Same thing again? It was working fine for a few months, now blocked all withdrawals (including crypto). Then later shut down the site. But this warning has been here for years. How come you just discovered it only after the website is not working? Just for clarity, the link in the OP is exmo.com but in your screenshot, the link is exmo.me. Are both links from the same site? |
|
|
|
The whole debate for the term "plagiarism" is clear to me. What you are saying is not clear to me. metalcecco is my private and personal account (opened 3 years ago to seek help with the theft of BTC that I suffered through the support of Bittrex ...) The Blokbro registration is done on the project (I don't see where the problem is to have a 'private and public accout ... I also have them for both private and commercial social networks) This thing has already been said in the previous comments. the others should be users who follow me to whom I talked about this fact .. with your thoughts if they write other 5 or 10 people you will attribute these accounts to me .. Strange way of thinking.
To be precise, I am not deceiving anyone and I have explained everything clearly, this way of discrediting and continuing to say that a shady project is rather childish.
Having alts in the forum is allowed. What is not accepted is trying to game the trust system using them, and you just did that. What you did is yet another form of proof showing how deceitful and untrustworthy you are. You are the one being childish here. Stop plagiarizing content from other projects, gaming the trusts system and blaming it on other people. |
|
|
|
I wouldn't mind if Xavi wanted to keep Aubameyang simply for the reason that his contribution was commendable last season,
If his contribution was commendable, then why did “broke” Barcelona risk it all and go ahead with the signing of Lewandowski? I think at some point (I don't remember when) Xavi didn't like Aubameyang's style of play. Why he signed him up later and then is now still holding onto him is I guess beyond my understanding. |
|
|
|
today is stake birthday
what happened
stake celebrate with 5th birthday
admin make huge rain for player
So what? This is a thread about Bitsler, not stake.com  I use this opportunity to wish a stake company. Very big Happy Birthday fun there focus future and gambling platform and everything they have created to support human life and the human activitie
Ahaaaa. Here comes another clueless spammer advertising a scam site with a stupid stake congratulatory message. Maybe you should take time a read better next time and know which thread you are replying to. |
|
|
|
What is the scam? In the description of the most detailed exchange conditions? Aren't you one of the dumbest members I have come across in the forum? Ok, since you are handicapped. I am going to help you understand what the flag says. Chahan alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with 16xypjnxlrew is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions.
Support: And that is very true. You are lying to your potential customers that 100 UST = 100 USDT, and yet it's just about 3 USDT. Your customers risk losing 97 USDT. You are one hell of a stupid scammer. |
|
|
|
|
Correction over? Maybe… depending on your time frame, but personally, I think we are still in a bear market. Such movements are expected. I mean, in the previous bear market, w had Bitcoin moving from $6k to $12K and then back downwards. Bitcoin isn't even two times the $17.5K low it recorded a few months ago. I think it's too early to judge that the dump is over.
|
|
|
|
It’s good to see Majestic 7 to be back. I really like it, and even though the reward went down (it used to be 1 bitcoin if I am not wrong) But at that time Bitcoin price was in most cases below $10K, so the 1 BTC price was below $10k… Do you still think the reward “went down”? I think the offer is more than good. How many gambling sites can offer you to win 10,000 USD for making just some free predictions? |
|
|
|
igeble07Date Registered: August 04, 2022, 03:57:56 PM Last Active: August 04, 2022, 04:30:17 PM YlliDate Registered: August 03, 2022, 07:50:15 AM Last Active: August 04, 2022, 07:54:12 AM metalceccoDate Registered: March 07, 2017, 04:42:27 AM Last Active: August 04, 2022, 04:36:00 PM Even a blind man can see that these are Blokbro's sockpuppet shill accounts He's trying to game the trust system, too. More reason not to trust Blokbro and his shady project 
|
|
|
|
Topic: Is this included in the account connection?
No, it's not. You are going to need more proof that just two proof of authentication posts having the same address. There are cases where certain users copy and paste proof of authentication posts of other users, but then forget to edit out the address or social media handles. You have to be careful or you may end up incriminating an innocent member. |
|
|
|
EDIT:User metalcecco woke up after 3 years of inactivity to post this in the BlokBro ANN thread but deleted the post shortly after. It is worth mentioning that he was active mostly in the Italian local before. Two other members opposing the flag (besides BlokBro and his alt metalcecco) registered today and have zero forum activity. Quite clever, I must say.  Thanks for the heads-up. I am going to tag and flag all his alts, and we see how he will try to trick newbies into believing his fake project that's created by plagiarizing content from other projects. BlokBro is one of the dumbest people I have come across lately. Imagine stealing content from another project and continuing to claim that it's not plagiarism after being exposed. |
|
|
|
Why are you still writing about the exchange of the UST token, when I stopped the exchange a long time ago?
A long time ago? You call 16th July, a long time ago? And you didn't just stop at UST, you have been trying so hard to scam members with all the loan requests like this one but no one here is going to fall for them because of our helpful negative feedback and flag.  |
|
|
|
|
One of Albert Einstein's famous saying was great, wasn't it? “Insanity Is Doing the Same Thing Over and Over Again and Expecting Different Results” and OP is just showing us a live example of insanity and dumbness of the highest order.
16xypjnxlrew whether you want to jerk-off on top of the Great Egyptian Pyramids or go and take a shit in the middle of a busy highway, you are not going to get a loan in this forum.
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately 1xbit keep advertising their scam casino and getting more victims everyday, even that here in the forum everybody knows the truth about this casino, even that some are advertising it even here just for few bucks and harming the new members sometimes.
People also have to be smart enough when it involves their money. I mean we have put up so many warning a round the forum, scam accusations, negative feedback and trust flags. All those advertising the scam. Sincerely, someone who ignores all those red flags is beyond someone who can be helped. |
|
|
|
The reality of the matter is you're in a group dominated by a bunch of thieves, and being inflexible in front of scams is nothing else but a disturbing sound to hear for most.
In my opinion, this is a bullshit comment. Do you have any evidence to support this? Of course, the “bunch of thieves” he keeps referring to are those DT members who didn't support his paid flag against fortunejack and also didn't fulfill his wet dream fantasy of raining 30+ negs on Royse's profile. |
|
|
|
But I don't think his trusts and distrust will matter much.
It could if someone had so many high ranking accounts that were banned. They could just want to mess up the trust system out of malice. I was always under the impression that getting banned puts your account in a read-only mode where you can browse the forum, read your old PMs, and it stops there.
It's also what I always thought. |
|
|
|
Well, you are "back" in a wrong profile.
I am the original jkoil.
Then follow the right procedure to recover the account if you are the original owner. I am sure the account recovery team will have ways to prove if you are the original owner. One of them is by writing to them through an email address that was used for registering the account. |
|
|
|
I usually prefer keeping off such disagreements, especially from members who registered earlier than me but since I have been mentioned here, let me make a small remark Are you trusting him because he is busting scam? Yes, he's done quite a lot in the past exposing a ring of scammers, that's why I added him to my trust list. In the event that things change drastically, I can revise my trust list accordingly. If so, do you see he is using your trust against me because he thinks I need to share the same information that I have shared with the people I trust. Royse777, I reckon most members understood and believed your story and are hoping things get better for you, including me. Those who left you negative feedback did it out of their judgement. Everyone can never think a like. So this shouldn't a war of who did vs who didn't, who trusts vs who doesn't. I have full right to choose who should I show my data. No one can force me for it. But JollyGood is forcing me for it.
True, you have a right and no one should force you to do anything. However, I believe both of you guys should cool off. It makes no sense having fights over something that can be resolved calmly. |
|
|
|
According to BPIP records, this user seems to have been or is still bannedHowever, what surprised me is that they are still able to trust and distrust in the recent weeks after the ban. Is it possible the user can still modify his trust list even when banned, or was he unbanned? |
|
|
|
|
Because it's a third party project, just like BPIP and Loyce.club. The forum administration isn't directly involved with them, so it is up to the members to look up such information, just like they should use the search button for any other query that has been asked before.
If we are going to include every frequently asked question in the welcome message, then it would be a mess. Imagine questions like “When NTF board?” appearing there because someone it too lazy to use the search button.
|
|
|
|
When were those accusations made? If it was during a bear market, I speculate that similar to other businesses in the cryptospace that went through cashflow problems, Cloudbet might have also had a difficult time in balancing their accounting hehe. However, it has been tested that they will not scam their users. There might only be delays in withdrawals.
There was an issue back in January. The accuser deposited money into the casino but shortly Cloudbet contacted them to perform KYC because they believed he was from a prohibited jurisdiction which was okay. However, the user just wanted to terminate his account and get back the funds since he made no bet, Cloudbet insisted on KYC if he wanted his money back which was unfair. But well the resolved the issue later. That's the only major complaint I have seen since then, and even before in this forum. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
