They are more likely to be a third party of this technology just like with fiat currencies. Yes, they are aiming for centralization. Personally I don't have plans buying Bitcoin from PayPal I just like the idea that it may influence and contribute to mass adoption of cryptocurrencies in the future, centralization is another story.
We may call PayPal as a network in mainstream, with that being given, it is more likely to introduce cryptos or Bitcoin perhaps to the masses in this case. But for those who are exposed to this industry, they would probably stick with the old method of purchasing Bitcoin and other cryptos.

It won't, not a single chance.
First of all, Bitcoin is decentralized which is a downside for majority of the governments when it comes to a currency. Its market value is also volatile, in contrast with the idea that a currency shouls have a stable market value in order to promote equity regarding the world market. Fiat currencies and cryptos are more likely to co-exist in the future than a single currency will be in the center of transactions. Bitcoin and other cryptos are having advantages over fiat but the fact that fiat are more supported across different countries, it will be impossible for it to have a single spotlight in the future. Also, I don't think that is the purpose of cryptos in the first place.

USD value is not dependent to Bitcoin's market price. The market value of Bitcoin and USD are not proportional, it is just that the price of cryptos are determined using fiat but the determinant of the true value of Bitcoin is the demand while in USD is the supply alone, if i'm not mistaken. That's why it became an issue in U. S that trump is planning to print more money which could result to hyperinflation if things will be caught off hand., but that's another case. And I also doubt that the possible decline in the value of USD will be also a burden to the market prices of cryptos.

Actually, games of roulette, dice games, and slot machines, in my opinion is dependent in mere luck. I am into card games by the way at this moment. There articles circulating online which includes strategies not only in roulette but also other gambling games. Since I am not into roulettes, my impression still is the same despite of reading some informations in some articles. My reason to this is the word "gambling". It won't be a gamble if winning is certain. But if you are really determined, trying the methods in this thread from ither users, would be a help I think.
If you are gambling for years already, you might agree to their perspective. If there are really strategies, why are there more players losing than winning in casinos and even in online platforms?

Terrence Crawford being undefeated, has the weight on him. If we would base on physiques, Crawford has the advantages not to mention his counterpunching skills which makes him one of the top pound-for-pound fighters of this date. What I mean with "weights on him" is that many people in in favor of him in this fight. That is how huge the influence of being undefeated not only their career but to almost any competition. But it does not guarantee victory. Things could either go as expected or not. Also, Brook has more experience which could be his trump card in this battle, which makes this match up more exciting IMO.

But what happened recently may contribute to the mass adaptation of cryptocurrencies, right? So we can consider it as a milestone already. But I do get the point that it does not guarantee acceptance across the globe. I just choose to appreciate this because it is something to consider as "rainbow after the rain". How? This year has been through a lot both in this industry and world in general. In terms of this market, the prices gone up and down early this year not to mention issues of banning Bitcoin in some countries such as in U. S. This could be a great thing to happen in this industry. Take not of "could be", but atleast it has a chance.

That is quite related to frustration. It would be greed if you are winning already and still continue playing, eventually ending up with losses, just sharing. Going back, good thing you have reflected in this situation. It would be a good thing to set limits, more likely, label it as an amount you can afford losing because wiining on any game which involves betting, does not determine assured victory. Self-discipline will make it more effective. Knowing what to do will be nonsense if you won't do it. It is like solving a math problem and despite of knowing formula 1 which would be the best way to come up with solution perhaps, you still insisted formula 2.

These questions are applicable to both real time and online gamblers so I'll just point out the questions that caught my attention. Whenever I am playing I limit my losses to only $500usd, whether I lose or win just to give pleasure to myself but also, with discipline, at the same time streaks will be limited if you will set an amount to gamble.  A gambler could go higher with the value of money to gamble, or lower which would be better, just be sure that the amount you will engage to gambling, is an amount you can afford losing. Gambling is full of risks and winning is not certain, so atleast, if ever you will lose, there won't be much of regrets which could trigger frustrations and eventually, bigger losses. No one will discipline you whenever you are playing other than yourself.

This community has no power regarding actions which are in the hands of the governments. Printing money has nothing to do with the cryptos and this community as a whole. The emergence of cryptos are something to make a change but that won't be as easy as it may seem. There is a process before such thing to occur. And at the end of that process, no assurance still that this would be the "future". Keep in mind the concept of decentralization of cryptos. Knowing that fiat currencies are supported by each of the governments, how come cryptos will just wipe these "papers" in an instant? Digital currencies are now being used through various services, but it is a different case if it is crypto we would like to do so.

Probably it is. Since PayPal is a huge network, it could also be influencial to other networks and also people to trust cryptocurrencies. This may then build a rapport with this thing called trust but that does not guarantee things. There's still no assurance that mass adaptation would occur but let's just hope that next year will be something positive for this market.
As what I have read from the article, the implementation would be next year but it did already make an impact because that is quite something unexpected. PayPal is widely being used across countries while Bitcoin still is working with the adaptation.

May I know where's the source to this claim? Immune means will not be afftected by the virus, which is a bold claim if this is true. All I know is that our immune system is adapting to the environment and is becoming stronger, but not totally immune.
Once the vaccine is introduced, it will generate bigger impact to the world. Why? because the sense of fear will be lessen, that is something they would look forward to. There are regulations and guidelines being followed at this moment and for sure, there is a strong reason from doing so. The vaccine will be limited to some countries at first, but once the idea of its existence is available to the masses, things could more improve that at this moment actions are mostly the "alternative" in order to just continue living.

Where will people get money to invest? Given the circumstances of this pandemic, many people are having financial problems. So I doubt that is something that will oush them to invest in Bitcoin, having no assurance of when will the price increase occur, and given how volatile the market is. People are more into things that would help them in their daily living.

The pandemic is bad for the economies of different countries but not that bad in this market. The market price of cryptos are not dramatically falling and not that much moving in the positive direction, so it is quite neutral in that aspect. But there's also this side of me that is disapointed because there is again high hopes early this year for this market. But since expectations are just expectations, i just keep this thought aside since no one knows if the market will be able to reach or even surpass its ATH if this pandemic doesnot occur. How can I say? Last year is a proof. No pandemic but also, there's no that much of an increase.

Just checked the tweet and it is hard to tell wether it would be worthy of your time following the instruction since there are no feedbacks of those who tried, which I think would attract more people to join.
The post is not having that much of popularity which is quite in contrast with the idea that the price is a good amount already to catch the attention of the audiences. Maybe there are no actual trials made still at this moment. But I will follow this tweet, and once I'm convinced that it is really functioning, i might give it a try.

Still a success for being able to continue despite of the pandemic. Changes are just inevitable in order to adapt with the new 'normal'. NBA as an example, successfully finished this year's league, which I think supports the claim of sports industry for successfully being again on "track". Same thing with local leagues of not only basketball but also other sports. Ofcourse, it is not as easy as it may sound hearing "they just got back with what they usually do". They made adjustments for such thing to happen. The continuation of sports industry does not mean we have already overcome the problem. Existence of it is still there and that is enough for all of us to be careful.

Sportsbetting is also coming back and that is quite of a good news for our fellow players out there which would again allow gamblers to enjoy the game and enjoy playing at the same time.

Sportsbet and 22Bet I think, are one of the good betting sites to engage with. Never tried these two but the names are quite popular, also I heard there are bonuses and also, they do accept Bitcoin and other cryptos as the mode of payment.

Going back, Palmeiras are quite having a good run having 23 titles in Campeonato Paulista and 10 in Brasileirao. It is quite hard to choose which one is/are more eager to get another title. Surely, the next tournament will be again, exciting.

I am not in your region so I've searched for it through online. I've read an article, the link is below and you may check it out.
Link: https://sportsbetting.net.in/cricket/ipl-betting/#:~:text=Indian%20IPL%20bettors%20normally%20prefer,card%20and%20other%20payment%20methods.

The article recommends gambling sites such as betway, 22bet, comeon!, Bet365, funbet, and 10cric. I am not sure if these gambling sites accepts cryptos as payment since I don't have access in my region, just want to share what I have found and I hope it may help.

@davis196 Just stated the facts and possibilities with basis, not merely speculations. That is more likely to happen if the government of U. S will continue printing dollars, its value will decrease eventually. But there's also still the possibility of not resulting to hypetinflation because it is USD we are talking about, which is more often the medium of transactions across world market, makit it more powerful than those currencies wherein printing of more paper money resulted to hyperinflation. So maybe the power of USD will be able to cope up the risks from doing so.

Not really a follower of this sport but I do see and heard these names most of the time when I am reading sports-related article. I made a few readings about these three and Roger Federer is more often being compared to Jordan in this sport. Supporting this claim are his titles, likewise with Djokovic and Nadal. But this is how legacy works, Federer left a deeper marks to the fans of tennis among the three. But given these are subjective opinions, and there's no actual basis, there will be biases for sure. All I know is that these three legends are having their own marks to this sport in particular.

Another thing is, what would really happen if ever Satoshi chose to appear in the eyes of the masses? Will there be that much of a change in this market? Creators of other cryptos are known to the public but what's the big deal? This aspect is quite unending.
Probably a matter of taking all the credits is the purpose of those who are pushing themselves to the spotlight. That would be tough in my opinion. Satoshi would more likely be mad rich by now, but to think other Billionaires' identity are exposed to the public and yet they do still manage to live a life, I don't think this would really happen.

Having no assurance of when will such thing happen means there's also no certainty.
What if there's just this linkage of similarity. The market price of Bitcoin and other cryptos are naturally volatile, meaning, it won't stay at a certain point for a long period of time. Its price movement can either go up or down without certainty of the occurence. So it is quite blurry to draw a conclusion of history repitition just because its market value is moving according to its 'nature'. We just like to make speculations to uplift our hopes regarding its market value.  The market price will move on its "own".