I'm pretty sure this happens when one or more earlier posts are deleted, causing later posts to appear on the page previous to the page they originally appeared on, the latter being where the link continues pointing to until the database is properly updated.

No, you don't. You really have no idea just how large the numbers involved are. (It's not your fault; humans are notoriously bad at conceptualising numbers greater than a quadrillion or so.)

FTFY. (A quindecillion is a trillion trillion trillion trillion.) Don't worry, you were only off by 36 orders of magnitude.

They don't. With numbers this large, they don't need to.

The rules (which admittedly don't seem to be strictly followed in this thread) also require you link to the image instead of embedding it (use [url] instead of [img]), like so:

https://i.imgur.com/6mYcMsM.jpg

But don't worry about it not belonging here; you're far from the first person to submit a NSFW entry, and they are indeed allowed:

It's just the bitcoin roller coaster guy (which they also plagiarised as part of their logo) with clipart of confetti and a party hat.

The related user I was talking about is this one.

I wonder how theymos feels about this low-effort entry that appears to be little more than an advertisement for the user's site and which has already received 70 merits from 2 users that appear to be related, have suspicious merit histories, and (before the latest update) were both on DT. I'm sure there's nothing untoward going on here.

You obviously live in a different world than the rest of us (I mean, even more obviously than it was already). In our world, you can't file a court case anonymously without the approval of the judge, which is only granted in extraordinary circumstances, what with the whole "right of the accused to know their accuser" thing. Human rights are so inconvenient like that.

His BPIP profile is ridiculously out of date*. His trust value under the old system actually stands at a whopping -549,755,813,888. One more tag and he'll become the first red trust trillionaire! (Maybe that's the achievement he's aiming for.)

*His negative trust is high enough to trigger a 32-bit integer overflow, so maybe it's straight-up crashing Vod's parser.

They'd better not be doing the "transtrender" thing where they're only pretending to be gender confused just because all the cool kids (eg Lauda et al) are doing it.

Sorry, but if I wanted the origin of my opinions scrutinised, I would have put on a more "entertaining" show for the contest. You'll just have to use your imagination.

We're afraid that if we point out that our sent trust feedback is public (and therefore you don't require our help to publicly examine it), you'll just accuse us of being too cowardly to cooperate with your "investigation" instead of accepting that you're just too lazy to do it yourself. After all, it's the same thing that happened when you promised to investigate our merit histories, and nothing ever came of that, did it?

Bitnodes is not 100% reliable. Your hidden service is definitely up: I can connect to it without problems. There are no errors in the log you posted either.

A Tor hidden service works as a reverse proxy: other users connect to your Tor server, which forwards the connection to your Bitcoin node, which sees the connection as coming from the IP address of your Tor server (localhost if both Tor and Bitcoin are running on the same machine). This is exactly what you should expect to see if your hidden service is working normally. Over time, you should start to see many more such connections.

EDIT:
No, bind simply blocks all incoming connections from any other IP address (ie, clearnet connections). Even if you omit the bind option to accept clearnet connections, you will still see Tor connections coming from localhost.

I'll give you a hint. Does it contain another word, or combination of words, that maybe means the same thing as the word steal? I know you find reading comprehension difficult, but please try to do your best.

It's certainly far more inspired than most of the spam being posted. Carry on.

Without going too far into any of these pesky "details" that you're so against going into, would you care to explain what specifically you think Gregory Maxwell's professional interests are, and how they are in conflict?

Does my disobedience call into question your theory that DT is centralised? One might expect it to. And are you sure I cannot resist you?

Perhaps it is you who cannot resist me.

Which one was that? The one where I describe the anatomical origin of opinions is from over a month ago, and I've made a lot of fun posts since then. Some more fun than others.

EDIT: Typo

Licensing isn't just about money; it's also about public safety. A two tonne car travelling at 110 km/h (70 mph) has about 1 megajoule (750,000 foot pounds) of kinetic energy, equivalent to 250 grams (half a pound) of TNT, which, as it happens, is roughly the yield of an M67 hand grenade. As terrorists are (surprising recently) starting to figure out, a car makes a very effective guided missile that can (either accidentally or maliciously) destroy another car completely, kill or maim a whole crowd of pedestrians, or partially demolish a small building. Even the most ardent gun nuts will concede that some licensing restrictions are necessary on the use of such weapons in public.

Those who can't abide by these (rather generous, IMO) restrictions are free to travel by less dangerous methods.

You think you've got it bad? Check out this bullshit:


That update was nearly three months ago, and still no details are coming. What must a gender-confused vixen do to have the sordid details of her observable dirtiness exposed?

---

So? We all do, according to c******unter. You'll need to do better than that!

EDIT: Typo

Well, it's a risky strategy, given the growing number of high-ranking users who are (believed to be) female. OP may be making some unwarranted assumptions.