|
The high subsidy we have these days distorts the market created by fees. Once the subsidy goes down to 6 or 3 BTC, miners will no longer have any incentive to mine empty blocks. They are going to need to include transactions or just lose money.
|
|
|
|
There should not have been a rounding error in my BTC value, as I actually had x.00000000 BTC on MtGox.
The PDF maintains the 8 decimal places, so there's no rounding error there. Rounding crap only happens with fiats, where mtgox gives you 5 places and the PDF trims to 2. Re: delay damages, ok, I'm the first one to see that in the world. Maybe the trustee is able to tell me something. |
|
|
|
El blog dice: Coinffeine is negotiating with specialized companies to close liquidity deals and market surveillance to be added in future releases. ¿A qué se refiere lo de "market surveillance"? |
|
|
|
Esto se publicó originalmente en Esquina libre. Como no hay herramientas para mover mensajes entre hilos (a theymos no le parece una gran idea y lo ha desactivado), hay que hacer la chapucilla de copiar y pegar: |
|
|
|
Yo creo que es una noticia, no siempre todas las noticias han de ser de la prensa no? Si la fuente la publica directamente aquí deja por ello de ser una noticia? Que los moderadores decidan  Que las 80 páginas que ya existen en el hilo decidan  . Sin mencionar el asunto del mismo: "prensa y páginas de blog". Creo que te dejas la parte mas importante del asunto, Noticias Bitcoin :p "Noticias Bitcoin - prensa y paginas de blog" para ser pedante, que por lo visto hace falta. |
|
|
|
Ya los descargué puedes ponerme los otros.
Ya, del 100 al 149. Si tal en adelante mándame un PM, que estamos ensuciando el hilo. |
|
|
|
Yo creo que es una noticia, no siempre todas las noticias han de ser de la prensa no? Si la fuente la publica directamente aquí deja por ello de ser una noticia? Que los moderadores decidan Que las 80 páginas que ya existen en el hilo decidan . Sin mencionar el asunto del mismo: "prensa y páginas de blog". |
|
|
|
I'm feeling a bit lost here. I was under the impression that the PDF was supposed to automatically calculate the correct values. In fact, when entering my values into the amendment PDF, I'm getting the exact same numbers I originally sent to Japan.
My theory is that balances as provided by mtgox have 5 decimal digits and if you use them like that in the PDF, they aren't correctly rounded. Eg. entering 0.00999 USD yields 0 JPY while it should give 1. So, do the rounding to 2 decimals by yourself, and enter only those 2 decimals in the PDF. That's what I'm going to try at least. |
|
|
|
Desde Bitchain anunciamos que Hoy ya está operativo -de nuevo- nuestro Cajero de Bitcoins en Valencia.
Después de la instalación del nuevo software ahora el terminal ofrece un servicio más eficiente de compra y venta de Bitcoins.
Y el artículo de prensa ¿dónde está? Escribe en Servicios, mejor. |
|
|
|
Does anyone have a plausible explanation for this?
Bump. I'm not the first person across the globe to notice this, right? |
|
|
|
Hola dserrano5 gracias por la ayuda que nos estas dando, ahora intente descargar y me da acceso denegado parece ser problemas en el apache.
Sorry, ya está arreglado. Seguramente me volverá a pasar otra vez… |
|
|
|
Ya puedes ponerme los otros 50. Verdad que comprimido se ahorra espacio cantidad!
saludos
Según escribo esto todavía se están comprimiendo, pero el 50 ya está listo  . |
|
|
|
Dejo esta dirección que tengo sobre papel: 15s9qhQPwjeWgsNucdywnTNBaeoqU61cua Y esto, en un hilo sobre privacidad? Bieeeen . |
|
|
|
So if the wallet is disabled in pruning mode, what purpose if any is pruning good for? Seeing you cant send /receive btc running it that way?
If you're currently running a full node: none. If not, you already have some other wallet, so this doesn't affect you. Pruning allows you to set up a node without the need to dedicate 50 Gb of storage to it. |
|
|
|
I can't find any thread about this. Background: I'm among the unfortunate people without access to the original email address used to sign up to mtgox, so I had to use the offline method. Recently I received an email from the trustee saying that I didn't use the correct conversion rate blah blah. So I'm filling in an amendment and playing with the document a little, but the following caught my attention:  If the delay damages are 6% "per annum" (more or less equivalent to "per year", I assume) and almost 1.5 years have passed since 2014-02-26, how come the automatically calculated damages are less than 1%? I'd expect them to be more like 10%, ie. nearly 1M JPY in this example. Does anyone have a plausible explanation for this? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
