|
Para mensajes posteriores, por favor ten en cuenta que las traducciones automáticas no se permiten en el foro. Este lo he dejado estar porque, en mi opinión, está bastante pasable.
|
|
|
|
What I've learned since is that core 0.10+ does its own fee estimate. Is it possible run that estimate without sending btc?
RPC commands estimatefee and estimatepriority. |
|
|
|
No está incluido, hay algún problema?
No todo el mundo, por ejemplo yo mismo, se va a fiar de un programa ajeno cuyo fuente no está disponible. No sabemos lo que el programa hace, y tu palabra no cambia eso. Ah, y ahora que lo veo, esto no encaja en mercadillo; mejor en servicios. |
|
|
|
El precio de compra es de 0.0008BTC (Aproximadamente 0.20€) y además podrás añadir una cantidad de forma voluntaria.
Entiendo, pues, que el código fuente no está disponible, correcto? |
|
|
|
|
I was there today, can confirm it's real. Didn't take a pic because there was someone sitting there speaking on the phone.
|
|
|
|
Instead, I started this thread to let everyone know that I've taken the step of removing default trust from my trust settings, so I'm starting blank, and I'll add people back to my list as I feel I can trust them. I'm encouraging others who have done this to post in this thread to let everyone know.
+1. AIUI, DefaultTrust was put there mostly to bootstrap the system, to prevent all scores from being displayed as 0, and in the hope that people would make the adjustments you just did (and that I did many months ago). Welcome to the set of people who chooses who to trust! |
|
|
|
Of course it's photoshopped  If you open the link that was mentioned above, you'll find different poster It's a joke Do you really expect the google car to go visit that area just when Gavin's there? Google was there X time ago, this image is supposed to be fresh new. |
|
|
|
Sometimes it's necessary to prove a PM was received or sent. This can be useful for a scam accusation to prove a deal was made or a specific address was given. It can also be useful to prove an address was sent and -along with a message signed with that address- prove ownership of an account. Also to prove a threat or a blackmail/extortion attempt. At the moment people just take screenshots or quote the PMs but there's no way to prove that wasn't edited. Could TLSnotary solve it? |
|
|
|
|
Otra opción es mandarle un PM a DefaultTrust, eso no lo puede borrar nadie. Luego uno se guarda la URL del PM para cuando haga falta, y listos.
|
|
|
|
|
Es un poco off topic para este hilo. Yo tengo info de Grecia de primera mano (alguien viviendo en Atenas), pero aquí no encaja.
|
|
|
|
what if the developers themselves are coerced to sneak something in?
This is certainly a problem in bitcoin XT where only… one? two? individual(s) have commit access. You can still download it and check it does it? Also when a release comes out, it usually has a checksum and a signature, any alteration after the release is easily detactable.. So if wallet 2.0 comes out, and it has a hash, but if you sneak something shady in it after, it wont match the hash of the 2.0. My concern is after people have switched to XT due do the 8 Mb max block size. In that scenario, and assuming they will be coerced to put some unwanted code (eg. CoinValidation—and Hearn was pretty much for that IIRC), how are we going to switch back to Bitcoin Core? We can pretty much assume we won't, with the result that TPTB will have successfully co-opted bitcoin. I'd rather see the 8 Mb change in Core, or stay at 1 Mb until more people have governance over XT. |
|
|
|
what if the developers themselves are coerced to sneak something in?
This is certainly a problem in bitcoin XT where only… one? two? individual(s) have commit access. |
|
|
|
But it doesn't matter. If one would devalue "Greece Euro" to nil, it would hurt people from all over Europe. Because the money travels.
Notes not only travel: some years ago, a lot of 10s in Spain had the letter Y in them. They were printed in Greece, then taken to Spain and distributed in Spain. In fact, spanish 10s have been a rarity, even in Spain, since 2005 or so. This is called pooling and happens all over the place. Other examples of notes pooled to Spain are Dutch 5s and French 20s. Conversely, 50s are made mostly in Spain and pooled out to several countries. All this about Y-notes losing value is bullshit. |
|
|
|
I don't think so as long as the issuing power of Euro is controlled by the ECB. So all of the banks in European are treating the same status for different Euro. So is the merchants! What is your intention of creating panic here?
They print a Y infront of the serial number of Greek Euros and X-in front of the serial number for german Euro's. Yes, and all notes are equally valid across the continent. Y-notes aren't going to lose their value. Also, new design notes (of which right now we have 5 and 10 euro, with the 20s coming in later this year) no longer have this country letter—they just duplicate the printing letter that appears at the front (very small, difficult to spot). |
|
|
|
This looks to be a SharedCoin transaction (lots of inputs and outputs, many outputs having similar amounts of BTC). But, in THIS transaction we can find an input that is very large (vs. the others) and an output that is also very large vs. its others: That's the change. The amount actually mixed is 50 BTC. (No need for it to be a SharedCoin transaction, it could also by a joinmarket one, which has the features of not having counterparty risk (funds are under your control at all times) and has an incentive mechanism for people to offer themselves for making joins.) |
|
|
|
Voy a actualizar lo que dije sobre este juego con nuevos puntos:
[…] Este es, a mi juicio, un buen ejemplo de un mensaje donde el autor podría añadir un enlace de referido al final y no pasaría nada. El objetivo del mensaje es aportar cosas, dar nueva información. Y se nota que has jugado  . |
|
|
|
Litecoin es una alt  . |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
