Purchased some Block erupters from the http://ibipot.com/ pool. Pool owner sent me a tracking number 7 hours later. Very nice! |
|
|
|
|
Picked up a jally just to dig some MED! Lets do this
|
|
|
|
so how many blocks per day will one 333MH/s block erupter find?
At a diff of 28.2k you'd have a 50% chance of finding a block in 4.2 days. If you're feelin lucky go for it! |
|
|
|
|
Successfully sold 2k MED to XiaoRui at 0.000045 BTC each
|
|
|
|
|
5% fee for a P2Pool?? Can I get a hell to the no
|
|
|
|
|
P2Pool?? I'm in!
Edit: Wait what's the fee? Can't find that stated anywhere
|
|
|
|
|
I'm shocked this coin isn't more popular with miners, it's actually made BE USB sticks useful again! I don't mind though, already got 200 blocks with 11 usb miners. Keep em coming!
|
|
|
|
|
Cool idea. I wonder how much ASIC power the first GPU/ASIC miner will allow
|
|
|
|
|
GJNsJGyKMjnfUzgb6Kn5rfsYfiKJWAV6aw
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Ok i tested something.
When i type my password wrong, i get an error.
When i type the password correct + the captcha correct , i get forwarded to the main site without login. (without error)
When i type the password correct + the captcha WRONG, i get forwarded to the main site without login. (without error)
So the problem must be cuased by the damn captcha again.
I tried to contact the support and the admin by email no responce until now.
I also send the bitcointalk user of Bter a message.
waiting without response sucks, i hope they dont react late after 3 days or so like Mt.Gox....
----One good support example: Cryptsy. today i had a deposit stuck. got 2 messages after 4 hours + soloution after another 30min later.
that is how support should be like!----
Yeah same problem. Tried from chrome, my phone, IE didn't help. |
|
|
|
|
I still can't log in, this is really annoying!
|
|
|
|
|
I can't login, every time I try to it just takes me to the LTC/BTC page without logging in. Anyone else having this problem?
|
|
|
|
My hashrate for YAC has gone from about 7.5kh/s to 1.9kh/s. So, about 25% of the previous rate.
My 7950 GPU results are similar--about 25% of what it was. 8.41 kh/s to 2.12 kh/s. Next n change going to be measuring mining speed in hash/sec! |
|
|
|
|
"The timestamp phrase was picked by the lvl 3 reiki master that agreed to include this coin in their reiki healing everyday"
lol wut
|
|
|
|
|
When I first installed the wallet the network was on block 6. Unless the first block was a super block I'd call that a fair start!
|
|
|
|
Darn it's still not reasonable to CPU mine.  Looks like it won't be for at least another n factor change. |
|
|
|
|
This is really fun to mine. Is there anywhere I can find out when the n factor changes?
|
|
|
|
|
Wow I'm so glad I got in when the reward was 50 PTS, nearly impossible to get one now with a 2 core AMD! How high do you guys think the difficulty will go?
|
|
|
|
Genuine question about the protocol, correct me if I'm wrong anywhere: Bitcoin works well because it takes a huge amount of work to find a block, but only takes one hash to verify that a block is valid. So a wallet can verify thousands of blocks fairly quickly. From what I understand Protoshares works by the same concept, except one Protoshares hash takes many orders of magnitude more work to perform. Does the Protoshares wallet need to perform one hash to verify each block in the network? Seeing how most computers get ~5 hashes per min, wouldn't that take an outrageously long time to verify the block chain once it gets bigger?
bytemaster apparently designed Momentum PoW and didn't use Scrypt for PoW for precisely that reason, but by making verification faster than finding a hash, I assert he opened a vulnerability that makes it easy to parallelize the finding of a hash and thus not CPU-only. See the link to my claim on the bounty and judge for yourself. And when (if) someone does implement a faster GPU miner for this coin, please kindly acknowledge I was correct. You don't have to tip me anything, the acknowledgement would be more than enough. bytecoin said "This new proof of work can require gigabytes of memory to solve, but almost no memory to verify and as a result the ideal ASIC is memory" in a post but didn't give any further details. I imagine it would explain in the white paper but I haven't read it |
|
|
|
|
Genuine question about the protocol, correct me if I'm wrong anywhere: Bitcoin works well because it takes a huge amount of work to find a block, but only takes one hash to verify that a block is valid. So a wallet can verify thousands of blocks fairly quickly. From what I understand Protoshares works by the same concept, except one Protoshares hash takes many orders of magnitude more work to perform. Does the Protoshares wallet need to perform one hash to verify each block in the network? Seeing how most computers get ~5 hashes per min, wouldn't that take an outrageously long time to verify the block chain once it gets bigger?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
