N-am declaratia la indemana, insa categoria de venit cred ca e alta decat cea in urma profitului de pe trading/hodling => fiat. Dupa incasarea de pe campanii de semnatura, cred ca e mai potrivita categoria "venituri din activitati independente". Sau sa fie "venit din alte surse"... nu stiu ce sa zic.

@GazetaBitcoin Monedele incasate prin campanii de semnatura sunt destul de sigur ca nu sunt luate in considerare drept cadouri ci mai degraba incasari in schimbul unor servicii prestate.

Referitor la legislatia din UK, e efectiv oribila. Facuta in asa fel incat sa te terorizeze cu cryptomonedele pana la abandon. https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/cryptoassets-manual

Well, journalism should always be taken with a pinch of salt since just the fact that it's on the news does not make the information in any kind of way legitimate.

I don't get how and why people even think decentralization could be compared to centralization. That's exactly the point of BTC - centralization is quick and easy. Tell me who else besides Satoshi has been able to create a successful currency that works without any third party and control. Exactly - nobody... Decentralization will never be as easy as centralization is to build, and we always forget that usually when things are free, you are the product.

This is a great warning to all of us that we should do our own research rather than letting our brains be controlled by mainstream news that have their own interest and sometimes a huge lack of legitimate information.

Stainless steel. Soda cans are not only of a weak material but also very thin imo. If you want something to last, you'd probably want at least 1.5-2mm in thickness. I don't think it's very hard to literally distort and destroy a soda can square sheet, nor would it be to melt it.

Perhaps you could purchase stainless steel washers and stamp a word on each of it (and the number of the word so that you don't mix them up) to create your own stainless steel seed-capsule.

Am cautat articolul cat de bine am putut si nu gasesc absolut nimic. Avand in vedere ca nu ajungi la fiat, banuiesc ca nu trebuie sa platesti impozit. Se considera tot tranzactie crypto-to-crypto, deci nu vad de ce ai plati..

Interesanta legea din UK. N-am avut idee cat de draconica e legislatia crypto acolo... pare a fi ceva de evitat, pana cand si staking-ul trebuie aparent declarat.. Daca afli ceva legat de impozitarea cadourilor, te rog sa lasi si aici informatia pentru ca sunt sigur ca pe toti ne intereseaza sa stim.

His tweet was posted 9hrs ago: https://mobile.twitter.com/PeterLBrandt/status/1377469474232659971

He's predicting a strong bull run, but only after a very strong correction.

I somehow expect a similar outcome but I'm having mixed feelings due to institutional investors coming out and purchasing BTC massively. I guess BTC will need a correction at some point. And since it's been strongly bullish for a while now, it only seems like the correction is coming closer and closer.

But who the hell knows? And if anything, a correction would only make me purchase more than ever before. I miss those days where weak handed people get out. They're exciting, if you know how to act at the right time.

This is the moment people should realize how bad their knowledge about security is and how bad their habits are.
The vast majority of users are blindly downloading all sorts of apps, blindly trusting anyone around as a sacrifice for their own convenience. It's their own fault and not Apple's, the same way someone cutting their finger with a knife is their own fault for having bad cutting habits.

As time goes on and Bitcoin becomes more expensive, what happens is these guys only get better and better strategies going on to steal your coins. And since almost nobody cares how safe their devices truly are, the number of potential victims is huge. Just think about the insane number of people storing their personal information/files on cloud storages without pre-encryption. This alone shows so much about how careful humans really are..

Citisem ceva despre acest subiect in urma cu vreo doi ani de zile si din ce stiu, cadourile NU sunt impozabile. Insa cum faci dovada ca acei 5 BTC dati spre prietenul tau au fost de fapt cadou si nu o cumparare/vanzare pe profit?

E un subiect relativ sensibil. Posibil sa te lamureasca un notar/contabil/avocat mai bine decat o facem noi.

The only thing is that people really don't care about how decentralized something is. As long as they can be more comfortable with it or earn a profit from it, it's fine. A decentralized car would not help in any kind of way.. perhaps a modular one would, but we're far off from it and cars themselves are quite customizable AFAIK.

Something people might be interested in is decentralized governance. I think if someone comes up with an idea to successfully create a decentralized government, it'd succeed tremendously.

Nu e totusi un "setup" suficient de suspect incat sa declanseze un proces fortat de KYC? Chiar daca aparatele functioneaza in mod automat si pentru sume sub 5.000 RON nu se cer date personale, ma gandesc ca exista si o astfel de varianta pentru utilizatorii ce par suspecti. Mai ales dupa ce Shitcoins au spus chiar ei ca, daca un utilizator pare ca incearca sa-si acopere identitatea, va fi obligat sa treaca prin proces de KYC.

Legat de masca, gluga si camere de supraveghere din incinta.. Reflectacles ar putea fi o solutie pentru asa ceva..

Purchasing alts doesn't necessarily end up as a failure, depending on how lucky you are to choose a failing/successful project. Hoping to purchase an altcoin to make more Bitocin is an insane risk to assume though, since you're running both the risk that the alt might never actually succeed and the risk that Bitcoin might drop significantly in price at any point.

But now if we think about all the alts that've been bumped dozens of times in a matter of 2-3 months, sometimes it's a very quick way to multiply your BTC..

Depends. Some alts might drop in face of BTC while others will do better than it. Depends on what your goals are and how much risk you want to assume.

Eu le consider neimportante, cel putin pe cele de unica folosinta. Sa nu ai seed-urile si privkey-urile mi se pare la fel de "grav" precum aruncarea bonurilor in urma cheltuielilor.. lucru pe care majoritatea oamenilor il face (sau ma rog, mai nou multi achizitioneaza totul cashless ca-i mai smecher si mai usor de supravegheat).

Hm, acum are sens. Totusi, sunt curios de ce ai specificat in OP faptul ca aparatul Bitcoin Romania nu are o camera care sa functioneze similar celei Shitcoins - exista vreo informatie oficiala privind acest fapt, sau ceea ce ai spus e strict bazat pe experienta ta personala?

Intreb deoarece chiar ma intereseaza acest lucru. E singurul lucru ce ma deranjeaza actual la ATM-uri: faptul ca iti e inregistrata/capturata fata in timpul tranzactiilor. Iar avand in vedere ca acea camera pentru tichetele de remitenta e amplasata la nivelul ochilor, banuiesc ca se cam confirma gandurile mele..

Ca acea camera e folosita in scop de supraveghere sau strict pentru scanarea tichetelor de remitenta cred ca nici nu mai are relevanta. Din moment ce-i acolo, e tot ce conteaza - mai ales daca nu este specificat pe undeva in mod oficial scopul existentei ei deasupra ecranului.

Folosesc saptamanal portofele "de unica folosinta" (creez seed nou pe care il folosesc doar pentru o singura tranzactie sau un anumit set de tranzactii, dupa care il arunc). Nu m-ar speria gandul ca ANAF s-ar intreba ce si cum, insa chiar vreau sa cred ca inca e valabila legea conform careia cel care invinovateste trebuie sa aduca probe. Cu toate ca am dubii. Altfel, cum s-ar spune... as merge in instanta cu mana-n fund.

Acum mai pune pe langa asta si niste seturi de private keys de pe ChipMixer si vreo 5 seed-uri de Bisq si ai un amalgam de wallet-uri din care nu mai inteleg absolut nimic daca ar fi sa fac un istoric al tranzactiilor mele. M-am chinuit o data acum vreo luna de zile sa fac asa ceva strict in scop personal si din curiozitate, dar m-am dat batut in momentul in care am vazut ca numai una dintre vechile mele adrese are cateva zeci de pagini de tranzactii pe Blockchain.info.

Edit: Stai, ca mi-am adus aminte ca mai am si niste seed-uri pentru Wasabi si unul pentru JoinMarket.

Ei bine, stim cu totii ca urgentele de multe ori aduc rezultate proaste. Deci decat sa te grabesti si sa te arunci cu capul inainte incurcandu-te cu banci, mai bine mai da-ti un pic de timp si gandeste bine ce decizie urmeaza sa iei.

Cum spuneam.. la sume mari, sa te incurci cu bancile si sa mai zici si ca reprezinta venit din crypto e un fel de kamikaze. Te arunci direct in gura lupului. Nu vad sincer de ce ar fi o problema atat de mare ca, in loc sa scoti 100k€ din prima, sa o faci de exemplu in 10 tranzactii separate p2p. E chiar atat de mare graba sa cumperi o masina/casa/bijuterii? Faci 10 tranzactii separate , te incadrezi si in limita de €10k/tranzactie cash legala si nu te incurci nici cu bancile.

Cum zice si Gazeta.. nu-i ca si cum azi depui banii si maine ai probleme. Insa mare bafta daca primesti in vreo 3-4 ani o notificare de la ANAF pt a te prezenta la o mica discutie in scris + semnatura referitor la tranzactia ta deloc neobisnuita de 100k. Eu stau cat mai departe de asa ceva, si o fac cu un motiv: intreaba-ma ce am facut cu o anumita suma de BTC de acum 2 ani de zile si sansele sunt maxime sa nu mai am nici cea mai mica idee.

Bancile fac orice in momentul de fata sa te convinga sa te opresti din activitatea ta crypto si sa "te bage in pamant" cu criptomonedele pe care le detii cu tot.

Mie, unul, mi-ar fi teama si sume mici sa trec prin banci daca ar proveni din crypto. Ce sa mai zic de sume de genul €100k.. Parerea mea e ca mai bine ii scoti p2p, depui declaratia la ANAF si pe urma faci ce vrei cu banii. Daca ii treci prin banca, sa nu ramai surprins daca o sa te trezesti cu contul blocat sub imvestigatii.

Problema nu e ca obtii banii din crypto. Problema e una personala pe care banca o are cu cei care fac asta. Tu folosesti o tehnologie ce presupune eliminarea partilor terte, eliminarea necesitatii bancilor. Logic ca banca nu va fi incantata sa afle ca tu esti unul dintre potentialii ei inamici..

E vorba de acel mic slot din partea de sus a imaginii citate, chiar deasupra de ecran. L-am observat si la alte ATM-uri de-ale lor, si am impresia ca acolo exista totusi o camera foto/video care actioneaza similar celei de la Shitcoins.

Am trecut si eu astazi pe langa un ATM Bitcoin Romania si deasupra ecranului exista un mic loc pentru o camera video. E foarte similar cu camerele video de la ATM-urile bancare, ceea ce ma duce cu gandul la faptul ca e posibil ca o camera de supraveghere sa existe ascunsa dupa un mic plastic fumuriu. Sa fie oare o camera si sus, pentru supraveghere? Mi s-ar parea destul de ciudat ca un ATM sa nu captureze imagini cu utilizatorii in scop preventiv.

Everything in the coding world has at least one vulnerability, more or less dangerous. The difference is that the worst thing that could happen with Samourai or other non-custodial wallets is that it could have various vulnerabilities such as.. I don't know, a way to bypass wallet login?

Non-custodial wallet vulnerabilities are mostly only a threat as soon as someone obtains your phone/computer physically and could tamper with it. Perhaps the hackers developed a maliciously modified version of Samourai and you're an unfortunate victim of it - that is why you should always verify your builds/executables/archives before installing something on your device. On the other hand, exchanges could be hacked through coding flaws and hot wallets (or even cold) could be stripped out of funds.

And then, there's the custodial/non-custodial risk: as soon as you deposit on an exchange, they have more rights over your coins than you do. So no matter how you take it, non-custodial wallets such as Samourai or Electrum are way, way better than exchanges.