myself. I joined BitBlender campaign, in early of 2019, but in fact that campaign lasted for years. The Bitblender platform used to be one of the oldest and most reputable mixer services, but suddenly the platform shut down with short announcement, and it is a scam exit. That is life, and every good campaign has to end someday.

Bitcoin will still remain in their longterm bullish phase, till its halving day, but it has to correct from its latest peak about $14000. I don't say bitcoin will fall into bearish, but it will be corrected significantly (we already saw its corrections last few weeks, and I don't think it will finish corrections till December). So, what does it mean? Personally, bitcoin correction will give opportunities and recovery flags for altcoins, which might rally well in their BTC pairs.
The chart clearly shows good supports for DASH, fortunately.

It is true to say altcoins have all been in their worst period over last two years, since their all time highs in 2017. Investors are human, and they have their own thresholds of pain and sufferings, so they will give up if their faith losts. If that happens with loyal investors, it will be terrible because Bitsend might lose big momentum for future recoveries. Therefore, the coming months are very important to keep loyal investors stay with Bitsend project. I still believe in Bitsend team and the project.
Last two days, I think we again saw some good signals from bitcoin, that has fallen back to below $10000 after failing to break $11000 price point.

The root is they won't be able to collect enough rains in order to withdraw for each account. Using multi-accounts to do chit-chats (by chat-bot, whatsoever)  and tip each other to centralize their money from raindrops into only one account to be able to withdraw will lead them to be found more easily. Generally, I don't think there are people who can cheat raindrops on casinos.

Appreciated your compliments!
Those reputable managers all came from scratch, so why not me can do the same?

I doubt probability that Wolf.bet platform won't have rain drops on their platform. This is one of basic stuffs on casinos and dice sites, so I believe Wolf.bet team have plans for that. We might soon know about that with upcoming upgrades in days/ weeks to come (as the Wolf.bet team said that they have plans and tried to finish their works for some important upgrades and new features, that promising to bring better experience for Wolf.betters.)
Additionally, I don't know that there are abusers can abuse rain drops or faucets, at least recent months. What I saw is they complained about their failed abusements only. They don't mention directly on what they abused, but on casinos, I think one of most common ways to abuse is faucets and rain drops, tips.

Yeah, this is likely time to bounce back, but if Litecoin can not bounce back from there, and fall deeper to break its latest bottom around 0.0054 BTC, worse things might come as you wrote, somewhere around 0.003 BTC to come. Nevertheless, I think it is the worst case for Litecoin after its halving, but it is possible in crypto. Especially if we look at recent drama on Litecoin development (inactively as drama shows), and recent dust attacks. I am not bearish with Litecoin, but yes the chart shows there is scenario for worse case with price around 0.003 BTC

qwizzie gave us interesting price charts, that shows good overview on temporary situation of market, for both bitcoin and DASH. For DASH and altcoins, I think if someone already bought good altcoins, they should hold them all for next several months. During current terrible period of market for altcoins, it is  a bit stressful to observe price every day, in my opinion.
We are human and somehow are unable to fully control our feelings, especially if we are inexperienced traders/ investors. Weak investors likely shake their hands out when price falls and fluctuates in bottom range for too long, long enough to beat patience of those guys.
Honestly, in April and May, I did not thought that DASH might drop to around 0.01 BTC, but in fact the coin fell deeper than 0.01 BTC. Felt dissapointed a bit when saw the coin fell, but days later, after accumulate more cheap DASH coins, my feelings are better and I am happy that I controlled my determination and did not shake my hands out at bottom recent weeks.

You made me laugh. If I am Satoshi, and a biggest bitcoin enthusiast, I will not cash out my bitcoin within next 20 years (of course, if I am not an elderly already). I thought about that assumption: Satoshi might mine lots of bitcoin in early days, weeks, months, and Satoshi actually not only own bitcoin in Genesis block. If I am Satoshi and plan for my dissapearance, I will mine bitcoin in unknow addresses.  

This is why I wrote this in my earlier post. Trying to abuse faucet or raindrops just a perfect way to waste their time. In fact, it is unfair for gambling platforms if people join and abuse like that, so it is logically to see they have good algorithms and techniques to prevent abusements.

People love news and people make losses.
News is for price manipulation, so if you don't have enough skills to differentiate between real and fake news, it will be better and safer for you to stay away from news. Reading news one time per week, ie. by spending around one hour in specific one day in weekends to read news. Nicholas Darvas said that when trends occur, they won't last for hours, or days, but they actuallly last longer; so reading news everyday is unneccessary.
If you are bitcoin enthusiasts, and know that next year bitcoin will have its halving of block rewars, let's buy cheap bitcoin, and hold them till next year, at least after May of 2020. Reading news might cause you to weakly sell your bitcoins.

I meant people tried to abuse with faucets or raindrops, and because each platforms has minimum amount of bitcoin to withdraw money, so abusers have to tip each other, and then they likely caught all by platforms. I saw some people complain about that (why I can not withdraw), and if you notice, it usually occurs with new born platforms. In early weeks, we usually see complaints from abusers, and then after get caught, they tried to attacks platforms' reputation (ie. the platform is scam because they don't allow me to withdraw my money). Sometimes, I read that old-era users mentioned about past generous faucets, years ago.  One or two weeks ago (but I don't remember where I read that), someone asked for ways to earn money in forum (from profitable bounties, LOL), and someone else mentioned about years-ago faucets.

Pmalek expressed his opinion incorrectly, I guess what he meant is good posts should be counted as eligible posts for payments in campaigns. Managers are responsible to judge which posts are good and eligible to get paid; and ordinal number of posts inside threads are non sense to judge post quality or to reject payments.
The mentioned post is a bump, but if we eliminate this line
That post is actually an informative and helpful one, and clearly not a bump post. It is a bump post for old readers of that threat, but for new visitors, it is very informative and helpful.

Local Ethereum
2 open spots on Legendary member rank, spots on Hero member rank filled.
Please read rules carefully to satisfy campaign requirements.

I know that page, and that statistics on total merits generated and allocated to merit sources, but today you reminded me about that. Fortunately, I likely more creative today, and discovered interesting fact from those statistics.
21045 sMerits per 30 days, so if we take average per day, it is nearly 702 available sMerits to be available from merit sources (only account for allocated sMerits for sources).
From my threads, the median of intra-day merits so far is 628 (from Time Series Analysis on Distributed Merits in the forum (daily, weekly, monthly))
It discloses the fact that there are merit sources often not use all of their monthly sMerits cap.

The median at 628 sMerits circulated per day is for all forum, and merit sources are just one of components. Additionally, merit sources earn merit themselves - they are excellent posters, and they certainly have more sMerits than monthly allocated ones
To sum up, both merit sources and normal users have still hoarded their sMerits (different extents for each user). Me too.

I wrote previously that masternode hosting industry seems to go to collapse, not only GINcoin (that did scam exit) or Gentarium, or any other masternode hosting platforms. Shared masternodes is the most terrible ideas I think. I don't support ideas to join and let your money in shared masternodes (on Gincoin, Gentarium, ihostmn.com, or whatever sites). That is risky.

There are three main usecases of faucets:
- To test new sites: creating account, and use bonus for new register account or faucet to play before sending money to new platform.
- To play for fun after running out of money due to bad bets; or to bet at highest multipliers to see luck.
- To abuse gambling system (but I don't think people can abuse gambling platform with faucets)

Merit is not a determinant factor to accept or reject participants. Two users with same amount of earned merits, but they likely have big gaps in post quality. Managers usually look at their post history to see applicant post quality in average. Depending solely on merit earned is a nearly blind method.