I am really sorry for that, yes it is down. The server has crashed down for some reasons and the support team is not responding to my tickets. I will let you know when it is back online.
P.S
It is my first priority to find a better server so we don't face such issues in future.
What are you currently using? Have you considered using AWS API Gateway? There's a free tier available, so that's 1 million API calls received free (per month) for the first year. |
|
|
|
Is the API down at the moment? I'm trying to use Socket to watch an address and I keep getting a timeout error. I'm basically doing the exact same as you are doing in the documentation, just in Python instead: import socketio
sio = socketio.Client()
sio.connect('https://btc.merapi.io/global')
@sio.on('spent-address-X_ADDRESS')
def on_spent_address(data):
print(data)
sio.wait()
|
|
|
|
Make sure that you have your wallet's seed first, and then try to delete the folder: Run Electrum again -> Restore your wallet (with the seed) and see if the problem persists. If it does, then I guess you should just go ahead and update. It's always recommended to use the latest version anyway. |
|
|
|
|
I tried the 4.0.9 portable version, and I couldn't reproduce the problem you're having. Does this happen with any transaction you make or just with a specific one?
|
|
|
|
نعم أخي أوميغا أتمنى أن يكون هذا الكلام صحيحا ويتعلق KYC بفيات فقط.
لكن أذكر أنك في موضوع سابق تحدثت عن قرار الإمارات أن أي منصة يتوجب عليها إعطاء المعلومات وعمليات المراجعة إذا أرادت الحصول على ترخيص:
-snip-
من هنا كان سؤالي حول إمكانية فرض KYC بواسطة Bybit على مستخدميها بما أنها حصلت على الترخيص بشكل قانوني.
على حسب ما فهمت، فالمعلومات التي ذكرتها في ذلك الموضوع ليس عندها أي علاقة بالمستخدم. يعني المنصة ملزمة باعطاء معلومات أكثر حول الشركة نفسها و ليس بالضرورة حول المستخدمين، أما بالنسبة لعمليات المراجعة، فأتصور أن هذا الأمر يعني مراجعة البيانات المالية للمنصة، لا غير. على أي، الأيام المقبلة كفيلة باعطاءنا الجواب الدقيق. لكن ان كنت تملك أموال كبيرة في المنصة، فقد يكون من الأفضل اخراجها ان لم تكن مستعدا لاعطاء بياناتك في حال تم طلبها منك |
|
|
|
Why would Binance support the lightning network when they can sell you WBTC in BSC.  As for Coinbase, then they already made a statement a couple of weeks ago about it if I'm not mistaken. They have plans to integrate it. |
|
|
|
Since the exchange have been mentioned above, you can check this[1] first to have a better idea about the liquidity in each one of them. You should also keep in mind that most (CEXes) mentioned do not support gift cards like LBC and Paxful used to. [1] https://monetory.io/en |
|
|
|
|
How did you create your wallet exactly? You're saying you lost them on Binance. Are you referring to their non-custodial wallet extension or the exchange? If it's the exchange, then you shouldn't have any private keys to start with.
Now, if you're confident that it's an actual private key or a seed phrase, and assuming you only have a display issue as I understood, then you should be able to plug it into your computer and access its files from there
|
|
|
|
|
أفترض أنك تقصد في desktop? ان كان الأمر كذلك فلدي خبرة لا بأس بها في C# (Winforms & WPF) ان كنت مهتما، اعلمني. عندي الوقت لكن الأمر يعتمد على طبيعة المشروع.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have access to the seed phrase either. I'm not expecting anyone to pay extra for the avatars anyway.
BTCump.
|
|
|
|
There's Reactor[1] from ChainAlysis but that's not available to the public, and it's way too complicated. Is it what you're trying to build? Would one be able to find the connection even if the funds moved through exchanges, services, mixers, etc. as is the case with this tool? [1] https://www.chainalysis.com/chainalysis-reactor/ |
|
|
|
How to get your own domain name? I am aware that we can get selected domain names with our own alias. The question still remains the same how can I get an address like - xyz@gmail.comI could be wrong but I don't think it's possible to use gmail, outlook, etc. since you don't own these domains. But if you want a custom domain, then from my understanding, you can buy a domain name (like you would for your website) and a server for your LN node and then run bridgeaddr as explained here[1]. [1] https://bridgeaddr.fiatjaf.com/ |
|
|
|
The site you mentioned has a list of services that gives you lightning addresses. I would go with Wallet of Satoshi as its pretty easy to use but obviously, when you're using these services, you will be stuck with their domain names: @bitrefill.me
@walletofsatoshi.com
etc.
If you want to implement the same thing with your own domain name, then I'm afraid you will need some technical knowledge. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Binance is a good choice but I don't prefer centralized exchange's p2p because when we cash out from the platform the funds will be deposited via exchange
What do you mean by that? It's not really any different than Paxful or LBC. I'm not sure if I understood you correctly, but when you deposit, you can deposit directly to the Funding wallet (the one used for P2P trading) and when withdrawing, you should be able to withdraw from either (Spot/funding). You're not required to move funds between accounts and then withdraw. |
|
|
|
|
- They might be able to see certain information (IP, balance etc.) but they can't link it to your identity. Besides, you can always setup your own server and connect to it.
- all wallets allow you to setup a password for extra security. I don't see how is this a bad thing, especially when the pin is just 6 digits. Also, You don't have to remember the seed, and you probably shouldn't try to it either. It's better to write it down and store it somewhere safe.
|
|
|
|
The news is shocking to me as well because those two P2P which are LBC and Paxful operated for years now shutting down one by one, for me it's still hard to find the alternative after LBC since I used to be a day trader. So what are there real alternatives now?
If you don't care about KYC, then Binance is a good alternative and it doesn't have any fees.
Update: it looks like the status page was reporting accurate data at the time I posted this: Paxful CEO Ray Youssef said roughly $4.4 million in frozen funds remained on the platform after staff had unfrozen 88% of existing accounts. According to Youssef, the unfreezing of accounts had been accomplished “with no engineers or compliance folks,” claiming all remaining frozen funds were “in the hands of” United States financial regulators.
-snip-
Youssef said though roughly 3% of total user funds were still frozen
-snip-
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
