added to new one, prices now it btc and shipping info included. feel free to post or pm offers  @SlidingHorn: sure, you are welcome @electronicash: Its a bunch of work, like i said : feel free to place an offer  |
|
|
|
|
naja gehen tut es schon aber es ist einfach schweine teuer.
|
|
|
|
DHL Sperrgut passt nicht?
DHL hab ich angerufen die sagten mir geht nicht bei den abmessungen, DHL Express würde es machen aber da liegen die kosten über 2k euro. Sperrgut hat nur ein gurtmaß von 300cm Ich hab echt nicht mit so schwierigkeiten gerechnet. |
|
|
|
no hard feeling but this sounds like a get rich quick schema |
|
|
|
Holla, ich bin ein wenig ratlos, ich möchte ein Paket (170x120x40 unter 20kg) in die Staaten verschicken. Das günstigste was ich online finde wären um die 600 Euro mit TNT. Ich bin davon ausgegangen das es teuer wird aber nicht so teuer... hat jemand einen guten Rat für mich, ausser zu schreiben ich soll es sein lassen  |
|
|
|
Thats true, people can ignore my feedback by putting ~whywefight in their trust list Well, you're not in the DT2 list atm so most people won't have you in their trust lists anyways. I know but ppl still complaining |
|
|
|
Thats true, people can ignore my feedback by putting ~whywefight in their trust list |
|
|
|
|
ahh sorry i forgot, will be updated this eve!
|
|
|
|
I have recently been given neutral trust rom Lutpin and negative trust from another user (who appears to be some sort of apprentice as he has positive trust from LutPin but has been moved out of Default Trust).
I had no idea that I couldn't make my own judgement to decide what to request when offering a loan. That (by the way) was only worth $5, so if I feed the scammer I haven't really lost anything and I already have his account held in collaterall.
Does anyone else think these people have given me negative trust for an insufficiant reason. (the lender is left to decide what they accept as "valid collaterall" (hence why it is left unexplained intentionally in the lending rules)).
It has come to my attention that you think you are smarter than anybody else and that is why you reject advice from people who know better than you. It is an unwritten rule that a signed message is mandatory when taking accounts as collateral. they way you act is full of ignorance. because of people like you, scamers will always have a chance to get at least a freaking satoshi out of someone. |
|
|
|
Lutpin does not deserved to be on Default Trust.
He is abusive and immature.
I haven't done anything wrong.
I'm just selling my lbc account but Lupin and his alt give me a negative feedback.
there is a proof you selling accounts, one of them is a LBC acc, that is why i think you shouldnt be trusted and this will help future scams. thats what my feedback says. not more not less. |
|
|
|
|
If a btct account with trust for previous deals get sold here, we -ve him because we cant be sure the new owner is trustworthy and he does not deserve to have a trusted account. Simply because he didnt do the trades.
People on here try to get other people in dealing off the site without escrows to scam em.
Buying an account for lbc that has trust might be used for the same stuff. I dont know if it happens, but again you are able to trade on lbc without having a history. Its easy and possible. Its total bs no one will deal with newbies over there.
Personaly i -ve those accounts because they are sold here i dont care if they are sold elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
I got a negative rating from him, because I'm selling my localbitcoin account.
This user is a hypocrite. What is the difference between selling bitcointalk account and lbc account?
Localbitcoin is more secure because it has a built in escrow service while bitcointalk has not. And he allow bitcointalk account selling.
Unfortunately I am going to have to make Lutpin go 0-2 on this one and agree with the OP. Escrow should not be released on LBC until funds are secured/received by the bitcoin seller, and funds should be in escrow prior to the bitcoin buyer sending any kind of fiat. LBC warns it's users against working outside of escrow. From what I can tell, the vast majority of LBC scams involve users not properly using the escrow system (or due to successful phishing attempts). Established LBC accounts do however potentially allow for people to get their ads more premonitory displayed, potentially allowing more people to trade with an established account, potentially allowing for more favorable rates (and more profits) for the owner of an established LBC account. There is no need to buy an "established" account. LBC has a good escrow system, even as a newbie it isnt a real problem to sell hundreds of BTC. Also LBC will ban the acc (in most of the cases afaik) if they get a hint that the acc was sold. If the escrow system is so good, then what is the harm in selling a LBC account? As I said previously, an established LBC account may allow you to get better rates on LBC they try to get people to deal off site, because those accs are so trusted
Clearly you have no logic there.Then Why you are ok with bitcointalk accounts which is more risky than locabitcoin? Which has completely no escrow at all. Even you use escrow in bitcointalk there is a chance the escrow is the one who will scam you.
i dont need any logic to have my opinion. if you stick around here you might understand why accs seling at all is bad but better to have it here than somewhere else Clearly you are doing things without thinking at all. tells me the guy which is new here and have never be involved in BTCT account sales, giving loans or hunting down alts/scamers. i explained my pov to you, you dont need to agree on it |
|
|
|
I got a negative rating from him, because I'm selling my localbitcoin account.
This user is a hypocrite. What is the difference between selling bitcointalk account and lbc account?
Localbitcoin is more secure because it has a built in escrow service while bitcointalk has not. And he allow bitcointalk account selling.
Unfortunately I am going to have to make Lutpin go 0-2 on this one and agree with the OP. Escrow should not be released on LBC until funds are secured/received by the bitcoin seller, and funds should be in escrow prior to the bitcoin buyer sending any kind of fiat. LBC warns it's users against working outside of escrow. From what I can tell, the vast majority of LBC scams involve users not properly using the escrow system (or due to successful phishing attempts). Established LBC accounts do however potentially allow for people to get their ads more premonitory displayed, potentially allowing more people to trade with an established account, potentially allowing for more favorable rates (and more profits) for the owner of an established LBC account. There is no need to buy an "established" account. LBC has a good escrow system, even as a newbie it isnt a real problem to sell hundreds of BTC. Also LBC will ban the acc (in most of the cases afaik) if they get a hint that the acc was sold. If the escrow system is so good, then what is the harm in selling a LBC account? As I said previously, an established LBC account may allow you to get better rates on LBC they try to get people to deal off site, because those accs are so trusted LBC warns it's users against working outside of escrow. From what I can tell, the vast majority of LBC scams involve users not properly using the escrow system (or due to successful phishing attempts). like we have ton of stickies and advices around here? well i see how well this works.. I got a negative rating from him, because I'm selling my localbitcoin account.
This user is a hypocrite. What is the difference between selling bitcointalk account and lbc account?
Localbitcoin is more secure because it has a built in escrow service while bitcointalk has not. And he allow bitcointalk account selling.
Unfortunately I am going to have to make Lutpin go 0-2 on this one and agree with the OP. Escrow should not be released on LBC until funds are secured/received by the bitcoin seller, and funds should be in escrow prior to the bitcoin buyer sending any kind of fiat. LBC warns it's users against working outside of escrow. From what I can tell, the vast majority of LBC scams involve users not properly using the escrow system (or due to successful phishing attempts). Established LBC accounts do however potentially allow for people to get their ads more premonitory displayed, potentially allowing more people to trade with an established account, potentially allowing for more favorable rates (and more profits) for the owner of an established LBC account. There is no need to buy an "established" account. LBC has a good escrow system, even as a newbie it isnt a real problem to sell hundreds of BTC. Also LBC will ban the acc (in most of the cases afaik) if they get a hint that the acc was sold. If the escrow system is so good, then what is the harm in selling a LBC account? As I said previously, an established LBC account may allow you to get better rates on LBC they try to get people to deal off site, because those accs are so trusted
Clearly you have no logic there.Then Why you are ok with bitcointalk accounts which is more risky than locabitcoin? Which has completely no escrow at all. Even you use escrow in bitcointalk there is a chance the escrow is the one who will scam you.i dont need any logic to have my opinion. if you stick around here you might understand why accs seling at all is bad but better to have it here than somewhere else |
|
|
|
I got a negative rating from him, because I'm selling my localbitcoin account.
This user is a hypocrite. What is the difference between selling bitcointalk account and lbc account?
Localbitcoin is more secure because it has a built in escrow service while bitcointalk has not. And he allow bitcointalk account selling.
Unfortunately I am going to have to make Lutpin go 0-2 on this one and agree with the OP. Escrow should not be released on LBC until funds are secured/received by the bitcoin seller, and funds should be in escrow prior to the bitcoin buyer sending any kind of fiat. LBC warns it's users against working outside of escrow. From what I can tell, the vast majority of LBC scams involve users not properly using the escrow system (or due to successful phishing attempts). Established LBC accounts do however potentially allow for people to get their ads more premonitory displayed, potentially allowing more people to trade with an established account, potentially allowing for more favorable rates (and more profits) for the owner of an established LBC account. There is no need to buy an "established" account. LBC has a good escrow system, even as a newbie it isnt a real problem to sell hundreds of BTC. Also LBC will ban the acc (in most of the cases afaik) if they get a hint that the acc was sold. If the escrow system is so good, then what is the harm in selling a LBC account? As I said previously, an established LBC account may allow you to get better rates on LBC they try to get people to deal off site, because those accs are so trusted |
|
|
|
I got a negative rating from him, because I'm selling my localbitcoin account.
This user is a hypocrite. What is the difference between selling bitcointalk account and lbc account?
Localbitcoin is more secure because it has a built in escrow service while bitcointalk has not. And he allow bitcointalk account selling.
Unfortunately I am going to have to make Lutpin go 0-2 on this one and agree with the OP. Escrow should not be released on LBC until funds are secured/received by the bitcoin seller, and funds should be in escrow prior to the bitcoin buyer sending any kind of fiat. LBC warns it's users against working outside of escrow. From what I can tell, the vast majority of LBC scams involve users not properly using the escrow system (or due to successful phishing attempts). Established LBC accounts do however potentially allow for people to get their ads more premonitory displayed, potentially allowing more people to trade with an established account, potentially allowing for more favorable rates (and more profits) for the owner of an established LBC account. There is no need to buy an "established" account. LBC has a good escrow system, even as a newbie it isnt a real problem to sell hundreds of BTC. Also LBC will ban the acc (in most of the cases afaik) if they get a hint that the acc was sold. You don't allow selling secure accounts, while you allow selling of high risk bitcointalk accounts. What is your point there? Are you an hyprocrite and alt of lutpin? If those accounts are dealed here, we know about it at least. I dont care about the others. As there is no real sense of selling an LBC account i am worried about those. Actually i am an alt of theymos, but dont tell anyone... |
|
|
|
I got one from selling lbc accounts which is also allowed here. This user must be removed from DT asap. He is clearly abusing his power.
Might be OT but didnt you contact me after i left feedback for you, telling me you wouldnt do this anymore and now you have several threads open, for selling different types of accounts? LBC: http://archive.is/uzSfzVCC for PP: http://archive.is/UvVJhFB: http://archive.is/suyebBHW: http://archive.is/CbeoMBTCT: http://archive.is/9pUXl (i am cool with those, personally) Ofc, you are free to sell them but after a while beeing around here we know how this will end up 90% of the time. Just speaking for me like i wrote before, i review my feedbacks after some time. Its my accounts. What is wrong selling those accounts? Yet you allow bitcointalk selling? Its not up to what "i" allow or not. i dont see a problem if the accs are traded here. Makes it easier to spot them. As i lender i end up with accounts from time to time. I am also cool on FB and dont care about BHW. I just dont like LBCs being sold, thats my persoanl opinion. |
|
|
|
I got a negative rating from him, because I'm selling my localbitcoin account.
This user is a hypocrite. What is the difference between selling bitcointalk account and lbc account?
Localbitcoin is more secure because it has a built in escrow service while bitcointalk has not. And he allow bitcointalk account selling.
Unfortunately I am going to have to make Lutpin go 0-2 on this one and agree with the OP. Escrow should not be released on LBC until funds are secured/received by the bitcoin seller, and funds should be in escrow prior to the bitcoin buyer sending any kind of fiat. LBC warns it's users against working outside of escrow. From what I can tell, the vast majority of LBC scams involve users not properly using the escrow system (or due to successful phishing attempts). Established LBC accounts do however potentially allow for people to get their ads more premonitory displayed, potentially allowing more people to trade with an established account, potentially allowing for more favorable rates (and more profits) for the owner of an established LBC account. There is no need to buy an "established" account. LBC has a good escrow system, even as a newbie it isnt a real problem to sell hundreds of BTC. Also LBC will ban the acc (in most of the cases afaik) if they get a hint that the acc was sold. |
|
|
|
I got one from selling lbc accounts which is also allowed here. This user must be removed from DT asap. He is clearly abusing his power.
Might be OT but didnt you contact me after i left feedback for you, telling me you wouldnt do this anymore and now you have several threads open, for selling different types of accounts? LBC: http://archive.is/uzSfzVCC for PP: http://archive.is/UvVJhFB: http://archive.is/suyebBHW: http://archive.is/CbeoMBTCT: http://archive.is/9pUXl (i am cool with those, personally) Ofc, you are free to sell them but after a while beeing around here we know how this will end up 90% of the time. Just speaking for me like i wrote before, i review my feedbacks after some time. |
|
|
|
I got this from raise.com
is it a real card or a code? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
